Team Stats

Rk Team gp ab h rbi bb k avg obp slg
0.33519553072625696 1 Sequoias 37 1074 360 214 116 95 .335 .405 .442
0.32419196865817823 2 Taft 36 1021 331 169 107 127 .324 .393 .425
0.307 3 Fresno City 39 1000 307 181 124 111 .307 .390 .453
0.3 4 Merced 32 800 240 115 76 138 .300 .367 .388
0.28005115089514065 5 Coalinga 32 782 219 129 108 113 .280 .373 .394
0.24739884393063583 6 Reedley 35 865 214 145 94 128 .247 .332 .348
Rk Team gp 2b 3b hr xbh
94.0 1 Fresno City 39 65 6 23 94
86.0 2 Sequoias 37 68 7 11 86
75.0 3 Taft 36 57 8 10 75
64.0 4 Coalinga 32 50 3 11 64
58.0 5 Merced 32 47 10 1 58
53.0 6 Reedley 35 34 4 15 53
Rk Team gp r tb sb cs
232.0 1 Sequoias 37 232 475 26 0
227.0 2 Fresno City 39 227 453 112 13
192.0 3 Taft 36 192 434 51 7
158.0 4 Reedley 35 158 301 34 7
149.0 5 Coalinga 32 149 308 64 15
137.0 6 Merced 32 137 310 20 5
Rk Team gp hbp sf sh hdp go fo go/fo pa
1238.0 1 Sequoias 37 17 11 20 10 271 261 1.04 1238
1178.0 2 Taft 36 14 9 27 4 220 287 .77 1178
1173.0 3 Fresno City 39 19 12 18 7 172 246 .70 1173
1000.0 4 Reedley 35 18 6 17 9 229 242 .95 1000
919.0 5 Coalinga 32 13 9 7 10 91 107 .85 919
896.0 6 Merced 32 12 5 3 4 190 173 1.10 896
Rk Team era w l app gs sv ip
1.8611111111111112 1 Sequoias 1.86 28 8 37 37 0 252.0
2.826379542395693 2 Fresno City 2.83 19 11 39 39 1 247.2
3.7142857142857144 3 Taft 3.71 21 15 36 36 6 245.0
5.641791044776119 4 Reedley 5.64 12 21 35 35 0 223.1
6.81283422459893 5 Coalinga 6.81 10 20 32 32 0 187.0
9.287003610108304 6 Merced 9.29 2 18 32 32 0 184.2
Rk Team h r er bb k k/9 hr whip bf wp hbp
1.0476190476190477 1 Sequoias 207 93 67 57 214 5.94 5 1.05 1044 7 4
1.3243606998654105 2 Fresno City 249 115 100 79 197 5.57 14 1.32 1095 10 16
1.7020408163265306 3 Taft 320 198 130 97 140 4.00 15 1.70 1187 12 13
1.844776119402985 4 Reedley 324 220 180 88 68 2.13 13 1.84 1114 10 10
2.1122994652406417 5 Coalinga 297 218 182 98 138 5.17 8 2.11 1012 10 32
2.3501805054151625 6 Merced 353 280 245 81 40 1.52 18 2.35 1048 17 23
Rk Team gp tc po a e pb f%
0.9666666666666667 1 Fresno City 39 960 742 186 32 3 .967
0.9593253968253969 2 Sequoias 37 1008 751 216 41 23 .959
0.9434343434343434 3 Reedley 35 990 661 273 56 7 .943
0.9344413665743305 4 Taft 36 1083 696 316 71 11 .934
0.9296482412060302 5 Coalinga 32 796 560 180 56 18 .930
0.9009546539379475 6 Merced 32 838 554 201 83 31 .901
Rk Team gp dp sba rcs rcs% ci
0.2413793103448276 1 Fresno City 39 6 22 7 .241 0
0.21428571428571427 2 Taft 36 6 44 12 .214 0
0.0967741935483871 3 Reedley 35 4 56 6 .097 0
0.08108108108108109 4 Sequoias 37 2 68 6 .081 0
0.07692307692307693 5 Coalinga 32 4 60 5 .077 0
0.07142857142857142 6 Merced 32 1 52 4 .071 0
Rk Team home games attend avg
60.0 1 Sequoias 20.0 1,200 60
36.0 2 Reedley 17.0 600 36
0.0 3 Coalinga 17.0 0 0
0.0 3 Fresno City 17.0 0 0
0.0 3 Merced 18.0 0 0
0.0 3 Taft 14.0 0 0
Rk Team gp ab h rbi bb k avg obp slg
0.3554083885209713 1 Sequoias 15 453 161 90 44 34 .355 .417 .459
0.2926829268292683 2 Taft 13 369 108 59 31 52 .293 .347 .377
0.3463687150837989 3 Fresno City 14 358 124 78 52 31 .346 .429 .511
0.29652996845425866 4 Merced 12 317 94 41 24 54 .297 .357 .397
0.27586206896551724 5 Coalinga 12 290 80 38 26 45 .276 .340 .393
0.21160409556313994 6 Reedley 12 293 62 44 31 55 .212 .308 .348
Rk Team gp 2b 3b hr xbh
39.0 1 Fresno City 14 27 4 8 39
35.0 2 Sequoias 15 28 2 5 35
17.0 3 Taft 13 8 4 5 17
26.0 4 Coalinga 12 22 0 4 26
28.0 5 Merced 12 25 2 1 28
23.0 6 Reedley 12 13 3 7 23
Rk Team gp r tb sb cs
97.0 1 Sequoias 15 97 208 16 0
95.0 2 Fresno City 14 95 183 36 3
63.0 3 Taft 13 63 139 13 2
47.0 4 Reedley 12 47 102 13 2
39.0 5 Coalinga 12 39 114 19 5
46.0 6 Merced 12 46 126 8 2
Rk Team gp hbp sf sh hdp go fo go/fo pa
515.0 1 Sequoias 15 6 3 9 1 97 118 .82 515
419.0 2 Taft 13 3 6 10 1 85 117 .73 419
432.0 3 Fresno City 14 5 7 10 1 61 123 .50 432
340.0 4 Reedley 12 10 0 6 2 60 96 .63 340
325.0 5 Coalinga 12 4 4 1 2 27 45 .60 325
350.0 6 Merced 12 7 2 0 1 61 64 .95 350
Rk Team era w l app gs sv ip
1.7326732673267327 1 Sequoias 1.73 13 1 15 15 0 101.0
2.2442748091603058 2 Fresno City 2.24 10 2 14 14 1 87.1
3.7472118959107803 3 Taft 3.75 6 7 13 13 3 89.2
5.205128205128205 4 Reedley 5.21 3 8 12 12 0 78.0
7.580487804878049 5 Coalinga 7.58 2 8 12 12 0 68.1
7.636363636363636 6 Merced 7.64 1 9 12 12 0 69.2
Rk Team h r er bb k k/9 hr whip bf wp hbp
1.1287128712871286 1 Sequoias 86 32 25 28 80 5.54 2 1.13 420 3 0
1.3053435114503817 2 Fresno City 74 34 28 40 76 6.09 2 1.31 380 7 4
1.6394052044609664 3 Taft 107 72 48 40 37 2.89 8 1.64 431 2 5
1.794871794871795 4 Reedley 115 63 58 25 16 1.44 6 1.79 374 5 1
2.3414634146341466 5 Coalinga 121 95 74 39 46 4.71 4 2.34 391 3 13
2.339712918660287 6 Merced 126 92 76 37 15 1.51 8 2.34 393 10 12
Rk Team gp tc po a e pb f%
0.9700598802395209 1 Fresno City 14 334 262 62 10 2 .970
0.9662337662337662 2 Sequoias 15 385 298 74 13 5 .966
0.9526627218934911 3 Reedley 12 338 234 88 16 0 .953
0.9354066985645934 4 Taft 13 418 269 122 27 6 .935
0.9013605442176871 5 Coalinga 12 294 201 64 29 5 .901
0.9018987341772152 6 Merced 12 316 209 76 31 18 .902
Rk Team gp dp sba rcs rcs% ci
0.6 1 Fresno City 14 3 2 3 .600 0
0.07692307692307693 2 Taft 13 3 12 1 .077 0
0.043478260869565216 3 Reedley 12 1 22 1 .043 0
0.10714285714285714 4 Sequoias 15 - 25 3 .107 0
0.07407407407407407 5 Coalinga 12 - 25 2 .074 0
0.05 6 Merced 12 1 19 1 .050 0
Rk Team home games attend avg
50.0 1 Sequoias 7.0 350 50
15.0 2 Reedley 7.0 100 15
0.0 3 Coalinga 7.0 0 0
0.0 3 Fresno City 6.0 0 0
0.0 3 Merced 5.0 0 0
0.0 3 Taft 7.0 0 0