California Community College Athletic Association

Team Stats

Rk	Team	gp	ab	h	rbi	bb	k	avg	obp	slg
3.8571428571428577 1	Palomar	42	1598	566	411	217	243	.354	.450	.523
4.365269461077844 2	Southwestern	43	1552	449	254	211	321	.289	.394	.385
5.732235701906412 3	Grossmont	43	1558	445	296	216	293	.286	.392	.438
6.91907514450867 4	San Diego Mesa	40	1335	379	212	167	280	.284	.387	.420
4.728358208955224 5	San Diego City	39	1311	370	229	157	230	.282	.389	.426
11.067961165048544 6	Imperial Valley	38	1227	316	159	134	338	.258	.354	.334

Rk	Team	gp	2b	3b	hr	xbh
3.8571428571428577 1	Palomar	42	116	20	38	174
5.732235701906412 2	Grossmont	43	88	12	42	142
6.91907514450867 3	San Diego Mesa	40	103	11	19	133
4.728358208955224 4	San Diego City	39	71	8	34	113
4.365269461077844 5	Southwestern	43	80	10	16	106
11.067961165048544 6	Imperial Valley	38	58	9	6	73

Rk	Team	gp	r	tb	sb	cs
3.8571428571428577 1	Palomar	42	471	836	79	19
5.732235701906412 2	Grossmont	43	333	683	30	12
4.365269461077844 3	Southwestern	43	293	597	22	8
4.728358208955224 4	San Diego City	39	265	559	43	20
6.91907514450867 5	San Diego Mesa	40	231	561	31	15
11.067961165048544 6	Imperial Valley	38	182	410	42	9

Rk	Team	gp	hbp	sf	sh	hdp	go	fo	go/fo	pa
3.8571428571428577 1	Palomar	42	91	35	22	19	387	401	.97	1963
5.732235701906412 2	Grossmont	43	71	22	17	37	360	432	.83	1884
4.365269461077844 3	Southwestern	43	65	13	20	35	380	394	.96	1861
6.91907514450867 4	San Diego Mesa	40	72	24	36	34	333	373	.89	1634
4.728358208955224 5	San Diego City	39	83	18	23	23	317	389	.81	1592
11.067961165048544 6	Imperial Valley	38	58	15	29	28	318	254	1.25	1463

Rk	Team	app	gs	ip	h	r	er	era
11.067961165048544 1	Imperial Valley	38	38	309.0	483	463	380	11.07
6.91907514450867 2	San Diego Mesa	40	40	346.0	431	358	266	6.92
5.732235701906412 3	Grossmont	43	43	384.2	459	289	245	5.73
4.728358208955224 4	San Diego City	39	39	335.0	353	207	176	4.73
4.365269461077844 5	Southwestern	43	43	389.2	445	254	189	4.37
3.8571428571428577 6	Palomar	42	42	373.1	339	193	160	3.86

Rk	Team	app	gs	k	k/9	hr	whip
3.8571428571428577 1	Palomar	42	42	375	9.04	21	-
4.365269461077844 2	Southwestern	43	43	310	7.16	20	-
4.728358208955224 3	San Diego City	39	39	311	8.36	16	-
5.732235701906412 4	Grossmont	43	43	287	6.71	23	-
6.91907514450867 5	San Diego Mesa	40	40	267	6.95	35	-
11.067961165048544 6	Imperial Valley	38	38	190	5.53	30	-

Rk	Team	gp	tc	po	a	e	pb	f%
4.728358208955224 1	San Diego City	39	1355	1005	312	38	8	.972
3.8571428571428577 2	Palomar	42	1551	1117	383	51	16	.967
5.732235701906412 3	Grossmont	43	1653	1154	437	62	21	.962
4.365269461077844 4	Southwestern	43	1655	1168	418	69	20	.958
6.91907514450867 5	San Diego Mesa	40	1502	1038	384	80	3	.947
11.067961165048544 6	Imperial Valley	38	1393	926	390	77	28	.945

Rk	Team	gp	dp	sba	rcs	rcs%	ci
4.365269461077844 1	Southwestern	43	32	39	15	.278	0
4.728358208955224 2	San Diego City	39	27	50	17	.254	0
6.91907514450867 3	San Diego Mesa	40	23	31	9	.225	0
5.732235701906412 4	Grossmont	43	31	54	15	.217	0
3.8571428571428577 5	Palomar	42	28	30	5	.143	3
11.067961165048544 6	Imperial Valley	38	30	86	9	.095	0

Rk	Team	home games	attend	avg
4.365269461077844 1	Southwestern	22	1,884	86
6.91907514450867 2	San Diego Mesa	20	1,320	66
4.728358208955224 3	San Diego City	20	980	49
5.732235701906412 4	Grossmont	16	685	43
3.8571428571428577 5	Palomar	20	456	23
11.067961165048544 6	Imperial Valley	20	310	16

Rk	Team	gp	ab	h	rbi	bb	k	avg	obp	slg
3.5112107623318387 1	Palomar	25	974	362	279	117	143	.372	.463	.569
3.6710526315789473 2	Southwestern	25	908	262	158	145	189	.289	.403	.385
6.013274336283186 3	Grossmont	25	920	274	190	131	161	.298	.408	.485
6.88479262672811 4	San Diego Mesa	25	833	240	148	110	156	.288	.400	.415
5.274418604651163 5	San Diego City	25	847	228	138	97	160	.269	.369	.398
11.359223300970875 6	Imperial Valley	25	799	196	72	70	228	.245	.327	.303

Rk	Team	gp	2b	3b	hr	xbh
3.5112107623318387 1	Palomar	25	85	13	27	125
6.013274336283186 2	Grossmont	25	53	10	33	96
6.88479262672811 3	San Diego Mesa	25	58	6	12	76
5.274418604651163 4	San Diego City	25	36	2	23	61
3.6710526315789473 5	Southwestern	25	43	6	11	60
11.359223300970875 6	Imperial Valley	25	32	4	2	38

Rk	Team	gp	r	tb	sb	cs
3.5112107623318387 1	Palomar	25	316	554	54	9
6.013274336283186 2	Grossmont	25	211	446	20	7
3.6710526315789473 3	Southwestern	25	184	350	17	6
5.274418604651163 4	San Diego City	25	158	337	28	10
6.88479262672811 5	San Diego Mesa	25	161	346	23	13
11.359223300970875 6	Imperial Valley	25	83	242	30	6

Rk	Team	gp	hbp	sf	sh	hdp	go	fo	go/fo	pa
3.5112107623318387 1	Palomar	25	71	25	14	12	231	238	.97	1201
6.013274336283186 2	Grossmont	25	52	16	10	23	212	266	.80	1129
3.6710526315789473 3	Southwestern	25	36	9	13	15	213	239	.89	1111
6.88479262672811 4	San Diego Mesa	25	52	11	20	22	205	244	.84	1026
5.274418604651163 5	San Diego City	25	44	13	16	13	215	242	.89	1017
11.359223300970875 6	Imperial Valley	25	32	9	18	21	214	165	1.30	928

Rk	Team	app	gs	ip	h	r	er	era
11.359223300970875 1	Imperial Valley	25	25	206.0	337	313	260	11.36
6.88479262672811 2	San Diego Mesa	25	25	217.0	279	232	166	6.88
6.013274336283186 3	Grossmont	25	25	226.0	269	177	151	6.01
5.274418604651163 4	San Diego City	25	25	215.0	245	148	126	5.27
3.6710526315789473 5	Southwestern	25	25	228.0	243	133	93	3.67
3.5112107623318387 6	Palomar	25	25	223.0	189	110	87	3.51

Rk	Team	app	gs	k	k/9	hr	whip
3.5112107623318387 1	Palomar	25	25	222	8.96	17	-
3.6710526315789473 2	Southwestern	25	25	189	7.46	15	-
5.274418604651163 3	San Diego City	25	25	175	7.33	14	-
6.013274336283186 4	Grossmont	25	25	163	6.49	17	-
6.88479262672811 5	San Diego Mesa	25	25	164	6.80	23	-
11.359223300970875 6	Imperial Valley	25	25	124	5.42	22	-

Rk	Team	gp	tc	po	a	e	pb	f%
5.274418604651163 1	San Diego City	25	874	645	207	22	3	.975
3.5112107623318387 2	Palomar	25	925	666	228	31	8	.966
6.013274336283186 3	Grossmont	25	1005	678	283	44	12	.956
3.6710526315789473 4	Southwestern	25	981	684	258	39	7	.960
6.88479262672811 5	San Diego Mesa	25	952	651	249	52	2	.945
11.359223300970875 6	Imperial Valley	25	929	618	252	59	16	.936

Rk	Team	gp	dp	sba	rcs	rcs%	ci
3.6710526315789473 1	Southwestern	25	18	25	11	.306	0
5.274418604651163 2	San Diego City	25	18	26	12	.316	0
6.88479262672811 3	San Diego Mesa	25	13	23	7	.233	0
6.013274336283186 4	Grossmont	25	20	24	12	.333	0
3.5112107623318387 5	Palomar	25	15	20	1	.048	1
11.359223300970875 6	Imperial Valley	25	22	54	6	.100	0

Rk	Team	home games	attend	avg
3.6710526315789473 1	Southwestern	13	1,036	80
6.88479262672811 2	San Diego Mesa	12	872	73
5.274418604651163 3	San Diego City	13	905	70
6.013274336283186 4	Grossmont	12	610	51
3.5112107623318387 5	Palomar	11	56	6
11.359223300970875 6	Imperial Valley	14	230	17