Team Stats

Overall Conference

entries per page

Search:

Rk	Team	gp	ab	h	rbi	bb	k	avg	obp	slg

Rk	Team	gp	ab	h	rbi	bb	k	avg	obp	slg
0.3301975540921919 1	Sequoias	40	1063	351	192	90	60	.330	.383	.413
0.2964641885766092 2	Fresno City	42	1103	327	204	131	129	.296	.386	.446
0.28755760368663597 3	Reedley	41	1085	312	184	133	120	.288	.371	.359
0.26974483596597815 4	Porterville	36	823	222	125	83	144	.270	.342	.348
0.2570281124497992 5	Taft	32	747	192	91	50	118	.257	.311	.329
0.256 6	Merced	40	1000	256	140	86	194	.256	.325	.354
0.24554039874081846 7	Coalinga	40	953	234	116	96	197	.246	.330	.324

Showing 1 to 7 of 7 entries

entries per page

Search:

Rk	Team	gp	2b	3b	hr	xbh

Rk	Team	gp	2b	3b	hr	xbh
105.0 1	Fresno City	42	70	10	25	105
70.0 2	Merced	40	48	16	6	70
68.0 3	Sequoias	40	53	10	5	68
55.0 4	Porterville	36	49	3	3	55
52.0 5	Reedley	41	36	6	10	52
52.0 5	Coalinga	40	39	3	10	52
38.0 7	Taft	32	28	4	6	38

Showing 1 to 7 of 7 entries

entries per page

Search:

Rk	Team	gp	r	tb	sb	cs

Rk	Team	gp	r	tb	sb	cs
236.0 1	Fresno City	42	236	492	72	13
227.0 2	Sequoias	40	227	439	40	4
201.0 3	Reedley	41	201	390	46	6
162.0 4	Merced	40	162	354	34	7
144.0 5	Coalinga	40	144	309	69	21
134.0 6	Porterville	36	134	286	22	6
103.0 7	Taft	32	103	246	11	4

Showing 1 to 7 of 7 entries

entries per page

Search:

Rk	Team	gp	hbp	sf	sh	hdp	go	fo	go/fo	pa

Rk	Team	gp	hbp	sf	sh	hdp	go	fo	go/fo	pa
1310.0 1	Fresno City	42	37	13	26	3	120	156	.77	1310
1273.0 2	Reedley	41	13	4	38	3	270	241	1.12	1273
1221.0 3	Sequoias	40	9	13	46	8	221	281	.79	1221
1136.0 4	Merced	40	21	9	20	4	184	200	.92	1136
1094.0 5	Coalinga	40	28	9	8	3	110	110	1.00	1094
931.0 6	Porterville	36	10	5	10	2	80	68	1.18	931
822.0 7	Taft	32	10	4	11	6	190	168	1.13	822

Showing 1 to 7 of 7 entries

entries per page

Search:

Rk	Team	app	gs	ip	h	r	er	era

Rk	Team	app	gs	ip	h	r	er	era
11.496047430830039 1	Taft	32	32	168.2	391	360	277	11.50
10.245674740484429 2	Porterville	36	36	192.2	395	360	282	10.25
6.450210378681627 3	Coalinga	40	40	237.2	372	299	219	6.45
3.236842105263158 4	Reedley	41	41	266.0	290	159	123	3.24
2.265454545454545 5	Fresno City	42	42	275.0	237	110	89	2.27
2.0144546649145862 6	Merced	40	40	253.2	228	113	73	2.01
1.4092105263157895 7	Sequoias	40	40	253.1	180	69	51	1.41

Showing 1 to 7 of 7 entries

entries per page

Search:

Rk	Team	app	gs	k	k/7	hr	whip

Rk	Team	app	gs	k	k/7	hr	whip
2.9762845849802373 1	Taft	32	32	41	1.70	23	2.98
2.8339100346020762 2	Porterville	36	36	57	2.07	11	2.83
2.1079943899018234 3	Coalinga	40	40	83	2.44	13	2.11
1.462406015037594 4	Reedley	41	41	200	5.26	7	1.46
1.3672727272727272 5	Fresno City	42	42	171	4.35	4	1.37
1.135348226018397 6	Merced	40	40	156	4.30	6	1.14
0.9868421052631579 7	Sequoias	40	40	263	7.27	4	0.99

Showing 1 to 7 of 7 entries

entries per page

Search:

Rk	Team	gp	tc	po	a	e	pb	f%

Rk	Team	gp	tc	po	a	e	pb	f%
0.9720558882235529 1	Sequoias	40	1002	758	216	28	2	.972
0.9679930795847751 2	Fresno City	42	1156	822	297	37	13	.968
0.9424520433694745 3	Reedley	41	1199	823	307	69	13	.942
0.9410569105691057 4	Merced	40	984	719	207	58	10	.941
0.925764192139738 5	Porterville	36	916	583	265	68	25	.926
0.9254302103250478 6	Coalinga	40	1046	703	265	78	35	.925
0.8760631834750912 7	Taft	32	823	506	215	102	13	.876

Showing 1 to 7 of 7 entries

entries per page

Search:

Rk	Team	gp	dp	sba	rcs	rcs%	ci

Rk	Team	gp	dp	sba	rcs	rcs%	ci
0.2830188679245283 1	Fresno City	42	6	38	15	.283	0
0.22857142857142856 2	Reedley	41	6	27	8	.229	0
0.16666666666666666 3	Sequoias	40	7	30	6	.167	0
0.10126582278481013 4	Taft	32	4	71	8	.101	0
0.0673076923076923 5	Coalinga	40	11	97	7	.067	0
0.05405405405405406 6	Merced	40	4	35	2	.054	0
0.02531645569620253 7	Porterville	36	3	77	2	.025	1

Showing 1 to 7 of 7 entries

entries per page

Search:

Rk	Team	home games	attend	avg

Rk	Team	home games	attend	avg
55.0 1	Sequoias	20.0	1,100	55
11.0 2	Reedley	24.0	260	11
5.0 3	Taft	12.0	50	5
0.0 4	Porterville	18.0	0	0
0.0 4	Merced	18.0	0	0
0.0 4	Fresno City	23.0	0	0
0.0 4	Coalinga	18.0	0	0

Showing 1 to 7 of 7 entries

entries per page

Search:

Rk	Team	gp	ab	h	rbi	bb	k	avg	obp	slg

Rk	Team	gp	ab	h	rbi	bb	k	avg	obp	slg
0.367170626349892 1	Sequoias	18	463	170	107	39	31	.367	.414	.473
0.31827956989247314 3	Reedley	18	465	148	95	71	52	.318	.418	.396
0.311804008908686 2	Fresno City	18	449	140	100	62	54	.312	.413	.486
0.27114967462039047 6	Merced	18	461	125	78	51	80	.271	.349	.367
0.2639225181598063 4	Porterville	18	413	109	81	51	73	.264	.350	.363
0.2366412213740458 5	Taft	18	393	93	37	27	70	.237	.289	.318
0.236144578313253 7	Coalinga	18	415	98	59	40	98	.236	.325	.316

Showing 1 to 7 of 7 entries

entries per page

Search:

Rk	Team	gp	2b	3b	hr	xbh

Rk	Team	gp	2b	3b	hr	xbh
50.0 1	Fresno City	18	33	6	11	50
36.0 3	Sequoias	18	27	5	4	36
32.0 4	Porterville	18	26	3	3	32
31.0 2	Merced	18	21	7	3	31
26.0 6	Reedley	18	20	2	4	26
21.0 7	Taft	18	15	1	5	21
21.0 5	Coalinga	18	14	2	5	21

Showing 1 to 7 of 7 entries

entries per page

Search:

Rk	Team	gp	r	tb	sb	cs

Rk	Team	gp	r	tb	sb	cs
119.0 2	Sequoias	18	119	219	17	2
113.0 1	Fresno City	18	113	218	38	5
101.0 3	Reedley	18	101	184	21	3
88.0 6	Porterville	18	88	150	12	3
88.0 4	Merced	18	88	169	16	4
70.0 5	Coalinga	18	70	131	26	11
42.0 7	Taft	18	42	125	6	1

Showing 1 to 7 of 7 entries

entries per page

Search:

Rk	Team	gp	hbp	sf	sh	hdp	go	fo	go/fo	pa

Rk	Team	gp	hbp	sf	sh	hdp	go	fo	go/fo	pa
568.0 2	Reedley	18	10	2	20	3	81	86	.94	568
551.0 1	Fresno City	18	21	8	11	0	34	45	.76	551
536.0 3	Sequoias	18	4	8	22	1	74	108	.69	536
529.0 4	Merced	18	6	3	8	2	75	101	.74	529
483.0 6	Porterville	18	6	4	9	0	21	29	.72	483
480.0 5	Coalinga	18	16	3	6	0	37	40	.93	480
428.0 7	Taft	18	3	2	3	2	73	90	.81	428

Showing 1 to 7 of 7 entries

entries per page

Search:

Rk	Team	app	gs	ip	h	r	er	era

Rk	Team	app	gs	ip	h	r	er	era
12.3 1	Taft	18	18	93.1	203	207	164	12.30
9.44295302013423 2	Porterville	18	18	99.1	201	176	134	9.44
6.148026315789474 3	Coalinga	18	18	101.1	165	130	89	6.15
2.625 4	Reedley	18	18	112.0	112	53	42	2.63
1.2612612612612613 5	Fresno City	18	18	111.0	64	24	20	1.26
0.9882352941176471 6	Merced	18	18	113.1	77	24	16	0.99
0.590625 7	Sequoias	18	18	106.2	63	9	9	0.59

Showing 1 to 7 of 7 entries

entries per page

Search:

Rk	Team	app	gs	k	k/7	hr	whip

Rk	Team	app	gs	k	k/7	hr	whip
2.967857142857143 1	Taft	18	18	22	1.65	14	2.97
2.7181208053691277 2	Porterville	18	18	28	1.97	6	2.72
2.1710526315789473 3	Coalinga	18	18	38	2.63	6	2.17
1.3035714285714286 4	Reedley	18	18	91	5.69	5	1.30
1.1081081081081081 5	Fresno City	18	18	80	5.05	1	1.11
0.8911764705882353 6	Merced	18	18	65	4.01	3	0.89
0.84375 7	Sequoias	18	18	132	8.66	0	0.84

Showing 1 to 7 of 7 entries

entries per page

Search:

Rk	Team	gp	tc	po	a	e	pb	f%

Rk	Team	gp	tc	po	a	e	pb	f%
0.9853658536585366 1	Sequoias	18	410	319	85	6	0	.985
0.972457627118644 2	Fresno City	18	472	333	126	13	4	.972
0.952914798206278 4	Merced	18	446	340	85	21	3	.953
0.9486652977412731 3	Reedley	18	487	341	121	25	5	.949
0.9252136752136753 5	Porterville	18	468	294	139	35	12	.925
0.9183222958057395 6	Coalinga	18	453	301	115	37	11	.918
0.8644444444444445 7	Taft	18	450	280	109	61	4	.864

Showing 1 to 7 of 7 entries

entries per page

Search:

Rk	Team	gp	dp	sba	rcs	rcs%	ci

Rk	Team	gp	dp	sba	rcs	rcs%
0.5263157894736842 1	Fresno City	18	5	9	10	.526
0.5 2	Reedley	18	3	5	5	.500
0.2727272727272727 3	Sequoias	18	2	8	3	.273
0.25 6	Merced	18	3	6	2	.250
0.10416666666666667 4	Taft	18	1	43	5	.104
0.03125 5	Coalinga	18	4	31	1	.031
0.02857142857142857 7	Porterville	18	2	34	1	.029