California Community College Athletic Association

Team Stats

Rk	Team	gp	ab	h	rbi	bb	k	avg	obp	slg
306.0 1	Fresno City	21	579	195	121	58	58	.337	.404	.528
279.0 2	Sequoias	23	625	205	124	33	44	.328	.367	.446
237.0 3	Porterville	20	498	151	96	73	85	.303	.397	.476
224.0 4	Reedley	25	655	188	99	58	63	.287	.351	.342
192.0 5	Merced	20	504	135	73	64	63	.268	.349	.381
136.0 6	Taft	18	420	109	47	25	91	.260	.301	.324
96.0 7	Coalinga	18	370	75	29	25	78	.203	.257	.259

Rk	Team	gp	2b	3b	hr	xbh
306.0 1	Fresno City	21	46	4	19	69
279.0 2	Sequoias	23	29	15	5	49
237.0 3	Porterville	20	24	4	18	46
192.0 4	Merced	20	23	8	6	37
224.0 5	Reedley	25	27	3	1	31
136.0 6	Taft	18	16	4	1	21
96.0 7	Coalinga	18	16	1	1	18

Rk	Team	gp	r	tb	sb	cs
306.0 1	Fresno City	21	145	306	21	3
279.0 2	Sequoias	23	149	279	6	4
237.0 3	Porterville	20	112	237	12	3
224.0 4	Reedley	25	129	224	69	7
192.0 5	Merced	20	89	192	22	3
136.0 6	Taft	18	61	136	25	7
96.0 7	Coalinga	18	37	96	12	1

Rk	Team	gp	hbp	sf	sh	hdp	go	fo	go/fo	pa
224.0 1	Reedley	25	9	5	29	10	170	130	1.31	756
279.0 2	Sequoias	23	10	8	27	5	115	127	.91	703
306.0 3	Fresno City	21	9	2	9	3	49	52	.94	657
192.0 4	Merced	20	4	10	5	1	88	107	.82	587
237.0 5	Porterville	20	5	1	10	2	41	46	.89	587
136.0 6	Taft	18	0	0	0	1	41	46	.89	445
96.0 7	Coalinga	18	2	-	2	2	44	28	1.57	399

Rk	Team	app	gs	ip	h	r	er	era
136.0 1	Taft	18	18	83.0	249	237	143	12.06
96.0 2	Coalinga	18	18	95.1	210	242	134	9.84
237.0 3	Porterville	20	20	114.2	200	180	117	7.14
224.0 4	Reedley	25	25	158.0	214	138	105	4.65
192.0 5	Merced	20	20	120.2	158	106	74	4.29
306.0 6	Fresno City	21	21	121.0	167	109	67	3.88
279.0 7	Sequoias	23	23	145.2	145	87	76	3.65

Rk	Team	app	gs	k	k/7	hr	whip
136.0 1	Taft	18	18	60	5.06	7	3.72
96.0 2	Coalinga	18	18	35	2.57	12	3.31
237.0 3	Porterville	20	20	28	1.71	7	2.32
306.0 4	Fresno City	21	21	56	3.24	14	1.89
224.0 5	Reedley	25	25	57	2.53	20	1.66
192.0 6	Merced	20	20	75	4.35	2	1.49
279.0 7	Sequoias	23	23	148	7.11	7	1.24

Rk	Team	gp	tc	po	a	e	pb	f%
279.0 1	Sequoias	23	577	432	118	27	1	.953
306.0 2	Fresno City	21	558	348	181	29	3	.948
224.0 3	Reedley	25	706	487	177	42	1	.941
192.0 4	Merced	20	518	359	120	39	9	.925
237.0 5	Porterville	20	596	340	194	62	13	.896
96.0 6	Coalinga	18	554	254	239	61	9	.890
136.0 7	Taft	18	411	250	88	73	42	.822

Rk	Team	gp	dp	sba	rcs	rcs%	ci
224.0 1	Reedley	25	6	12	4	.250	0
192.0 2	Merced	20	2	30	4	.118	0
306.0 3	Fresno City	21	10	18	2	.100	0
279.0 4	Sequoias	23	3	26	2	.071	0
136.0 5	Taft	18	2	50	2	.038	0
237.0 6	Porterville	20	1	38	1	.026	0
96.0 7	Coalinga	18	-	84	-	-	-

Rk	Team	home games	attend	avg
224.0 1	Reedley	13.0	1,054	82
279.0 2	Sequoias	12.0	550	46
192.0 3	Merced	8.0	0	0
306.0 4	Fresno City	7.0	-	-
237.0 5	Porterville	8.0	0	0
136.0 6	Taft	10.0	0	0
96.0 7	Coalinga	10.0	0	0

Rk	Team	gp	ab	h	rbi	bb	k	avg	obp	slg
98.00000000000001 1	Fresno City	6	175	65	36	13	13	.371	.424	.560
61.99999999999999 2	Sequoias	4	111	44	28	4	3	.396	.412	.559
57.0 3	Porterville	5	129	29	23	26	27	.225	.355	.442
76.0 4	Reedley	7	188	63	43	16	16	.335	.391	.404
101.0 5	Merced	6	166	63	43	19	17	.380	.432	.608
32.0 6	Taft	6	127	28	5	7	37	.220	.261	.252
19.0 7	Coalinga	6	119	15	4	10	24	.126	.194	.160

Rk	Team	gp	2b	3b	hr	xbh
98.00000000000001 1	Fresno City	6	18	0	5	23
61.99999999999999 2	Sequoias	4	5	2	3	10
57.0 3	Porterville	5	5	1	7	13
101.0 4	Merced	6	12	7	4	23
76.0 5	Reedley	7	13	-	-	13
32.0 6	Taft	6	4	0	0	4
19.0 7	Coalinga	6	2	1	-	3

Rk	Team	gp	r	tb	sb	cs
98.00000000000001 1	Fresno City	6	52	98	13	0
61.99999999999999 2	Sequoias	4	36	62	0	0
57.0 3	Porterville	5	28	57	2	0
76.0 4	Reedley	7	57	76	35	4
101.0 5	Merced	6	56	101	17	1
32.0 6	Taft	6	10	32	2	3
19.0 7	Coalinga	6	3	19	1	-

Rk	Team	gp	hbp	sf	sh	hdp	go	fo	go/fo	pa
76.0 1	Reedley	7	2	1	6	1	45	26	1.73	213
61.99999999999999 2	Sequoias	4	1	3	8	1	22	23	.96	127
98.00000000000001 3	Fresno City	6	3	0	6	1	7	12	.58	197
101.0 4	Merced	6	1	6	2	-	11	32	.34	194
57.0 5	Porterville	5	0	0	3	-	5	18	.28	158
32.0 6	Taft	6	0	0	0	1	11	16	.69	134
19.0 7	Coalinga	6	-	-	-	-	11	13	.85	129

Rk	Team	app	gs	ip	h	r	er	era
32.0 1	Taft	6	6	28.2	62	70	42	10.26
19.0 2	Coalinga	6	6	32.2	82	82	53	11.36
57.0 3	Porterville	5	5	33.0	37	25	12	2.55
76.0 4	Reedley	7	7	43.0	42	26	17	2.77
101.0 5	Merced	6	6	33.0	34	20	10	2.12
98.00000000000001 6	Fresno City	6	6	37.0	31	15	8	1.51
61.99999999999999 7	Sequoias	4	4	24.0	22	5	4	1.17

Rk	Team	app	gs	k	k/7	hr	whip
32.0 1	Taft	6	6	20	4.88	2	2.90
19.0 2	Coalinga	6	6	12	2.57	4	3.15
57.0 3	Porterville	5	5	5	1.06	2	1.36
98.00000000000001 4	Fresno City	6	6	25	4.73	5	1.32
76.0 5	Reedley	7	7	20	3.26	5	1.40
101.0 6	Merced	6	6	33	7.00	0	1.24
61.99999999999999 7	Sequoias	4	4	21	6.13	1	1.00

Rk	Team	gp	tc	po	a	e	pb	f%
61.99999999999999 1	Sequoias	4	93	71	18	4	0	.957
98.00000000000001 2	Fresno City	6	190	114	72	4	0	.979
76.0 3	Reedley	7	217	135	70	12	-	.945
101.0 4	Merced	6	142	99	33	10	2	.930
57.0 5	Porterville	5	184	97	72	15	4	.918
19.0 6	Coalinga	6	246	115	109	22	6	.911
32.0 7	Taft	6	149	86	34	29	25	.805

Rk	Team	gp	dp	sba	rcs	rcs%	ci
76.0 1	Reedley	7	2	-	1	1.000	-
101.0 2	Merced	6	1	5	2	.286	0
98.00000000000001 3	Fresno City	6	3	3	2	.400	0
61.99999999999999 4	Sequoias	4	1	4	0	.000	0
32.0 5	Taft	6	0	22	0	.000	0
57.0 6	Porterville	5	0	4	0	.000	0
19.0 7	Coalinga	6	-	32	-	-	-

Rk	Team	home games	attend	avg
76.0 1	Reedley	5.0	382	77
61.99999999999999 2	Sequoias	2.0	50	25
101.0 3	Merced	2.0	0	0
98.00000000000001 4	Fresno City	4.0	-	-
57.0 5	Porterville	1	0	0
32.0 6	Taft	2.0	-	-
19.0 7	Coalinga	4.0	0	0