California Community College Athletic Association

Team Stats

Rk	Team	gp	fg	pct	3pt	pct	ft	pct	pts
88.71428571428571 1	Palomar	28	897-1874	47.9	282-749	37.7	408-589	69.3	88.7
87.18518518518519 2	Grossmont	27	835-2261	36.9	301-1102	27.3	386-617	62.6	87.2
85.36666666666666 3	San Diego City	30	960-1847	52.0	196-534	36.7	445-602	73.9	85.4
77.75 4	Southwestern	28	775-1759	44.1	188-550	34.2	434-691	62.8	77.8
76.75 5	San Diego Mesa	28	729-1687	43.2	195-633	30.8	498-642	77.6	76.8
75.72413793103448 6	San Diego Miramar	29	815-1762	46.3	226-677	33.4	340-452	75.2	75.7
75.10714285714286 7	MiraCosta	28	750-1801	41.6	200-644	31.1	341-553	61.7	75.1
67.46428571428571 8	Cuyamaca	28	714-1678	42.6	141-480	29.4	320-466	68.7	67.5
59.03846153846154 9	Imperial Valley	26	519-1534	33.8	148-547	27.1	300-424	70.8	59.0

Rk	Team	gp	off	def	reb	mrgn
21.0 1	Grossmont	27	21.0	25.0	46.0	-0.2
13.714285714285714 2	Palomar	28	13.7	24.8	38.5	4.3
12.678571428571429 3	MiraCosta	28	12.7	27.0	39.6	0.7
11.5 4	Southwestern	28	11.5	29.7	41.2	3.3
9.9 5	San Diego City	30	9.9	25.8	35.7	3.5
9.620689655172415 6	San Diego Miramar	29	9.6	29.1	38.7	5.1
8.678571428571429 7	Cuyamaca	28	8.7	24.3	33.0	-8.8
8.214285714285714 8	San Diego Mesa	28	8.2	24.6	32.8	-5.8
5.5 9	Imperial Valley	26	5.5	18.6	24.1	-19.5

Rk	Team	gp	to	stl	blk	ast
12.241379310344827 1	San Diego Miramar	29	12.2	5.8	2.4	16.7
13.035714285714286 2	MiraCosta	28	13.0	6.7	2.5	12.9
13.3 3	San Diego City	30	13.3	8.8	2.9	16.3
13.428571428571429 4	Southwestern	28	13.4	7.3	3.2	13.9
13.892857142857142 5	San Diego Mesa	28	13.9	9.3	2.3	12.4
14.25 6	Palomar	28	14.3	9.0	2.9	16.2
14.592592592592593 7	Grossmont	27	14.6	12.1	2.2	16.6
16.964285714285715 8	Cuyamaca	28	17.0	7.4	2.8	14.5
18.692307692307693 9	Imperial Valley	26	18.7	7.3	4.5	10.3

Rk	Team	gp	pf	off eff	net eff
1.1382222222222222 1	San Diego City	30	18.1	1.138	0.220
1.137623082207465 2	Palomar	28	16.4	1.138	0.179
1.063953488372093 3	San Diego Miramar	29	16.2	1.064	0.179
1.0085707667361594 4	Southwestern	28	16.6	1.009	0.052
1.0074251497005988 5	MiraCosta	28	14.1	1.007	0.045
0.991693585602215 6	San Diego Mesa	28	18.8	0.992	0.004
0.9822658042979345 7	Grossmont	27	18.4	0.982	-0.012
0.8814745683621092 8	Cuyamaca	28	4.7	0.881	-0.254
0.7348013403542365 9	Imperial Valley	26	15.9	0.735	-0.519

Rk	Team	gp	fg	pct	3pt	pct	pts
96.23076923076923 1	Imperial Valley	26	908-1784	50.9	242-660	36.7	96.2
88.29629629629629 2	Grossmont	27	862-1777	48.5	167-508	32.9	88.3
84.82142857142857 3	Cuyamaca	28	921-1963	46.9	276-753	36.7	84.8
79.85714285714286 4	San Diego Mesa	28	813-1778	45.7	180-569	31.6	79.9
75.85714285714286 5	Palomar	28	742-1680	44.2	170-560	30.4	75.9
75.57142857142857 6	Southwestern	28	775-1830	42.3	196-653	30.0	75.6
74.03571428571429 7	MiraCosta	28	751-1820	41.3	230-696	33.0	74.0
68.2 8	San Diego City	30	731-1721	42.5	164-517	31.7	68.2
63.41379310344828 9	San Diego Miramar	29	646-1753	36.9	181-632	28.6	63.4

Rk	Team	gp	off	def	reb	mrgn
34.55555555555556 1	Grossmont	27	11.7	34.6	46.2	-0.2
29.23076923076923 2	Imperial Valley	26	14.4	29.2	43.6	-19.5
28.285714285714285 3	MiraCosta	28	10.7	28.3	39.0	0.7
28.0 4	San Diego Mesa	28	10.6	28.0	38.6	-5.8
27.714285714285715 5	Southwestern	28	10.2	27.7	37.9	3.3
26.428571428571427 6	Cuyamaca	28	15.3	26.4	41.8	-8.8
24.142857142857142 7	Palomar	28	10.1	24.1	34.2	4.3
23.75862068965517 8	San Diego Miramar	29	9.8	23.8	33.6	5.1
22.2 9	San Diego City	30	10.0	22.2	32.2	3.5

Rk	Team	gp	to	stl	blk	ast
21.925925925925927 1	Grossmont	27	21.9	7.1	4.7	16.4
17.071428571428573 2	Palomar	28	17.1	7.2	2.6	10.1
17.066666666666666 3	San Diego City	30	17.1	7.1	2.4	10.7
16.714285714285715 4	San Diego Mesa	28	16.7	7.7	3.6	15.6
14.5 5	Southwestern	28	14.5	7.5	3.4	13.9
13.714285714285714 6	MiraCosta	28	13.7	7.0	2.1	15.1
13.035714285714286 7	Cuyamaca	28	13.0	10.8	3.0	20.6
12.692307692307692 8	Imperial Valley	26	12.7	10.8	3.6	21.9
12.172413793103448 9	San Diego Miramar	29	12.2	5.9	2.4	10.2

Rk	Team	gp	pf	def eff	net eff
19.25925925925926 1	Grossmont	27	19.3	0.994	-0.012
18.035714285714285 2	Palomar	28	18.0	0.958	0.179
16.9 3	San Diego City	30	16.9	0.918	0.220
15.071428571428571 4	Southwestern	28	15.1	0.957	0.052
14.857142857142858 5	MiraCosta	28	14.9	0.962	0.045
14.607142857142858 6	San Diego Mesa	28	14.6	0.987	0.004
14.321428571428571 7	Cuyamaca	28	14.3	1.135	-0.254
12.586206896551724 8	San Diego Miramar	29	12.6	0.885	0.179
12.5 9	Imperial Valley	26	12.5	1.254	-0.519

Rk	Team	gp	fg	pct	3pt	pct	ft	pct	pts
93.1875 1	Palomar	16	545-1087	50.1	177-421	42.0	224-318	70.4	93.2
84.75 2	Grossmont	16	483-1296	37.3	156-597	26.1	237-372	63.7	84.8
92.25 3	San Diego City	16	565-1042	54.2	119-293	40.6	227-309	73.5	92.3
82.875 4	Southwestern	16	484-1041	46.5	103-303	34.0	254-401	63.3	82.9
77.0 5	San Diego Mesa	16	428-933	45.9	108-322	33.5	268-346	77.5	77.0
77.8125 6	San Diego Miramar	16	478-996	48.0	136-382	35.6	153-209	73.2	77.8
74.75 7	MiraCosta	16	452-1120	40.4	105-364	28.8	187-297	63.0	74.8
68.1875 8	Cuyamaca	16	413-972	42.5	81-270	30.0	184-259	71.0	68.2
62.125 9	Imperial Valley	16	355-1065	33.3	102-365	27.9	182-245	74.3	62.1

Rk	Team	gp	off	def	reb	mrgn
19.9375 1	Grossmont	16	19.9	27.1	47.1	1.9
13.1875 2	Palomar	16	13.2	25.2	38.4	4.9
14.8125 3	MiraCosta	16	14.8	28.8	43.6	5.4
11.375 4	Southwestern	16	11.4	30.1	41.5	4.5
11.1875 5	San Diego City	16	11.2	29.6	40.8	10.3
9.8125 6	San Diego Miramar	16	9.8	30.3	40.1	6.7
8.75 7	Cuyamaca	16	8.8	25.8	34.6	-7.2
7.875 8	San Diego Mesa	16	7.9	25.2	33.1	-4.9
6.125 9	Imperial Valley	16	6.1	19.1	25.2	-21.6

Rk	Team	gp	to	stl	blk	ast
11.3125 1	San Diego Miramar	16	11.3	5.7	2.9	19.9
13.125 2	MiraCosta	16	13.1	7.6	3.5	13.9
14.6875 3	San Diego City	16	14.7	8.4	3.4	18.9
12.375 4	Southwestern	16	12.4	7.4	2.8	15.9
13.6875 5	San Diego Mesa	16	13.7	8.3	2.4	12.8
13.3125 6	Palomar	16	13.3	8.6	3.2	17.4
15.8125 7	Grossmont	16	15.8	10.9	2.4	16.1
16.875 8	Cuyamaca	16	16.9	6.8	3.2	14.8
17.1875 9	Imperial Valley	16	17.2	7.8	5.5	11.3

Rk	Team	gp	pf	off eff	net eff
1.1784431137724551 1	San Diego City	16	17.2	1.178	0.297
1.1947115384615385 2	Palomar	16	13.9	1.195	0.197
1.1071587372165408 3	San Diego Miramar	16	15.9	1.107	0.216
1.0544731610337972 4	Southwestern	16	15.5	1.054	0.070
0.9633507853403142 5	MiraCosta	16	12.1	0.963	0.008
1.0275229357798166 6	San Diego Mesa	16	15.8	1.028	0.058
0.9576271186440678 7	Grossmont	16	15.8	0.958	-0.030
0.8859114900527811 8	Cuyamaca	16	3.3	0.886	-0.275
0.728471967753756 9	Imperial Valley	16	16.3	0.728	-0.496

Rk	Team	gp	fg	pct	3pt	pct	pts
97.1875 1	Imperial Valley	16	592-1145	51.7	160-431	37.1	97.2
87.0625 2	Grossmont	16	506-1097	46.1	117-346	33.8	87.1
86.6875 3	Cuyamaca	16	529-1133	46.7	174-464	37.5	86.7
78.25 4	San Diego Mesa	16	465-1046	44.5	94-331	28.4	78.3
79.5 5	Palomar	16	458-1019	44.9	98-335	29.3	79.5
79.5 5	Southwestern	16	473-1090	43.4	117-385	30.4	79.5
73.25 7	MiraCosta	16	428-1060	40.4	129-391	33.0	73.3
68.0 8	San Diego City	16	386-974	39.6	104-302	34.4	68.0
63.5 9	San Diego Miramar	16	366-988	37.0	94-332	28.3	63.5

Rk	Team	gp	off	def	reb	mrgn
34.0 1	Grossmont	16	11.2	34.0	45.2	1.9
31.875 2	Imperial Valley	16	14.9	31.9	46.8	-21.6
27.5625 3	MiraCosta	16	10.6	27.6	38.1	5.4
27.125 4	San Diego Mesa	16	10.8	27.1	37.9	-4.9
27.0625 5	Southwestern	16	9.9	27.1	37.0	4.5
26.6875 6	Cuyamaca	16	15.1	26.7	41.8	-7.2
22.8125 7	Palomar	16	10.6	22.8	33.4	4.9
23.375 8	San Diego Miramar	16	10.1	23.4	33.4	6.7
20.6875 9	San Diego City	16	9.9	20.7	30.6	10.3

Rk	Team	gp	to	stl	blk	ast
19.25 1	Grossmont	16	19.3	7.2	4.6	16.6
14.9375 2	Palomar	16	14.9	6.6	2.3	11.2
16.625 3	San Diego City	16	16.6	8.3	2.1	10.8
15.4375 4	San Diego Mesa	16	15.4	8.2	4.3	14.7
13.8125 5	Southwestern	16	13.8	7.8	3.7	14.9
12.8125 6	MiraCosta	16	12.8	7.3	2.5	16.2
11.625 7	Cuyamaca	16	11.6	10.7	2.9	21.6
12.875 8	Imperial Valley	16	12.9	10.1	4.2	23.8
11.0 9	San Diego Miramar	16	11.0	5.4	2.9	11.4

Rk	Team	gp	pf	def eff	net eff
19.4375 1	Grossmont	16	19.4	0.987	-0.030
15.875 2	Palomar	16	15.9	0.998	0.197
16.5 3	San Diego City	16	16.5	0.881	0.297
13.25 4	Southwestern	16	13.3	0.984	0.070
11.5625 5	MiraCosta	16	11.6	0.956	0.008
15.25 6	San Diego Mesa	16	15.3	0.970	0.058
13.75 7	Cuyamaca	16	13.8	1.161	-0.275
9.3125 8	San Diego Miramar	16	9.3	0.891	0.216
10.6875 9	Imperial Valley	16	10.7	1.225	-0.496