Skip to navigation Skip to content Skip to footer
California Community College Athletic Association

Team Stats

Rk Team gp fg pct 3pt pct ft pct pts
133-428 1 Taft 24 411-1195 34.4 91-278 32.7 266-497 53.5 49.4
163-522 2 Porterville 27 570-1694 33.6 142-548 25.9 221-350 63.1 55.7
143-552 3 Reedley 24 456-1264 36.1 126-432 29.2 252-499 50.5 56.7
139-477 4 Sequoias 29 700-1770 39.5 80-329 24.3 317-551 57.5 62.0
137-467 5 Merced 29 692-1754 39.5 126-434 29.0 350-567 61.7 64.1
148-570 6 Lemoore 29 736-1588 46.3 69-251 27.5 369-596 61.9 67.9
99-427 7 Fresno City 33 1023-2363 43.3 295-906 32.6 481-711 67.7 85.5
Rk Team gp off def reb mrgn
143-552 1 Reedley 24 8.8 24.0 32.8 -7.4
133-428 2 Taft 24 10.1 21.9 32.0 -18.4
163-522 3 Porterville 27 12.9 21.7 34.6 -10.5
137-467 4 Merced 29 13.3 24.1 37.4 0.7
148-570 5 Lemoore 29 13.7 28.2 41.9 9.8
139-477 6 Sequoias 29 14.4 27.6 42.0 7.6
99-427 7 Fresno City 33 15.8 27.2 43.1 7.5
Rk Team gp to stl blk ast
133-428 1 Taft 24 16.4 11.8 4.6 5.8
99-427 2 Fresno City 33 17.2 5.8 2.9 16.8
148-570 3 Lemoore 29 17.9 9.9 2.7 13.2
137-467 4 Merced 29 18.4 11.1 3.0 10.9
163-522 5 Porterville 27 19.9 10.6 3.1 11.4
143-552 6 Reedley 24 21.5 14.0 4.3 8.3
139-477 7 Sequoias 29 23.2 10.2 3.0 12.3
Rk Team gp pf off eff net eff
163-522 1 Porterville 27 14.4 0.730 -0.197
133-428 2 Taft 24 16.8 0.743 -0.214
143-552 3 Reedley 24 18.2 0.748 -0.180
139-477 4 Sequoias 29 15.0 0.781 0.072
137-467 5 Merced 29 16.0 0.851 0.015
148-570 6 Lemoore 29 16.6 0.980 0.196
99-427 7 Fresno City 33 18.1 1.022 0.290
Rk Team gp fg pct 3pt pct pts
99-427 1 Fresno City 33 714-1884 37.9 99-427 23.2 56.8
133-428 2 Taft 24 722-1735 41.6 133-428 31.1 77.3
137-467 3 Merced 29 681-1701 40.0 137-467 29.3 63.6
139-477 4 Sequoias 29 544-1722 31.6 139-477 29.1 54.5
143-552 5 Reedley 24 595-1568 37.9 143-552 25.9 71.6
148-570 6 Lemoore 29 617-1761 35.0 148-570 26.0 58.9
163-522 7 Porterville 27 756-1793 42.2 163-522 31.2 71.4
Rk Team gp off def reb mrgn
148-570 1 Lemoore 29 12.2 19.9 32.1 9.8
139-477 2 Sequoias 29 12.2 22.2 34.4 7.6
99-427 3 Fresno City 33 11.6 23.9 35.5 7.5
137-467 4 Merced 29 12.0 24.8 36.8 0.7
143-552 5 Reedley 24 15.3 24.9 40.2 -7.4
163-522 6 Porterville 27 16.7 28.4 45.1 -10.5
133-428 7 Taft 24 17.9 32.5 50.4 -18.4
Rk Team gp to stl blk ast
133-428 1 Taft 24 16.4 6.5 3.0 15.0
148-570 2 Lemoore 29 16.8 8.7 3.0 10.2
143-552 3 Reedley 24 17.5 8.2 1.4 13.8
139-477 4 Sequoias 29 19.3 9.5 7.0 9.5
137-467 5 Merced 29 19.7 8.8 2.7 12.2
163-522 6 Porterville 27 20.1 11.2 1.7 15.5
99-427 7 Fresno City 33 23.6 15.8 3.5 9.5
Rk Team gp pf def eff net eff
163-522 1 Porterville 27 13.7 0.927 -0.197
139-477 2 Sequoias 29 16.5 0.709 0.072
133-428 3 Taft 24 16.5 0.957 -0.214
148-570 4 Lemoore 29 16.6 0.784 0.196
99-427 5 Fresno City 33 16.9 0.732 0.290
137-467 6 Merced 29 18.1 0.837 0.015
143-552 7 Reedley 24 18.7 0.927 -0.180
Rk Team gp fg pct 3pt pct ft pct pts
76-250 1 Taft 12 208-543 38.3 46-128 35.9 109-201 54.2 47.7
76-232 1 Porterville 12 243-770 31.6 63-272 23.2 110-166 66.3 54.9
71-298 3 Reedley 12 225-604 37.3 59-199 29.6 120-233 51.5 52.2
58-179 4 Sequoias 12 310-785 39.5 31-144 21.5 148-256 57.8 66.6
43-163 5 Merced 12 270-720 37.5 62-223 27.8 138-219 63.0 61.7
53-204 6 Lemoore 12 313-721 43.4 35-125 28.0 141-250 56.4 66.8
30-124 7 Fresno City 12 386-898 43.0 111-359 30.9 164-241 68.0 87.3
Rk Team gp off def reb mrgn
71-298 1 Reedley 12 7.3 25.8 33.0 -7.1
76-250 2 Taft 12 8.6 22.0 30.6 -18.6
76-232 2 Porterville 12 11.4 21.8 33.3 -13.6
43-163 4 Merced 12 14.3 25.8 40.0 5.5
53-204 5 Lemoore 12 15.8 28.7 44.5 13.1
58-179 6 Sequoias 12 16.5 27.3 43.8 10.6
30-124 7 Fresno City 12 16.8 26.6 43.4 10.1
Rk Team gp to stl blk ast
76-250 1 Taft 12 16.3 12.2 4.4 6.2
30-124 2 Fresno City 12 14.6 4.8 2.6 17.7
53-204 3 Lemoore 12 19.7 9.3 3.5 15.3
43-163 4 Merced 12 17.3 11.1 3.0 9.5
76-232 5 Porterville 12 20.7 10.4 4.3 9.7
71-298 6 Reedley 12 19.1 13.0 3.8 8.8
58-179 7 Sequoias 12 23.4 9.8 3.3 13.9
Rk Team gp pf off eff net eff
76-232 1 Porterville 12 14.9 0.684 -0.259
76-250 1 Taft 12 13.9 0.778 -0.240
71-298 3 Reedley 12 16.8 0.726 -0.185
58-179 4 Sequoias 12 12.9 0.802 0.110
43-163 5 Merced 12 13.6 0.855 0.079
53-204 6 Lemoore 12 17.9 0.899 0.098
30-124 7 Fresno City 12 17.2 1.056 0.392
Rk Team gp fg pct 3pt pct pts
30-124 1 Fresno City 12 218-579 37.7 30-124 24.2 48.0
76-250 2 Taft 12 370-871 42.5 76-250 30.4 79.9
43-163 3 Merced 12 252-641 39.3 43-163 26.4 55.0
58-179 4 Sequoias 12 209-681 30.7 58-179 32.4 54.2
71-298 5 Reedley 12 294-789 37.3 71-298 23.8 67.1
53-204 6 Lemoore 12 254-663 38.3 53-204 26.0 58.3
76-232 7 Porterville 12 358-817 43.8 76-232 32.8 74.7
Rk Team gp off def reb mrgn
53-204 1 Lemoore 12 9.3 22.2 31.4 13.1
58-179 2 Sequoias 12 11.3 21.9 33.3 10.6
30-124 3 Fresno City 12 9.8 23.5 33.3 10.1
43-163 4 Merced 12 10.6 23.9 34.5 5.5
71-298 5 Reedley 12 15.3 24.8 40.1 -7.1
76-232 6 Porterville 12 16.8 30.0 46.8 -13.6
76-250 6 Taft 12 17.5 31.7 49.2 -18.6
Rk Team gp to stl blk ast
76-250 1 Taft 12 13.9 4.7 3.2 15.8
53-204 2 Lemoore 12 17.1 9.9 3.3 9.6
71-298 3 Reedley 12 14.0 6.5 1.8 13.8
58-179 4 Sequoias 12 20.3 11.8 8.2 9.2
43-163 5 Merced 12 18.9 8.0 3.6 10.8
76-232 6 Porterville 12 20.7 12.1 1.7 14.2
30-124 7 Fresno City 12 26.0 17.6 3.1 7.7
Rk Team gp pf def eff net eff
76-232 1 Porterville 12 13.3 0.942 -0.259
58-179 2 Sequoias 12 16.1 0.693 0.110
76-250 3 Taft 12 12.3 1.018 -0.240
53-204 4 Lemoore 12 15.8 0.801 0.098
30-124 5 Fresno City 12 16.3 0.664 0.392
43-163 6 Merced 12 14.9 0.776 0.079
71-298 7 Reedley 12 18.6 0.911 -0.185