Skip to navigation Skip to content Skip to footer
California Community College Athletic Association

Team Stats

Rk Team gp ab h rbi bb k avg obp slg
148.0 1 Antelope Valley 40 1463 448 252 178 285 .306 .390 .456
144.0 2 Citrus 40 1435 435 264 190 274 .303 .394 .459
129.0 3 Glendale 45 1606 483 287 201 303 .301 .399 .432
142.0 4 Canyons 42 1473 441 270 150 272 .299 .379 .461
98.0 5 Barstow 40 1401 412 235 162 299 .294 .391 .383
114.0 6 Victor Valley 40 1395 373 183 152 367 .267 .351 .386
Rk Team gp 2b 3b hr xbh
148.0 1 Antelope Valley 40 95 35 18 148
144.0 2 Citrus 40 97 14 33 144
142.0 3 Canyons 42 87 14 41 142
129.0 4 Glendale 45 80 17 32 129
114.0 5 Victor Valley 40 87 3 24 114
98.0 6 Barstow 40 79 11 8 98
Rk Team gp r tb sb cs
129.0 1 Glendale 45 334 693 131 23
142.0 2 Canyons 42 294 679 32 6
148.0 3 Antelope Valley 40 291 667 54 7
144.0 4 Citrus 40 286 659 49 17
98.0 5 Barstow 40 264 537 34 9
114.0 6 Victor Valley 40 216 538 47 12
Rk Team gp hbp sf sh hdp go fo go/fo pa
129.0 1 Glendale 45 74 18 14 25 360 407 .88 1913
148.0 2 Antelope Valley 40 36 19 18 20 361 336 1.07 1714
142.0 3 Canyons 42 49 16 22 26 387 369 1.05 1710
144.0 4 Citrus 40 33 13 22 22 310 361 .86 1693
98.0 5 Barstow 40 70 16 38 38 362 322 1.12 1687
114.0 6 Victor Valley 40 30 6 12 21 240 253 .95 1595
Rk Team app gs ip h r er era
148.0 1 Antelope Valley 40 40 352.2 451 306 272 6.94
114.0 2 Victor Valley 40 40 325.2 435 305 243 6.72
98.0 3 Barstow 40 40 351.2 469 347 250 6.40
144.0 4 Citrus 40 40 353.1 406 224 190 4.84
142.0 5 Canyons 42 42 371.0 375 192 166 4.03
129.0 6 Glendale 45 45 406.0 381 208 165 3.66
Rk Team app gs k k/9 hr whip
148.0 1 Antelope Valley 40 40 228 5.82 26 1.79
144.0 2 Citrus 40 40 335 8.53 17 -
142.0 3 Canyons 42 42 392 9.51 16 -
129.0 4 Glendale 45 45 359 7.96 29 -
114.0 5 Victor Valley 40 40 178 4.92 22 -
98.0 6 Barstow 40 40 230 5.89 39 -
Rk Team gp tc po a e pb f%
142.0 1 Canyons 42 1537 1113 386 38 17 .975
148.0 2 Antelope Valley 40 1535 1004 478 53 6 .965
129.0 3 Glendale 45 1717 1184 468 65 11 .962
144.0 4 Citrus 40 1442 1007 370 65 11 .955
98.0 5 Barstow 40 1497 1025 403 69 15 .954
114.0 6 Victor Valley 40 1118 747 310 61 16 .945
Rk Team gp dp sba rcs rcs% ci
129.0 1 Glendale 45 23 39 18 .316 1
144.0 2 Citrus 40 17 61 17 .218 -
148.0 3 Antelope Valley 40 37 66 14 .175 -
98.0 4 Barstow 40 17 55 10 .154 1
142.0 5 Canyons 42 23 49 8 .140 -
114.0 6 Victor Valley 40 30 78 8 .093 -
Rk Team home games attend avg
98.0 1 Barstow 20 2,000 100
142.0 2 Canyons 20 1,652 83
129.0 3 Glendale 19 1,499 79
148.0 4 Antelope Valley 21 930 45
144.0 5 Citrus 19 712 37
114.0 6 Victor Valley 20 180 9
Rk Team gp ab h rbi bb k avg obp slg
72.0 1 Antelope Valley 20 748 230 132 84 157 .307 .386 .453
86.0 2 Citrus 20 732 231 150 87 133 .316 .399 .501
78.0 3 Glendale 20 731 231 151 83 145 .316 .408 .490
78.0 3 Canyons 20 703 225 152 74 115 .320 .399 .518
46.0 5 Barstow 20 711 214 102 61 157 .301 .384 .378
63.0 6 Victor Valley 20 707 195 89 68 196 .276 .350 .414
Rk Team gp 2b 3b hr xbh
72.0 1 Antelope Valley 20 48 11 13 72
86.0 2 Citrus 20 56 10 20 86
78.0 3 Canyons 20 44 7 27 78
78.0 3 Glendale 20 48 11 19 78
63.0 5 Victor Valley 20 45 1 17 63
46.0 6 Barstow 20 40 3 3 46
Rk Team gp r tb sb cs
78.0 1 Glendale 20 168 358 60 10
78.0 1 Canyons 20 156 364 21 3
72.0 3 Antelope Valley 20 148 339 24 4
86.0 4 Citrus 20 157 367 25 8
46.0 5 Barstow 20 112 269 20 5
63.0 6 Victor Valley 20 104 293 30 3
Rk Team gp hbp sf sh hdp go fo go/fo pa
78.0 1 Glendale 20 35 6 7 7 140 182 .77 862
72.0 2 Antelope Valley 20 18 11 5 8 159 176 .90 866
78.0 3 Canyons 20 25 10 5 18 182 182 1.00 817
86.0 4 Citrus 20 19 7 12 9 157 183 .86 857
46.0 5 Barstow 20 41 10 14 23 186 152 1.22 837
63.0 6 Victor Valley 20 14 3 7 10 120 137 .88 799
Rk Team app gs ip h r er era
72.0 1 Antelope Valley 20 20 177.1 238 168 163 8.27
63.0 2 Victor Valley 20 20 174.2 245 177 138 7.11
46.0 3 Barstow 20 20 174.2 249 199 140 7.21
86.0 4 Citrus 20 20 178.1 207 111 93 4.69
78.0 5 Canyons 20 20 178.1 155 71 59 2.98
78.0 5 Glendale 20 20 184.1 149 60 53 2.59
Rk Team app gs k k/9 hr whip
72.0 1 Antelope Valley 20 20 92 4.67 19 1.82
86.0 2 Citrus 20 20 179 9.03 8 -
78.0 3 Canyons 20 20 206 10.40 6 -
78.0 3 Glendale 20 20 193 9.42 17 -
63.0 5 Victor Valley 20 20 80 4.12 13 -
46.0 6 Barstow 20 20 110 5.67 26 -
Rk Team gp tc po a e pb f%
78.0 1 Canyons 20 724 535 173 16 5 .978
72.0 2 Antelope Valley 20 726 478 227 21 5 .971
78.0 3 Glendale 20 722 519 192 11 2 .985
86.0 4 Citrus 20 673 484 157 32 5 .952
46.0 5 Barstow 20 760 524 197 39 10 .949
63.0 6 Victor Valley 20 576 381 164 31 9 .946
Rk Team gp dp sba rcs rcs% ci
78.0 1 Glendale 20 8 8 5 .385 1
86.0 2 Citrus 20 7 29 6 .171 -
72.0 3 Antelope Valley 20 22 38 2 .050 -
46.0 4 Barstow 20 10 35 5 .125 -
78.0 5 Canyons 20 15 24 2 .077 -
63.0 6 Victor Valley 20 13 46 5 .098 -
Rk Team home games attend avg
46.0 1 Barstow 10 1,000 100
78.0 2 Canyons 10 827 83
78.0 2 Glendale 10 888 89
72.0 4 Antelope Valley 10 405 41
86.0 5 Citrus 10 394 39
63.0 6 Victor Valley 10 150 15