Skip to navigation Skip to content Skip to footer
California Community College Athletic Association

Team Stats

Rk Team gp ab h rbi bb k avg obp slg
$value 1 Glendale 22 731 199 127 88 155 .272 .382 .420
.420 2 Citrus 20 683 187 100 82 134 .274 .369 .382
.382 3 Antelope Valley 18 605 181 93 71 111 .299 .387 .415
.415 4 Canyons 19 723 236 154 84 133 .326 .406 .510
Rk Team gp 2b 3b hr xbh
$value 1 Antelope Valley 18 29 7 9 45
45 2 Citrus 20 29 6 11 46
46 3 Glendale 22 44 5 18 67
67 4 Canyons 19 46 9 23 78
Rk Team gp r tb sb cs
$value 1 Antelope Valley 18 107 251 21 8
8 2 Citrus 20 116 261 28 11
11 3 Glendale 22 150 307 61 10
10 4 Canyons 19 164 369 17 5
Rk Team gp hbp sf sh hdp go fo go/fo pa
$value 1 Antelope Valley 18 20 7 14 17 164 139 1.18 717
717 2 Citrus 20 24 6 6 19 147 198 .74 801
801 3 Canyons 19 22 13 4 10 163 188 .87 846
846 4 Glendale 22 50 13 5 3 143 219 .65 887
Rk Team app gs ip h r er era
$value 1 Citrus 20 20 174.1 184 109 70 3.61
3.61 2 Glendale 22 22 190.0 168 118 104 4.93
4.93 3 Antelope Valley 18 18 152.0 203 123 97 5.74
5.74 4 Canyons 19 19 165.0 221 164 135 7.36
Rk Team app gs k k/9 hr whip
$value 1 Antelope Valley 18 18 80 4.74 5 -
- 2 Canyons 19 19 104 5.67 12 -
- 2 Citrus 20 20 158 8.16 8 -
- 2 Glendale 22 22 196 9.28 8 -
Rk Team gp tc po a e pb f%
$value 1 Citrus 20 772 523 200 49 9 .937
.937 2 Glendale 22 800 568 198 34 4 .958
.958 3 Canyons 19 709 495 186 28 7 .961
.961 4 Antelope Valley 18 710 455 231 24 4 .966
Rk Team gp dp sba rcs rcs% ci
$value 1 Glendale 22 6 44 6 .120 -
- 2 Citrus 20 12 23 6 .207 1
1 3 Canyons 19 12 25 10 .286 -
- 4 Antelope Valley 18 23 19 13 .406 -
Rk Team home games attend avg
$value 1 Citrus 11 476 44
44 2 Antelope Valley 11 736 67
67 3 Canyons 9 857 96
96 4 Glendale 11 2,118 193
Rk Team gp ab h rbi bb k avg obp slg
$value 1 Glendale 5 157 40 23 18 42 .255 .385 .312
.312 2 Citrus 4 142 50 28 24 17 .352 .457 .458
.458 3 Antelope Valley 4 136 29 16 13 38 .213 .294 .390
.390 4 Canyons 4 151 50 39 24 22 .331 .421 .556
Rk Team gp 2b 3b hr xbh
$value 1 Antelope Valley 4 8 2 4 14
14 2 Citrus 4 6 3 1 10
10 3 Glendale 5 7 1 - 8
8 4 Canyons 4 5 4 7 16
Rk Team gp r tb sb cs
$value 1 Antelope Valley 4 16 53 1 1
1 2 Citrus 4 33 65 11 1
1 2 Glendale 5 28 49 19 1
1 2 Canyons 4 41 84 9 2
Rk Team gp hbp sf sh hdp go fo go/fo pa
$value 1 Antelope Valley 4 3 1 2 3 35 30 1.17 155
155 2 Citrus 4 5 2 4 3 31 46 .67 177
177 3 Canyons 4 3 5 - 3 33 44 .75 183
183 4 Glendale 5 17 3 1 1 31 35 .89 196
Rk Team app gs ip h r er era
$value 1 Citrus 4 4 36.0 27 12 7 1.75
1.75 2 Glendale 5 5 40.0 37 30 28 6.30
6.30 3 Antelope Valley 4 4 34.0 51 35 28 7.41
7.41 4 Canyons 4 4 36.0 42 19 13 3.25
Rk Team app gs k k/9 hr whip
$value 1 Antelope Valley 4 4 18 4.76 2 -
- 2 Canyons 4 4 26 6.50 2 -
- 2 Citrus 4 4 47 11.75 4 -
- 2 Glendale 5 5 51 11.47 - -
Rk Team gp tc po a e pb f%
$value 1 Citrus 4 149 108 34 7 1 .953
.953 2 Glendale 5 171 120 43 8 2 .953
.953 2 Canyons 4 159 108 43 8 3 .950
.950 4 Antelope Valley 4 157 102 45 10 1 .936
Rk Team gp dp sba rcs rcs% ci
$value 1 Glendale 5 1 13 0 .000 -
- 2 Citrus 4 3 1 - - -
- 2 Canyons 4 1 5 2 .286 -
- 2 Antelope Valley 4 3 4 1 .200 -
Rk Team home games attend avg
$value 1 Citrus 3 148 50
50 2 Antelope Valley 2 118 59
59 3 Canyons 1 150 150
150 4 Glendale 2 226 113