Team Stats

Rk Team gp ab h rbi bb k avg obp slg
0.2920580700256191 1 Fresno City 34 1171 342 261 190 206 .292 .416 .440
0.2715340442986054 2 Reedley 35 1219 331 211 169 257 .272 .381 .356
0.26532399299474607 3 Merced 33 1142 303 157 108 233 .265 .349 .368
0.25662251655629137 4 Taft 36 1208 310 151 125 275 .257 .350 .349
0.25426944971537 5 Coalinga 31 1054 268 126 104 238 .254 .353 .331
0.24751655629139072 6 Sequoias 35 1208 299 171 135 249 .248 .346 .327
0.23870417732310314 7 Porterville 36 1173 280 144 150 295 .239 .337 .309
Rk Team gp 2b 3b hr xbh
115.0 1 Fresno City 34 81 10 24 115
71.0 2 Merced 33 43 10 18 71
70.0 3 Reedley 35 46 15 9 70
70.0 3 Taft 36 44 11 15 70
68.0 5 Sequoias 35 52 4 12 68
62.0 6 Coalinga 31 49 7 6 62
60.0 7 Porterville 36 47 3 10 60
Rk Team gp r tb sb cs
290.0 1 Fresno City 34 290 515 56 20
247.0 2 Reedley 35 247 434 33 9
196.0 3 Sequoias 35 196 395 12 6
186.0 4 Merced 33 186 420 33 8
181.0 5 Taft 36 181 421 30 15
161.0 6 Porterville 36 161 363 27 11
152.0 7 Coalinga 31 152 349 56 10
Rk Team gp hbp sf sh hdp go fo go/fo pa
1475.0 1 Reedley 35 53 12 22 23 285 287 .99 1475
1454.0 2 Fresno City 34 70 15 8 11 125 157 .80 1454
1428.0 3 Taft 36 54 12 29 18 304 304 1.00 1428
1420.0 4 Sequoias 35 51 8 18 27 317 278 1.14 1420
1377.0 5 Porterville 36 30 12 12 14 274 286 .96 1377
1320.0 6 Merced 33 44 11 15 17 286 276 1.04 1320
1235.0 7 Coalinga 31 59 4 14 11 284 229 1.24 1235
Rk Team era w l app gs sv ip
4.1515486725663715 1 Fresno City 4.15 27 6 34 34 14 301.1
4.368932038834951 2 Reedley 4.37 20 15 35 35 2 309.0
5.277537796976241 3 Sequoias 5.28 15 19 35 35 7 308.2
5.365750528541227 4 Taft 5.37 15 21 36 36 4 315.1
6.595419847328245 5 Porterville 6.60 12 20 36 36 4 305.2
7.318339100346021 6 Merced 7.32 13 18 33 33 4 289.0
7.724050632911393 7 Coalinga 7.72 5 25 31 31 3 263.1
Rk Team h r er bb k k/9 hr whip bf wp hbp
1.3075221238938053 1 Fresno City 262 169 139 132 319 9.53 20 1.31 1346 38 46
1.4336569579288025 2 Reedley 294 191 150 149 255 7.43 13 1.43 1398 41 42
1.5809935205183585 3 Sequoias 363 221 181 125 257 7.49 15 1.58 1444 21 53
1.6652126499454742 4 Porterville 337 269 224 172 245 7.21 19 1.67 1477 58 45
1.671280276816609 5 Merced 359 264 235 124 226 7.04 37 1.67 1393 28 50
1.7029598308668077 6 Taft 385 234 188 152 221 6.31 20 1.70 1507 40 39
2.1721518987341772 7 Coalinga 402 321 226 170 171 5.84 18 2.17 1430 33 57
Rk Team gp tc po a e pb f%
0.9669992325402916 1 Sequoias 35 1303 926 334 43 5 .967
0.9589153656532456 2 Fresno City 34 1217 901 266 50 9 .959
0.9586583463338534 3 Merced 33 1282 867 362 53 20 .959
0.9575971731448764 4 Taft 36 1415 946 409 60 10 .958
0.9486803519061584 5 Reedley 35 1364 927 367 70 33 .949
0.9460458240946046 6 Porterville 36 1353 917 363 73 19 .946
0.9155518394648829 7 Coalinga 31 1196 790 305 101 32 .916
Rk Team gp dp sba rcs rcs% ci
0.3673469387755102 1 Sequoias 35 23 31 18 .367 1
0.3191489361702128 2 Reedley 35 27 32 15 .319 1
0.2465753424657534 3 Coalinga 31 11 55 18 .247 0
0.2391304347826087 4 Fresno City 34 22 35 11 .239 1
0.23214285714285715 5 Taft 36 19 43 13 .232 1
0.08823529411764706 6 Merced 33 24 31 3 .088 1
0.0821917808219178 7 Porterville 36 13 67 6 .082 0
Rk Team home games attend avg
86.0 1 Reedley 18 1,545 86
68.0 2 Taft 22 1,475 68
17.0 3 Coalinga 15 245 17
11.0 4 Fresno City 19 200 11
5.0 5 Merced 17 80 5
0.0 6 Porterville 18 0 0
0.0 6 Sequoias 18 0 0
Rk Team gp ab h rbi bb k avg obp slg
0.3185840707964602 1 Fresno City 19 678 216 176 99 97 .319 .422 .496
0.2894356005788712 2 Reedley 19 691 200 141 91 131 .289 .387 .386
0.28487518355359764 3 Merced 19 681 194 103 63 136 .285 .369 .404
0.27631578947368424 4 Taft 20 684 189 94 62 145 .276 .357 .390
0.26109215017064846 5 Coalinga 17 586 153 68 52 122 .261 .347 .352
0.2637037037037037 6 Sequoias 19 675 178 95 77 122 .264 .356 .348
0.2659732540861813 7 Porterville 20 673 179 81 74 167 .266 .346 .361
Rk Team gp 2b 3b hr xbh
80.0 1 Fresno City 19 56 8 16 80
49.0 2 Merced 19 30 6 13 49
42.0 3 Reedley 19 23 13 6 42
45.0 4 Taft 20 25 7 13 45
39.0 5 Sequoias 19 28 4 7 39
38.0 6 Coalinga 17 28 5 5 38
43.0 7 Porterville 20 31 3 9 43
Rk Team gp r tb sb cs
189.0 1 Fresno City 19 189 336 30 9
160.0 2 Reedley 19 160 267 25 5
110.0 3 Sequoias 19 110 235 6 2
124.0 4 Merced 19 124 275 26 6
109.0 5 Taft 20 109 267 12 10
85.0 6 Porterville 20 85 243 16 5
85.0 6 Coalinga 17 85 206 23 6
Rk Team gp hbp sf sh hdp go fo go/fo pa
821.0 1 Reedley 19 24 7 8 10 157 150 1.05 821
827.0 2 Fresno City 19 32 13 5 4 76 80 .95 827
799.0 3 Taft 20 28 7 18 13 173 162 1.07 799
790.0 4 Sequoias 19 21 3 14 14 161 161 1.00 790
775.0 5 Porterville 20 13 8 7 9 155 143 1.08 775
789.0 6 Merced 19 31 6 8 4 148 160 .93 789
678.0 7 Coalinga 17 27 4 9 5 165 122 1.35 678
Rk Team era w l app gs sv ip
3.5470588235294116 1 Fresno City 3.55 18 1 19 19 9 170.0
4.285714285714286 2 Reedley 4.29 12 7 19 19 2 168.0
5.0119760479041915 3 Sequoias 5.01 8 10 19 19 4 167.0
4.11864406779661 4 Taft 4.12 9 11 20 20 2 177.0
6.174418604651163 5 Porterville 6.17 7 11 20 20 3 172.0
6.333996023856859 6 Merced 6.33 10 7 19 19 3 167.2
6.826879271070614 7 Coalinga 6.83 3 13 17 17 2 146.1
Rk Team h r er bb k k/9 hr whip bf wp hbp
1.223529411764706 1 Fresno City 135 80 67 73 175 9.26 5 1.22 747 18 27
1.4642857142857142 2 Reedley 156 97 80 90 142 7.61 8 1.46 759 19 24
1.5449101796407185 3 Sequoias 204 118 93 54 138 7.44 3 1.54 772 10 24
1.6686046511627908 4 Porterville 198 149 118 89 130 6.80 11 1.67 835 23 26
1.5208747514910537 5 Merced 190 138 118 65 137 7.35 18 1.52 780 18 25
1.5480225988700564 6 Taft 208 106 81 66 114 5.80 12 1.55 817 13 18
2.015945330296127 7 Coalinga 215 168 111 80 86 5.29 12 2.02 773 19 30
Rk Team gp tc po a e pb f%
0.9636871508379888 1 Sequoias 19 716 501 189 26 3 .964
0.9581005586592178 2 Fresno City 19 716 510 176 30 8 .958
0.9595141700404858 3 Merced 19 741 503 208 30 16 .960
0.9592356687898089 4 Taft 20 785 531 222 32 3 .959
0.9560439560439561 5 Reedley 19 728 504 192 32 12 .956
0.9418457648546145 6 Porterville 20 791 516 229 46 13 .942
0.9204204204204204 7 Coalinga 17 666 439 174 53 9 .920
Rk Team gp dp sba rcs rcs% ci
0.38461538461538464 1 Sequoias 19 9 16 10 .385 0
0.36363636363636365 2 Reedley 19 16 14 8 .364 1
0.2413793103448276 3 Coalinga 17 8 22 7 .241 0
0.3 4 Fresno City 19 14 14 6 .300 1
0.15384615384615385 5 Taft 20 10 22 4 .154 0
0.14285714285714285 6 Merced 19 8 18 3 .143 1
0.1388888888888889 7 Porterville 20 9 31 5 .139 0
Rk Team home games attend avg
94.0 1 Reedley 9 842 94
73.0 2 Taft 11 800 73
25.0 3 Coalinga 8 195 25
25 4 Fresno City 11 - -
0.0 5 Merced 10 0 0
0.0 5 Porterville 10 0 0
0.0 5 Sequoias 8 0 0