Skip to navigation Skip to content Skip to footer
California Community College Athletic Association

Team Stats

Rk Team gp ab h rbi bb k avg obp slg
4.291021671826625 1 Grossmont 17 493 192 120 39 37 .389 .439 .546
3.5368421052631582 2 Southwestern 20 574 200 113 36 58 .348 .381 .507
1.8691099476439792 3 Palomar 19 547 189 113 51 43 .346 .417 .536
4.154471544715447 4 San Diego Mesa 20 508 160 122 80 65 .315 .422 .449
8.067796610169491 5 Imperial Valley 10 263 80 37 24 28 .304 .369 .373
14.777777777777779 6 San Diego City 2 38 7 2 1 15 .184 .205 .211
Rk Team gp 2b 3b hr xbh
3.5368421052631582 1 Southwestern 20 43 12 8 63
1.8691099476439792 2 Palomar 19 32 18 12 62
4.291021671826625 3 Grossmont 17 43 8 6 57
4.154471544715447 4 San Diego Mesa 20 21 4 13 38
8.067796610169491 5 Imperial Valley 10 11 2 1 14
14.777777777777779 6 San Diego City 2 1 - - 1
Rk Team gp r tb sb cs
4.291021671826625 1 Grossmont 17 144 269 51 5
4.154471544715447 2 San Diego Mesa 20 137 228 17 10
1.8691099476439792 3 Palomar 19 129 293 14 -
3.5368421052631582 4 Southwestern 20 128 291 46 3
8.067796610169491 5 Imperial Valley 10 48 98 5 1
14.777777777777779 6 San Diego City 2 2 8 - -
Rk Team gp hbp sf sh hdp go fo go/fo pa
3.5368421052631582 1 Southwestern 20 - 9 30 2 153 166 .92 649
1.8691099476439792 2 Palomar 19 18 3 19 1 165 140 1.18 638
4.154471544715447 3 San Diego Mesa 20 15 1 16 4 147 99 1.48 620
4.291021671826625 4 Grossmont 17 8 5 3 3 106 128 .83 548
8.067796610169491 5 Imperial Valley 10 3 - 4 5 28 37 .76 294
14.777777777777779 6 San Diego City 2 - - - 1 10 4 2.50 39
Rk Team app gs ip h r er era
14.777777777777779 1 San Diego City 2 2 9.0 29 44 19 14.78
8.067796610169491 2 Imperial Valley 10 10 59.0 113 81 68 8.07
4.291021671826625 3 Grossmont 17 17 107.2 114 85 66 4.29
4.154471544715447 4 San Diego Mesa 20 20 123.0 150 79 73 4.15
3.5368421052631582 5 Southwestern 20 20 126.2 150 91 64 3.54
1.8691099476439792 6 Palomar 19 19 127.1 114 39 34 1.87
Rk Team app gs k k/7 hr whip
1.8691099476439792 1 Palomar 19 19 84 4.62 6 -
3.5368421052631582 2 Southwestern 20 20 48 2.65 10 -
4.154471544715447 3 San Diego Mesa 20 20 56 3.19 3 -
4.291021671826625 4 Grossmont 17 17 63 4.10 3 -
8.067796610169491 5 Imperial Valley 10 10 13 1.54 2 -
14.777777777777779 6 San Diego City 2 2 1 .78 - -
Rk Team gp tc po a e pb f%
1.8691099476439792 1 Palomar 19 570 382 175 13 5 .977
4.154471544715447 2 San Diego Mesa 20 529 369 137 23 5 .957
4.291021671826625 3 Grossmont 17 476 319 132 25 13 .947
8.067796610169491 4 Imperial Valley 10 257 179 61 17 3 .934
3.5368421052631582 5 Southwestern 20 532 374 121 37 2 .930
14.777777777777779 6 San Diego City 2 52 27 9 16 2 .692
Rk Team gp dp sba rcs rcs% ci
4.291021671826625 1 Grossmont 17 3 13 7 .350 0
4.154471544715447 2 San Diego Mesa 20 3 15 5 .250 -
1.8691099476439792 3 Palomar 19 12 7 2 .222 -
3.5368421052631582 4 Southwestern 20 4 16 4 .200 1
8.067796610169491 5 Imperial Valley 10 - 20 - - -
14.777777777777779 6 San Diego City 2 - 2 - - -
Rk Team home games attend avg
3.5368421052631582 1 Southwestern 2.0 100 50
1.8691099476439792 2 Palomar 9.0 445 49
14.777777777777779 3 San Diego City 1 30 30
8.067796610169491 4 Imperial Valley 5.0 128 26
4.154471544715447 5 San Diego Mesa 9.0 100 12
4.291021671826625 6 Grossmont 9.0 0 0
Rk Team gp ab h rbi bb k avg obp slg
4.732394366197183 1 Grossmont 4 104 30 19 11 11 .288 .373 .423
3.868421052631579 2 Southwestern 4 113 40 16 10 11 .354 .400 .425
0.7241379310344828 3 Palomar 4 115 38 14 11 6 .330 .412 .435
1.75 4 San Diego Mesa 4 105 27 22 17 11 .257 .381 .429
9.227272727272727 5 Imperial Valley 4 88 18 1 6 16 .205 .255 .227
0.0 6 San Diego City - - - - - - - - -
Rk Team gp 2b 3b hr xbh
3.868421052631579 1 Southwestern 4 8 - - 8
0.7241379310344828 2 Palomar 4 6 3 - 9
4.732394366197183 3 Grossmont 4 4 2 2 8
1.75 4 San Diego Mesa 4 4 1 4 9
9.227272727272727 5 Imperial Valley 4 2 - - 2
0.0 6 San Diego City - - - - 0
Rk Team gp r tb sb cs
4.732394366197183 1 Grossmont 4 22 44 4 -
1.75 2 San Diego Mesa 4 24 45 4 1
0.7241379310344828 3 Palomar 4 19 50 5 -
3.868421052631579 4 Southwestern 4 23 48 8 -
9.227272727272727 5 Imperial Valley 4 1 20 1 -
0.0 6 San Diego City - - 0 - -
Rk Team gp hbp sf sh hdp go fo go/fo pa
3.868421052631579 1 Southwestern 4 - 2 8 - 31 35 .89 133
0.7241379310344828 2 Palomar 4 7 3 3 - 33 38 .87 139
1.75 3 San Diego Mesa 4 4 - - - 29 16 1.81 126
4.732394366197183 4 Grossmont 4 3 - 2 - 28 33 .85 120
9.227272727272727 5 Imperial Valley 4 - - 1 2 12 25 .48 95
0.0 6 San Diego City - - - - - - - - 0
Rk Team app gs ip h r er era
0.0 1 San Diego City - - 0.0 - - - 0.00
9.227272727272727 2 Imperial Valley 4 4 22.0 47 36 29 9.23
4.732394366197183 3 Grossmont 4 4 23.2 30 21 16 4.73
1.75 4 San Diego Mesa 4 4 28.0 24 7 7 1.75
3.868421052631579 5 Southwestern 4 4 25.1 29 20 14 3.87
0.7241379310344828 6 Palomar 4 4 29.0 23 5 3 0.72
Rk Team app gs k k/7 hr whip
0.7241379310344828 1 Palomar 4 4 22 5.31 1 -
3.868421052631579 2 Southwestern 4 4 8 2.21 4 -
1.75 3 San Diego Mesa 4 4 12 3.00 - -
4.732394366197183 4 Grossmont 4 4 11 3.25 1 -
9.227272727272727 5 Imperial Valley 4 4 3 .95 - -
0.0 6 San Diego City - - - .00 - -
Rk Team gp tc po a e pb f%
0.7241379310344828 1 Palomar 4 130 87 39 4 - .969
1.75 2 San Diego Mesa 4 120 84 32 4 - .967
4.732394366197183 3 Grossmont 4 107 71 29 7 1 .935
9.227272727272727 4 Imperial Valley 4 96 66 22 8 3 .917
3.868421052631579 5 Southwestern 4 116 76 28 12 - .897
0.0 6 San Diego City - 0 - - - - -
Rk Team gp dp sba rcs rcs% ci
4.732394366197183 1 Grossmont 4 1 5 0 .000 -
1.75 2 San Diego Mesa 4 1 3 - - -
0.7241379310344828 3 Palomar 4 - 1 - - -
3.868421052631579 4 Southwestern 4 - 1 - - -
9.227272727272727 5 Imperial Valley 4 - 12 - - -
0.0 6 San Diego City - - - - - -
Rk Team home games attend avg
3.868421052631579 1 Southwestern 1 50 50
0.7241379310344828 2 Palomar 3.0 150 50
0.0 3 San Diego City - - -
9.227272727272727 4 Imperial Valley 2.0 50 25
1.75 5 San Diego Mesa 3.0 0 0
4.732394366197183 6 Grossmont 1 0 0