Team Stats

Rk Team gp ab h rbi bb k avg obp slg
0.28295454545454546 1 Fresno City 26 880 249 195 166 168 .283 .423 .416
0.2755102040816326 2 Reedley 28 980 270 175 152 213 .276 .394 .358
0.26374859708193044 3 Merced 26 891 235 123 89 185 .264 .349 .358
0.2510204081632653 4 Taft 29 980 246 117 93 222 .251 .340 .343
0.24309978768577495 5 Porterville 29 942 229 116 122 212 .243 .343 .312
0.24267782426778242 6 Sequoias 28 956 232 134 110 211 .243 .344 .313
0.23375 7 Coalinga 24 800 187 84 85 186 .234 .342 .294
Rk Team gp 2b 3b hr xbh
83.0 1 Fresno City 26 63 6 14 83
58.0 2 Reedley 28 40 13 5 58
57.0 3 Taft 29 36 9 12 57
52.0 4 Merced 26 32 8 12 52
48.0 5 Porterville 29 38 3 7 48
48.0 5 Sequoias 28 38 1 9 48
40.0 7 Coalinga 24 34 4 2 40
Rk Team gp r tb sb cs
220.0 1 Fresno City 26 220 366 46 17
208.0 2 Reedley 28 208 351 30 8
151.0 3 Sequoias 28 151 299 7 6
146.0 4 Merced 26 146 319 28 6
138.0 5 Taft 29 138 336 27 12
133.0 6 Porterville 29 133 294 23 11
105.0 7 Coalinga 24 105 235 44 8
Rk Team gp hbp sf sh hdp go fo go/fo pa
1206.0 1 Reedley 28 47 10 17 20 226 231 .98 1206
1149.0 2 Taft 29 44 10 22 11 245 253 .97 1149
1127.0 3 Sequoias 28 41 6 14 24 265 226 1.17 1127
1121.0 4 Fresno City 26 56 12 7 10 94 127 .74 1121
1110.0 5 Porterville 29 27 10 9 13 235 259 .91 1110
1036.0 6 Merced 26 33 10 13 15 220 211 1.04 1036
944.0 7 Coalinga 24 48 2 9 10 208 183 1.14 944
Rk Team app gs ip h r er era
4.5 1 Reedley 28 28 248.0 234 157 124 4.50
4.649782923299566 2 Fresno City 26 26 230.1 209 145 119 4.65
5.182550335570469 3 Sequoias 28 28 248.1 284 175 143 5.18
5.783180026281209 4 Taft 29 29 253.2 316 197 163 5.78
6.290190735694823 5 Porterville 29 29 244.2 257 201 171 6.29
7.612334801762115 6 Merced 26 26 227.0 284 209 192 7.61
8.051070840197692 7 Coalinga 24 24 202.1 317 260 181 8.05
Rk Team app gs k k/9 hr whip
2.28830313014827 1 Coalinga 24 24 141 6.27 11 2.29
1.742444152431012 2 Taft 29 29 175 6.21 16 1.74
1.7004405286343611 3 Merced 26 26 178 7.06 27 1.70
1.614441416893733 4 Porterville 29 29 198 7.28 14 1.61
1.578523489932886 5 Sequoias 28 28 211 7.65 13 1.58
1.4556451612903225 6 Reedley 28 28 205 7.44 10 1.46
1.3719247467438493 7 Fresno City 26 26 249 9.73 17 1.37
Rk Team gp tc po a e pb f%
0.9672447013487476 1 Sequoias 28 1038 745 259 34 4 .967
0.9590818363273453 2 Merced 26 1002 681 280 41 15 .959
0.9586994727592267 3 Taft 29 1138 761 330 47 8 .959
0.9554831704668838 4 Fresno City 26 921 688 192 41 7 .955
0.9470802919708029 5 Reedley 28 1096 744 294 58 29 .947
0.9466911764705882 6 Porterville 29 1088 734 296 58 8 .947
0.912472647702407 7 Coalinga 24 914 607 227 80 28 .912
Rk Team gp dp sba rcs rcs% ci
0.42857142857142855 1 Sequoias 28 21 20 15 .429 1
0.30952380952380953 2 Reedley 28 21 29 13 .310 1
0.25 3 Coalinga 24 9 48 16 .250 0
0.25 3 Fresno City 26 16 33 11 .250 1
0.2391304347826087 5 Taft 29 14 35 11 .239 0
0.08333333333333333 6 Porterville 29 10 55 5 .083 0
0.07407407407407407 7 Merced 26 22 25 2 .074 1
Rk Team home games attend avg
89.0 1 Reedley 15 1,334 89
65.0 2 Taft 17 1,100 65
15.0 3 Coalinga 12 175 15
15.0 3 Fresno City 14 200 15
7.0 5 Merced 13 80 7
0.0 6 Porterville 14 0 0
0.0 6 Sequoias 16 0 0
Rk Team gp ab h rbi bb k avg obp slg
0.3178294573643411 1 Fresno City 11 387 123 110 75 59 .318 .441 .483
0.3075221238938053 2 Reedley 12 452 139 105 74 87 .308 .421 .407
0.2930232558139535 3 Merced 12 430 126 69 44 88 .293 .381 .405
0.27533460803059273 4 Taft 15 523 144 76 43 110 .275 .355 .392
0.274703557312253 5 Porterville 15 506 139 59 54 109 .275 .355 .368
0.2624113475177305 6 Sequoias 12 423 111 58 52 84 .262 .357 .329
0.21686746987951808 7 Coalinga 10 332 72 26 33 70 .217 .316 .277
Rk Team gp 2b 3b hr xbh
48.0 1 Fresno City 11 38 4 6 48
30.0 2 Reedley 12 17 11 2 30
35.0 3 Taft 15 19 6 10 35
30.0 4 Merced 12 19 4 7 30
32.0 5 Porterville 15 23 3 6 32
19.0 6 Sequoias 12 14 1 4 19
16.0 7 Coalinga 10 13 2 1 16
Rk Team gp r tb sb cs
119.0 1 Fresno City 11 119 187 20 6
121.0 2 Reedley 12 121 184 22 4
65.0 3 Sequoias 12 65 139 1 2
84.0 4 Merced 12 84 174 21 4
84.0 4 Taft 15 84 205 9 8
63.0 6 Porterville 15 63 186 13 5
38.0 7 Coalinga 10 38 92 11 4
Rk Team gp hbp sf sh hdp go fo go/fo pa
552.0 1 Reedley 12 18 5 3 7 98 94 1.04 552
607.0 2 Taft 15 24 5 12 7 133 122 1.09 607
497.0 3 Sequoias 12 11 1 10 11 109 109 1.00 497
494.0 4 Fresno City 11 18 10 4 3 45 50 .90 494
583.0 5 Porterville 15 12 6 5 8 132 128 1.03 583
505.0 6 Merced 12 20 5 6 2 82 95 .86 505
387.0 7 Coalinga 10 16 2 4 4 89 76 1.17 387
Rk Team app gs ip h r er era
4.5420560747663545 1 Reedley 12 12 107.0 96 63 54 4.54
4.2727272727272725 2 Fresno City 11 11 99.0 82 56 47 4.27
4.640625 3 Sequoias 12 12 106.2 125 72 55 4.64
4.206030150753769 4 Taft 15 15 132.2 159 80 62 4.21
6.209302325581396 5 Porterville 15 15 129.0 144 108 89 6.21
6.388012618296529 6 Merced 12 12 105.2 115 83 75 6.39
6.9609375 7 Coalinga 10 10 85.1 130 107 66 6.96
Rk Team app gs k k/9 hr whip
2.1796875 1 Coalinga 10 10 56 5.91 5 2.18
1.613065326633166 2 Taft 15 15 80 5.43 8 1.61
1.4952681388012619 3 Merced 12 12 89 7.58 8 1.50
1.6356589147286822 4 Porterville 15 15 96 6.70 7 1.64
1.5187499999999998 5 Sequoias 12 12 92 7.76 1 1.52
1.5327102803738317 6 Reedley 12 12 92 7.74 5 1.53
1.3131313131313131 7 Fresno City 11 11 105 9.55 2 1.31
Rk Team gp tc po a e pb f%
0.9623059866962306 1 Sequoias 12 451 320 114 17 2 .962
0.9609544468546638 2 Merced 12 461 317 126 18 11 .961
0.9609507640067911 3 Taft 15 589 398 168 23 3 .961
0.95 4 Fresno City 11 420 297 102 21 6 .950
0.9565217391304348 5 Reedley 12 460 321 119 20 8 .957
0.9431438127090301 6 Porterville 15 598 387 177 34 6 .943
0.9166666666666666 7 Coalinga 10 384 256 96 32 5 .917
Rk Team gp dp sba rcs rcs% ci
0.5833333333333334 1 Sequoias 12 7 5 7 .583 0
0.35294117647058826 2 Reedley 12 10 11 6 .353 1
0.25 3 Coalinga 10 6 15 5 .250 0
0.3333333333333333 4 Fresno City 11 8 12 6 .333 1
0.15 5 Taft 15 7 17 3 .150 0
0.14285714285714285 6 Porterville 15 6 24 4 .143 0
0.14285714285714285 6 Merced 12 6 12 2 .143 1
Rk Team home games attend avg
106.0 1 Reedley 6 631 106
68.0 2 Taft 7 475 68
25.0 3 Coalinga 5 125 25
25 4 Fresno City 6 - -
0.0 5 Merced 6 0 0
0.0 5 Porterville 8 0 0
0.0 5 Sequoias 6 0 0