Skip to navigation Skip to content Skip to footer
California Community College Athletic Association

Team Stats

Rk Team gp ab h rbi bb k avg obp slg
$value 1 West Valley 39 1318 332 180 150 283 .252 .351 .339
.339 2 Chabot 40 1398 377 256 172 314 .270 .382 .395
.395 3 San Francisco 38 1267 343 165 154 290 .271 .371 .350
.350 4 De Anza 37 1292 376 204 183 285 .291 .385 .416
.416 5 San Mateo 45 1556 458 288 233 308 .294 .399 .447
.447 6 Mission 40 1446 470 349 257 263 .325 .437 .499
Rk Team gp 2b 3b hr xbh
$value 1 San Francisco 38 51 11 9 71
71 2 West Valley 39 70 6 11 87
87 3 Chabot 40 61 9 32 102
102 4 De Anza 37 71 11 23 105
105 5 San Mateo 45 106 15 34 155
155 6 Mission 40 104 23 34 161
Rk Team gp r tb sb cs
$value 1 San Francisco 38 192 443 42 21
21 2 West Valley 39 214 447 20 7
7 3 De Anza 37 234 538 73 21
21 4 Chabot 40 280 552 51 14
14 5 San Mateo 45 320 696 62 10
10 6 Mission 40 397 722 85 20
Rk Team gp hbp sf sh hdp go fo go/fo pa
$value 1 San Francisco 38 53 8 22 18 352 280 1.26 1504
1504 2 De Anza 37 30 25 18 21 321 326 .98 1548
1548 3 West Valley 39 58 12 19 19 316 375 .84 1557
1557 4 Chabot 40 93 16 22 17 303 396 .77 1701
1701 5 Mission 40 55 32 18 12 318 392 .81 1808
1808 6 San Mateo 45 51 21 27 24 341 452 .75 1888
Rk Team app gs ip h r er era
$value 1 San Mateo 45 45 399.0 337 203 170 3.83
3.83 2 West Valley 39 39 338.0 345 240 197 5.25
5.25 3 Mission 40 40 351.0 391 276 218 5.59
5.59 4 Chabot 40 40 348.1 415 257 235 6.07
6.07 5 De Anza 37 37 325.1 416 346 273 7.55
7.55 6 San Francisco 38 38 324.2 457 352 296 8.21
Rk Team app gs k k/9 hr whip
$value 1 San Mateo 45 45 355 8.01 17 1.33
1.33 2 West Valley 39 39 284 7.56 15 1.57
1.57 3 Mission 40 40 291 7.46 18 1.60
1.60 4 Chabot 40 40 287 7.42 22 1.66
1.66 5 De Anza 37 37 249 6.89 31 1.90
1.90 6 San Francisco 38 38 127 3.52 25 1.98
Rk Team gp tc po a e pb f%
$value 1 De Anza 37 1411 976 350 85 30 .940
.940 2 San Francisco 38 1430 974 386 70 12 .951
.951 3 Mission 40 1508 1053 382 73 9 .952
.952 4 West Valley 39 1457 1014 392 51 18 .965
.965 5 Chabot 40 1498 1045 405 48 7 .968
.968 6 San Mateo 45 1707 1197 459 51 13 .970
Rk Team gp dp sba rcs rcs% ci
$value 1 De Anza 37 17 62 9 .127 -
- 2 Mission 40 21 65 11 .145 -
- 2 San Francisco 38 10 86 19 .181 1
1 4 San Mateo 45 33 54 14 .206 -
- 5 Chabot 40 15 39 15 .278 1
1 6 West Valley 39 28 58 24 .293 -
Rk Team home games attend avg
$value 1 San Francisco 17 385 23
23 2 Chabot 13 462 36
36 3 West Valley 18 1,219 68
68 4 De Anza 18 1,560 87
87 5 San Mateo 24 3,384 141
141 6 Mission 14 210,400 15,029
Rk Team gp ab h rbi bb k avg obp slg
$value 1 West Valley 20 706 200 110 82 131 .283 .380 .381
.381 2 Chabot 20 702 211 165 106 129 .301 .428 .453
.453 3 San Francisco 20 660 172 67 74 158 .261 .360 .317
.317 4 De Anza 21 740 219 136 106 159 .296 .394 .420
.420 5 San Mateo 20 706 221 144 95 119 .313 .405 .470
.470 6 Mission 20 740 252 194 120 125 .341 .446 .536
Rk Team gp 2b 3b hr xbh
$value 1 San Francisco 20 21 2 4 27
27 2 West Valley 20 40 4 7 51
51 3 Chabot 20 34 8 19 61
61 4 De Anza 21 44 6 12 62
62 5 San Mateo 20 48 6 17 71
71 6 Mission 20 58 12 21 91
Rk Team gp r tb sb cs
$value 1 San Francisco 20 81 209 18 12
12 2 West Valley 20 135 269 12 3
3 3 De Anza 21 151 311 45 11
11 4 Chabot 20 183 318 35 8
8 5 San Mateo 20 161 332 27 3
3 6 Mission 20 220 397 42 11
Rk Team gp hbp sf sh hdp go fo go/fo pa
$value 1 San Francisco 20 30 2 14 11 188 144 1.31 780
780 2 De Anza 21 21 12 10 12 182 186 .98 889
889 3 West Valley 20 33 9 10 11 162 209 .78 840
840 4 Chabot 20 58 11 12 8 148 212 .70 889
889 5 Mission 20 31 13 9 5 153 202 .76 913
913 6 San Mateo 20 22 12 12 11 150 216 .69 847
Rk Team app gs ip h r er era
$value 1 San Mateo 20 20 178.0 135 85 72 3.64
3.64 2 West Valley 20 20 178.1 187 134 109 5.50
5.50 3 Mission 20 20 176.0 230 164 135 6.90
6.90 4 Chabot 20 20 175.0 222 124 116 5.97
5.97 5 De Anza 21 21 183.1 237 206 162 7.95
7.95 6 San Francisco 20 20 171.2 257 214 172 9.02
Rk Team app gs k k/9 hr whip
$value 1 San Mateo 20 20 154 7.79 12 1.22
1.22 2 West Valley 20 20 161 8.13 11 1.63
1.63 3 Mission 20 20 149 7.62 12 1.84
1.84 4 Chabot 20 20 163 8.38 13 1.74
1.74 5 De Anza 21 21 142 6.97 17 1.90
1.90 6 San Francisco 20 20 56 2.94 14 2.18
Rk Team gp tc po a e pb f%
$value 1 De Anza 21 787 550 186 51 20 .935
.935 2 San Francisco 20 754 515 198 41 5 .946
.946 3 Mission 20 745 528 186 31 2 .958
.958 4 West Valley 20 763 535 197 31 4 .959
.959 5 Chabot 20 745 525 195 25 2 .966
.966 6 San Mateo 20 773 534 216 23 5 .970
Rk Team gp dp sba rcs rcs% ci
$value 1 De Anza 21 10 37 2 .051 -
- 2 Mission 20 10 19 7 .269 -
- 2 San Francisco 20 4 56 10 .152 1
1 4 San Mateo 20 15 19 6 .240 -
- 5 Chabot 20 6 13 9 .409 1
1 6 West Valley 20 15 34 11 .244 -
Rk Team home games attend avg
$value 1 San Francisco 9 330 37
37 2 Chabot 10 360 36
36 3 West Valley 10 705 71
71 4 De Anza 11 840 77
77 5 San Mateo 10 1,326 133
133 6 Mission 10 150,000 15,000