Team Stats

Rk Team gp ab h rbi bb k avg obp slg
0.2928786359077232 1 Fresno City 29 997 292 230 181 186 .293 .425 .431
0.27849264705882354 2 Reedley 31 1088 303 198 162 231 .278 .392 .367
0.26156941649899396 3 Merced 29 994 260 131 97 207 .262 .346 .356
0.2537174721189591 4 Sequoias 31 1076 273 158 122 224 .254 .354 .329
0.25286259541984735 5 Taft 31 1048 265 133 106 240 .253 .347 .343
0.24287343215507412 6 Coalinga 26 877 213 99 95 200 .243 .350 .308
0.23722275795564127 7 Porterville 32 1037 246 122 135 247 .237 .337 .306
Rk Team gp 2b 3b hr xbh
96.0 1 Fresno City 29 71 8 17 96
65.0 2 Reedley 31 43 13 9 65
60.0 3 Taft 31 38 10 12 60
59.0 4 Merced 29 37 9 13 59
57.0 5 Sequoias 31 43 4 10 57
52.0 6 Porterville 32 41 3 8 52
47.0 7 Coalinga 26 39 6 2 47
Rk Team gp r tb sb cs
257.0 1 Fresno City 29 257 430 51 18
234.0 2 Reedley 31 234 399 30 8
182.0 3 Sequoias 31 182 354 11 6
158.0 4 Merced 29 158 354 29 7
156.0 5 Taft 31 156 359 27 13
139.0 6 Porterville 32 139 317 23 11
122.0 7 Coalinga 26 122 270 46 9
Rk Team gp hbp sf sh hdp go fo go/fo pa
1329.0 1 Reedley 31 49 11 19 22 258 256 1.01 1329
1270.0 2 Sequoias 31 49 6 17 26 297 259 1.15 1270
1259.0 3 Fresno City 29 59 14 8 10 106 136 .78 1259
1236.0 4 Taft 31 50 10 22 12 264 264 1.00 1236
1220.0 5 Porterville 32 27 11 10 13 241 264 .91 1220
1152.0 6 Merced 29 37 10 14 17 251 234 1.07 1152
1035.0 7 Coalinga 26 50 2 11 10 234 195 1.20 1035
Rk Team app gs ip h r er era
4.32 1 Reedley 31 31 275.0 259 169 132 4.32
4.33678756476684 2 Fresno City 29 29 257.1 226 151 124 4.34
5.393462469733657 3 Sequoias 31 31 275.1 326 203 165 5.39
5.598773006134969 4 Taft 31 31 271.2 336 209 169 5.60
6.57478368355995 5 Porterville 32 32 269.2 300 238 197 6.57
7.5059288537549405 6 Merced 29 29 253.0 317 235 211 7.51
8.251134644478062 7 Coalinga 26 26 220.1 347 285 202 8.25
Rk Team app gs k k/9 hr whip
1.344559585492228 1 Fresno City 29 29 284 9.93 18 1.34
1.4327272727272726 2 Reedley 31 31 227 7.43 11 1.43
1.6198547215496368 3 Sequoias 31 31 232 7.58 13 1.62
1.679851668726823 4 Porterville 32 32 216 7.21 17 1.68
1.6956521739130435 5 Merced 29 29 196 6.97 31 1.70
1.7558282208588956 6 Taft 31 31 187 6.20 16 1.76
2.264750378214826 7 Coalinga 26 26 151 6.17 12 2.26
Rk Team gp tc po a e pb f%
0.9664082687338501 1 Sequoias 31 1161 826 296 39 5 .966
0.9597855227882037 2 Merced 29 1119 759 315 45 15 .960
0.9582992641046607 3 Taft 31 1223 815 357 51 10 .958
0.9567307692307693 4 Fresno City 29 1040 769 226 45 9 .957
0.9497114591920858 5 Reedley 31 1213 825 327 61 33 .950
0.9442131557035803 6 Porterville 32 1201 809 325 67 15 .944
0.9108216432865731 7 Coalinga 26 998 661 248 89 31 .911
Rk Team gp dp sba rcs rcs% ci
0.37209302325581395 1 Sequoias 31 21 27 16 .372 1
0.3181818181818182 2 Reedley 31 23 30 14 .318 1
0.25 3 Fresno City 29 18 33 11 .250 1
0.24 4 Taft 31 17 38 12 .240 1
0.23529411764705882 5 Coalinga 26 9 52 16 .235 0
0.09090909090909091 6 Porterville 32 11 60 6 .091 0
0.07407407407407407 7 Merced 29 24 25 2 .074 1
Rk Team home games attend avg
87.0 1 Reedley 17 1,469 87
64.0 2 Taft 18 1,150 64
15.0 3 Coalinga 14 205 15
13.0 4 Fresno City 16 200 13
6.0 5 Merced 14 80 6
0.0 6 Porterville 15 0 0
0.0 6 Sequoias 17 0 0
Rk Team gp ab h rbi bb k avg obp slg
0.32936507936507936 1 Fresno City 14 504 166 145 90 77 .329 .442 .498
0.30714285714285716 2 Reedley 15 560 172 128 84 105 .307 .412 .414
0.28330206378986866 3 Merced 15 533 151 77 52 110 .283 .370 .392
0.27992633517495397 4 Sequoias 15 543 152 82 64 97 .280 .375 .357
0.27533460803059273 5 Taft 15 523 144 76 43 110 .275 .355 .392
0.2396088019559902 6 Coalinga 12 409 98 41 43 84 .240 .337 .311
0.259567387687188 7 Porterville 18 601 156 65 67 144 .260 .342 .348
Rk Team gp 2b 3b hr xbh
61.0 1 Fresno City 14 46 6 9 61
37.0 2 Reedley 15 20 11 6 37
35.0 3 Taft 15 19 6 10 35
37.0 4 Merced 15 24 5 8 37
28.0 5 Sequoias 15 19 4 5 28
36.0 6 Porterville 18 26 3 7 36
23.0 7 Coalinga 12 18 4 1 23
Rk Team gp r tb sb cs
156.0 1 Fresno City 14 156 251 25 7
147.0 2 Reedley 15 147 232 22 4
96.0 3 Sequoias 15 96 194 5 2
96.0 3 Merced 15 96 209 22 5
84.0 5 Taft 15 84 205 9 8
69.0 6 Porterville 18 69 209 13 5
55.0 7 Coalinga 12 55 127 13 5
Rk Team gp hbp sf sh hdp go fo go/fo pa
675.0 1 Reedley 15 20 6 5 9 130 119 1.09 675
640.0 2 Sequoias 15 19 1 13 13 141 142 .99 640
632.0 3 Fresno City 14 21 12 5 3 57 59 .97 632
607.0 4 Taft 15 24 5 12 7 133 122 1.09 607
693.0 5 Porterville 18 12 7 6 8 138 133 1.04 693
621.0 6 Merced 15 24 5 7 4 113 118 .96 621
478.0 7 Coalinga 12 18 2 6 4 115 88 1.31 478
Rk Team app gs ip h r er era
4.164179104477612 1 Reedley 15 15 134.0 121 75 62 4.16
3.714285714285714 2 Fresno City 14 14 126.0 99 62 52 3.71
5.184538653366585 3 Sequoias 15 15 133.2 167 100 77 5.18
4.206030150753769 4 Taft 15 15 132.2 159 80 62 4.21
6.720779220779221 5 Porterville 18 18 154.0 187 145 115 6.72
6.425316455696203 6 Merced 15 15 131.2 148 109 94 6.43
7.577419354838709 7 Coalinga 12 12 103.1 160 132 87 7.58
Rk Team app gs k k/9 hr whip
1.2698412698412698 1 Fresno City 14 14 140 10.00 3 1.27
1.4701492537313432 2 Reedley 15 15 114 7.66 6 1.47
1.6159600997506236 3 Sequoias 15 15 113 7.61 1 1.62
1.7467532467532467 4 Porterville 18 18 114 6.66 10 1.75
1.5265822784810128 5 Merced 15 15 107 7.31 12 1.53
1.613065326633166 6 Taft 15 15 80 5.43 8 1.61
2.1483870967741936 7 Coalinga 12 12 66 5.75 6 2.15
Rk Team gp tc po a e pb f%
0.9616724738675958 1 Sequoias 15 574 401 151 22 3 .962
0.9619377162629758 2 Merced 15 578 395 161 22 11 .962
0.9609507640067911 3 Taft 15 589 398 168 23 3 .961
0.9536178107606679 4 Fresno City 14 539 378 136 25 8 .954
0.9601386481802426 5 Reedley 15 577 402 152 23 12 .960
0.939521800281294 6 Porterville 18 711 462 206 43 13 .940
0.9123931623931624 7 Coalinga 12 468 310 117 41 8 .912
Rk Team gp dp sba rcs rcs% ci
0.4 1 Sequoias 15 7 12 8 .400 0
0.3684210526315789 2 Reedley 15 12 12 7 .368 1
0.3333333333333333 3 Fresno City 14 10 12 6 .333 1
0.15 4 Taft 15 7 17 3 .150 0
0.20833333333333334 5 Coalinga 12 6 19 5 .208 0
0.14705882352941177 6 Porterville 18 7 29 5 .147 0
0.14285714285714285 7 Merced 15 8 12 2 .143 1
Rk Team home games attend avg
96.0 1 Reedley 8 766 96
68.0 2 Taft 7 475 68
23.0 3 Coalinga 7 155 23
23 4 Fresno City 8 - -
0.0 5 Merced 7 0 0
0.0 5 Porterville 9 0 0
0.0 5 Sequoias 7 0 0