Skip to navigation Skip to content Skip to footer
California Community College Athletic Association

Team Stats

Rk Team gp ab h rbi bb k avg obp slg
0.5662745098039216 1 Palomar 42 1275 495 313 94 67 .388 .438 .566
0.44591029023746703 2 Imperial Valley 27 758 259 118 77 78 .342 .402 .446
0.4364326375711575 3 Southwestern 39 1054 358 175 77 113 .340 .393 .436
0.43413729128014844 4 Grossmont 39 1078 351 159 90 114 .326 .379 .434
0.40854472630173566 5 San Diego Mesa 31 749 228 124 75 84 .304 .384 .409
0.4004149377593361 6 San Bernardino 34 964 309 155 85 98 .321 .384 .400
0.3786764705882353 7 Mt. San Jacinto 33 816 232 128 60 134 .284 .343 .379
0.3092948717948718 8 Desert 29 624 147 59 48 129 .236 .304 .309
0.2808219178082192 9 San Diego City 34 730 167 67 52 139 .229 .294 .281
Rk Team gp 2b 3b hr xbh
0.5662745098039216 1 Palomar 42 92 15 35 142
0.43413729128014844 2 Grossmont 39 58 16 9 83
0.4364326375711575 3 Southwestern 39 49 10 11 70
0.4004149377593361 4 San Bernardino 34 54 4 5 63
0.44591029023746703 5 Imperial Valley 27 32 19 3 54
0.40854472630173566 6 San Diego Mesa 31 30 18 4 52
0.3786764705882353 7 Mt. San Jacinto 33 34 11 7 52
0.3092948717948718 8 Desert 29 29 7 1 37
0.2808219178082192 9 San Diego City 34 25 5 1 31
Rk Team gp r tb sb cs
0.5662745098039216 1 Palomar 42 349 722 76 4
0.4364326375711575 2 Southwestern 39 203 460 60 2
0.43413729128014844 3 Grossmont 39 197 468 36 5
0.4004149377593361 4 San Bernardino 34 181 386 13 5
0.3786764705882353 5 Mt. San Jacinto 33 165 309 68 10
0.44591029023746703 6 Imperial Valley 27 158 338 27 2
0.40854472630173566 7 San Diego Mesa 31 147 306 19 12
0.2808219178082192 8 San Diego City 34 89 205 40 9
0.3092948717948718 9 Desert 29 79 193 22 7
Rk Team gp hbp sf sh hdp go fo go/fo pa
0.5662745098039216 1 Palomar 42 27 11 26 13 178 188 .95 1433
0.4364326375711575 2 Southwestern 39 20 7 50 7 291 272 1.07 1208
0.43413729128014844 3 Grossmont 39 6 4 28 10 197 241 .82 1206
0.4004149377593361 4 San Bernardino 34 17 5 32 13 175 184 .95 1103
0.3786764705882353 5 Mt. San Jacinto 33 15 4 29 3 123 97 1.27 924
0.44591029023746703 6 Imperial Valley 27 10 15 30 9 69 72 .96 890
0.40854472630173566 7 San Diego Mesa 31 26 6 32 5 212 171 1.24 888
0.2808219178082192 8 San Diego City 34 17 4 23 12 191 154 1.24 826
0.3092948717948718 9 Desert 29 14 2 16 7 180 124 1.45 704
Rk Team app gs ip h r er era
0.3092948717948718 1 Desert 29 29 158.0 335 271 191 8.46
0.2808219178082192 2 San Diego City 34 34 190.2 410 320 196 7.20
0.3786764705882353 3 Mt. San Jacinto 33 33 191.1 243 197 140 5.12
0.40854472630173566 4 San Diego Mesa 31 31 186.0 265 181 134 5.04
0.5662745098039216 5 Palomar 42 42 273.0 263 186 142 3.64
0.43413729128014844 6 Grossmont 39 39 241.0 319 158 118 3.43
0.4364326375711575 7 Southwestern 39 39 247.0 240 128 99 2.81
0.4004149377593361 8 San Bernardino 34 34 222.2 244 139 89 2.80
0.44591029023746703 9 Imperial Valley 27 27 171.2 171 89 53 2.16
Rk Team app gs k k/7 hr whip
0.5662745098039216 1 Palomar 42 42 221 5.67 10 -
0.44591029023746703 2 Imperial Valley 27 27 133 5.42 - -
0.43413729128014844 3 Grossmont 39 39 63 1.83 10 -
0.4364326375711575 4 Southwestern 39 39 194 5.50 10 -
0.40854472630173566 5 San Diego Mesa 31 31 72 2.71 19 -
0.3786764705882353 6 Mt. San Jacinto 33 33 79 2.89 6 -
0.4004149377593361 7 San Bernardino 34 34 192 6.04 6 -
0.3092948717948718 8 Desert 29 29 43 1.91 11 -
0.2808219178082192 9 San Diego City 34 34 39 1.43 11 -
Rk Team gp tc po a e pb f%
0.4364326375711575 1 Southwestern 39 1031 734 259 38 8 .963
0.5662745098039216 2 Palomar 42 1162 798 313 51 12 .956
0.44591029023746703 3 Imperial Valley 27 676 430 215 31 10 .954
0.43413729128014844 4 Grossmont 39 1088 692 328 68 3 .938
0.3786764705882353 5 Mt. San Jacinto 33 893 559 277 57 16 .936
0.4004149377593361 6 San Bernardino 34 985 630 284 71 10 .928
0.40854472630173566 7 San Diego Mesa 31 880 551 250 79 1 .910
0.3092948717948718 8 Desert 29 733 471 183 79 9 .892
0.2808219178082192 9 San Diego City 34 916 552 263 101 6 .890
Rk Team gp dp sba rcs rcs% ci
0.4004149377593361 1 San Bernardino 34 5 21 7 .250 0
0.43413729128014844 2 Grossmont 39 13 31 10 .244 -
0.40854472630173566 3 San Diego Mesa 31 2 29 6 .171 -
0.5662745098039216 4 Palomar 42 11 35 6 .146 -
0.3092948717948718 5 Desert 29 9 48 6 .111 1
0.4364326375711575 6 Southwestern 39 9 35 3 .079 1
0.3786764705882353 7 Mt. San Jacinto 33 6 37 3 .075 0
0.2808219178082192 8 San Diego City 34 9 81 3 .036 0
0.44591029023746703 9 Imperial Valley 27 2 17 0 .000 -
Rk Team home games attend avg
0.4364326375711575 1 Southwestern 18.0 8,950 497
0.3092948717948718 2 Desert 15.0 1,170 78
0.5662745098039216 3 Palomar 20.0 1,130 57
0.2808219178082192 4 San Diego City 14.0 700 50
0.3786764705882353 5 Mt. San Jacinto 14.0 275 20
0.43413729128014844 6 Grossmont 17.0 99 6
0.40854472630173566 7 San Diego Mesa 18.0 50 3
0.4004149377593361 8 San Bernardino 14.0 20 2
0.44591029023746703 9 Imperial Valley 12.0 0 0
Rk Team gp ab h rbi bb k avg obp slg
0.605543710021322 1 Palomar 16 469 198 136 39 23 .422 .469 .606
0.4559139784946237 2 Imperial Valley 16 465 160 68 38 61 .344 .390 .456
0.4014778325123153 3 Southwestern 16 406 130 68 28 50 .320 .373 .401
0.44567627494456763 4 Grossmont 16 451 147 76 37 46 .326 .377 .446
0.39054726368159204 5 San Diego Mesa 16 402 120 68 31 46 .299 .367 .391
0.36283185840707965 6 San Bernardino 16 452 131 48 36 51 .290 .345 .363
0.3700787401574803 7 Mt. San Jacinto 16 381 101 53 21 63 .265 .312 .370
0.3111111111111111 8 Desert 16 360 85 34 25 64 .236 .299 .311
0.26865671641791045 9 San Diego City 16 335 76 23 21 67 .227 .285 .269
Rk Team gp 2b 3b hr xbh
0.605543710021322 1 Palomar 16 32 9 12 53
0.44567627494456763 2 Grossmont 16 24 9 4 37
0.4014778325123153 3 Southwestern 16 18 3 3 24
0.36283185840707965 4 San Bernardino 16 25 1 2 28
0.4559139784946237 5 Imperial Valley 16 19 12 3 34
0.39054726368159204 6 San Diego Mesa 16 17 10 - 27
0.3700787401574803 7 Mt. San Jacinto 16 15 8 3 26
0.3111111111111111 8 Desert 16 14 5 1 20
0.26865671641791045 9 San Diego City 16 12 1 - 13
Rk Team gp r tb sb cs
0.605543710021322 1 Palomar 16 159 284 34 3
0.4014778325123153 2 Southwestern 16 89 163 24 2
0.44567627494456763 3 Grossmont 16 97 201 16 -
0.36283185840707965 4 San Bernardino 16 64 164 6 1
0.3700787401574803 5 Mt. San Jacinto 16 63 141 28 5
0.4559139784946237 6 Imperial Valley 16 93 212 19 -
0.39054726368159204 7 San Diego Mesa 16 80 157 7 6
0.26865671641791045 8 San Diego City 16 28 90 9 6
0.3111111111111111 9 Desert 16 46 112 6 4
Rk Team gp hbp sf sh hdp go fo go/fo pa
0.605543710021322 1 Palomar 16 4 2 8 3 42 55 .76 522
0.4014778325123153 2 Southwestern 16 8 3 26 3 112 89 1.26 471
0.44567627494456763 3 Grossmont 16 2 3 16 3 80 96 .83 509
0.36283185840707965 4 San Bernardino 16 3 2 20 7 95 96 .99 513
0.3700787401574803 5 Mt. San Jacinto 16 6 2 15 3 56 50 1.12 425
0.4559139784946237 6 Imperial Valley 16 6 14 21 7 53 56 .95 544
0.39054726368159204 7 San Diego Mesa 16 13 1 21 - 99 91 1.09 468
0.26865671641791045 8 San Diego City 16 6 - 17 6 85 72 1.18 379
0.3111111111111111 9 Desert 16 8 2 8 - 98 69 1.42 403
Rk Team app gs ip h r er era
0.3111111111111111 1 Desert 16 16 87.0 175 136 93 7.48
0.26865671641791045 2 San Diego City 16 16 88.2 187 139 89 7.03
0.3700787401574803 3 Mt. San Jacinto 16 16 92.0 145 118 82 6.24
0.39054726368159204 4 San Diego Mesa 16 16 95.2 117 68 50 3.66
0.605543710021322 5 Palomar 16 16 95.0 62 23 10 0.74
0.44567627494456763 6 Grossmont 16 16 101.0 117 48 33 2.29
0.4014778325123153 7 Southwestern 16 16 100.2 85 42 32 2.23
0.36283185840707965 8 San Bernardino 16 16 105.2 135 72 50 3.31
0.4559139784946237 9 Imperial Valley 16 16 100.2 109 61 29 2.02
Rk Team app gs k k/7 hr whip
0.605543710021322 1 Palomar 16 16 98 7.22 1 -
0.4559139784946237 2 Imperial Valley 16 16 69 4.80 - -
0.44567627494456763 3 Grossmont 16 16 25 1.73 2 -
0.4014778325123153 4 Southwestern 16 16 88 6.12 2 -
0.39054726368159204 5 San Diego Mesa 16 16 32 2.34 6 -
0.3700787401574803 6 Mt. San Jacinto 16 16 31 2.36 3 -
0.36283185840707965 7 San Bernardino 16 16 76 5.03 4 -
0.3111111111111111 8 Desert 16 16 21 1.69 5 -
0.26865671641791045 9 San Diego City 16 16 15 1.18 4 -
Rk Team gp tc po a e pb f%
0.4014778325123153 1 Southwestern 16 404 295 98 11 2 .973
0.605543710021322 2 Palomar 16 410 285 105 20 6 .951
0.4559139784946237 3 Imperial Valley 16 440 277 135 28 6 .936
0.44567627494456763 4 Grossmont 16 427 270 126 31 2 .927
0.3700787401574803 5 Mt. San Jacinto 16 426 261 132 33 5 .923
0.36283185840707965 6 San Bernardino 16 527 330 155 42 7 .920
0.39054726368159204 7 San Diego Mesa 16 448 282 130 36 - .920
0.3111111111111111 8 Desert 16 414 258 111 45 6 .891
0.26865671641791045 9 San Diego City 16 417 250 117 50 1 .880
Rk Team gp dp sba rcs rcs% ci
0.36283185840707965 1 San Bernardino 16 2 14 3 .176 -
0.44567627494456763 2 Grossmont 16 7 11 1 .083 -
0.39054726368159204 3 San Diego Mesa 16 2 9 1 .100 -
0.605543710021322 4 Palomar 16 4 9 1 .100 -
0.3111111111111111 5 Desert 16 5 27 3 .100 -
0.4014778325123153 6 Southwestern 16 3 9 1 .100 1
0.3700787401574803 7 Mt. San Jacinto 16 2 19 0 .000 -
0.26865671641791045 8 San Diego City 16 5 43 1 .023 -
0.4559139784946237 9 Imperial Valley 16 2 8 0 .000 -
Rk Team home games attend avg
0.4014778325123153 1 Southwestern 8.0 3,650 456
0.3111111111111111 2 Desert 8.0 624 78
0.605543710021322 3 Palomar 8.0 363 46
0.26865671641791045 4 San Diego City 8.0 430 54
0.3700787401574803 5 Mt. San Jacinto 8.0 125 16
0.44567627494456763 6 Grossmont 8.0 99 13
0.39054726368159204 7 San Diego Mesa 8.0 0 0
0.36283185840707965 8 San Bernardino 8.0 20 3
0.4559139784946237 9 Imperial Valley 8.0 0 0