California Community College Athletic Association

Team Stats

Rk	Team	gp	ab	h	rbi	bb	k	avg	obp	slg
$value 1	San Diego City	34	730	167	67	52	139	.229	.294	.281
.281 2	Desert	29	624	147	59	48	129	.236	.304	.309
.309 3	Mt. San Jacinto	33	816	232	128	60	134	.284	.343	.379
.379 4	San Diego Mesa	31	749	228	124	75	84	.304	.384	.409
.409 5	San Bernardino	34	964	309	155	85	98	.321	.384	.400
.400 6	Grossmont	39	1078	351	159	90	114	.326	.379	.434
.434 7	Southwestern	39	1054	358	175	77	113	.340	.393	.436
.436 8	Imperial Valley	27	758	259	118	77	78	.342	.402	.446
.446 9	Palomar	42	1275	495	313	94	67	.388	.438	.566

Rk	Team	gp	2b	3b	hr	xbh
$value 1	San Diego City	34	25	5	1	31
31 2	Desert	29	29	7	1	37
37 3	Mt. San Jacinto	33	34	11	7	52
52 4	San Diego Mesa	31	30	18	4	52
52 4	Imperial Valley	27	32	19	3	54
54 6	San Bernardino	34	54	4	5	63
63 7	Southwestern	39	49	10	11	70
70 8	Grossmont	39	58	16	9	83
83 9	Palomar	42	92	15	35	142

Rk	Team	gp	r	tb	sb	cs
$value 1	Desert	29	79	193	22	7
7 2	San Diego City	34	89	205	40	9
9 3	San Diego Mesa	31	147	306	19	12
12 4	Imperial Valley	27	158	338	27	2
2 5	Mt. San Jacinto	33	165	309	68	10
10 6	San Bernardino	34	181	386	13	5
5 7	Grossmont	39	197	468	36	5
5 7	Southwestern	39	203	460	60	2
2 9	Palomar	42	349	722	76	4

Rk	Team	gp	hbp	sf	sh	hdp	go	fo	go/fo	pa
$value 1	Desert	29	14	2	16	7	180	124	1.45	704
704 2	San Diego City	34	17	4	23	12	191	154	1.24	826
826 3	San Diego Mesa	31	26	6	32	5	212	171	1.24	888
888 4	Imperial Valley	27	10	15	30	9	69	72	.96	890
890 5	Mt. San Jacinto	33	15	4	29	3	123	97	1.27	924
924 6	San Bernardino	34	17	5	32	13	175	184	.95	1103
1103 7	Grossmont	39	6	4	28	10	197	241	.82	1206
1206 8	Southwestern	39	20	7	50	7	291	272	1.07	1208
1208 9	Palomar	42	27	11	26	13	178	188	.95	1433

Rk	Team	app	gs	ip	h	r	er	era
$value 1	Imperial Valley	27	27	171.2	171	89	53	2.16
2.16 2	San Bernardino	34	34	222.2	244	139	89	2.80
2.80 3	Southwestern	39	39	247.0	240	128	99	2.81
2.81 4	Grossmont	39	39	241.0	319	158	118	3.43
3.43 5	Palomar	42	42	273.0	263	186	142	3.64
3.64 6	San Diego Mesa	31	31	186.0	265	181	134	5.04
5.04 7	Mt. San Jacinto	33	33	191.1	243	197	140	5.12
5.12 8	San Diego City	34	34	190.2	410	320	196	7.20
7.20 9	Desert	29	29	158.0	335	271	191	8.46

Rk	Team	app	gs	k	k/7	hr	whip
$value 1	Desert	29	29	43	1.91	11	-
- 2	Grossmont	39	39	63	1.83	10	-
- 2	Imperial Valley	27	27	133	5.42	-	-
- 2	Mt. San Jacinto	33	33	79	2.89	6	-
- 2	Palomar	42	42	221	5.67	10	-
- 2	San Bernardino	34	34	192	6.04	6	-
- 2	San Diego City	34	34	39	1.43	11	-
- 2	San Diego Mesa	31	31	72	2.71	19	-
- 2	Southwestern	39	39	194	5.50	10	-

Rk	Team	gp	tc	po	a	e	pb	f%
$value 1	San Diego City	34	916	552	263	101	6	.890
.890 2	Desert	29	733	471	183	79	9	.892
.892 3	San Diego Mesa	31	880	551	250	79	1	.910
.910 4	San Bernardino	34	985	630	284	71	10	.928
.928 5	Mt. San Jacinto	33	893	559	277	57	16	.936
.936 6	Grossmont	39	1088	692	328	68	3	.938
.938 7	Imperial Valley	27	676	430	215	31	10	.954
.954 8	Palomar	42	1162	798	313	51	12	.956
.956 9	Southwestern	39	1031	734	259	38	8	.963

Rk	Team	gp	dp	sba	rcs	rcs%	ci
$value 1	Imperial Valley	27	2	17	0	.000	-
- 2	San Diego City	34	9	81	3	.036	0
0 3	Mt. San Jacinto	33	6	37	3	.075	0
0 3	Southwestern	39	9	35	3	.079	1
1 5	Desert	29	9	48	6	.111	1
1 5	Palomar	42	11	35	6	.146	-
- 7	San Diego Mesa	31	2	29	6	.171	-
- 7	Grossmont	39	13	31	10	.244	-
- 7	San Bernardino	34	5	21	7	.250	0

Rk	Team	home games	attend	avg
$value 1	Imperial Valley	12.0	0	0
0 2	San Bernardino	14.0	20	2
2 3	San Diego Mesa	18.0	50	3
3 4	Grossmont	17.0	99	6
6 5	Mt. San Jacinto	14.0	275	20
20 6	San Diego City	14.0	700	50
50 7	Palomar	20.0	1,130	57
57 8	Desert	15.0	1,170	78
78 9	Southwestern	18.0	8,950	497

Rk	Team	gp	ab	h	rbi	bb	k	avg	obp	slg
$value 1	San Diego City	16	335	76	23	21	67	.227	.285	.269
.269 2	Desert	16	360	85	34	25	64	.236	.299	.311
.311 3	Mt. San Jacinto	16	381	101	53	21	63	.265	.312	.370
.370 4	San Diego Mesa	16	402	120	68	31	46	.299	.367	.391
.391 5	San Bernardino	16	452	131	48	36	51	.290	.345	.363
.363 6	Grossmont	16	451	147	76	37	46	.326	.377	.446
.446 7	Southwestern	16	406	130	68	28	50	.320	.373	.401
.401 8	Imperial Valley	16	465	160	68	38	61	.344	.390	.456
.456 9	Palomar	16	469	198	136	39	23	.422	.469	.606

Rk	Team	gp	2b	3b	hr	xbh
$value 1	San Diego City	16	12	1	-	13
13 2	Desert	16	14	5	1	20
20 3	Mt. San Jacinto	16	15	8	3	26
26 4	San Diego Mesa	16	17	10	-	27
27 5	Imperial Valley	16	19	12	3	34
34 6	San Bernardino	16	25	1	2	28
28 7	Southwestern	16	18	3	3	24
24 8	Grossmont	16	24	9	4	37
37 9	Palomar	16	32	9	12	53

Rk	Team	gp	r	tb	sb	cs
$value 1	Desert	16	46	112	6	4
4 2	San Diego City	16	28	90	9	6
6 3	San Diego Mesa	16	80	157	7	6
6 3	Imperial Valley	16	93	212	19	-
- 5	Mt. San Jacinto	16	63	141	28	5
5 6	San Bernardino	16	64	164	6	1
1 7	Grossmont	16	97	201	16	-
- 8	Southwestern	16	89	163	24	2
2 9	Palomar	16	159	284	34	3

Rk	Team	gp	hbp	sf	sh	hdp	go	fo	go/fo	pa
$value 1	Desert	16	8	2	8	-	98	69	1.42	403
403 2	San Diego City	16	6	-	17	6	85	72	1.18	379
379 3	San Diego Mesa	16	13	1	21	-	99	91	1.09	468
468 4	Imperial Valley	16	6	14	21	7	53	56	.95	544
544 5	Mt. San Jacinto	16	6	2	15	3	56	50	1.12	425
425 6	San Bernardino	16	3	2	20	7	95	96	.99	513
513 7	Grossmont	16	2	3	16	3	80	96	.83	509
509 8	Southwestern	16	8	3	26	3	112	89	1.26	471
471 9	Palomar	16	4	2	8	3	42	55	.76	522

Rk	Team	app	gs	ip	h	r	er	era
$value 1	Imperial Valley	16	16	100.2	109	61	29	2.02
2.02 2	San Bernardino	16	16	105.2	135	72	50	3.31
3.31 3	Southwestern	16	16	100.2	85	42	32	2.23
2.23 4	Grossmont	16	16	101.0	117	48	33	2.29
2.29 5	Palomar	16	16	95.0	62	23	10	0.74
0.74 6	San Diego Mesa	16	16	95.2	117	68	50	3.66
3.66 7	Mt. San Jacinto	16	16	92.0	145	118	82	6.24
6.24 8	San Diego City	16	16	88.2	187	139	89	7.03
7.03 9	Desert	16	16	87.0	175	136	93	7.48

Rk	Team	app	gs	k	k/7	hr	whip
$value 1	Desert	16	16	21	1.69	5	-
- 2	Grossmont	16	16	25	1.73	2	-
- 2	Imperial Valley	16	16	69	4.80	-	-
- 2	Mt. San Jacinto	16	16	31	2.36	3	-
- 2	Palomar	16	16	98	7.22	1	-
- 2	San Bernardino	16	16	76	5.03	4	-
- 2	San Diego City	16	16	15	1.18	4	-
- 2	San Diego Mesa	16	16	32	2.34	6	-
- 2	Southwestern	16	16	88	6.12	2	-

Rk	Team	gp	tc	po	a	e	pb	f%
$value 1	San Diego City	16	417	250	117	50	1	.880
.880 2	Desert	16	414	258	111	45	6	.891
.891 3	San Diego Mesa	16	448	282	130	36	-	.920
.920 4	San Bernardino	16	527	330	155	42	7	.920
.920 4	Mt. San Jacinto	16	426	261	132	33	5	.923
.923 6	Grossmont	16	427	270	126	31	2	.927
.927 7	Imperial Valley	16	440	277	135	28	6	.936
.936 8	Palomar	16	410	285	105	20	6	.951
.951 9	Southwestern	16	404	295	98	11	2	.973

Rk	Team	gp	dp	sba	rcs	rcs%	ci
$value 1	Imperial Valley	16	2	8	0	.000	-
- 2	San Diego City	16	5	43	1	.023	-
- 2	Mt. San Jacinto	16	2	19	0	.000	-
- 2	Southwestern	16	3	9	1	.100	1
1 5	Desert	16	5	27	3	.100	-
- 6	Palomar	16	4	9	1	.100	-
- 6	San Diego Mesa	16	2	9	1	.100	-
- 6	Grossmont	16	7	11	1	.083	-
- 6	San Bernardino	16	2	14	3	.176	-

Rk	Team	home games	attend	avg
$value 1	Imperial Valley	8.0	0	0
0 2	San Bernardino	8.0	20	3
3 3	San Diego Mesa	8.0	0	0
0 4	Grossmont	8.0	99	13
13 5	Mt. San Jacinto	8.0	125	16
16 6	San Diego City	8.0	430	54
54 7	Palomar	8.0	363	46
46 8	Desert	8.0	624	78
78 9	Southwestern	8.0	3,650	456