Team Stats

Rk Team gp ab h rbi bb k avg obp slg
0.2883435582822086 1 Fresno City 24 815 235 186 158 160 .288 .430 .421
0.2788671023965142 2 Reedley 26 918 256 170 146 199 .279 .399 .361
0.26374859708193044 3 Merced 26 891 235 123 89 185 .264 .349 .358
0.24656084656084656 4 Taft 28 945 233 114 92 219 .247 .338 .340
0.24451754385964913 5 Porterville 28 912 223 115 117 203 .245 .344 .316
0.2435064935064935 6 Sequoias 27 924 225 133 107 203 .244 .346 .315
0.23375 7 Coalinga 24 800 187 84 85 186 .234 .342 .294
Rk Team gp 2b 3b hr xbh
77.0 1 Fresno City 24 59 5 13 77
56.0 2 Taft 28 36 8 12 56
55.0 3 Reedley 26 39 12 4 55
52.0 4 Merced 26 32 8 12 52
48.0 5 Porterville 28 38 3 7 48
47.0 6 Sequoias 27 37 1 9 47
40.0 7 Coalinga 24 34 4 2 40
Rk Team gp r tb sb cs
211.0 1 Fresno City 24 211 343 43 17
202.0 2 Reedley 26 202 331 28 8
149.0 3 Sequoias 27 149 291 7 6
146.0 4 Merced 26 146 319 28 6
134.0 5 Taft 28 134 321 27 11
132.0 6 Porterville 28 132 288 22 10
105.0 7 Coalinga 24 105 235 44 8
Rk Team gp hbp sf sh hdp go fo go/fo pa
1131.0 1 Reedley 26 44 9 14 20 208 212 .98 1131
1111.0 2 Taft 28 43 10 21 9 234 245 .96 1111
1091.0 3 Sequoias 27 41 6 13 23 256 218 1.17 1091
1073.0 4 Porterville 28 26 10 8 13 224 254 .88 1073
1044.0 5 Fresno City 24 53 12 6 9 85 113 .75 1044
1036.0 6 Merced 26 33 10 13 15 220 211 1.04 1036
944.0 7 Coalinga 24 48 2 9 10 208 183 1.14 944
Rk Team app gs ip h r er era
4.695652173913043 1 Reedley 26 26 230.0 222 153 120 4.70
4.816901408450704 2 Fresno City 24 24 213.0 194 140 114 4.82
5.264623955431754 3 Sequoias 27 27 239.1 271 171 140 5.26
5.922343324250681 4 Taft 28 28 244.2 309 195 161 5.92
6.492220650636493 5 Porterville 28 28 235.2 252 199 170 6.49
7.612334801762115 6 Merced 26 26 227.0 284 209 192 7.61
8.051070840197692 7 Coalinga 24 24 202.1 317 260 181 8.05
Rk Team app gs k k/9 hr whip
2.28830313014827 1 Coalinga 24 24 141 6.27 11 2.29
1.7656675749318802 2 Taft 28 28 167 6.14 16 1.77
1.7004405286343611 3 Merced 26 26 178 7.06 27 1.70
1.6463932107496464 4 Porterville 28 28 191 7.29 14 1.65
1.5793871866295264 5 Sequoias 27 27 208 7.82 13 1.58
1.4652173913043478 6 Reedley 26 26 193 7.55 9 1.47
1.3943661971830985 7 Fresno City 24 24 234 9.89 16 1.39
Rk Team gp tc po a e pb f%
0.9668341708542714 1 Sequoias 27 995 718 244 33 4 .967
0.9590818363273453 2 Merced 26 1002 681 280 41 15 .959
0.9573115349682108 3 Taft 28 1101 734 320 47 7 .957
0.954225352112676 4 Fresno City 24 852 636 177 39 7 .954
0.9477832512315271 5 Reedley 26 1015 690 272 53 29 .948
0.9467680608365019 6 Porterville 28 1052 707 289 56 6 .947
0.912472647702407 7 Coalinga 24 914 607 227 80 28 .912
Rk Team gp dp sba rcs rcs% ci
0.4117647058823529 1 Sequoias 27 19 20 14 .412 1
0.3157894736842105 2 Reedley 26 20 26 12 .316 0
0.2558139534883721 3 Fresno City 24 16 32 11 .256 1
0.25 4 Coalinga 24 9 48 16 .250 0
0.2391304347826087 5 Taft 28 13 35 11 .239 0
0.0847457627118644 6 Porterville 28 10 54 5 .085 0
0.07407407407407407 7 Merced 26 22 25 2 .074 1
Rk Team home games attend avg
89.0 1 Reedley 15 1,334 89
65.0 2 Taft 17 1,100 65
16.0 3 Fresno City 13 200 16
15.0 4 Coalinga 12 175 15
0.0 5 Merced 13 0 0
0.0 5 Porterville 13 0 0
0.0 5 Sequoias 15 0 0
Rk Team gp ab h rbi bb k avg obp slg
0.32303370786516855 1 Fresno City 10 356 115 104 74 54 .323 .450 .486
0.3182897862232779 2 Reedley 11 421 134 103 72 80 .318 .433 .420
0.2930232558139535 3 Merced 12 430 126 69 44 88 .293 .381 .405
0.26844262295081966 4 Taft 14 488 131 73 42 107 .268 .351 .389
0.27941176470588236 5 Porterville 14 476 133 58 49 100 .279 .356 .378
0.2659846547314578 6 Sequoias 11 391 104 57 49 76 .266 .363 .335
0.21686746987951808 7 Coalinga 10 332 72 26 33 70 .217 .316 .277
Rk Team gp 2b 3b hr xbh
43.0 1 Fresno City 10 34 3 6 43
34.0 2 Taft 14 19 5 10 34
29.0 3 Reedley 11 17 10 2 29
30.0 4 Merced 12 19 4 7 30
32.0 5 Porterville 14 23 3 6 32
18.0 6 Sequoias 11 13 1 4 18
16.0 7 Coalinga 10 13 2 1 16
Rk Team gp r tb sb cs
113.0 1 Fresno City 10 113 173 19 6
119.0 2 Reedley 11 119 177 21 4
63.0 3 Sequoias 11 63 131 1 2
84.0 4 Merced 12 84 174 21 4
80.0 5 Taft 14 80 190 9 7
62.0 6 Porterville 14 62 180 12 4
38.0 7 Coalinga 10 38 92 11 4
Rk Team gp hbp sf sh hdp go fo go/fo pa
515.0 1 Reedley 11 16 4 2 7 91 81 1.12 515
569.0 2 Taft 14 23 5 11 5 122 114 1.07 569
461.0 3 Sequoias 11 11 1 9 10 100 101 .99 461
546.0 4 Porterville 14 11 6 4 8 121 123 .98 546
460.0 5 Fresno City 10 16 10 4 3 45 50 .90 460
505.0 6 Merced 12 20 5 6 2 82 95 .86 505
387.0 7 Coalinga 10 16 2 4 4 89 76 1.17 387
Rk Team app gs ip h r er era
4.86734693877551 1 Reedley 11 11 98.0 90 62 53 4.87
4.6 2 Fresno City 10 10 90.0 76 55 46 4.60
4.791808873720136 3 Sequoias 11 11 97.2 112 68 52 4.79
4.366576819407007 4 Taft 14 14 123.2 152 78 60 4.37
6.6 5 Porterville 14 14 120.0 139 106 88 6.60
6.388012618296529 6 Merced 12 12 105.2 115 83 75 6.39
6.9609375 7 Coalinga 10 10 85.1 130 107 66 6.96
Rk Team app gs k k/9 hr whip
2.1796875 1 Coalinga 10 10 56 5.91 5 2.18
1.6495956873315363 2 Taft 14 14 72 5.24 8 1.65
1.4952681388012619 3 Merced 12 12 89 7.58 8 1.50
1.7 4 Porterville 14 14 89 6.68 7 1.70
1.515358361774744 5 Sequoias 11 11 89 8.20 1 1.52
1.5612244897959184 6 Reedley 11 11 83 7.62 5 1.56
1.3777777777777778 7 Fresno City 10 10 97 9.70 2 1.38
Rk Team gp tc po a e pb f%
0.9607843137254902 1 Sequoias 11 408 293 99 16 2 .961
0.9609544468546638 2 Merced 12 461 317 126 18 11 .961
0.9583333333333334 3 Taft 14 552 371 158 23 2 .958
0.9507772020725389 4 Fresno City 10 386 270 97 19 6 .951
0.9569377990430622 5 Reedley 11 418 294 106 18 8 .957
0.9430604982206405 6 Porterville 14 562 360 170 32 4 .943
0.9166666666666666 7 Coalinga 10 384 256 96 32 5 .917
Rk Team gp dp sba rcs rcs% ci
0.5454545454545454 1 Sequoias 11 5 5 6 .545 0
0.3333333333333333 2 Reedley 11 10 10 5 .333 0
0.3333333333333333 2 Fresno City 10 8 12 6 .333 1
0.25 4 Coalinga 10 6 15 5 .250 0
0.15 5 Taft 14 6 17 3 .150 0
0.14814814814814814 6 Porterville 14 6 23 4 .148 0
0.14285714285714285 7 Merced 12 6 12 2 .143 1
Rk Team home games attend avg
106.0 1 Reedley 6 631 106
68.0 2 Taft 7 475 68
68 3 Fresno City 5 - -
25.0 4 Coalinga 5 125 25
0.0 5 Merced 6 0 0
0.0 5 Porterville 7 0 0
0.0 5 Sequoias 5 0 0