Skip to navigation Skip to content Skip to footer
California Community College Athletic Association

Team Stats

Rk Team gp ab h rbi bb k avg obp slg
546.0 1 Sequoias 42 1147 421 240 84 138 .367 .413 .476
511.0 2 Reedley 42 1149 374 246 115 135 .326 .402 .445
468.0 3 Fresno City 39 1042 339 208 90 121 .325 .391 .449
431.0 4 Porterville 37 985 307 211 112 120 .312 .393 .438
476.0 5 Taft 40 1038 297 167 88 189 .286 .356 .459
335.0 6 Merced 40 1054 276 138 117 148 .262 .344 .318
272.0 7 Coalinga 34 874 218 121 70 204 .249 .317 .311
218.99999999999997 8 Cerro Coso 37 790 180 64 33 154 .228 .278 .277
Rk Team gp 2b 3b hr xbh
476.0 1 Taft 40 53 9 36 98
511.0 2 Reedley 42 67 14 14 95
468.0 3 Fresno City 39 55 13 16 84
546.0 4 Sequoias 42 50 15 15 80
431.0 5 Porterville 37 47 10 19 76
335.0 6 Merced 40 37 8 2 47
272.0 7 Coalinga 34 30 9 2 41
218.99999999999997 8 Cerro Coso 37 16 4 5 25
Rk Team gp r tb sb cs
546.0 1 Sequoias 42 304 546 54 10
511.0 2 Reedley 42 293 511 66 10
476.0 3 Taft 40 204 476 27 4
468.0 4 Fresno City 39 246 468 88 7
431.0 5 Porterville 37 238 431 25 4
335.0 6 Merced 40 172 335 41 3
272.0 7 Coalinga 34 138 272 16 3
218.99999999999997 8 Cerro Coso 37 73 219 9 10
Rk Team gp hbp sf sh hdp go fo go/fo pa
511.0 1 Reedley 42 40 11 34 6 246 178 1.38 1349
546.0 2 Sequoias 42 13 10 75 31 221 140 1.58 1329
335.0 3 Merced 40 16 2 22 7 238 213 1.12 1211
468.0 4 Fresno City 39 25 5 34 4 82 90 .91 1196
476.0 5 Taft 40 28 5 18 3 103 75 1.37 1177
431.0 6 Porterville 37 30 15 24 4 165 143 1.15 1166
272.0 7 Coalinga 34 19 5 12 4 95 41 2.32 980
218.99999999999997 8 Cerro Coso 37 23 4 3 8 161 143 1.13 853
Rk Team app gs ip h r er era
218.99999999999997 1 Cerro Coso 37 37 185.1 465 437 308 11.63
272.0 2 Coalinga 34 34 195.1 343 311 228 8.17
476.0 3 Taft 40 40 239.0 396 288 194 5.68
468.0 4 Fresno City 39 39 245.1 306 154 124 3.54
431.0 5 Porterville 37 37 220.1 254 158 107 3.40
511.0 6 Reedley 42 42 270.2 262 141 103 2.66
546.0 7 Sequoias 42 42 251.0 225 103 87 2.43
335.0 8 Merced 40 40 254.2 229 131 88 2.42
Rk Team app gs k k/7 hr whip
218.99999999999997 1 Cerro Coso 37 37 72 2.72 14 2.88
272.0 2 Coalinga 34 34 51 1.83 14 2.39
476.0 3 Taft 40 40 79 2.31 24 2.05
468.0 4 Fresno City 39 39 98 2.80 17 1.58
431.0 5 Porterville 37 37 151 4.80 13 1.44
511.0 6 Reedley 42 42 258 6.67 8 1.40
546.0 7 Sequoias 42 42 217 6.05 9 1.21
335.0 8 Merced 40 40 267 7.34 3 1.19
Rk Team gp tc po a e pb f%
468.0 1 Fresno City 39 1066 728 299 39 11 .963
546.0 2 Sequoias 42 938 678 221 39 10 .958
335.0 3 Merced 40 1138 751 331 56 14 .951
511.0 4 Reedley 42 1043 717 264 62 24 .941
431.0 5 Porterville 37 1022 664 289 69 18 .932
476.0 6 Taft 40 1078 698 285 95 26 .912
272.0 7 Coalinga 34 901 584 228 89 20 .901
218.99999999999997 8 Cerro Coso 37 874 471 228 175 41 .800
Rk Team gp dp sba rcs rcs% ci
431.0 1 Porterville 37 13 37 5 .119 0
511.0 2 Reedley 42 5 38 5 .116 0
468.0 3 Fresno City 39 11 26 3 .103 0
546.0 4 Sequoias 42 2 38 4 .095 0
476.0 5 Taft 40 12 47 4 .078 0
272.0 6 Coalinga 34 4 59 4 .063 0
218.99999999999997 7 Cerro Coso 37 4 77 4 .049 0
335.0 8 Merced 40 1 68 3 .042 1
Rk Team home games attend avg
511.0 1 Reedley 21.0 1,642 79
546.0 2 Sequoias 15.0 750 50
272.0 3 Coalinga 16.0 50 4
218.99999999999997 4 Cerro Coso 14.0 40 3
468.0 5 Fresno City 19.0 - -
476.0 6 Taft 19.0 0 0
431.0 7 Porterville 18.0 0 0
335.0 8 Merced 15.0 0 0
Rk Team gp ab h rbi bb k avg obp slg
301.0 1 Sequoias 21 603 233 134 44 61 .386 .426 .499
268.0 2 Reedley 21 566 189 143 60 67 .334 .416 .473
263.0 3 Fresno City 21 566 195 125 50 61 .345 .414 .465
243.0 4 Porterville 21 564 168 103 50 73 .298 .365 .431
244.0 5 Taft 21 531 148 85 38 101 .279 .343 .460
209.0 6 Merced 21 598 174 95 63 72 .291 .370 .349
169.0 7 Coalinga 21 541 137 83 35 133 .253 .309 .312
99.0 8 Cerro Coso 21 424 83 24 18 100 .196 .248 .233
Rk Team gp 2b 3b hr xbh
244.0 1 Taft 21 35 2 19 56
268.0 2 Reedley 21 38 7 9 54
263.0 3 Fresno City 21 34 5 8 47
301.0 4 Sequoias 21 31 8 7 46
243.0 5 Porterville 21 29 2 14 45
209.0 6 Merced 21 25 5 0 30
169.0 7 Coalinga 21 17 6 1 24
99.0 8 Cerro Coso 21 6 2 2 10
Rk Team gp r tb sb cs
301.0 1 Sequoias 21 180 301 32 6
268.0 2 Reedley 21 171 268 48 4
244.0 3 Taft 21 99 244 17 2
263.0 4 Fresno City 21 155 263 62 4
243.0 5 Porterville 21 117 243 8 0
209.0 6 Merced 21 115 209 31 2
169.0 7 Coalinga 21 91 169 9 2
99.0 8 Cerro Coso 21 29 99 7 2
Rk Team gp hbp sf sh hdp go fo go/fo pa
268.0 1 Reedley 21 25 8 15 1 127 91 1.40 674
301.0 2 Sequoias 21 4 8 37 - 115 68 1.69 696
209.0 3 Merced 21 12 0 10 5 117 132 .89 683
263.0 4 Fresno City 21 20 4 19 1 49 51 .96 659
244.0 5 Taft 21 15 2 9 1 41 21 1.95 595
243.0 6 Porterville 21 13 6 15 2 84 83 1.01 648
169.0 7 Coalinga 21 10 3 7 1 71 24 2.96 596
99.0 8 Cerro Coso 21 12 1 2 5 75 87 .86 457
Rk Team app gs ip h r er era
99.0 1 Cerro Coso 21 21 105.0 269 271 197 13.13
169.0 2 Coalinga 21 21 118.1 206 174 130 7.69
244.0 3 Taft 21 21 125.0 220 156 103 5.77
263.0 4 Fresno City 21 21 128.1 162 87 75 4.09
243.0 5 Porterville 21 21 131.1 166 115 88 4.69
268.0 6 Reedley 21 21 127.2 109 59 43 2.36
301.0 7 Sequoias 21 21 127.0 92 36 33 1.82
209.0 8 Merced 21 21 139.2 103 59 39 1.95
Rk Team app gs k k/7 hr whip
99.0 1 Cerro Coso 21 21 38 2.53 7 2.92
169.0 2 Coalinga 21 21 32 1.89 9 2.30
244.0 3 Taft 21 21 50 2.80 15 2.13
263.0 4 Fresno City 21 21 54 2.95 8 1.68
243.0 5 Porterville 21 21 88 4.69 11 1.56
268.0 6 Reedley 21 21 138 7.57 2 1.26
301.0 7 Sequoias 21 21 109 6.01 6 0.91
209.0 8 Merced 21 21 156 7.82 2 1.03
Rk Team gp tc po a e pb f%
263.0 1 Fresno City 21 553 385 146 22 8 .960
301.0 2 Sequoias 21 497 364 109 24 4 .952
209.0 3 Merced 21 610 419 159 32 13 .948
268.0 4 Reedley 21 543 382 132 29 8 .947
243.0 5 Porterville 21 598 394 161 43 12 .928
244.0 6 Taft 21 583 375 156 52 15 .911
169.0 7 Coalinga 21 563 354 161 48 18 .915
99.0 8 Cerro Coso 21 547 297 134 116 34 .788
Rk Team gp dp sba rcs rcs% ci
243.0 1 Porterville 21 7 22 2 .083 0
268.0 2 Reedley 21 5 19 4 .174 0
263.0 3 Fresno City 21 5 14 2 .125 0
301.0 4 Sequoias 21 0 19 2 .095 0
244.0 5 Taft 21 7 22 3 .120 0
169.0 6 Coalinga 21 3 27 4 .129 0
99.0 7 Cerro Coso 21 2 58 1 .017 0
209.0 8 Merced 21 1 30 3 .091 1
Rk Team home games attend avg
268.0 1 Reedley 9.0 347 39
301.0 2 Sequoias 10.0 500 50
169.0 3 Coalinga 9.0 50 6
99.0 4 Cerro Coso 12.0 40 4
263.0 5 Fresno City 11.0 - -
244.0 6 Taft 12.0 0 0
243.0 7 Porterville 11.0 0 0
209.0 8 Merced 10.0 0 0