Team Stats

Rk Team gp ab h rbi bb k avg obp slg
0.3301975540921919 1 Sequoias 40 1063 351 192 90 60 .330 .383 .413
0.2964641885766092 2 Fresno City 42 1103 327 204 131 129 .296 .386 .446
0.28755760368663597 3 Reedley 41 1085 312 184 133 120 .288 .371 .359
0.26974483596597815 4 Porterville 36 823 222 125 83 144 .270 .342 .348
0.2570281124497992 5 Taft 32 747 192 91 50 118 .257 .311 .329
0.256 6 Merced 40 1000 256 140 86 194 .256 .325 .354
0.24554039874081846 7 Coalinga 40 953 234 116 96 197 .246 .330 .324
Rk Team gp 2b 3b hr xbh
105.0 1 Fresno City 42 70 10 25 105
70.0 2 Merced 40 48 16 6 70
68.0 3 Sequoias 40 53 10 5 68
55.0 4 Porterville 36 49 3 3 55
52.0 5 Coalinga 40 39 3 10 52
52.0 5 Reedley 41 36 6 10 52
38.0 7 Taft 32 28 4 6 38
Rk Team gp r tb sb cs
236.0 1 Fresno City 42 236 492 72 13
227.0 2 Sequoias 40 227 439 40 4
201.0 3 Reedley 41 201 390 46 6
162.0 4 Merced 40 162 354 34 7
144.0 5 Coalinga 40 144 309 69 21
134.0 6 Porterville 36 134 286 22 6
103.0 7 Taft 32 103 246 11 4
Rk Team gp hbp sf sh hdp go fo go/fo pa
1310.0 1 Fresno City 42 37 13 26 3 120 156 .77 1310
1273.0 2 Reedley 41 13 4 38 3 270 241 1.12 1273
1221.0 3 Sequoias 40 9 13 46 8 221 281 .79 1221
1136.0 4 Merced 40 21 9 20 4 184 200 .92 1136
1094.0 5 Coalinga 40 28 9 8 3 110 110 1.00 1094
931.0 6 Porterville 36 10 5 10 2 80 68 1.18 931
822.0 7 Taft 32 10 4 11 6 190 168 1.13 822
Rk Team app gs ip h r er era
11.496047430830039 1 Taft 32 32 168.2 391 360 277 11.50
10.245674740484429 2 Porterville 36 36 192.2 395 360 282 10.25
6.450210378681627 3 Coalinga 40 40 237.2 372 299 219 6.45
3.236842105263158 4 Reedley 41 41 266.0 290 159 123 3.24
2.265454545454545 5 Fresno City 42 42 275.0 237 110 89 2.27
2.0144546649145862 6 Merced 40 40 253.2 228 113 73 2.01
1.4092105263157895 7 Sequoias 40 40 253.1 180 69 51 1.41
Rk Team app gs k k/7 hr whip
2.9762845849802373 1 Taft 32 32 41 1.70 23 2.98
2.8339100346020762 2 Porterville 36 36 57 2.07 11 2.83
2.1079943899018234 3 Coalinga 40 40 83 2.44 13 2.11
1.462406015037594 4 Reedley 41 41 200 5.26 7 1.46
1.3672727272727272 5 Fresno City 42 42 171 4.35 4 1.37
1.135348226018397 6 Merced 40 40 156 4.30 6 1.14
0.9868421052631579 7 Sequoias 40 40 263 7.27 4 0.99
Rk Team gp tc po a e pb f%
0.9720558882235529 1 Sequoias 40 1002 758 216 28 2 .972
0.9679930795847751 2 Fresno City 42 1156 822 297 37 13 .968
0.9424520433694745 3 Reedley 41 1199 823 307 69 13 .942
0.9410569105691057 4 Merced 40 984 719 207 58 10 .941
0.925764192139738 5 Porterville 36 916 583 265 68 25 .926
0.9254302103250478 6 Coalinga 40 1046 703 265 78 35 .925
0.8760631834750912 7 Taft 32 823 506 215 102 13 .876
Rk Team gp dp sba rcs rcs% ci
0.2830188679245283 1 Fresno City 42 6 38 15 .283 0
0.22857142857142856 2 Reedley 41 6 27 8 .229 0
0.16666666666666666 3 Sequoias 40 7 30 6 .167 0
0.10126582278481013 4 Taft 32 4 71 8 .101 0
0.0673076923076923 5 Coalinga 40 11 97 7 .067 0
0.05405405405405406 6 Merced 40 4 35 2 .054 0
0.02531645569620253 7 Porterville 36 3 77 2 .025 1
Rk Team home games attend avg
55.0 1 Sequoias 20.0 1,100 55
11.0 2 Reedley 24.0 260 11
5.0 3 Taft 12.0 50 5
0.0 4 Coalinga 18.0 0 0
0.0 4 Fresno City 23.0 0 0
0.0 4 Merced 18.0 0 0
0.0 4 Porterville 18.0 0 0
Rk Team gp ab h rbi bb k avg obp slg
0.367170626349892 1 Sequoias 18 463 170 107 39 31 .367 .414 .473
0.311804008908686 2 Fresno City 18 449 140 100 62 54 .312 .413 .486
0.31827956989247314 3 Reedley 18 465 148 95 71 52 .318 .418 .396
0.2639225181598063 4 Porterville 18 413 109 81 51 73 .264 .350 .363
0.2366412213740458 5 Taft 18 393 93 37 27 70 .237 .289 .318
0.27114967462039047 6 Merced 18 461 125 78 51 80 .271 .349 .367
0.236144578313253 7 Coalinga 18 415 98 59 40 98 .236 .325 .316
Rk Team gp 2b 3b hr xbh
50.0 1 Fresno City 18 33 6 11 50
31.0 2 Merced 18 21 7 3 31
36.0 3 Sequoias 18 27 5 4 36
32.0 4 Porterville 18 26 3 3 32
21.0 5 Coalinga 18 14 2 5 21
26.0 6 Reedley 18 20 2 4 26
21.0 7 Taft 18 15 1 5 21
Rk Team gp r tb sb cs
113.0 1 Fresno City 18 113 218 38 5
119.0 2 Sequoias 18 119 219 17 2
101.0 3 Reedley 18 101 184 21 3
88.0 4 Merced 18 88 169 16 4
70.0 5 Coalinga 18 70 131 26 11
88.0 6 Porterville 18 88 150 12 3
42.0 7 Taft 18 42 125 6 1
Rk Team gp hbp sf sh hdp go fo go/fo pa
551.0 1 Fresno City 18 21 8 11 0 34 45 .76 551
568.0 2 Reedley 18 10 2 20 3 81 86 .94 568
536.0 3 Sequoias 18 4 8 22 1 74 108 .69 536
529.0 4 Merced 18 6 3 8 2 75 101 .74 529
480.0 5 Coalinga 18 16 3 6 0 37 40 .93 480
483.0 6 Porterville 18 6 4 9 0 21 29 .72 483
428.0 7 Taft 18 3 2 3 2 73 90 .81 428
Rk Team app gs ip h r er era
12.3 1 Taft 18 18 93.1 203 207 164 12.30
9.44295302013423 2 Porterville 18 18 99.1 201 176 134 9.44
6.148026315789474 3 Coalinga 18 18 101.1 165 130 89 6.15
2.625 4 Reedley 18 18 112.0 112 53 42 2.63
1.2612612612612613 5 Fresno City 18 18 111.0 64 24 20 1.26
0.9882352941176471 6 Merced 18 18 113.1 77 24 16 0.99
0.590625 7 Sequoias 18 18 106.2 63 9 9 0.59
Rk Team app gs k k/7 hr whip
2.967857142857143 1 Taft 18 18 22 1.65 14 2.97
2.7181208053691277 2 Porterville 18 18 28 1.97 6 2.72
2.1710526315789473 3 Coalinga 18 18 38 2.63 6 2.17
1.3035714285714286 4 Reedley 18 18 91 5.69 5 1.30
1.1081081081081081 5 Fresno City 18 18 80 5.05 1 1.11
0.8911764705882353 6 Merced 18 18 65 4.01 3 0.89
0.84375 7 Sequoias 18 18 132 8.66 0 0.84
Rk Team gp tc po a e pb f%
0.9853658536585366 1 Sequoias 18 410 319 85 6 0 .985
0.972457627118644 2 Fresno City 18 472 333 126 13 4 .972
0.9486652977412731 3 Reedley 18 487 341 121 25 5 .949
0.952914798206278 4 Merced 18 446 340 85 21 3 .953
0.9252136752136753 5 Porterville 18 468 294 139 35 12 .925
0.9183222958057395 6 Coalinga 18 453 301 115 37 11 .918
0.8644444444444445 7 Taft 18 450 280 109 61 4 .864
Rk Team gp dp sba rcs rcs% ci
0.5263157894736842 1 Fresno City 18 5 9 10 .526 0
0.5 2 Reedley 18 3 5 5 .500 0
0.2727272727272727 3 Sequoias 18 2 8 3 .273 0
0.10416666666666667 4 Taft 18 1 43 5 .104 0
0.03125 5 Coalinga 18 4 31 1 .031 0
0.25 6 Merced 18 3 6 2 .250 0
0.02857142857142857 7 Porterville 18 2 34 1 .029 0
Rk Team home games attend avg
50.0 1 Sequoias 9.0 450 50
0.0 2 Reedley 8.0 0 0
5.0 3 Taft 10.0 50 5
5 4 Coalinga 7.0 - -
0.0 5 Fresno City 10.0 0 0
0.0 5 Merced 9.0 0 0
0.0 5 Porterville 10.0 0 0