Team Stats

Rk Team gp ab h rbi bb k avg obp slg
0.2922330097087379 1 Fresno City 30 1030 301 232 181 190 .292 .423 .431
0.27653880463871544 2 Reedley 32 1121 310 200 163 239 .277 .389 .363
0.2611650485436893 3 Merced 30 1030 269 134 100 214 .261 .345 .358
0.25462962962962965 4 Taft 32 1080 275 140 112 247 .255 .349 .344
0.2513562386980108 5 Sequoias 32 1106 278 160 125 227 .251 .351 .328
0.24894957983193278 6 Coalinga 28 952 237 112 98 217 .249 .351 .313
0.23358348968105067 7 Porterville 33 1066 249 122 140 261 .234 .334 .300
Rk Team gp 2b 3b hr xbh
99.0 1 Fresno City 30 73 8 18 99
66.0 2 Reedley 32 44 13 9 66
62.0 3 Merced 30 38 10 14 62
62.0 3 Taft 32 40 10 12 62
59.0 5 Sequoias 32 44 4 11 59
52.0 6 Porterville 33 41 3 8 52
51.0 7 Coalinga 28 43 6 2 51
Rk Team gp r tb sb cs
259.0 1 Fresno City 30 259 444 51 20
236.0 2 Reedley 32 236 407 31 8
185.0 3 Sequoias 32 185 363 11 6
166.0 4 Taft 32 166 371 28 13
161.0 5 Merced 30 161 369 30 7
139.0 6 Porterville 33 139 320 23 11
137.0 7 Coalinga 28 137 298 53 9
Rk Team gp hbp sf sh hdp go fo go/fo pa
1365.0 1 Reedley 32 50 11 20 22 265 268 .99 1365
1303.0 2 Sequoias 32 49 6 17 27 306 270 1.13 1303
1295.0 3 Fresno City 30 62 14 8 11 115 145 .79 1295
1277.0 4 Taft 32 50 10 25 13 276 268 1.03 1277
1254.0 5 Porterville 33 27 11 10 13 248 269 .92 1254
1191.0 6 Merced 30 37 10 14 17 261 244 1.07 1191
1119.0 7 Coalinga 28 53 2 14 10 254 209 1.22 1119
Rk Team app gs ip h r er era
4.273869346733669 1 Fresno City 30 30 265.1 231 154 126 4.27
4.420494699646643 2 Reedley 32 32 283.0 269 179 139 4.42
5.254396248534584 3 Sequoias 32 32 284.1 335 205 166 5.25
5.483372921615201 4 Taft 32 32 280.2 343 211 171 5.48
6.717703349282296 5 Porterville 33 33 278.2 314 251 208 6.72
7.351145038167939 6 Merced 30 30 262.0 325 239 214 7.35
7.816783216783216 7 Coalinga 28 28 238.1 367 294 207 7.82
Rk Team app gs k k/9 hr whip
1.3341708542713568 1 Fresno City 30 30 287 9.73 19 1.33
1.4487632508833923 2 Reedley 32 32 234 7.44 11 1.45
1.6002344665885113 3 Sequoias 32 32 236 7.47 14 1.60
1.6717557251908397 4 Merced 30 30 206 7.08 31 1.67
1.686602870813397 5 Porterville 33 33 221 7.14 18 1.69
1.7280285035629452 6 Taft 32 32 195 6.25 16 1.73
2.2153846153846155 7 Coalinga 28 28 161 6.08 13 2.22
Rk Team gp tc po a e pb f%
0.9659751037344398 1 Sequoias 32 1205 853 311 41 5 .966
0.9594827586206897 2 Merced 30 1160 786 327 47 15 .959
0.9594272076372315 3 Taft 32 1257 842 364 51 10 .959
0.9571295433364398 4 Fresno City 30 1073 793 234 46 9 .957
0.9488817891373802 5 Reedley 32 1252 849 339 64 33 .949
0.9442198868229588 6 Porterville 33 1237 836 332 69 17 .944
0.9170549860205033 7 Coalinga 28 1073 715 269 89 32 .917
Rk Team gp dp sba rcs rcs% ci
0.4 1 Sequoias 32 22 27 18 .400 1
0.3111111111111111 2 Reedley 32 24 31 14 .311 1
0.25 3 Fresno City 30 19 33 11 .250 1
0.23529411764705882 4 Taft 32 17 39 12 .235 1
0.2318840579710145 5 Coalinga 28 11 53 16 .232 0
0.09090909090909091 6 Porterville 33 11 60 6 .091 0
0.06896551724137931 7 Merced 30 24 27 2 .069 1
Rk Team home games attend avg
87.0 1 Reedley 17 1,469 87
65.0 2 Taft 19 1,225 65
15.0 3 Coalinga 14 205 15
13.0 4 Fresno City 16 200 13
6.0 5 Merced 15 80 6
0.0 6 Porterville 16 0 0
0.0 6 Sequoias 18 0 0
Rk Team gp ab h rbi bb k avg obp slg
0.3258845437616387 1 Fresno City 15 537 175 147 90 81 .326 .436 .493
0.30185497470489037 2 Reedley 16 593 179 130 85 113 .302 .404 .405
0.281195079086116 3 Merced 16 569 160 80 55 117 .281 .366 .394
0.2774774774774775 4 Taft 16 555 154 83 49 117 .277 .359 .391
0.27399650959860383 5 Sequoias 16 573 157 84 67 100 .274 .368 .354
0.25206611570247933 6 Coalinga 14 484 122 54 46 101 .252 .342 .320
0.259567387687188 7 Porterville 18 601 156 65 67 144 .260 .342 .348
Rk Team gp 2b 3b hr xbh
64.0 1 Fresno City 15 48 6 10 64
38.0 2 Reedley 16 21 11 6 38
40.0 3 Merced 16 25 6 9 40
37.0 4 Taft 16 21 6 10 37
30.0 5 Sequoias 16 20 4 6 30
36.0 6 Porterville 18 26 3 7 36
27.0 7 Coalinga 14 22 4 1 27
Rk Team gp r tb sb cs
158.0 1 Fresno City 15 158 265 25 9
149.0 2 Reedley 16 149 240 23 4
99.0 3 Sequoias 16 99 203 5 2
94.0 4 Taft 16 94 217 10 8
99.0 5 Merced 16 99 224 23 5
69.0 6 Porterville 18 69 209 13 5
70.0 7 Coalinga 14 70 155 20 5
Rk Team gp hbp sf sh hdp go fo go/fo pa
711.0 1 Reedley 16 21 6 6 9 137 131 1.05 711
673.0 2 Sequoias 16 19 1 13 14 150 153 .98 673
668.0 3 Fresno City 15 24 12 5 4 66 68 .97 668
648.0 4 Taft 16 24 5 15 8 145 126 1.15 648
693.0 5 Porterville 18 12 7 6 8 138 133 1.04 693
660.0 6 Merced 16 24 5 7 4 123 128 .96 660
562.0 7 Coalinga 14 21 2 9 4 135 102 1.32 562
Rk Team app gs ip h r er era
3.626865671641791 1 Fresno City 15 15 134.0 104 65 54 3.63
4.373239436619718 2 Reedley 16 16 142.0 131 85 69 4.37
4.920560747663552 3 Sequoias 16 16 142.2 176 102 78 4.92
4.065882352941177 4 Taft 16 16 141.2 166 82 64 4.07
6.720779220779221 5 Porterville 18 18 154.0 187 145 115 6.72
6.206161137440759 6 Merced 16 16 140.2 156 113 97 6.21
6.824175824175825 7 Coalinga 14 14 121.1 180 141 92 6.82
Rk Team app gs k k/9 hr whip
1.2537313432835822 1 Fresno City 15 15 143 9.60 4 1.25
1.5 2 Reedley 16 16 121 7.67 6 1.50
1.577102803738318 3 Sequoias 16 16 117 7.38 2 1.58
1.4928909952606637 4 Merced 16 16 117 7.49 12 1.49
1.7467532467532467 5 Porterville 18 18 114 6.66 10 1.75
1.5670588235294118 6 Taft 16 16 88 5.59 8 1.57
2.068681318681319 7 Coalinga 14 14 76 5.64 7 2.07
Rk Team gp tc po a e pb f%
0.9611650485436893 1 Sequoias 16 618 428 166 24 3 .961
0.9612277867528272 2 Merced 16 619 422 173 24 11 .961
0.9630818619582665 3 Taft 16 623 425 175 23 3 .963
0.9545454545454546 4 Fresno City 15 572 402 144 26 8 .955
0.9577922077922078 5 Reedley 16 616 426 164 26 12 .958
0.939521800281294 6 Porterville 18 711 462 206 43 13 .940
0.9244935543278084 7 Coalinga 14 543 364 138 41 9 .924
Rk Team gp dp sba rcs rcs% ci
0.45454545454545453 1 Sequoias 16 8 12 10 .455 0
0.35 2 Reedley 16 13 13 7 .350 1
0.3333333333333333 3 Fresno City 15 11 12 6 .333 1
0.14285714285714285 4 Taft 16 7 18 3 .143 0
0.2 5 Coalinga 14 8 20 5 .200 0
0.14705882352941177 6 Porterville 18 7 29 5 .147 0
0.125 7 Merced 16 8 14 2 .125 1
Rk Team home games attend avg
96.0 1 Reedley 8 766 96
69.0 2 Taft 8 550 69
23.0 3 Coalinga 7 155 23
23 4 Fresno City 8 - -
0.0 5 Merced 8 0 0
0.0 5 Porterville 9 0 0
0.0 5 Sequoias 8 0 0