California Community College Athletic Association

Team Stats

Rk	Team	gp	ab	h	rbi	bb	k	avg	obp	slg
104.0 1	Reedley	46	1666	522	329	200	314	.313	.398	.444
94.0 2	Fresno City	46	1635	494	348	267	341	.302	.416	.454
60.0 3	Coalinga	37	1315	384	216	143	299	.292	.383	.384
67.0 4	Merced	43	1532	443	293	211	310	.289	.392	.386
78.0 5	Sequoias	41	1447	400	214	174	300	.276	.374	.367
63.0 6	Taft	40	1366	366	200	167	279	.268	.366	.372
65.0 7	Porterville	40	1378	361	176	178	315	.262	.367	.329

Rk	Team	gp	2b	3b	hr	xbh
104.0 1	Reedley	46	104	18	26	148
94.0 2	Fresno City	46	94	8	46	148
78.0 3	Sequoias	41	78	7	13	98
67.0 4	Merced	43	67	12	19	98
65.0 5	Porterville	40	65	5	6	76
63.0 6	Taft	40	63	8	21	92
60.0 7	Coalinga	37	60	8	15	83

Rk	Team	gp	r	tb	sb	cs
94.0 1	Fresno City	46	395	742	49	16
104.0 2	Reedley	46	383	740	28	8
67.0 3	Merced	43	348	591	51	8
78.0 4	Sequoias	41	250	531	23	17
60.0 5	Coalinga	37	242	505	77	22
63.0 6	Taft	40	229	508	67	24
65.0 7	Porterville	40	205	454	25	9

Rk	Team	gp	hbp	sf	sh	hdp	go	fo	go/fo	pa
94.0 1	Fresno City	46	74	32	15	21	275	276	1.00	2023
104.0 2	Reedley	46	55	29	34	16	392	384	1.02	1984
67.0 3	Merced	43	63	21	42	9	404	344	1.17	1869
78.0 4	Sequoias	41	57	11	18	23	372	320	1.16	1707
65.0 5	Porterville	40	60	14	11	25	333	334	1.00	1641
63.0 6	Taft	40	54	16	21	24	338	355	.95	1624
60.0 7	Coalinga	37	63	21	16	7	329	267	1.23	1558

Rk	Team	app	gs	ip	h	r	er	era
65.0 1	Porterville	40	40	336.0	478	501	418	11.20
60.0 2	Coalinga	37	37	325.0	436	340	287	7.95
63.0 3	Taft	40	40	350.0	433	294	245	6.30
67.0 4	Merced	43	43	387.0	402	264	251	5.84
78.0 5	Sequoias	41	41	364.1	449	272	220	5.43
104.0 6	Reedley	46	46	409.1	418	280	214	4.71
94.0 7	Fresno City	46	46	411.1	427	225	189	4.14

Rk	Team	app	gs	k	k/9	hr	whip
65.0 1	Porterville	40	40	258	6.91	27	2.39
60.0 2	Coalinga	37	37	273	7.56	13	1.90
78.0 3	Sequoias	41	41	255	6.30	15	1.74
63.0 4	Taft	40	40	269	6.92	23	1.74
104.0 5	Reedley	46	46	351	7.72	28	1.59
67.0 6	Merced	43	43	276	6.42	26	1.51
94.0 7	Fresno City	46	46	387	8.47	14	1.34

Rk	Team	gp	tc	po	a	e	pb	f%
67.0 1	Merced	43	1699	1162	476	61	26	.964
94.0 2	Fresno City	46	1769	1230	473	66	17	.963
78.0 3	Sequoias	41	1581	1092	429	60	18	.962
104.0 4	Reedley	46	1762	1228	458	76	26	.957
63.0 5	Taft	40	1550	1050	433	67	13	.957
65.0 6	Porterville	40	1451	1006	330	115	36	.921
60.0 7	Coalinga	37	1411	978	321	112	26	.921

Rk	Team	gp	dp	sba	rcs	rcs%	ci
78.0 1	Sequoias	41	36	37	16	.302	0
63.0 2	Taft	40	21	46	19	.292	1
60.0 3	Coalinga	37	6	40	16	.286	3
94.0 4	Fresno City	46	39	42	14	.250	0
104.0 5	Reedley	46	24	38	10	.208	1
67.0 6	Merced	43	15	44	11	.200	2
65.0 7	Porterville	40	13	93	15	.139	2

Rk	Team	home games	attend	avg
104.0 1	Reedley	25	2,626	106
63.0 2	Taft	21	1,225	59
94.0 3	Fresno City	23	0	0
78.0 4	Sequoias	24	0	0
60.0 5	Coalinga	21	0	0
67.0 6	Merced	19	0	0
65.0 7	Porterville	19	0	0

Rk	Team	gp	ab	h	rbi	bb	k	avg	obp	slg
43.0 1	Reedley	24	866	257	156	95	154	.297	.381	.411
58.0 2	Fresno City	24	858	274	201	150	165	.319	.434	.498
41.0 3	Coalinga	24	871	274	162	93	180	.315	.399	.418
39.0 4	Merced	24	867	268	200	126	162	.309	.410	.416
44.0 5	Sequoias	24	843	234	127	101	149	.278	.374	.380
49.0 6	Taft	24	849	250	140	94	152	.294	.378	.412
38.0 7	Porterville	24	817	197	82	100	194	.241	.343	.308

Rk	Team	gp	2b	3b	hr	xbh
43.0 1	Reedley	24	43	13	10	66
58.0 2	Fresno City	24	58	7	27	92
44.0 3	Sequoias	24	44	6	10	60
39.0 4	Merced	24	39	9	12	60
38.0 5	Porterville	24	38	1	5	44
49.0 6	Taft	24	49	3	15	67
41.0 7	Coalinga	24	41	5	13	59

Rk	Team	gp	r	tb	sb	cs
58.0 1	Fresno City	24	227	427	29	9
43.0 2	Reedley	24	183	356	15	4
39.0 3	Merced	24	229	361	33	6
44.0 4	Sequoias	24	153	320	15	12
41.0 5	Coalinga	24	181	364	45	11
49.0 6	Taft	24	156	350	40	18
38.0 7	Porterville	24	100	252	14	5

Rk	Team	gp	hbp	sf	sh	hdp	go	fo	go/fo	pa
58.0 1	Fresno City	24	39	20	10	11	132	127	1.04	1077
43.0 2	Reedley	24	30	11	16	6	204	212	.96	1018
39.0 3	Merced	24	32	14	22	3	216	186	1.16	1061
44.0 4	Sequoias	24	33	7	10	9	220	197	1.12	994
38.0 5	Porterville	24	31	8	6	13	204	196	1.04	962
49.0 6	Taft	24	28	12	9	8	200	224	.89	992
41.0 7	Coalinga	24	40	16	14	6	214	172	1.24	1034

Rk	Team	app	gs	ip	h	r	er	era
38.0 1	Porterville	24	24	205.0	316	312	269	11.81
41.0 2	Coalinga	24	24	208.1	296	233	199	8.60
49.0 3	Taft	24	24	208.0	261	176	148	6.40
39.0 4	Merced	24	24	213.0	216	136	128	5.41
44.0 5	Sequoias	24	24	213.0	236	134	110	4.65
43.0 6	Reedley	24	24	213.0	205	128	97	4.10
58.0 7	Fresno City	24	24	213.1	224	110	90	3.80

Rk	Team	app	gs	k	k/9	hr	whip
38.0 1	Porterville	24	24	150	6.59	21	2.37
41.0 2	Coalinga	24	24	160	6.91	11	2.01
44.0 3	Sequoias	24	24	149	6.30	11	1.62
49.0 4	Taft	24	24	175	7.57	13	1.72
43.0 5	Reedley	24	24	166	7.01	14	1.46
39.0 6	Merced	24	24	152	6.42	20	1.47
58.0 7	Fresno City	24	24	204	8.61	2	1.33

Rk	Team	gp	tc	po	a	e	pb	f%
39.0 1	Merced	24	940	639	269	32	14	.966
58.0 2	Fresno City	24	945	639	265	41	12	.957
44.0 3	Sequoias	24	928	639	260	29	8	.969
43.0 4	Reedley	24	933	639	254	40	14	.957
49.0 5	Taft	24	917	624	257	36	8	.961
38.0 6	Porterville	24	873	615	192	66	20	.924
41.0 7	Coalinga	24	917	627	219	71	15	.923

Rk	Team	gp	dp	sba	rcs	rcs%	ci
44.0 1	Sequoias	24	17	15	9	.375	0
49.0 2	Taft	24	10	27	7	.206	0
41.0 3	Coalinga	24	6	22	14	.389	0
58.0 4	Fresno City	24	20	26	10	.278	0
43.0 5	Reedley	24	7	16	6	.273	1
39.0 6	Merced	24	10	20	6	.231	0
38.0 7	Porterville	24	5	65	9	.122	0

Rk	Team	home games	attend	avg
43.0 1	Reedley	12	1,177	99
49.0 2	Taft	12	750	63
58.0 3	Fresno City	12	0	0
44.0 4	Sequoias	12	0	0
41.0 5	Coalinga	12	0	0
39.0 6	Merced	12	0	0
38.0 7	Porterville	12	0	0