Team Stats

Rk Team gp ab h rbi bb k avg obp slg
0.2892819979188345 1 Fresno City 28 961 278 221 179 180 .289 .426 .432
0.2786729857819905 2 Reedley 30 1055 294 195 160 229 .279 .394 .366
0.2609603340292276 3 Merced 28 958 250 127 92 202 .261 .344 .352
0.25296442687747034 4 Taft 30 1012 256 127 101 234 .253 .345 .344
0.24806201550387597 5 Sequoias 30 1032 256 146 118 219 .248 .350 .325
0.23837902264600716 6 Coalinga 25 839 200 88 88 192 .238 .345 .304
0.23781094527363184 7 Porterville 31 1005 239 121 132 236 .238 .339 .305
Rk Team gp 2b 3b hr xbh
95.0 1 Fresno City 28 70 8 17 95
63.0 2 Reedley 30 42 13 8 63
58.0 3 Taft 30 36 10 12 58
55.0 4 Merced 28 35 8 12 55
55.0 4 Sequoias 30 41 4 10 55
51.0 6 Porterville 31 41 3 7 51
45.0 7 Coalinga 25 37 6 2 45
Rk Team gp r tb sb cs
247.0 1 Fresno City 28 247 415 49 18
231.0 2 Reedley 30 231 386 30 8
168.0 3 Sequoias 30 168 335 9 6
152.0 4 Merced 28 152 337 28 6
148.0 5 Taft 30 148 348 27 13
138.0 6 Porterville 31 138 307 23 11
110.0 7 Coalinga 25 110 255 44 9
Rk Team gp hbp sf sh hdp go fo go/fo pa
1292.0 1 Reedley 30 48 11 18 20 247 244 1.01 1292
1219.0 2 Fresno City 28 59 13 7 10 106 136 .78 1219
1218.0 3 Sequoias 30 47 6 15 26 288 247 1.17 1218
1192.0 4 Taft 30 47 10 22 12 252 256 .98 1192
1185.0 5 Porterville 31 27 11 10 13 241 264 .91 1185
1108.0 6 Merced 28 35 10 13 16 238 227 1.05 1108
988.0 7 Coalinga 25 49 2 10 10 223 188 1.19 988
Rk Team app gs ip h r er era
4.296992481203008 1 Reedley 30 30 266.0 249 163 127 4.30
4.457718120805369 2 Fresno City 28 28 248.1 219 150 123 4.46
5.2377972465581975 3 Sequoias 30 30 266.1 313 191 155 5.24
5.790609137055837 4 Taft 30 30 262.2 325 203 169 5.79
6.535031847133758 5 Porterville 31 31 261.2 286 228 190 6.54
7.745901639344262 6 Merced 28 28 244.0 308 232 210 7.75
8.048895899053628 7 Coalinga 25 25 211.1 330 271 189 8.05
Rk Team app gs k k/9 hr whip
1.3530201342281878 1 Fresno City 28 28 273 9.89 17 1.35
1.4248120300751879 2 Reedley 30 30 222 7.51 10 1.42
1.5994993742177723 3 Sequoias 30 30 224 7.57 13 1.60
1.6700636942675158 4 Porterville 31 31 210 7.22 17 1.67
1.7131147540983607 5 Merced 28 28 194 7.16 30 1.71
1.762690355329949 6 Taft 30 30 184 6.30 16 1.76
2.261829652996845 7 Coalinga 25 25 146 6.22 12 2.26
Rk Team gp tc po a e pb f%
0.9678571428571429 1 Sequoias 30 1120 799 285 36 5 .968
0.9582560296846011 2 Merced 28 1078 732 301 45 15 .958
0.9576988155668359 3 Taft 30 1182 788 344 50 8 .958
0.9560439560439561 4 Fresno City 28 1001 742 215 44 9 .956
0.9496587030716723 5 Reedley 30 1172 798 315 59 32 .950
0.9466437177280551 6 Porterville 31 1162 785 315 62 15 .947
0.9112734864300627 7 Coalinga 25 958 634 239 85 31 .911
Rk Team gp dp sba rcs rcs% ci
0.3902439024390244 1 Sequoias 30 21 25 16 .390 1
0.30952380952380953 2 Reedley 30 22 29 13 .310 1
0.25 3 Fresno City 28 17 33 11 .250 1
0.24242424242424243 4 Coalinga 25 9 50 16 .242 0
0.22916666666666666 5 Taft 30 16 37 11 .229 1
0.09375 6 Porterville 31 10 58 6 .094 0
0.07407407407407407 7 Merced 28 22 25 2 .074 1
Rk Team home games attend avg
87.0 1 Reedley 16 1,382 87
64.0 2 Taft 18 1,150 64
16.0 3 Coalinga 13 205 16
14.0 4 Fresno City 15 200 14
6.0 5 Merced 14 80 6
0.0 6 Porterville 15 0 0
0.0 6 Sequoias 17 0 0
Rk Team gp ab h rbi bb k avg obp slg
0.3247863247863248 1 Fresno City 13 468 152 136 88 71 .325 .444 .504
0.3092979127134725 2 Reedley 14 527 163 125 82 103 .309 .416 .416
0.2837022132796781 3 Merced 14 497 141 73 47 105 .284 .368 .386
0.27533460803059273 4 Taft 15 523 144 76 43 110 .275 .355 .392
0.27054108216432865 5 Sequoias 14 499 135 70 60 92 .271 .367 .351
0.22911051212938005 6 Coalinga 11 371 85 30 36 76 .229 .324 .302
0.2618629173989455 7 Porterville 17 569 149 64 64 133 .262 .345 .350
Rk Team gp 2b 3b hr xbh
60.0 1 Fresno City 13 45 6 9 60
35.0 2 Reedley 14 19 11 5 35
35.0 2 Taft 15 19 6 10 35
33.0 4 Merced 14 22 4 7 33
26.0 5 Sequoias 14 17 4 5 26
35.0 6 Porterville 17 26 3 6 35
21.0 7 Coalinga 11 16 4 1 21
Rk Team gp r tb sb cs
146.0 1 Fresno City 13 146 236 23 7
144.0 2 Reedley 14 144 219 22 4
82.0 3 Sequoias 14 82 175 3 2
90.0 4 Merced 14 90 192 21 4
84.0 5 Taft 15 84 205 9 8
68.0 6 Porterville 17 68 199 13 5
43.0 7 Coalinga 11 43 112 11 5
Rk Team gp hbp sf sh hdp go fo go/fo pa
638.0 1 Reedley 14 19 6 4 7 119 107 1.11 638
592.0 2 Fresno City 13 21 11 4 3 57 59 .97 592
588.0 3 Sequoias 14 17 1 11 13 132 130 1.02 588
607.0 4 Taft 15 24 5 12 7 133 122 1.09 607
658.0 5 Porterville 17 12 7 6 8 138 133 1.04 658
577.0 6 Merced 14 22 5 6 3 100 111 .90 577
431.0 7 Coalinga 11 17 2 5 4 104 81 1.28 431
Rk Team app gs ip h r er era
4.104 1 Reedley 14 14 125.0 111 69 57 4.10
3.9230769230769234 2 Fresno City 13 13 117.0 92 61 51 3.92
4.836898395721924 3 Sequoias 14 14 124.2 154 88 67 4.84
4.206030150753769 4 Taft 15 15 132.2 159 80 62 4.21
6.657534246575342 5 Porterville 17 17 146.0 173 135 108 6.66
6.823369565217391 6 Merced 14 14 122.2 139 106 93 6.82
7.060070671378092 7 Coalinga 11 11 94.1 143 118 74 7.06
Rk Team app gs k k/9 hr whip
1.2820512820512822 1 Fresno City 13 13 129 9.92 2 1.28
1.456 2 Reedley 14 14 109 7.85 5 1.46
1.5721925133689838 3 Sequoias 14 14 105 7.58 1 1.57
1.7328767123287672 4 Porterville 17 17 108 6.66 10 1.73
1.5489130434782608 5 Merced 14 14 105 7.70 11 1.55
1.613065326633166 6 Taft 15 15 80 5.43 8 1.61
2.1307420494699647 7 Coalinga 11 11 61 5.82 6 2.13
Rk Team gp tc po a e pb f%
0.9643527204502814 1 Sequoias 14 533 374 140 19 3 .964
0.9590316573556797 2 Merced 14 537 368 147 22 11 .959
0.9609507640067911 3 Taft 15 589 398 168 23 3 .961
0.952 4 Fresno City 13 500 351 125 24 8 .952
0.960820895522388 5 Reedley 14 536 375 140 21 11 .961
0.9434523809523809 6 Porterville 17 672 438 196 38 13 .943
0.9135514018691588 7 Coalinga 11 428 283 108 37 8 .914
Rk Team gp dp sba rcs rcs% ci
0.4444444444444444 1 Sequoias 14 7 10 8 .444 0
0.35294117647058826 2 Reedley 14 11 11 6 .353 1
0.3333333333333333 3 Fresno City 13 9 12 6 .333 1
0.22727272727272727 4 Coalinga 11 6 17 5 .227 0
0.15 5 Taft 15 7 17 3 .150 0
0.15625 6 Porterville 17 6 27 5 .156 0
0.14285714285714285 7 Merced 14 6 12 2 .143 1
Rk Team home games attend avg
97.0 1 Reedley 7 679 97
68.0 2 Taft 7 475 68
26.0 3 Coalinga 6 155 26
26 4 Fresno City 7 - -
0.0 5 Merced 7 0 0
0.0 5 Porterville 9 0 0
0.0 5 Sequoias 7 0 0