Team Stats

Rk Team gp ab h rbi bb k avg obp slg
0.36704446381865735 1 Sequoias 42 1147 421 240 84 138 .367 .413 .476
0.32550043516100957 2 Reedley 42 1149 374 246 115 135 .326 .402 .445
0.3253358925143954 3 Fresno City 39 1042 339 208 90 121 .325 .391 .449
0.3116751269035533 4 Porterville 37 985 307 211 112 120 .312 .393 .438
0.2861271676300578 5 Taft 40 1038 297 167 88 189 .286 .356 .459
0.2618595825426945 6 Merced 40 1054 276 138 117 148 .262 .344 .318
0.2494279176201373 7 Coalinga 34 874 218 121 70 204 .249 .317 .311
0.22784810126582278 8 Cerro Coso 37 790 180 64 33 154 .228 .278 .277
Rk Team gp 2b 3b hr xbh
98.0 1 Taft 40 53 9 36 98
95.0 2 Reedley 42 67 14 14 95
84.0 3 Fresno City 39 55 13 16 84
80.0 4 Sequoias 42 50 15 15 80
76.0 5 Porterville 37 47 10 19 76
47.0 6 Merced 40 37 8 2 47
41.0 7 Coalinga 34 30 9 2 41
25.0 8 Cerro Coso 37 16 4 5 25
Rk Team gp r tb sb cs
304.0 1 Sequoias 42 304 546 54 10
293.0 2 Reedley 42 293 511 66 10
246.0 3 Fresno City 39 246 468 88 7
238.0 4 Porterville 37 238 431 25 4
204.0 5 Taft 40 204 476 27 4
172.0 6 Merced 40 172 335 41 3
138.0 7 Coalinga 34 138 272 16 3
73.0 8 Cerro Coso 37 73 219 9 10
Rk Team gp hbp sf sh hdp go fo go/fo pa
1349.0 1 Reedley 42 40 11 34 6 246 178 1.38 1349
1329.0 2 Sequoias 42 13 10 75 31 221 140 1.58 1329
1211.0 3 Merced 40 16 2 22 7 238 213 1.12 1211
1196.0 4 Fresno City 39 25 5 34 4 82 90 .91 1196
1177.0 5 Taft 40 28 5 18 3 103 75 1.37 1177
1166.0 6 Porterville 37 30 15 24 4 165 143 1.15 1166
980.0 7 Coalinga 34 19 5 12 4 95 41 2.32 980
853.0 8 Cerro Coso 37 23 4 3 8 161 143 1.13 853
Rk Team app gs ip h r er era
11.633093525179856 1 Cerro Coso 37 37 185.1 465 437 308 11.63
8.170648464163822 2 Coalinga 34 34 195.1 343 311 228 8.17
5.682008368200837 3 Taft 40 40 239.0 396 288 194 5.68
3.5380434782608696 4 Fresno City 39 39 245.1 306 154 124 3.54
3.399394856278366 5 Porterville 37 37 220.1 254 158 107 3.40
2.6637931034482754 6 Reedley 42 42 270.2 262 141 103 2.66
2.4262948207171315 7 Sequoias 42 42 251.0 225 103 87 2.43
2.4188481675392675 8 Merced 40 40 254.2 229 131 88 2.42
Rk Team app gs k k/7 hr whip
2.881294964028777 1 Cerro Coso 37 37 72 2.72 14 2.88
2.3907849829351533 2 Coalinga 34 34 51 1.83 14 2.39
2.0543933054393304 3 Taft 40 40 79 2.31 24 2.05
1.5815217391304348 4 Fresno City 39 39 98 2.80 17 1.58
1.4387291981845687 5 Porterville 37 37 151 4.80 13 1.44
1.3965517241379308 6 Reedley 42 42 258 6.67 8 1.40
1.207171314741036 7 Sequoias 42 42 217 6.05 9 1.21
1.1897905759162304 8 Merced 40 40 267 7.34 3 1.19
Rk Team gp tc po a e pb f%
0.9634146341463414 1 Fresno City 39 1066 728 299 39 11 .963
0.9584221748400853 2 Sequoias 42 938 678 221 39 10 .958
0.9507908611599297 3 Merced 40 1138 751 331 56 14 .951
0.9405560882070949 4 Reedley 42 1043 717 264 62 24 .941
0.9324853228962818 5 Porterville 37 1022 664 289 69 18 .932
0.911873840445269 6 Taft 40 1078 698 285 95 26 .912
0.9012208657047724 7 Coalinga 34 901 584 228 89 20 .901
0.799771167048055 8 Cerro Coso 37 874 471 228 175 41 .800
Rk Team gp dp sba rcs rcs% ci
0.11904761904761904 1 Porterville 37 13 37 5 .119 0
0.11627906976744186 2 Reedley 42 5 38 5 .116 0
0.10344827586206896 3 Fresno City 39 11 26 3 .103 0
0.09523809523809523 4 Sequoias 42 2 38 4 .095 0
0.0784313725490196 5 Taft 40 12 47 4 .078 0
0.06349206349206349 6 Coalinga 34 4 59 4 .063 0
0.04938271604938271 7 Cerro Coso 37 4 77 4 .049 0
0.04225352112676056 8 Merced 40 1 68 3 .042 1
Rk Team home games attend avg
79.0 1 Reedley 21.0 1,642 79
50.0 2 Sequoias 15.0 750 50
4.0 3 Coalinga 16.0 50 4
3.0 4 Cerro Coso 14.0 40 3
3 5 Fresno City 19.0 - -
0.0 6 Merced 15.0 0 0
0.0 6 Porterville 18.0 0 0
0.0 6 Taft 19.0 0 0
Rk Team gp ab h rbi bb k avg obp slg
0.3864013266998342 1 Sequoias 21 603 233 134 44 61 .386 .426 .499
0.3339222614840989 2 Reedley 21 566 189 143 60 67 .334 .416 .473
0.34452296819787986 3 Fresno City 21 566 195 125 50 61 .345 .414 .465
0.2978723404255319 4 Porterville 21 564 168 103 50 73 .298 .365 .431
0.2787193973634652 5 Taft 21 531 148 85 38 101 .279 .343 .460
0.2909698996655518 6 Merced 21 598 174 95 63 72 .291 .370 .349
0.2532347504621072 7 Coalinga 21 541 137 83 35 133 .253 .309 .312
0.1957547169811321 8 Cerro Coso 21 424 83 24 18 100 .196 .248 .233
Rk Team gp 2b 3b hr xbh
56.0 1 Taft 21 35 2 19 56
54.0 2 Reedley 21 38 7 9 54
47.0 3 Fresno City 21 34 5 8 47
46.0 4 Sequoias 21 31 8 7 46
45.0 5 Porterville 21 29 2 14 45
30.0 6 Merced 21 25 5 0 30
24.0 7 Coalinga 21 17 6 1 24
10.0 8 Cerro Coso 21 6 2 2 10
Rk Team gp r tb sb cs
180.0 1 Sequoias 21 180 301 32 6
171.0 2 Reedley 21 171 268 48 4
155.0 3 Fresno City 21 155 263 62 4
117.0 4 Porterville 21 117 243 8 0
99.0 5 Taft 21 99 244 17 2
115.0 6 Merced 21 115 209 31 2
91.0 7 Coalinga 21 91 169 9 2
29.0 8 Cerro Coso 21 29 99 7 2
Rk Team gp hbp sf sh hdp go fo go/fo pa
674.0 1 Reedley 21 25 8 15 1 127 91 1.40 674
696.0 2 Sequoias 21 4 8 37 - 115 68 1.69 696
683.0 3 Merced 21 12 0 10 5 117 132 .89 683
659.0 4 Fresno City 21 20 4 19 1 49 51 .96 659
595.0 5 Taft 21 15 2 9 1 41 21 1.95 595
648.0 6 Porterville 21 13 6 15 2 84 83 1.01 648
596.0 7 Coalinga 21 10 3 7 1 71 24 2.96 596
457.0 8 Cerro Coso 21 12 1 2 5 75 87 .86 457
Rk Team app gs ip h r er era
13.133333333333333 1 Cerro Coso 21 21 105.0 269 271 197 13.13
7.690140845070423 2 Coalinga 21 21 118.1 206 174 130 7.69
5.768 3 Taft 21 21 125.0 220 156 103 5.77
4.090909090909091 4 Fresno City 21 21 128.1 162 87 75 4.09
4.690355329949238 5 Porterville 21 21 131.1 166 115 88 4.69
2.3577023498694514 6 Reedley 21 21 127.2 109 59 43 2.36
1.8188976377952755 7 Sequoias 21 21 127.0 92 36 33 1.82
1.9546539379474943 8 Merced 21 21 139.2 103 59 39 1.95
Rk Team app gs k k/7 hr whip
2.9238095238095236 1 Cerro Coso 21 21 38 2.53 7 2.92
2.2985915492957747 2 Coalinga 21 21 32 1.89 9 2.30
2.128 3 Taft 21 21 50 2.80 15 2.13
1.675324675324675 4 Fresno City 21 21 54 2.95 8 1.68
1.5609137055837563 5 Porterville 21 21 88 4.69 11 1.56
1.2610966057441253 6 Reedley 21 21 138 7.57 2 1.26
0.905511811023622 7 Sequoias 21 21 109 6.01 6 0.91
1.0310262529832936 8 Merced 21 21 156 7.82 2 1.03
Rk Team gp tc po a e pb f%
0.9602169981916817 1 Fresno City 21 553 385 146 22 8 .960
0.9517102615694165 2 Sequoias 21 497 364 109 24 4 .952
0.9475409836065574 3 Merced 21 610 419 159 32 13 .948
0.9465930018416207 4 Reedley 21 543 382 132 29 8 .947
0.9280936454849499 5 Porterville 21 598 394 161 43 12 .928
0.9108061749571184 6 Taft 21 583 375 156 52 15 .911
0.9147424511545293 7 Coalinga 21 563 354 161 48 18 .915
0.7879341864716636 8 Cerro Coso 21 547 297 134 116 34 .788
Rk Team gp dp sba rcs rcs% ci
0.08333333333333333 1 Porterville 21 7 22 2 .083 0
0.17391304347826086 2 Reedley 21 5 19 4 .174 0
0.125 3 Fresno City 21 5 14 2 .125 0
0.09523809523809523 4 Sequoias 21 0 19 2 .095 0
0.12 5 Taft 21 7 22 3 .120 0
0.12903225806451613 6 Coalinga 21 3 27 4 .129 0
0.01694915254237288 7 Cerro Coso 21 2 58 1 .017 0
0.09090909090909091 8 Merced 21 1 30 3 .091 1
Rk Team home games attend avg
39.0 1 Reedley 9.0 347 39
50.0 2 Sequoias 10.0 500 50
6.0 3 Coalinga 9.0 50 6
4.0 4 Cerro Coso 12.0 40 4
4 5 Fresno City 11.0 - -
0.0 6 Merced 10.0 0 0
0.0 6 Porterville 11.0 0 0
0.0 6 Taft 12.0 0 0