Team Stats

Rk Team gp ab h rbi bb k avg obp slg
0.33519553072625696 1 Sequoias 37 1074 360 214 116 95 .335 .405 .442
0.33394664213431463 2 Taft 38 1087 363 185 115 134 .334 .402 .437
0.31061343719571566 3 Fresno City 40 1027 319 196 128 113 .311 .394 .457
0.3086560364464693 4 Merced 35 878 271 136 82 145 .309 .375 .397
0.28255813953488373 5 Coalinga 35 860 243 137 115 128 .283 .372 .393
0.24973432518597238 6 Reedley 38 941 235 150 99 135 .250 .332 .349
Rk Team gp 2b 3b hr xbh
96.0 1 Fresno City 40 66 6 24 96
86.0 2 Sequoias 37 68 7 11 86
81.0 3 Taft 38 61 9 11 81
70.0 4 Coalinga 35 56 3 11 70
65.0 5 Merced 35 53 11 1 65
57.0 6 Reedley 38 37 4 16 57
Rk Team gp r tb sb cs
242.0 1 Fresno City 40 242 469 118 13
232.0 2 Sequoias 37 232 475 26 0
210.0 3 Taft 38 210 475 55 7
165.0 4 Reedley 38 165 328 35 7
159.0 5 Coalinga 35 159 338 67 16
158.0 6 Merced 35 158 349 25 7
Rk Team gp hbp sf sh hdp go fo go/fo pa
1254.0 1 Taft 38 15 9 28 7 220 287 .77 1254
1238.0 2 Sequoias 37 17 11 20 10 271 261 1.04 1238
1206.0 3 Fresno City 40 21 12 18 7 175 253 .69 1206
1087.0 4 Reedley 38 21 7 19 9 240 281 .85 1087
1007.0 5 Coalinga 35 13 10 9 12 96 112 .86 1007
986.0 6 Merced 35 15 7 4 5 205 199 1.03 986
Rk Team era w l app gs sv ip
1.8611111111111112 1 Sequoias 1.86 28 8 37 37 0 252.0
2.770448548812665 2 Fresno City 2.77 20 11 40 40 1 252.2
3.702702702702703 3 Taft 3.70 22 15 38 38 6 259.0
5.759002770083103 4 Reedley 5.76 12 22 38 38 0 240.2
7.239024390243903 5 Coalinga 7.24 10 22 35 35 0 205.0
8.55810147299509 6 Merced 8.56 3 18 35 35 0 203.2
Rk Team h r er bb k k/9 hr whip bf wp hbp
1.0476190476190477 1 Sequoias 207 93 67 57 214 5.94 5 1.05 1044 7 4
1.3100263852242744 2 Fresno City 252 116 100 79 201 5.57 14 1.31 1114 10 16
1.718146718146718 3 Taft 341 208 137 104 151 4.08 15 1.72 1256 13 13
1.865650969529086 4 Reedley 355 241 198 94 75 2.18 13 1.87 1204 11 13
2.209756097560976 5 Coalinga 341 251 212 112 147 5.02 10 2.21 1123 10 35
2.258592471358429 6 Merced 374 287 249 86 47 1.62 19 2.26 1135 17 26
Rk Team gp tc po a e pb f%
0.9653061224489796 1 Fresno City 40 980 757 189 34 3 .965
0.9593253968253969 2 Sequoias 37 1008 751 216 41 23 .959
0.9426691729323309 3 Reedley 38 1064 713 290 61 7 .943
0.9348392701998263 4 Taft 38 1151 738 338 75 11 .935
0.930045871559633 5 Coalinga 35 872 614 197 61 18 .930
0.9053905390539054 6 Merced 35 909 611 212 86 35 .905
Rk Team gp dp sba rcs rcs% ci
0.2413793103448276 1 Fresno City 40 6 22 7 .241 0
0.2033898305084746 2 Taft 38 8 47 12 .203 0
0.11594202898550725 3 Reedley 38 5 61 8 .116 0
0.08108108108108109 4 Sequoias 37 2 68 6 .081 0
0.07017543859649122 5 Merced 35 1 53 4 .070 0
0.06666666666666667 6 Coalinga 35 7 70 5 .067 0
Rk Team home games attend avg
60.0 1 Sequoias 20.0 1,200 60
34.0 2 Reedley 18.0 600 34
0.0 3 Coalinga 19.0 0 0
0.0 3 Fresno City 18.0 0 0
0.0 3 Merced 20.0 0 0
0.0 3 Taft 14.0 0 0
Rk Team gp ab h rbi bb k avg obp slg
0.3554083885209713 1 Sequoias 15 453 161 90 44 34 .355 .417 .459
0.3218390804597701 2 Taft 15 435 140 75 39 59 .322 .378 .414
0.35324675324675325 3 Fresno City 15 385 136 93 56 33 .353 .437 .517
0.31645569620253167 4 Merced 15 395 125 62 30 61 .316 .376 .418
0.2826086956521739 5 Coalinga 15 368 104 46 33 60 .283 .344 .391
0.22493224932249323 6 Reedley 15 369 83 49 36 62 .225 .315 .350
Rk Team gp 2b 3b hr xbh
41.0 1 Fresno City 15 28 4 9 41
35.0 2 Sequoias 15 28 2 5 35
23.0 3 Taft 15 12 5 6 23
32.0 4 Coalinga 15 28 0 4 32
35.0 5 Merced 15 31 3 1 35
27.0 6 Reedley 15 16 3 8 27
Rk Team gp r tb sb cs
110.0 1 Fresno City 15 110 199 42 3
97.0 2 Sequoias 15 97 208 16 0
81.0 3 Taft 15 81 180 17 2
54.0 4 Reedley 15 54 129 14 2
49.0 5 Coalinga 15 49 144 22 6
67.0 6 Merced 15 67 165 13 4
Rk Team gp hbp sf sh hdp go fo go/fo pa
495.0 1 Taft 15 4 6 11 4 85 117 .73 495
515.0 2 Sequoias 15 6 3 9 1 97 118 .82 515
465.0 3 Fresno City 15 7 7 10 1 64 130 .49 465
427.0 4 Reedley 15 13 1 8 2 71 135 .53 427
413.0 5 Coalinga 15 4 5 3 4 32 50 .64 413
440.0 6 Merced 15 10 4 1 2 76 90 .84 440
Rk Team era w l app gs sv ip
1.7326732673267327 1 Sequoias 1.73 13 1 15 15 0 101.0
2.1227436823104697 2 Fresno City 2.12 11 2 15 15 1 92.1
3.713826366559486 3 Taft 3.71 7 7 15 15 3 103.2
5.580419580419581 4 Reedley 5.58 3 9 15 15 0 95.1
8.432432432432433 5 Coalinga 8.43 2 10 15 15 0 86.1
6.315789473684211 6 Merced 6.32 2 9 15 15 0 88.2
Rk Team h r er bb k k/9 hr whip bf wp hbp
1.1287128712871286 1 Sequoias 86 32 25 28 80 5.54 2 1.13 420 3 0
1.2671480144404332 2 Fresno City 77 35 28 40 80 6.06 2 1.27 399 7 4
1.6881028938906752 3 Taft 128 82 55 47 48 3.24 8 1.69 500 3 5
1.8566433566433567 4 Reedley 146 84 76 31 23 1.69 6 1.86 464 6 4
2.5250965250965254 5 Coalinga 165 128 104 53 55 4.46 6 2.53 502 3 16
2.131578947368421 6 Merced 147 99 80 42 22 1.74 9 2.13 480 10 15
Rk Team gp tc po a e pb f%
0.9661016949152542 1 Fresno City 15 354 277 65 12 2 .966
0.9662337662337662 2 Sequoias 15 385 298 74 13 5 .966
0.9490291262135923 3 Reedley 15 412 286 105 21 0 .949
0.9362139917695473 4 Taft 15 486 311 144 31 6 .936
0.9081081081081082 5 Coalinga 15 370 255 81 34 5 .908
0.9121447028423773 6 Merced 15 387 266 87 34 22 .912
Rk Team gp dp sba rcs rcs% ci
0.6 1 Fresno City 15 3 2 3 .600 0
0.0625 2 Taft 15 5 15 1 .063 0
0.1 3 Reedley 15 2 27 3 .100 0
0.10714285714285714 4 Sequoias 15 - 25 3 .107 0
0.047619047619047616 5 Merced 15 1 20 1 .048 0
0.05405405405405406 6 Coalinga 15 3 35 2 .054 0
Rk Team home games attend avg
50.0 1 Sequoias 7.0 350 50
13.0 2 Reedley 8.0 100 13
0.0 3 Coalinga 9.0 0 0
0.0 3 Fresno City 7.0 0 0
0.0 3 Merced 7.0 0 0
0.0 3 Taft 7.0 0 0