Skip to navigation Skip to content Skip to footer
California Community College Athletic Association

Team Stats

Rk Team m s k k/s e ta pct a a/s pts pts/s
16.677570093457945 1 Fresno City 31 107 1352 12.64 465 3349 .265 1248 11.66 1784.5 16.7
15.409574468085106 2 Coalinga 25 94 1107 11.78 511 3060 .195 1004 10.68 1448.5 15.4
13.596153846153847 3 Taft 29 104 1083 10.41 514 3339 .170 1010 9.71 1414.0 13.6
13.343373493975903 4 Merced 23 83 799 9.63 488 2978 .104 725 8.73 1107.5 13.3
12.533333333333333 5 Sequoias 28 105 973 9.27 386 3134 .187 799 7.61 1316.0 12.5
12.471153846153847 6 Porterville 29 104 927 8.91 545 2994 .128 780 7.50 1297.0 12.5
10.527777777777779 7 Lemoore 25 90 701 7.79 481 2724 .081 600 6.67 947.5 10.5
9.1 8 Reedley 21 70 428 6.11 226 1478 .137 438 6.26 637.0 9.1
7.2421875 9 Columbia 20 64 260 4.06 282 1312 -.017 227 3.55 463.5 7.2
Rk Team m s digs d/s bs ba tot b/s
2238.0 1 Taft 29 104 2238 21.52 31 168 115 1.11
1548.0 2 Fresno City 31 107 1548 14.47 58 285 201 1.87
1546.0 3 Porterville 29 104 1546 14.87 109 180 199 1.91
1422.0 4 Coalinga 25 94 1422 15.13 34 117 93 0.98
1321.0 5 Lemoore 25 90 1321 14.68 47 83 89 0.98
962.0 6 Sequoias 28 105 962 9.16 131 60 161 1.53
954.0 7 Reedley 21 70 954 13.63 98 74 135 1.93
943.0 8 Merced 23 83 943 11.36 48 117 107 1.28
504.0 9 Columbia 20 64 504 7.88 86 93 133 2.07
Rk Team m s sa sa/s r re
2.648936170212766 1 Coalinga 25 94 249 2.65 0 0
2.433734939759036 2 Merced 23 83 202 2.43 1597 143
2.1682242990654204 3 Fresno City 31 107 232 2.17 1592 169
2.076923076923077 4 Taft 29 104 216 2.08 170 27
1.7555555555555555 5 Lemoore 25 90 158 1.76 2264 218
1.7333333333333334 6 Sequoias 28 105 182 1.73 1527 262
1.6442307692307692 7 Porterville 29 104 171 1.64 0 0
1.109375 8 Columbia 20 64 71 1.11 55 35
1.0571428571428572 9 Reedley 21 70 74 1.06 0 0
Rk Team m s k k/s e ta pct a a/s pts pts/s
17.94 1 Fresno City 16 50 682 13.64 205 1535 .311 626 12.52 897.0 17.9
16.375 2 Coalinga 16 60 754 12.57 316 2035 .215 677 11.28 982.5 16.4
14.517857142857142 3 Taft 16 56 633 11.30 280 1900 .186 593 10.59 813.0 14.5
14.276785714285714 4 Merced 16 56 573 10.23 305 2093 .128 529 9.45 799.5 14.3
12.911290322580646 5 Sequoias 16 62 594 9.58 205 1777 .219 485 7.82 800.5 12.9
12.62280701754386 6 Porterville 16 57 531 9.32 313 1920 .114 476 8.35 719.5 12.6
10.698275862068966 7 Lemoore 16 58 466 8.03 279 1754 .107 392 6.76 620.5 10.7
8.943396226415095 8 Reedley 16 53 325 6.13 173 1203 .126 322 6.08 474.0 8.9
7.9326923076923075 9 Columbia 16 52 229 4.40 228 1098 .001 212 4.08 412.5 7.9
Rk Team m s digs d/s bs ba tot b/s
1230.0 1 Taft 16 56 1230 21.96 15 80 55 0.98
758.0 2 Fresno City 16 50 758 15.16 15 144 87 1.74
961.0 3 Porterville 16 57 961 16.86 33 105 86 1.50
1000.0 4 Coalinga 16 60 1000 16.67 19 81 60 0.99
824.0 5 Lemoore 16 58 824 14.21 18 61 49 0.84
525.0 6 Sequoias 16 62 525 8.47 79 43 101 1.62
679.0 7 Reedley 16 53 679 12.81 72 44 94 1.77
688.0 8 Merced 16 56 688 12.29 38 95 86 1.53
362.0 9 Columbia 16 52 362 6.96 78 85 121 2.32
Rk Team m s sa sa/s r re
2.816666666666667 1 Coalinga 16 60 169 2.82 0 0
2.517857142857143 2 Merced 16 56 141 2.52 1073 95
2.56 3 Fresno City 16 50 128 2.56 612 49
2.232142857142857 4 Taft 16 56 125 2.23 0 0
1.8275862068965518 5 Lemoore 16 58 106 1.83 1574 128
1.7096774193548387 6 Sequoias 16 62 106 1.71 881 132
1.8070175438596492 7 Porterville 16 57 103 1.81 0 0
1.2115384615384615 8 Columbia 16 52 63 1.21 0 30
1.0377358490566038 9 Reedley 16 53 55 1.04 0 0