Skip to navigation Skip to content Skip to footer
California Community College Athletic Association

Team Stats

Rk Team gp ab h rbi bb k avg obp slg
79.0 1 Palomar 42 1598 566 411 217 243 .354 .450 .523
22.0 2 Southwestern 43 1552 449 254 211 321 .289 .394 .385
30.0 3 Grossmont 43 1558 445 296 216 293 .286 .392 .438
31.0 4 San Diego Mesa 40 1335 379 212 167 280 .284 .387 .420
43.0 5 San Diego City 39 1311 370 229 157 230 .282 .389 .426
42.0 6 Imperial Valley 38 1227 316 159 134 338 .258 .354 .334
Rk Team gp 2b 3b hr xbh
79.0 1 Palomar 42 116 20 38 174
30.0 2 Grossmont 43 88 12 42 142
31.0 3 San Diego Mesa 40 103 11 19 133
43.0 4 San Diego City 39 71 8 34 113
22.0 5 Southwestern 43 80 10 16 106
42.0 6 Imperial Valley 38 58 9 6 73
Rk Team gp r tb sb cs
79.0 1 Palomar 42 471 836 79 19
43.0 2 San Diego City 39 265 559 43 20
42.0 3 Imperial Valley 38 182 410 42 9
31.0 4 San Diego Mesa 40 231 561 31 15
30.0 5 Grossmont 43 333 683 30 12
22.0 6 Southwestern 43 293 597 22 8
Rk Team gp hbp sf sh hdp go fo go/fo pa
79.0 1 Palomar 42 91 35 22 19 387 401 .97 1963
30.0 2 Grossmont 43 71 22 17 37 360 432 .83 1884
22.0 3 Southwestern 43 65 13 20 35 380 394 .96 1861
31.0 4 San Diego Mesa 40 72 24 36 34 333 373 .89 1634
43.0 5 San Diego City 39 83 18 23 23 317 389 .81 1592
42.0 6 Imperial Valley 38 58 15 29 28 318 254 1.25 1463
Rk Team app gs ip h r er era
42.0 1 Imperial Valley 38 38 309.0 483 463 380 11.07
31.0 2 San Diego Mesa 40 40 346.0 431 358 266 6.92
30.0 3 Grossmont 43 43 384.2 459 289 245 5.73
43.0 4 San Diego City 39 39 335.0 353 207 176 4.73
22.0 5 Southwestern 43 43 389.2 445 254 189 4.37
79.0 6 Palomar 42 42 373.1 339 193 160 3.86
Rk Team app gs k k/9 hr whip
79.0 1 Palomar 42 42 375 9.04 21 -
43.0 2 San Diego City 39 39 311 8.36 16 -
42.0 3 Imperial Valley 38 38 190 5.53 30 -
31.0 4 San Diego Mesa 40 40 267 6.95 35 -
30.0 5 Grossmont 43 43 287 6.71 23 -
22.0 6 Southwestern 43 43 310 7.16 20 -
Rk Team gp tc po a e pb f%
43.0 1 San Diego City 39 1355 1005 312 38 8 .972
79.0 2 Palomar 42 1551 1117 383 51 16 .967
30.0 3 Grossmont 43 1653 1154 437 62 21 .962
22.0 4 Southwestern 43 1655 1168 418 69 20 .958
31.0 5 San Diego Mesa 40 1502 1038 384 80 3 .947
42.0 6 Imperial Valley 38 1393 926 390 77 28 .945
Rk Team gp dp sba rcs rcs% ci
22.0 1 Southwestern 43 32 39 15 .278 0
43.0 2 San Diego City 39 27 50 17 .254 0
31.0 3 San Diego Mesa 40 23 31 9 .225 0
30.0 4 Grossmont 43 31 54 15 .217 0
79.0 5 Palomar 42 28 30 5 .143 3
42.0 6 Imperial Valley 38 30 86 9 .095 0
Rk Team home games attend avg
22.0 1 Southwestern 22 1,884 86
31.0 2 San Diego Mesa 20 1,320 66
43.0 3 San Diego City 20 980 49
30.0 4 Grossmont 16 685 43
79.0 5 Palomar 20 456 23
42.0 6 Imperial Valley 20 310 16
Rk Team gp ab h rbi bb k avg obp slg
54.0 1 Palomar 25 974 362 279 117 143 .372 .463 .569
17.0 2 Southwestern 25 908 262 158 145 189 .289 .403 .385
20.0 3 Grossmont 25 920 274 190 131 161 .298 .408 .485
23.0 4 San Diego Mesa 25 833 240 148 110 156 .288 .400 .415
28.0 5 San Diego City 25 847 228 138 97 160 .269 .369 .398
30.0 6 Imperial Valley 25 799 196 72 70 228 .245 .327 .303
Rk Team gp 2b 3b hr xbh
54.0 1 Palomar 25 85 13 27 125
20.0 2 Grossmont 25 53 10 33 96
23.0 3 San Diego Mesa 25 58 6 12 76
28.0 4 San Diego City 25 36 2 23 61
17.0 5 Southwestern 25 43 6 11 60
30.0 6 Imperial Valley 25 32 4 2 38
Rk Team gp r tb sb cs
54.0 1 Palomar 25 316 554 54 9
28.0 2 San Diego City 25 158 337 28 10
30.0 3 Imperial Valley 25 83 242 30 6
23.0 4 San Diego Mesa 25 161 346 23 13
20.0 5 Grossmont 25 211 446 20 7
17.0 6 Southwestern 25 184 350 17 6
Rk Team gp hbp sf sh hdp go fo go/fo pa
54.0 1 Palomar 25 71 25 14 12 231 238 .97 1201
20.0 2 Grossmont 25 52 16 10 23 212 266 .80 1129
17.0 3 Southwestern 25 36 9 13 15 213 239 .89 1111
23.0 4 San Diego Mesa 25 52 11 20 22 205 244 .84 1026
28.0 5 San Diego City 25 44 13 16 13 215 242 .89 1017
30.0 6 Imperial Valley 25 32 9 18 21 214 165 1.30 928
Rk Team app gs ip h r er era
30.0 1 Imperial Valley 25 25 206.0 337 313 260 11.36
23.0 2 San Diego Mesa 25 25 217.0 279 232 166 6.88
20.0 3 Grossmont 25 25 226.0 269 177 151 6.01
28.0 4 San Diego City 25 25 215.0 245 148 126 5.27
17.0 5 Southwestern 25 25 228.0 243 133 93 3.67
54.0 6 Palomar 25 25 223.0 189 110 87 3.51
Rk Team app gs k k/9 hr whip
54.0 1 Palomar 25 25 222 8.96 17 -
28.0 2 San Diego City 25 25 175 7.33 14 -
30.0 3 Imperial Valley 25 25 124 5.42 22 -
23.0 4 San Diego Mesa 25 25 164 6.80 23 -
20.0 5 Grossmont 25 25 163 6.49 17 -
17.0 6 Southwestern 25 25 189 7.46 15 -
Rk Team gp tc po a e pb f%
28.0 1 San Diego City 25 874 645 207 22 3 .975
54.0 2 Palomar 25 925 666 228 31 8 .966
20.0 3 Grossmont 25 1005 678 283 44 12 .956
17.0 4 Southwestern 25 981 684 258 39 7 .960
23.0 5 San Diego Mesa 25 952 651 249 52 2 .945
30.0 6 Imperial Valley 25 929 618 252 59 16 .936
Rk Team gp dp sba rcs rcs% ci
17.0 1 Southwestern 25 18 25 11 .306 0
28.0 2 San Diego City 25 18 26 12 .316 0
23.0 3 San Diego Mesa 25 13 23 7 .233 0
20.0 4 Grossmont 25 20 24 12 .333 0
54.0 5 Palomar 25 15 20 1 .048 1
30.0 6 Imperial Valley 25 22 54 6 .100 0
Rk Team home games attend avg
17.0 1 Southwestern 13 1,036 80
23.0 2 San Diego Mesa 12 872 73
28.0 3 San Diego City 13 905 70
20.0 4 Grossmont 12 610 51
54.0 5 Palomar 11 56 6
30.0 6 Imperial Valley 14 230 17