Skip to navigation Skip to content Skip to footer
California Community College Athletic Association

Team Stats

Rk Team gp ab h rbi bb k avg obp slg
169.0 1 Fresno City 45 1584 488 320 212 379 .308 .409 .482
127.0 2 Cerro Coso 40 1430 440 303 185 285 .308 .404 .435
155.0 3 Taft 41 1467 427 329 258 404 .291 .413 .475
104.0 4 Sequoias 40 1452 420 266 175 195 .289 .376 .389
102.0 5 Merced 40 1413 405 240 171 268 .287 .386 .395
101.0 6 Reedley 38 1345 365 224 180 295 .271 .370 .381
68.0 7 Coalinga 39 1337 334 155 155 312 .250 .343 .319
42.0 8 Porterville 39 1190 248 83 101 346 .208 .289 .247
Rk Team gp 2b 3b hr xbh
169.0 1 Fresno City 45 105 22 42 169
155.0 2 Taft 41 87 21 47 155
127.0 3 Cerro Coso 40 88 23 16 127
104.0 4 Sequoias 40 79 9 16 104
102.0 5 Merced 40 67 19 16 102
101.0 6 Reedley 38 73 10 18 101
68.0 7 Coalinga 39 53 6 9 68
42.0 8 Porterville 39 40 - 2 42
Rk Team gp r tb sb cs
155.0 1 Taft 41 364 697 56 19
127.0 2 Cerro Coso 40 355 622 42 17
169.0 3 Fresno City 45 354 763 65 18
104.0 4 Sequoias 40 299 565 32 4
102.0 5 Merced 40 277 558 62 22
101.0 6 Reedley 38 261 512 18 3
68.0 7 Coalinga 39 174 426 28 18
42.0 8 Porterville 39 91 294 33 18
Rk Team gp hbp sf sh hdp go fo go/fo pa
169.0 1 Fresno City 45 71 19 23 26 303 415 .73 1909
155.0 2 Taft 41 60 19 15 25 257 361 .71 1819
104.0 3 Sequoias 40 38 18 15 32 391 407 .96 1698
102.0 4 Merced 40 66 15 29 15 357 370 .96 1694
127.0 5 Cerro Coso 40 55 14 9 20 326 337 .97 1693
101.0 6 Reedley 38 42 20 13 25 291 364 .80 1600
68.0 7 Coalinga 39 39 9 8 36 336 317 1.06 1548
42.0 8 Porterville 39 35 1 5 25 304 263 1.16 1332
Rk Team app gs ip h r er era
42.0 1 Porterville 39 39 315.0 531 504 365 10.43
68.0 2 Coalinga 39 39 330.1 509 468 348 9.48
127.0 3 Cerro Coso 40 40 337.0 414 286 229 6.12
101.0 4 Reedley 38 38 326.2 407 279 215 5.92
102.0 5 Merced 40 40 357.1 315 235 189 4.76
155.0 6 Taft 41 41 369.2 358 255 194 4.72
104.0 7 Sequoias 40 40 352.2 400 226 179 4.57
169.0 8 Fresno City 45 45 395.0 346 196 138 3.14
Rk Team app gs k k/9 hr whip
42.0 1 Porterville 39 39 199 5.69 19 2.37
68.0 2 Coalinga 39 39 219 5.97 21 2.33
101.0 3 Reedley 38 38 261 7.19 28 1.80
127.0 4 Cerro Coso 40 40 299 7.99 30 1.67
155.0 5 Taft 41 41 338 8.23 17 1.65
104.0 6 Sequoias 40 40 252 6.43 20 1.49
102.0 7 Merced 40 40 328 8.26 18 1.47
169.0 8 Fresno City 45 45 463 10.55 10 1.33
Rk Team gp tc po a e pb f%
102.0 1 Merced 40 1543 1072 411 60 28 .961
155.0 2 Taft 41 1605 1109 423 73 8 .955
169.0 3 Fresno City 45 1665 1185 401 79 27 .953
104.0 4 Sequoias 40 1488 1058 357 73 1 .951
127.0 5 Cerro Coso 40 1447 1009 359 79 12 .945
101.0 6 Reedley 38 1450 980 371 99 19 .932
68.0 7 Coalinga 39 1472 991 374 107 43 .927
42.0 8 Porterville 39 1395 945 335 115 57 .918
Rk Team gp dp sba rcs rcs% ci
127.0 1 Cerro Coso 40 29 38 21 .356 2
104.0 2 Sequoias 40 26 24 13 .351 1
101.0 3 Reedley 38 29 40 20 .333 -
169.0 4 Fresno City 45 22 39 16 .291 -
102.0 5 Merced 40 25 42 17 .288 -
155.0 6 Taft 41 27 45 14 .237 5
68.0 7 Coalinga 39 35 81 15 .156 -
42.0 8 Porterville 39 15 83 14 .144 1
Rk Team home games attend avg
169.0 1 Fresno City 25 5,897 236
101.0 2 Reedley 18 1,544 86
42.0 3 Porterville 23 771 34
127.0 4 Cerro Coso 20 600 30
155.0 5 Taft 21 565 27
104.0 6 Sequoias 23 0 0
102.0 7 Merced 18 0 0
68.0 8 Coalinga 20 0 0
Rk Team gp ab h rbi bb k avg obp slg
106.0 1 Fresno City 21 775 262 190 110 175 .338 .439 .559
76.0 2 Cerro Coso 21 816 254 188 101 168 .311 .405 .453
87.0 3 Taft 21 771 233 195 142 199 .302 .424 .497
68.0 4 Sequoias 21 802 259 188 107 87 .323 .412 .441
55.0 5 Merced 21 775 235 136 85 144 .303 .394 .412
60.0 6 Reedley 21 775 228 159 112 154 .294 .391 .410
44.0 7 Coalinga 21 719 182 92 87 177 .253 .349 .338
22.0 8 Porterville 21 680 144 46 66 199 .212 .297 .247
Rk Team gp 2b 3b hr xbh
106.0 1 Fresno City 21 66 15 25 106
87.0 2 Taft 21 50 11 26 87
76.0 3 Cerro Coso 21 47 18 11 76
68.0 4 Sequoias 21 50 9 9 68
55.0 5 Merced 21 35 11 9 55
60.0 6 Reedley 21 43 4 13 60
44.0 7 Coalinga 21 34 3 7 44
22.0 8 Porterville 21 21 - 1 22
Rk Team gp r tb sb cs
87.0 1 Taft 21 217 383 33 11
76.0 2 Cerro Coso 21 219 370 12 9
106.0 3 Fresno City 21 209 433 27 11
68.0 4 Sequoias 21 217 354 23 2
55.0 5 Merced 21 158 319 22 12
60.0 6 Reedley 21 186 318 10 1
44.0 7 Coalinga 21 101 243 16 11
22.0 8 Porterville 21 51 168 11 8
Rk Team gp hbp sf sh hdp go fo go/fo pa
106.0 1 Fresno City 21 38 12 8 13 132 201 .66 943
87.0 2 Taft 21 30 13 8 14 135 187 .72 964
68.0 3 Sequoias 21 23 12 8 16 205 221 .93 952
55.0 4 Merced 21 37 9 14 9 188 196 .96 920
76.0 5 Cerro Coso 21 31 6 2 11 171 183 .93 956
60.0 6 Reedley 21 21 16 6 13 158 214 .74 930
44.0 7 Coalinga 21 22 5 4 26 178 164 1.09 837
22.0 8 Porterville 21 17 1 3 17 188 134 1.40 767
Rk Team app gs ip h r er era
22.0 1 Porterville 21 21 179.0 305 289 203 10.21
44.0 2 Coalinga 21 21 180.0 294 268 208 10.40
76.0 3 Cerro Coso 21 21 182.0 260 200 165 8.16
60.0 4 Reedley 21 21 182.2 207 141 109 5.37
55.0 5 Merced 21 21 189.0 182 143 109 5.19
87.0 6 Taft 21 21 191.2 191 128 100 4.70
68.0 7 Sequoias 21 21 185.0 206 103 84 4.09
106.0 8 Fresno City 21 21 185.0 152 86 58 2.82
Rk Team app gs k k/9 hr whip
22.0 1 Porterville 21 21 123 6.18 15 2.36
44.0 2 Coalinga 21 21 123 6.15 16 2.44
60.0 3 Reedley 21 21 166 8.18 13 1.65
76.0 4 Cerro Coso 21 21 155 7.66 22 1.93
87.0 5 Taft 21 21 169 7.94 7 1.58
68.0 6 Sequoias 21 21 147 7.15 9 1.40
55.0 7 Merced 21 21 181 8.62 13 1.53
106.0 8 Fresno City 21 21 239 11.63 6 1.30
Rk Team gp tc po a e pb f%
55.0 1 Merced 21 822 567 218 37 15 .955
87.0 2 Taft 21 840 575 225 40 5 .952
106.0 3 Fresno City 21 757 555 167 35 13 .954
68.0 4 Sequoias 21 774 555 185 34 - .956
76.0 5 Cerro Coso 21 789 544 194 51 7 .935
60.0 6 Reedley 21 805 548 204 53 11 .934
44.0 7 Coalinga 21 795 540 189 66 20 .917
22.0 8 Porterville 21 796 537 186 73 21 .908
Rk Team gp dp sba rcs rcs% ci
76.0 1 Cerro Coso 21 15 25 10 .286 2
68.0 2 Sequoias 21 16 5 6 .545 -
60.0 3 Reedley 21 16 22 10 .313 -
106.0 4 Fresno City 21 7 10 7 .412 -
55.0 5 Merced 21 16 19 9 .321 -
87.0 6 Taft 21 20 14 4 .222 4
44.0 7 Coalinga 21 20 33 10 .233 -
22.0 8 Porterville 21 9 26 6 .188 -
Rk Team home games attend avg
106.0 1 Fresno City 11 2,856 260
60.0 2 Reedley 10 732 74
22.0 3 Porterville 11 684 63
76.0 4 Cerro Coso 11 210 20
87.0 5 Taft 10 390 39
68.0 6 Sequoias 11 0 0
55.0 7 Merced 10 0 0
44.0 8 Coalinga 10 0 0