California Community College Athletic Association

Team Stats

Rk	Team	gp	ab	h	rbi	bb	k	avg	obp	slg
105.0 1	Fresno City	45	1584	488	320	212	379	.308	.409	.482
88.0 2	Cerro Coso	40	1430	440	303	185	285	.308	.404	.435
87.0 3	Taft	41	1467	427	329	258	404	.291	.413	.475
79.0 4	Sequoias	40	1452	420	266	175	195	.289	.376	.389
67.0 5	Merced	40	1413	405	240	171	268	.287	.386	.395
73.0 6	Reedley	38	1345	365	224	180	295	.271	.370	.381
53.0 7	Coalinga	39	1337	334	155	155	312	.250	.343	.319
40.0 8	Porterville	39	1190	248	83	101	346	.208	.289	.247

Rk	Team	gp	2b	3b	hr	xbh
105.0 1	Fresno City	45	105	22	42	169
88.0 2	Cerro Coso	40	88	23	16	127
87.0 3	Taft	41	87	21	47	155
79.0 4	Sequoias	40	79	9	16	104
73.0 5	Reedley	38	73	10	18	101
67.0 6	Merced	40	67	19	16	102
53.0 7	Coalinga	39	53	6	9	68
40.0 8	Porterville	39	40	-	2	42

Rk	Team	gp	r	tb	sb	cs
87.0 1	Taft	41	364	697	56	19
88.0 2	Cerro Coso	40	355	622	42	17
105.0 3	Fresno City	45	354	763	65	18
79.0 4	Sequoias	40	299	565	32	4
67.0 5	Merced	40	277	558	62	22
73.0 6	Reedley	38	261	512	18	3
53.0 7	Coalinga	39	174	426	28	18
40.0 8	Porterville	39	91	294	33	18

Rk	Team	gp	hbp	sf	sh	hdp	go	fo	go/fo	pa
105.0 1	Fresno City	45	71	19	23	26	303	415	.73	1909
87.0 2	Taft	41	60	19	15	25	257	361	.71	1819
79.0 3	Sequoias	40	38	18	15	32	391	407	.96	1698
67.0 4	Merced	40	66	15	29	15	357	370	.96	1694
88.0 5	Cerro Coso	40	55	14	9	20	326	337	.97	1693
73.0 6	Reedley	38	42	20	13	25	291	364	.80	1600
53.0 7	Coalinga	39	39	9	8	36	336	317	1.06	1548
40.0 8	Porterville	39	35	1	5	25	304	263	1.16	1332

Rk	Team	app	gs	ip	h	r	er	era
40.0 1	Porterville	39	39	315.0	531	504	365	10.43
53.0 2	Coalinga	39	39	330.1	509	468	348	9.48
88.0 3	Cerro Coso	40	40	337.0	414	286	229	6.12
73.0 4	Reedley	38	38	326.2	407	279	215	5.92
67.0 5	Merced	40	40	357.1	315	235	189	4.76
87.0 6	Taft	41	41	369.2	358	255	194	4.72
79.0 7	Sequoias	40	40	352.2	400	226	179	4.57
105.0 8	Fresno City	45	45	395.0	346	196	138	3.14

Rk	Team	app	gs	k	k/9	hr	whip
40.0 1	Porterville	39	39	199	5.69	19	2.37
53.0 2	Coalinga	39	39	219	5.97	21	2.33
73.0 3	Reedley	38	38	261	7.19	28	1.80
88.0 4	Cerro Coso	40	40	299	7.99	30	1.67
87.0 5	Taft	41	41	338	8.23	17	1.65
79.0 6	Sequoias	40	40	252	6.43	20	1.49
67.0 7	Merced	40	40	328	8.26	18	1.47
105.0 8	Fresno City	45	45	463	10.55	10	1.33

Rk	Team	gp	tc	po	a	e	pb	f%
67.0 1	Merced	40	1543	1072	411	60	28	.961
87.0 2	Taft	41	1605	1109	423	73	8	.955
105.0 3	Fresno City	45	1665	1185	401	79	27	.953
79.0 4	Sequoias	40	1488	1058	357	73	1	.951
88.0 5	Cerro Coso	40	1447	1009	359	79	12	.945
73.0 6	Reedley	38	1450	980	371	99	19	.932
53.0 7	Coalinga	39	1472	991	374	107	43	.927
40.0 8	Porterville	39	1395	945	335	115	57	.918

Rk	Team	gp	dp	sba	rcs	rcs%	ci
88.0 1	Cerro Coso	40	29	38	21	.356	2
79.0 2	Sequoias	40	26	24	13	.351	1
73.0 3	Reedley	38	29	40	20	.333	-
105.0 4	Fresno City	45	22	39	16	.291	-
67.0 5	Merced	40	25	42	17	.288	-
87.0 6	Taft	41	27	45	14	.237	5
53.0 7	Coalinga	39	35	81	15	.156	-
40.0 8	Porterville	39	15	83	14	.144	1

Rk	Team	home games	attend	avg
105.0 1	Fresno City	25	5,897	236
73.0 2	Reedley	18	1,544	86
40.0 3	Porterville	23	771	34
88.0 4	Cerro Coso	20	600	30
87.0 5	Taft	21	565	27
79.0 6	Sequoias	23	0	0
67.0 7	Merced	18	0	0
53.0 8	Coalinga	20	0	0

Rk	Team	gp	ab	h	rbi	bb	k	avg	obp	slg
66.0 1	Fresno City	21	775	262	190	110	175	.338	.439	.559
47.0 2	Cerro Coso	21	816	254	188	101	168	.311	.405	.453
50.0 3	Taft	21	771	233	195	142	199	.302	.424	.497
50.0 3	Sequoias	21	802	259	188	107	87	.323	.412	.441
35.0 5	Merced	21	775	235	136	85	144	.303	.394	.412
43.0 6	Reedley	21	775	228	159	112	154	.294	.391	.410
34.0 7	Coalinga	21	719	182	92	87	177	.253	.349	.338
21.0 8	Porterville	21	680	144	46	66	199	.212	.297	.247

Rk	Team	gp	2b	3b	hr	xbh
66.0 1	Fresno City	21	66	15	25	106
47.0 2	Cerro Coso	21	47	18	11	76
50.0 3	Taft	21	50	11	26	87
50.0 3	Sequoias	21	50	9	9	68
43.0 5	Reedley	21	43	4	13	60
35.0 6	Merced	21	35	11	9	55
34.0 7	Coalinga	21	34	3	7	44
21.0 8	Porterville	21	21	-	1	22

Rk	Team	gp	r	tb	sb	cs
50.0 1	Taft	21	217	383	33	11
47.0 2	Cerro Coso	21	219	370	12	9
66.0 3	Fresno City	21	209	433	27	11
50.0 4	Sequoias	21	217	354	23	2
35.0 5	Merced	21	158	319	22	12
43.0 6	Reedley	21	186	318	10	1
34.0 7	Coalinga	21	101	243	16	11
21.0 8	Porterville	21	51	168	11	8

Rk	Team	gp	hbp	sf	sh	hdp	go	fo	go/fo	pa
66.0 1	Fresno City	21	38	12	8	13	132	201	.66	943
50.0 2	Taft	21	30	13	8	14	135	187	.72	964
50.0 2	Sequoias	21	23	12	8	16	205	221	.93	952
35.0 4	Merced	21	37	9	14	9	188	196	.96	920
47.0 5	Cerro Coso	21	31	6	2	11	171	183	.93	956
43.0 6	Reedley	21	21	16	6	13	158	214	.74	930
34.0 7	Coalinga	21	22	5	4	26	178	164	1.09	837
21.0 8	Porterville	21	17	1	3	17	188	134	1.40	767

Rk	Team	app	gs	ip	h	r	er	era
21.0 1	Porterville	21	21	179.0	305	289	203	10.21
34.0 2	Coalinga	21	21	180.0	294	268	208	10.40
47.0 3	Cerro Coso	21	21	182.0	260	200	165	8.16
43.0 4	Reedley	21	21	182.2	207	141	109	5.37
35.0 5	Merced	21	21	189.0	182	143	109	5.19
50.0 6	Taft	21	21	191.2	191	128	100	4.70
50.0 6	Sequoias	21	21	185.0	206	103	84	4.09
66.0 8	Fresno City	21	21	185.0	152	86	58	2.82

Rk	Team	app	gs	k	k/9	hr	whip
21.0 1	Porterville	21	21	123	6.18	15	2.36
34.0 2	Coalinga	21	21	123	6.15	16	2.44
43.0 3	Reedley	21	21	166	8.18	13	1.65
47.0 4	Cerro Coso	21	21	155	7.66	22	1.93
50.0 5	Taft	21	21	169	7.94	7	1.58
50.0 5	Sequoias	21	21	147	7.15	9	1.40
35.0 7	Merced	21	21	181	8.62	13	1.53
66.0 8	Fresno City	21	21	239	11.63	6	1.30

Rk	Team	gp	tc	po	a	e	pb	f%
35.0 1	Merced	21	822	567	218	37	15	.955
50.0 2	Taft	21	840	575	225	40	5	.952
66.0 3	Fresno City	21	757	555	167	35	13	.954
50.0 4	Sequoias	21	774	555	185	34	-	.956
47.0 5	Cerro Coso	21	789	544	194	51	7	.935
43.0 6	Reedley	21	805	548	204	53	11	.934
34.0 7	Coalinga	21	795	540	189	66	20	.917
21.0 8	Porterville	21	796	537	186	73	21	.908

Rk	Team	gp	dp	sba	rcs	rcs%	ci
47.0 1	Cerro Coso	21	15	25	10	.286	2
50.0 2	Sequoias	21	16	5	6	.545	-
43.0 3	Reedley	21	16	22	10	.313	-
66.0 4	Fresno City	21	7	10	7	.412	-
35.0 5	Merced	21	16	19	9	.321	-
50.0 6	Taft	21	20	14	4	.222	4
34.0 7	Coalinga	21	20	33	10	.233	-
21.0 8	Porterville	21	9	26	6	.188	-

Rk	Team	home games	attend	avg
66.0 1	Fresno City	11	2,856	260
43.0 2	Reedley	10	732	74
21.0 3	Porterville	11	684	63
47.0 4	Cerro Coso	11	210	20
50.0 5	Taft	10	390	39
50.0 5	Sequoias	11	0	0
35.0 7	Merced	10	0	0
34.0 8	Coalinga	10	0	0