Team Stats

Rk Team gp ab h rbi bb k avg obp slg
0.3361904761904762 1 Sequoias 36 1050 353 210 115 94 .336 .407 .440
0.32628398791540786 2 Taft 35 993 324 166 107 121 .326 .396 .429
0.3140495867768595 3 Merced 29 726 228 113 68 121 .314 .379 .404
0.3012318029115342 4 Fresno City 35 893 269 156 114 100 .301 .385 .436
0.2828146143437077 5 Coalinga 30 739 209 119 99 99 .283 .371 .401
0.24739884393063583 6 Reedley 35 865 214 145 94 128 .247 .332 .348
Rk Team gp 2b 3b hr xbh
84.0 1 Sequoias 36 68 7 9 84
81.0 2 Fresno City 35 59 5 17 81
74.0 3 Taft 35 56 8 10 74
62.0 4 Coalinga 30 48 3 11 62
55.0 5 Merced 29 46 8 1 55
53.0 6 Reedley 35 34 4 15 53
Rk Team gp r tb sb cs
228.0 1 Sequoias 36 228 462 26 0
199.0 2 Fresno City 35 199 389 99 10
189.0 3 Taft 35 189 426 49 7
158.0 4 Reedley 35 158 301 34 7
139.0 5 Coalinga 30 139 296 60 15
135.0 6 Merced 29 135 293 20 4
Rk Team gp hbp sf sh hdp go fo go/fo pa
1212.0 1 Sequoias 36 17 11 19 10 258 258 1.00 1212
1148.0 2 Taft 35 14 9 25 4 215 278 .77 1148
1050.0 3 Fresno City 35 15 11 17 7 149 213 .70 1050
1000.0 4 Reedley 35 18 6 17 9 229 242 .95 1000
861.0 5 Coalinga 30 9 8 6 9 82 96 .85 861
812.0 6 Merced 29 11 4 3 2 174 146 1.19 812
Rk Team era w l app gs sv ip
1.8285714285714287 1 Sequoias 1.83 27 8 36 36 0 245.0
2.3785394932935917 2 Fresno City 2.38 17 9 35 35 1 223.2
3.690376569037657 3 Taft 3.69 21 14 35 35 6 239.0
5.641791044776119 4 Reedley 5.64 12 21 35 35 0 223.1
6.880681818181818 5 Coalinga 6.88 9 19 30 30 0 176.0
9.623217922606926 6 Merced 9.62 2 18 29 29 0 163.2
Rk Team h r er bb k k/9 hr whip bf wp hbp
1.0489795918367346 1 Sequoias 200 90 64 57 208 5.94 5 1.05 1014 7 4
1.2205663189269746 2 Fresno City 200 88 76 73 187 5.85 10 1.22 968 10 15
1.711297071129707 3 Taft 313 194 126 96 139 4.07 13 1.71 1161 12 13
1.844776119402985 4 Reedley 324 220 180 88 68 2.13 13 1.84 - 10 10
2.1420454545454546 5 Coalinga 285 209 173 92 130 5.17 8 2.14 958 7 29
2.4134419551934827 6 Merced 320 259 225 75 37 1.58 18 2.41 944 16 23
Rk Team gp tc po a e pb f%
0.9694117647058823 1 Fresno City 35 850 670 154 26 3 .969
0.9611451942740287 2 Sequoias 36 978 730 210 38 23 .961
0.9434343434343434 3 Reedley 35 990 661 273 56 7 .943
0.9334600760456274 4 Taft 35 1052 678 304 70 11 .933
0.9269588313413014 5 Coalinga 30 753 527 171 55 16 .927
0.898921832884097 6 Merced 29 742 491 176 75 29 .899
Rk Team gp dp sba rcs rcs% ci
0.30434782608695654 1 Fresno City 35 6 16 7 .304 0
0.21428571428571427 2 Taft 35 6 44 12 .214 0
0.0967741935483871 3 Reedley 35 4 56 6 .097 0
0.08333333333333333 4 Sequoias 36 2 66 6 .083 0
0.078125 5 Coalinga 30 4 59 5 .078 0
0.057692307692307696 6 Merced 29 1 49 3 .058 0
Rk Team home games attend avg
61.0 1 Sequoias 19.0 1,150 61
36.0 2 Reedley 17.0 600 36
0.0 3 Coalinga 17.0 0 0
0.0 3 Fresno City 15.0 0 0
0.0 3 Merced 15.0 0 0
0.0 3 Taft 14.0 0 0
Rk Team gp ab h rbi bb k avg obp slg
0.358974358974359 1 Sequoias 14 429 154 86 43 33 .359 .422 .455
0.2961876832844575 2 Taft 12 341 101 56 31 46 .296 .354 .384
0.29652996845425866 3 Merced 12 317 94 41 24 54 .297 .357 .397
0.3463687150837989 4 Fresno City 14 358 124 78 52 31 .346 .429 .511
0.27586206896551724 5 Coalinga 12 290 80 38 26 45 .276 .340 .393
0.21160409556313994 6 Reedley 12 293 62 44 31 55 .212 .308 .348
Rk Team gp 2b 3b hr xbh
33.0 1 Sequoias 14 28 2 3 33
39.0 2 Fresno City 14 27 4 8 39
16.0 3 Taft 12 7 4 5 16
26.0 4 Coalinga 12 22 0 4 26
28.0 5 Merced 12 25 2 1 28
23.0 6 Reedley 12 13 3 7 23
Rk Team gp r tb sb cs
93.0 1 Sequoias 14 93 195 16 0
95.0 2 Fresno City 14 95 183 36 3
60.0 3 Taft 12 60 131 11 2
47.0 4 Reedley 12 47 102 13 2
39.0 5 Coalinga 12 39 114 19 5
46.0 6 Merced 12 46 126 8 2
Rk Team gp hbp sf sh hdp go fo go/fo pa
489.0 1 Sequoias 14 6 3 8 1 84 115 .73 489
389.0 2 Taft 12 3 6 8 1 80 108 .74 389
432.0 3 Fresno City 14 5 7 10 1 61 123 .50 432
340.0 4 Reedley 12 10 0 6 2 60 96 .63 340
325.0 5 Coalinga 12 4 4 1 2 27 45 .60 325
350.0 6 Merced 12 7 2 0 1 61 64 .95 350
Rk Team era w l app gs sv ip
1.6382978723404256 1 Sequoias 1.64 12 1 14 14 0 94.0
2.2442748091603058 2 Fresno City 2.24 10 2 14 14 1 87.1
3.681274900398406 3 Taft 3.68 6 6 12 12 3 83.2
5.205128205128205 4 Reedley 5.21 3 8 12 12 0 78.0
7.580487804878049 5 Coalinga 7.58 2 8 12 12 0 68.1
7.636363636363636 6 Merced 7.64 1 9 12 12 0 69.2
Rk Team h r er bb k k/9 hr whip bf wp hbp
1.1382978723404256 1 Sequoias 79 29 22 28 74 5.51 2 1.14 390 3 0
1.3053435114503817 2 Fresno City 74 34 28 40 76 6.09 2 1.31 380 7 4
1.6613545816733066 3 Taft 100 68 44 39 36 3.01 6 1.66 405 2 5
1.794871794871795 4 Reedley 115 63 58 25 16 1.44 6 1.79 - 5 1
2.3414634146341466 5 Coalinga 121 95 74 39 46 4.71 4 2.34 391 3 13
2.339712918660287 6 Merced 126 92 76 37 15 1.51 8 2.34 393 10 12
Rk Team gp tc po a e pb f%
0.9700598802395209 1 Fresno City 14 334 262 62 10 2 .970
0.971830985915493 2 Sequoias 14 355 277 68 10 5 .972
0.9526627218934911 3 Reedley 12 338 234 88 16 0 .953
0.9328165374677002 4 Taft 12 387 251 110 26 6 .933
0.9013605442176871 5 Coalinga 12 294 201 64 29 5 .901
0.9018987341772152 6 Merced 12 316 209 76 31 18 .902
Rk Team gp dp sba rcs rcs% ci
0.6 1 Fresno City 14 3 2 3 .600 0
0.07692307692307693 2 Taft 12 3 12 1 .077 0
0.043478260869565216 3 Reedley 12 1 22 1 .043 0
0.11538461538461539 4 Sequoias 14 - 23 3 .115 0
0.07407407407407407 5 Coalinga 12 - 25 2 .074 0
0.05 6 Merced 12 1 19 1 .050 0
Rk Team home games attend avg
50.0 1 Sequoias 6.0 300 50
15.0 2 Reedley 7.0 100 15
0.0 3 Coalinga 7.0 0 0
0.0 3 Fresno City 6.0 0 0
0.0 3 Merced 5.0 0 0
0.0 3 Taft 7.0 0 0