Skip to navigation Skip to content Skip to footer
California Community College Athletic Association

Team Stats

Rk Team gp ab h rbi bb k avg obp slg
0.3062200956937799 1 Antelope Valley 40 1463 448 252 178 285 .306 .390 .456
0.30313588850174217 2 Citrus 40 1435 435 264 190 274 .303 .394 .459
0.30074719800747196 3 Glendale 45 1606 483 287 201 303 .301 .399 .432
0.29938900203665986 4 Canyons 42 1473 441 270 150 272 .299 .379 .461
0.2940756602426838 5 Barstow 40 1401 412 235 162 299 .294 .391 .383
0.26738351254480286 6 Victor Valley 40 1395 373 183 152 367 .267 .351 .386
Rk Team gp 2b 3b hr xbh
148.0 1 Antelope Valley 40 95 35 18 148
144.0 2 Citrus 40 97 14 33 144
142.0 3 Canyons 42 87 14 41 142
129.0 4 Glendale 45 80 17 32 129
114.0 5 Victor Valley 40 87 3 24 114
98.0 6 Barstow 40 79 11 8 98
Rk Team gp r tb sb cs
334.0 1 Glendale 45 334 693 131 23
294.0 2 Canyons 42 294 679 32 6
291.0 3 Antelope Valley 40 291 667 54 7
286.0 4 Citrus 40 286 659 49 17
264.0 5 Barstow 40 264 537 34 9
216.0 6 Victor Valley 40 216 538 47 12
Rk Team gp hbp sf sh hdp go fo go/fo pa
1913.0 1 Glendale 45 74 18 14 25 360 407 .88 1913
1714.0 2 Antelope Valley 40 36 19 18 20 361 336 1.07 1714
1710.0 3 Canyons 42 49 16 22 26 387 369 1.05 1710
1693.0 4 Citrus 40 33 13 22 22 310 361 .86 1693
1687.0 5 Barstow 40 70 16 38 38 362 322 1.12 1687
1595.0 6 Victor Valley 40 30 6 12 21 240 253 .95 1595
Rk Team app gs ip h r er era
6.941398865784499 1 Antelope Valley 40 40 352.2 451 306 272 6.94
6.715455475946776 2 Victor Valley 40 40 325.2 435 305 243 6.72
6.398104265402844 3 Barstow 40 40 351.2 469 347 250 6.40
4.839622641509434 4 Citrus 40 40 353.1 406 224 190 4.84
4.026954177897574 5 Canyons 42 42 371.0 375 192 166 4.03
3.6576354679802954 6 Glendale 45 45 406.0 381 208 165 3.66
Rk Team app gs k k/9 hr whip
1.7892249527410207 1 Antelope Valley 40 40 228 5.82 26 1.79
1.79 2 Barstow 40 40 230 5.89 39 -
- 3 Canyons 42 42 392 9.51 16 -
- 3 Citrus 40 40 335 8.53 17 -
- 3 Glendale 45 45 359 7.96 29 -
- 3 Victor Valley 40 40 178 4.92 22 -
Rk Team gp tc po a e pb f%
0.9752765126870527 1 Canyons 42 1537 1113 386 38 17 .975
0.965472312703583 2 Antelope Valley 40 1535 1004 478 53 6 .965
0.9621432731508445 3 Glendale 45 1717 1184 468 65 11 .962
0.9549237170596394 4 Citrus 40 1442 1007 370 65 11 .955
0.9539078156312625 5 Barstow 40 1497 1025 403 69 15 .954
0.945438282647585 6 Victor Valley 40 1118 747 310 61 16 .945
Rk Team gp dp sba rcs rcs% ci
0.3157894736842105 1 Glendale 45 23 39 18 .316 1
0.21794871794871795 2 Citrus 40 17 61 17 .218 -
0.175 3 Antelope Valley 40 37 66 14 .175 -
0.15384615384615385 4 Barstow 40 17 55 10 .154 1
0.14035087719298245 5 Canyons 42 23 49 8 .140 -
0.09302325581395349 6 Victor Valley 40 30 78 8 .093 -
Rk Team home games attend avg
100.0 1 Barstow 20 2,000 100
82.6 2 Canyons 20 1,652 83
78.89473684210526 3 Glendale 19 1,499 79
45.0 4 Antelope Valley 21 930 45
37.473684210526315 5 Citrus 19 712 37
9.0 6 Victor Valley 20 180 9
Rk Team gp ab h rbi bb k avg obp slg
0.3074866310160428 1 Antelope Valley 20 748 230 132 84 157 .307 .386 .453
0.3155737704918033 2 Citrus 20 732 231 150 87 133 .316 .399 .501
0.31600547195622436 3 Glendale 20 731 231 151 83 145 .316 .408 .490
0.3200568990042674 4 Canyons 20 703 225 152 74 115 .320 .399 .518
0.3009845288326301 5 Barstow 20 711 214 102 61 157 .301 .384 .378
0.2758132956152758 6 Victor Valley 20 707 195 89 68 196 .276 .350 .414
Rk Team gp 2b 3b hr xbh
72.0 1 Antelope Valley 20 48 11 13 72
86.0 2 Citrus 20 56 10 20 86
78.0 3 Canyons 20 44 7 27 78
78.0 3 Glendale 20 48 11 19 78
63.0 5 Victor Valley 20 45 1 17 63
46.0 6 Barstow 20 40 3 3 46
Rk Team gp r tb sb cs
168.0 1 Glendale 20 168 358 60 10
156.0 2 Canyons 20 156 364 21 3
148.0 3 Antelope Valley 20 148 339 24 4
157.0 4 Citrus 20 157 367 25 8
112.0 5 Barstow 20 112 269 20 5
104.0 6 Victor Valley 20 104 293 30 3
Rk Team gp hbp sf sh hdp go fo go/fo pa
862.0 1 Glendale 20 35 6 7 7 140 182 .77 862
866.0 2 Antelope Valley 20 18 11 5 8 159 176 .90 866
817.0 3 Canyons 20 25 10 5 18 182 182 1.00 817
857.0 4 Citrus 20 19 7 12 9 157 183 .86 857
837.0 5 Barstow 20 41 10 14 23 186 152 1.22 837
799.0 6 Victor Valley 20 14 3 7 10 120 137 .88 799
Rk Team app gs ip h r er era
8.272556390977442 1 Antelope Valley 20 20 177.1 238 168 163 8.27
7.1106870229007635 2 Victor Valley 20 20 174.2 245 177 138 7.11
7.213740458015267 3 Barstow 20 20 174.2 249 199 140 7.21
4.693457943925233 4 Citrus 20 20 178.1 207 111 93 4.69
2.9775700934579437 5 Canyons 20 20 178.1 155 71 59 2.98
2.5877034358047015 6 Glendale 20 20 184.1 149 60 53 2.59
Rk Team app gs k k/9 hr whip
1.8157894736842104 1 Antelope Valley 20 20 92 4.67 19 1.82
1.82 2 Barstow 20 20 110 5.67 26 -
- 3 Canyons 20 20 206 10.40 6 -
- 3 Citrus 20 20 179 9.03 8 -
- 3 Glendale 20 20 193 9.42 17 -
- 3 Victor Valley 20 20 80 4.12 13 -
Rk Team gp tc po a e pb f%
0.9779005524861878 1 Canyons 20 724 535 173 16 5 .978
0.9710743801652892 2 Antelope Valley 20 726 478 227 21 5 .971
0.9847645429362881 3 Glendale 20 722 519 192 11 2 .985
0.9524517087667161 4 Citrus 20 673 484 157 32 5 .952
0.9486842105263158 5 Barstow 20 760 524 197 39 10 .949
0.9461805555555556 6 Victor Valley 20 576 381 164 31 9 .946
Rk Team gp dp sba rcs rcs% ci
0.38461538461538464 1 Glendale 20 8 8 5 .385 1
0.17142857142857143 2 Citrus 20 7 29 6 .171 -
0.05 3 Antelope Valley 20 22 38 2 .050 -
0.125 4 Barstow 20 10 35 5 .125 -
0.07692307692307693 5 Canyons 20 15 24 2 .077 -
0.09803921568627451 6 Victor Valley 20 13 46 5 .098 -
Rk Team home games attend avg
100.0 1 Barstow 10 1,000 100
82.7 2 Canyons 10 827 83
88.8 3 Glendale 10 888 89
41.0 4 Antelope Valley 10 405 41
39.4 5 Citrus 10 394 39
15.0 6 Victor Valley 10 150 15