Skip to navigation Skip to content Skip to footer
California Community College Athletic Association

Team Stats

Rk Team gp ab h rbi bb k avg obp slg
$value 1 De Anza 26 661 140 43 62 122 .212 .300 .266
.266 2 Ohlone 38 1049 317 182 92 139 .302 .366 .456
.456 3 Chabot 37 1032 341 205 114 112 .330 .404 .477
.477 4 San Mateo 47 1323 510 343 121 64 .385 .446 .562
Rk Team gp 2b 3b hr xbh
$value 1 De Anza 26 25 1 3 29
29 2 Chabot 37 57 17 20 94
94 3 Ohlone 38 71 9 24 104
104 4 San Mateo 47 102 12 36 150
Rk Team gp r tb sb cs
$value 1 De Anza 26 70 176 33 11
11 2 Ohlone 38 213 478 57 11
11 2 Chabot 37 291 492 72 7
7 4 San Mateo 47 403 744 70 11
Rk Team gp hbp sf sh hdp go fo go/fo pa
$value 1 De Anza 26 21 0 7 1 128 117 1.09 751
751 2 Chabot 37 18 8 21 3 103 76 1.36 1193
1193 3 Ohlone 38 16 5 33 8 163 138 1.18 1195
1195 4 San Mateo 47 34 13 40 4 211 204 1.03 1531
Rk Team app gs ip h r er era
$value 1 San Mateo 47 47 296.0 227 94 68 1.61
1.61 2 Chabot 37 37 213.2 233 118 85 2.78
2.78 3 Ohlone 38 38 254.0 289 166 112 3.09
3.09 4 De Anza 26 26 152.2 341 250 130 5.96
Rk Team app gs k k/7 hr whip
$value 1 San Mateo 47 47 130 3.07 12 1.07
1.07 2 Chabot 37 37 93 3.05 9 1.29
1.29 3 Ohlone 38 38 121 3.33 13 1.41
1.41 4 De Anza 26 26 37 1.70 9 2.46
Rk Team gp tc po a e pb f%
$value 1 De Anza 26 663 444 161 58 9 .913
.913 2 Ohlone 38 1143 694 378 71 13 .938
.938 3 Chabot 37 1045 675 315 55 9 .947
.947 4 San Mateo 47 1403 866 483 54 5 .962
Rk Team gp dp sba rcs rcs% ci
$value 1 De Anza 26 8 17 1 .056 0
0 2 Ohlone 38 8 7 1 .125 0
0 2 Chabot 37 12 9 6 .400 1
1 4 San Mateo 47 11 9 8 .471 0
Rk Team home games attend avg
$value 1 De Anza 13.0 0 0
0 2 Ohlone 7.0 0 0
0 2 San Mateo 27.0 257 10
10 4 Chabot 14.0 - -
Rk Team gp ab h rbi bb k avg obp slg
$value 1 De Anza 10 220 32 8 19 57 .145 .239 .182
.182 2 Ohlone 11 302 104 56 23 33 .344 .390 .487
.487 3 Chabot 11 288 86 36 13 46 .299 .338 .399
.399 4 San Mateo 12 352 143 104 28 18 .406 .457 .634
Rk Team gp 2b 3b hr xbh
$value 1 De Anza 10 5 0 1 6
6 2 Chabot 11 10 2 5 17
17 3 Ohlone 11 22 3 5 30
30 4 San Mateo 12 32 6 12 50
Rk Team gp r tb sb cs
$value 1 De Anza 10 14 40 13 3
3 2 Ohlone 11 64 147 9 6
6 3 Chabot 11 49 115 17 2
2 4 San Mateo 12 116 223 14 5
Rk Team gp hbp sf sh hdp go fo go/fo pa
$value 1 De Anza 10 8 0 4 1 44 28 1.57 251
251 2 Chabot 11 5 2 7 3 36 25 1.44 315
315 3 Ohlone 11 1 2 8 1 47 37 1.27 336
336 4 San Mateo 12 8 4 5 - 62 61 1.02 397
Rk Team app gs ip h r er era
$value 1 San Mateo 12 12 75.1 65 27 19 1.77
1.77 2 Chabot 11 11 59.1 75 45 30 3.54
3.54 3 Ohlone 11 11 74.0 80 39 29 2.74
2.74 4 De Anza 10 10 58.2 142 108 49 5.85
Rk Team app gs k k/7 hr whip
$value 1 San Mateo 12 12 29 2.69 4 1.05
1.05 2 Chabot 11 11 21 2.48 5 1.57
1.57 3 Ohlone 11 11 40 3.78 4 1.35
1.35 4 De Anza 10 10 12 1.43 4 2.52
Rk Team gp tc po a e pb f%
$value 1 De Anza 10 255 170 57 28 4 .890
.890 2 Ohlone 11 317 204 99 14 5 .956
.956 3 Chabot 11 305 201 86 18 1 .941
.941 4 San Mateo 12 356 208 134 14 3 .961
Rk Team gp dp sba rcs rcs% ci
$value 1 De Anza 10 3 9 1 .100 0
0 2 Ohlone 11 2 5 1 .167 0
0 2 Chabot 11 2 4 3 .429 0
0 2 San Mateo 12 3 4 0 .000 0
Rk Team home games attend avg
$value 1 De Anza 5.0 0 0
0 2 Ohlone 2.0 0 0
0 2 San Mateo 6.0 0 0
0 2 Chabot 5.0 - -