Skip to navigation Skip to content Skip to footer
California Community College Athletic Association

Team Stats

Rk Team gp ab h rbi bb k avg obp slg
2.804577464788732 1 San Mateo 21 746 224 138 105 153 .300 .407 .441
4.431472081218274 2 West Valley 22 765 208 104 89 142 .272 .366 .375
10.16008316008316 3 San Francisco 19 625 161 85 84 158 .258 .361 .318
4.421052631578947 4 Mission 20 674 173 87 87 130 .257 .351 .340
5.622980251346499 5 Chabot 21 706 147 86 102 210 .208 .337 .271
12.465838509316772 6 De Anza 19 609 117 31 45 183 .192 .270 .230
Rk Team gp 2b 3b hr xbh
2.804577464788732 1 San Mateo 21 53 5 14 72
4.431472081218274 2 West Valley 22 43 3 10 56
4.421052631578947 3 Mission 20 33 1 7 41
5.622980251346499 4 Chabot 21 23 3 5 31
10.16008316008316 5 San Francisco 19 27 1 3 31
12.465838509316772 6 De Anza 19 21 1 - 22
Rk Team gp r tb sb cs
2.804577464788732 1 San Mateo 21 157 329 37 7
4.431472081218274 2 West Valley 22 130 287 19 5
5.622980251346499 3 Chabot 21 110 191 33 9
4.421052631578947 4 Mission 20 104 229 30 13
10.16008316008316 5 San Francisco 19 100 199 15 9
12.465838509316772 6 De Anza 19 43 140 31 11
Rk Team gp hbp sf sh hdp go fo go/fo pa
2.804577464788732 1 San Mateo 21 37 12 10 6 160 206 .78 910
4.431472081218274 2 West Valley 22 28 6 9 15 178 227 .78 897
5.622980251346499 3 Chabot 21 39 7 8 14 143 189 .76 862
4.421052631578947 4 Mission 20 16 9 10 11 159 201 .79 796
10.16008316008316 5 San Francisco 19 23 11 16 12 176 128 1.38 759
12.465838509316772 6 De Anza 19 22 5 10 5 129 120 1.07 691
Rk Team app gs ip h r er era
12.465838509316772 1 De Anza 19 19 161.0 250 265 223 12.47
10.16008316008316 2 San Francisco 19 19 160.1 249 207 181 10.16
5.622980251346499 3 Chabot 21 21 185.2 193 138 116 5.62
4.431472081218274 4 West Valley 22 22 197.0 217 127 97 4.43
4.421052631578947 5 Mission 20 20 171.0 163 107 84 4.42
2.804577464788732 6 San Mateo 21 21 189.1 147 78 59 2.80
Rk Team app gs k k/9 hr whip
12.465838509316772 1 De Anza 19 19 98 5.48 12 2.65
10.16008316008316 2 San Francisco 19 19 102 5.73 15 2.28
5.622980251346499 3 Chabot 21 21 179 8.68 8 1.54
4.431472081218274 4 West Valley 22 22 148 6.76 3 1.50
4.421052631578947 5 Mission 20 20 168 8.84 3 1.40
2.804577464788732 6 San Mateo 21 21 217 10.32 2 1.27
Rk Team gp tc po a e pb f%
2.804577464788732 1 San Mateo 21 819 568 228 23 7 .972
4.431472081218274 2 West Valley 22 838 591 217 30 12 .964
5.622980251346499 3 Chabot 21 789 557 197 35 11 .956
4.421052631578947 4 Mission 20 750 513 199 38 10 .949
10.16008316008316 5 San Francisco 19 706 480 189 37 18 .948
12.465838509316772 6 De Anza 19 645 481 112 52 38 .919
Rk Team gp dp sba rcs rcs% ci
4.431472081218274 1 West Valley 22 13 17 10 .370 -
2.804577464788732 2 San Mateo 21 13 15 8 .348 -
5.622980251346499 3 Chabot 21 13 18 5 .217 -
10.16008316008316 4 San Francisco 19 12 47 6 .113 0
4.421052631578947 5 Mission 20 8 66 5 .070 -
12.465838509316772 6 De Anza 19 3 66 5 .070 -
Rk Team home games attend avg
4.431472081218274 1 West Valley 14 877 63
2.804577464788732 2 San Mateo 10 520 52
5.622980251346499 3 Chabot 8 410 52
10.16008316008316 4 San Francisco 7 190 28
12.465838509316772 5 De Anza 10 50 5
4.421052631578947 6 Mission 6 0 0
Rk Team gp ab h rbi bb k avg obp slg
1.8270676691729322 1 San Mateo 5 179 65 43 21 28 .363 .457 .603
4.2 2 West Valley 5 186 61 34 29 26 .328 .425 .435
14.837837837837839 3 San Francisco 5 160 40 14 14 46 .250 .324 .294
0.3333333333333333 4 Mission 3 116 39 29 21 12 .336 .441 .466
4.304347826086957 5 Chabot 5 170 32 17 19 40 .188 .322 .229
9.209302325581396 6 De Anza 5 161 32 6 9 47 .199 .261 .224
Rk Team gp 2b 3b hr xbh
1.8270676691729322 1 San Mateo 5 17 1 8 26
4.2 2 West Valley 5 14 - 2 16
0.3333333333333333 3 Mission 3 12 - 1 13
4.304347826086957 4 Chabot 5 5 1 - 6
14.837837837837839 5 San Francisco 5 7 - - 7
9.209302325581396 6 De Anza 5 4 - - 4
Rk Team gp r tb sb cs
1.8270676691729322 1 San Mateo 5 48 108 7 3
4.2 2 West Valley 5 45 81 6 1
4.304347826086957 3 Chabot 5 24 39 10 1
0.3333333333333333 4 Mission 3 36 54 13 -
14.837837837837839 5 San Francisco 5 18 47 1 2
9.209302325581396 6 De Anza 5 8 36 9 3
Rk Team gp hbp sf sh hdp go fo go/fo pa
1.8270676691729322 1 San Mateo 5 10 - 3 2 34 50 .68 213
4.2 2 West Valley 5 3 1 1 5 38 58 .66 220
4.304347826086957 3 Chabot 5 15 1 - 3 33 59 .56 205
0.3333333333333333 4 Mission 3 4 4 - - 22 39 .56 145
14.837837837837839 5 San Francisco 5 4 1 4 3 51 24 2.13 183
9.209302325581396 6 De Anza 5 5 1 3 3 49 34 1.44 179
Rk Team app gs ip h r er era
9.209302325581396 1 De Anza 5 5 43.0 51 50 44 9.21
14.837837837837839 2 San Francisco 5 5 37.0 79 71 61 14.84
4.304347826086957 3 Chabot 5 5 46.0 47 25 22 4.30
4.2 4 West Valley 5 5 45.0 48 28 21 4.20
0.3333333333333333 5 Mission 3 3 27.0 19 4 1 0.33
1.8270676691729322 6 San Mateo 5 5 44.1 32 13 9 1.83
Rk Team app gs k k/9 hr whip
9.209302325581396 1 De Anza 5 5 30 6.28 1 2.07
14.837837837837839 2 San Francisco 5 5 19 4.62 6 3.05
4.304347826086957 3 Chabot 5 5 40 7.83 1 1.46
4.2 4 West Valley 5 5 38 7.60 - 1.44
0.3333333333333333 5 Mission 3 3 33 11.00 - 0.85
1.8270676691729322 6 San Mateo 5 5 51 10.35 1 1.02
Rk Team gp tc po a e pb f%
1.8270676691729322 1 San Mateo 5 189 133 52 4 1 .979
4.2 2 West Valley 5 189 135 50 4 4 .979
4.304347826086957 3 Chabot 5 190 138 48 4 - .979
0.3333333333333333 4 Mission 3 119 81 36 2 1 .983
14.837837837837839 5 San Francisco 5 162 111 39 12 10 .926
9.209302325581396 6 De Anza 5 179 129 38 12 19 .933
Rk Team gp dp sba rcs rcs% ci
4.2 1 West Valley 5 2 3 1 .250 -
1.8270676691729322 2 San Mateo 5 5 2 2 .500 -
4.304347826086957 3 Chabot 5 2 3 1 .250 -
14.837837837837839 4 San Francisco 5 2 12 - - -
0.3333333333333333 5 Mission 3 3 6 1 .143 -
9.209302325581396 6 De Anza 5 1 16 3 .158 -
Rk Team home games attend avg
4.2 1 West Valley 3 100 34
1.8270676691729322 2 San Mateo 2 100 50
4.304347826086957 3 Chabot 2 80 40
14.837837837837839 4 San Francisco 2 150 75
9.209302325581396 5 De Anza 3 0 0
0.3333333333333333 6 Mission 1 0 0