Team Stats

Rk Team gp ab h rbi bb 2b 3b hr xbh k avg obp slg hbp sf sh hdp go fo go/fo pa
0.31063829787234043 1 Fresno City 26 940 292 200 146 61 4 11 76 174 .311 .427 .419 55 13 6 11 92 106 .87 1160
0.30726256983240224 2 Merced 24 895 275 161 103 46 7 13 66 190 .307 .400 .418 41 9 13 22 212 210 1.01 1061
0.29132231404958675 3 Coalinga 28 968 282 158 105 42 9 3 54 228 .291 .393 .363 65 13 14 19 233 201 1.16 1165
0.28164196123147095 4 Sequoias 25 877 247 115 100 44 4 6 54 187 .282 .371 .361 33 14 13 23 192 206 .93 1037
0.2720677146311971 5 Taft 25 827 225 143 102 32 7 11 50 159 .272 .365 .368 27 15 13 13 232 188 1.23 984
0.25744934445768775 6 Porterville 25 839 216 119 77 41 8 17 66 207 .257 .340 .386 33 9 7 9 164 223 .74 965
0.25235849056603776 7 Reedley 25 848 214 100 111 24 3 7 34 157 .252 .354 .313 28 11 15 26 258 212 1.22 1013
Rk Team gp r tb sb cs
229.0 1 Fresno City 26 229 394 46 16
185.0 2 Coalinga 28 185 351 91 23
185.0 2 Merced 24 185 374 37 2
161.0 4 Taft 25 161 304 67 12
146.0 5 Porterville 25 146 324 33 8
126.0 6 Sequoias 25 126 317 11 7
117.0 7 Reedley 25 117 265 14 3
Rk Team era w l app gs sv ip h r er bb k k/9 hr whip bf wp hbp
2.924050632911392 1 Fresno City 2.92 24 2 26 26 2 237.0 196 88 77 82 287 10.90 8 1.17 1006 23 24
3.9206586826347305 2 Reedley 3.92 12 13 25 25 4 222.2 216 118 97 102 212 8.57 8 1.43 1006 22 35
3.9658753709198815 3 Sequoias 3.97 11 12 25 25 6 224.2 220 116 99 96 160 6.41 7 1.41 986 24 34
5.071621621621622 4 Coalinga 5.07 11 14 28 28 4 246.2 336 239 139 119 175 6.39 16 1.84 1252 30 52
5.228441754916793 5 Taft 5.23 12 13 25 25 6 220.1 258 156 128 97 158 6.45 22 1.61 1042 24 39
5.76219512195122 6 Merced 5.76 9 15 24 24 5 218.2 261 186 140 99 157 6.46 19 1.65 1038 13 33
7.551562499999999 7 Porterville 7.55 8 17 25 25 4 213.1 280 219 179 148 184 7.76 11 2.01 1104 48 46
Rk Team gp tc po a e pb f% dp sba rcs rcs% ci
0.9772502472799208 1 Sequoias 25 1011 673 315 23 10 .977 22 32 14 .304 0
0.964509394572025 2 Reedley 25 958 668 256 34 14 .965 23 29 13 .310 0
0.9644779332615716 3 Fresno City 26 929 711 185 33 7 .964 10 35 13 .271 0
0.9623655913978495 4 Taft 25 930 661 234 35 0 .962 17 44 7 .137 1
0.957983193277311 5 Merced 24 952 656 256 40 20 .958 16 18 2 .100 0
0.9520089285714286 6 Porterville 25 896 640 213 43 28 .952 18 70 3 .041 0
0.932780847145488 7 Coalinga 28 1086 740 273 73 21 .933 16 41 18 .305 0
Rk Team home games attend avg
95.0 1 Reedley 13 1,225 95
83.0 2 Taft 15 1,235 83
4.0 3 Merced 13 50 4
0.0 4 Coalinga 16 0 0
0 5 Fresno City 13 - -
0.0 6 Porterville 13 0 0
0.0 6 Sequoias 13 0 0
Rk Team gp ab h rbi bb 2b 3b hr xbh k avg obp slg hbp sf sh hdp go fo go/fo pa
0.3303964757709251 1 Fresno City 12 454 150 87 55 29 1 9 39 70 .330 .429 .458 28 6 2 5 52 59 .88 545
0.31976744186046513 2 Merced 9 344 110 62 37 15 1 8 24 70 .320 .408 .439 17 4 5 7 69 91 .76 407
0.28329297820823246 3 Coalinga 12 413 117 64 43 22 5 1 28 98 .283 .379 .368 24 6 4 9 102 84 1.21 490
0.289044289044289 4 Sequoias 12 429 124 61 52 21 4 1 26 84 .289 .380 .364 14 5 6 9 72 105 .69 506
0.25 5 Taft 9 316 79 42 24 13 3 5 21 78 .250 .316 .358 7 1 4 4 85 44 1.93 352
0.23384615384615384 6 Porterville 9 325 76 37 14 14 2 6 22 82 .234 .275 .345 5 2 2 1 62 78 .79 348
0.27639751552795033 7 Reedley 9 322 89 51 37 12 2 3 17 54 .276 .364 .354 11 6 9 11 96 82 1.17 385
Rk Team gp r tb sb cs
100.0 1 Fresno City 12 100 208 24 10
74.0 2 Coalinga 12 74 152 37 9
72.0 3 Merced 9 72 151 16 0
43.0 4 Taft 9 43 113 11 3
44.0 5 Porterville 9 44 112 7 1
64.0 6 Sequoias 12 64 156 9 5
57.0 7 Reedley 9 57 114 4 1
Rk Team era w l app gs sv ip h r er bb k k/9 hr whip bf wp hbp
2.4107142857142856 1 Fresno City 2.41 11 1 12 12 1 112.0 89 37 30 34 139 11.17 1 1.10 464 11 10
4.57258064516129 2 Reedley 4.57 4 5 9 9 2 82.2 81 52 42 37 74 8.06 1 1.43 384 16 17
3.147239263803681 3 Sequoias 3.15 5 5 12 12 2 108.2 92 44 38 29 63 5.22 1 1.11 439 10 15
4.584905660377358 4 Coalinga 4.58 4 6 12 12 0 106.0 164 101 54 35 69 5.86 9 1.88 532 6 15
5.661290322580645 5 Taft 5.66 3 6 9 9 1 82.2 101 59 52 37 64 6.97 9 1.67 393 13 16
4.607142857142857 6 Merced 4.61 6 3 9 9 4 84.0 94 63 43 29 61 6.54 6 1.46 383 4 13
9.37190082644628 7 Porterville 9.37 1 8 9 9 0 80.2 122 98 84 61 66 7.36 6 2.27 438 21 20
Rk Team gp tc po a e pb f% dp sba rcs rcs% ci
0.9860834990059643 1 Sequoias 12 503 325 171 7 3 .986 15 9 6 .400 0
0.9518413597733711 2 Reedley 9 353 248 88 17 4 .952 9 9 2 .182 0
0.963963963963964 3 Fresno City 12 444 336 92 16 3 .964 5 13 6 .316 0
0.973293768545994 4 Taft 9 337 248 80 9 0 .973 5 16 5 .238 0
0.9514824797843666 5 Merced 9 371 252 101 18 2 .951 5 7 - - 0
0.940677966101695 6 Porterville 9 354 242 91 21 15 .941 8 42 3 .067 0
0.9400428265524625 7 Coalinga 12 467 318 121 28 3 .940 8 13 6 .316 0
Rk Team home games attend avg
96.0 1 Reedley 4 381 96
66.0 2 Taft 5 330 66
0.0 3 Merced 5 0 0
0.0 3 Coalinga 7 0 0
0 5 Fresno City 6 - -
0.0 6 Porterville 4 0 0
0.0 6 Sequoias 5 0 0