California Community College Athletic Association

Team Stats

Rk	Team	gp	ab	h	rbi	bb	k	avg	obp	slg
21.0 1	LA Valley	36	989	407	345	140	76	.412	.491	.666
15.0 2	Citrus	40	1083	393	245	99	84	.363	.422	.494
4.0 3	Barstow	35	982	347	222	90	111	.353	.417	.503
16.0 4	Canyons	44	1141	392	276	151	113	.344	.436	.516
16.0 4	Antelope Valley	44	1133	377	309	167	143	.333	.426	.534
6.0 6	LA Mission	40	1037	334	224	140	148	.322	.420	.460
3.0 7	Glendale	38	950	298	182	116	135	.314	.397	.436
2.0 8	Victor Valley	28	658	172	86	52	117	.261	.325	.337

Rk	Team	gp	2b	3b	hr	xbh
21.0 1	LA Valley	36	86	14	46	146
16.0 2	Canyons	44	92	15	25	132
16.0 2	Antelope Valley	44	69	24	37	130
4.0 4	Barstow	35	71	17	14	102
15.0 5	Citrus	40	71	13	15	99
6.0 6	LA Mission	40	62	12	19	93
3.0 7	Glendale	38	44	15	14	73
2.0 8	Victor Valley	28	24	10	2	36

Rk	Team	gp	r	tb	sb	cs
21.0 1	LA Valley	36	371	659	33	5
16.0 2	Antelope Valley	44	357	605	13	3
16.0 2	Canyons	44	331	589	125	17
15.0 4	Citrus	40	273	535	33	10
6.0 5	LA Mission	40	273	477	23	7
4.0 6	Barstow	35	252	494	33	1
3.0 7	Glendale	38	196	414	26	8
2.0 8	Victor Valley	28	102	222	34	6

Rk	Team	gp	hbp	sf	sh	hdp	go	fo	go/fo	pa
21.0 1	LA Valley	36	34	21	2	6	212	270	.79	1186
16.0 2	Antelope Valley	44	30	16	29	7	185	290	.64	1375
16.0 2	Canyons	44	48	16	30	5	223	336	.66	1386
15.0 4	Citrus	40	22	15	26	14	277	279	.99	1245
6.0 5	LA Mission	40	39	6	13	2	221	251	.88	1235
4.0 6	Barstow	35	20	4	13	3	225	228	.99	1109
3.0 7	Glendale	38	18	3	7	6	201	220	.91	1094
2.0 8	Victor Valley	28	11	2	6	5	170	124	1.37	729

Rk	Team	app	gs	ip	h	r	er	era
2.0 1	Victor Valley	28	28	151.2	306	330	224	10.34
3.0 2	Glendale	38	38	204.0	457	378	277	9.50
4.0 3	Barstow	35	35	198.0	400	364	241	8.52
21.0 4	LA Valley	36	36	208.2	282	223	174	5.84
6.0 5	LA Mission	40	40	236.0	300	200	155	4.60
15.0 6	Citrus	40	40	245.0	257	177	135	3.86
16.0 7	Antelope Valley	44	44	263.1	278	165	132	3.51
16.0 7	Canyons	44	44	269.0	299	170	123	3.20

Rk	Team	app	gs	k	k/7	hr	whip
21.0 1	LA Valley	36	36	83	2.78	19	-
16.0 2	Antelope Valley	44	44	173	4.60	24	-
16.0 2	Canyons	44	44	173	4.50	14	-
15.0 4	Citrus	40	40	103	2.94	15	-
6.0 5	LA Mission	40	40	84	2.49	12	-
4.0 6	Barstow	35	35	67	2.37	13	-
3.0 7	Glendale	38	38	55	1.89	39	-
2.0 8	Victor Valley	28	28	59	2.72	9	-

Rk	Team	gp	tc	po	a	e	pb	f%
16.0 1	Antelope Valley	44	1099	761	285	53	20	.952
16.0 1	Canyons	44	1199	820	321	58	11	.952
21.0 3	LA Valley	36	1017	626	334	57	24	.944
15.0 4	Citrus	40	1099	716	316	67	6	.939
6.0 5	LA Mission	40	996	669	249	78	26	.922
3.0 6	Glendale	38	959	597	281	81	15	.916
2.0 7	Victor Valley	28	605	386	146	73	28	.879
4.0 8	Barstow	35	915	544	255	116	40	.873

Rk	Team	gp	dp	sba	rcs	rcs%	ci
16.0 1	Canyons	44	11	35	16	.314	1
4.0 2	Barstow	35	9	28	10	.263	-
15.0 3	Citrus	40	9	35	6	.146	1
21.0 4	LA Valley	36	1	25	4	.138	1
6.0 5	LA Mission	40	4	54	7	.115	1
3.0 6	Glendale	38	10	68	4	.056	-
2.0 7	Victor Valley	28	3	56	3	.051	1
16.0 8	Antelope Valley	44	7	43	2	.044	0

Rk	Team	home games	attend	avg
21.0 1	LA Valley	20.0	1,629	82
4.0 2	Barstow	16.0	1,050	66
16.0 3	Canyons	22.0	1,246	57
15.0 4	Citrus	20.0	614	31
16.0 5	Antelope Valley	19.0	250	14
6.0 6	LA Mission	13.0	0	0
3.0 7	Glendale	16.0	0	0
2.0 8	Victor Valley	15.0	0	0

Rk	Team	gp	ab	h	rbi	bb	k	avg	obp	slg
8.0 1	LA Valley	16	437	178	149	53	30	.407	.481	.659
12.0 2	Citrus	16	461	187	128	49	24	.406	.457	.579
3.0 3	Barstow	16	415	136	94	51	50	.328	.411	.482
7.0 4	Canyons	16	389	161	147	81	17	.414	.522	.627
8.0 5	Antelope Valley	16	445	179	147	63	34	.402	.480	.658
1.0 6	LA Mission	16	410	154	113	61	45	.376	.478	.517
.517 7	Glendale	16	409	125	78	50	46	.306	.393	.433
2.0 8	Victor Valley	16	371	105	59	28	59	.283	.338	.369

Rk	Team	gp	2b	3b	hr	xbh
8.0 1	LA Valley	16	41	6	19	66
7.0 2	Canyons	16	44	6	9	59
8.0 3	Antelope Valley	16	38	11	18	67
3.0 4	Barstow	16	33	8	5	46
12.0 5	Citrus	16	32	9	10	51
1.0 6	LA Mission	16	30	5	6	41
41 7	Glendale	16	25	3	7	35
2.0 8	Victor Valley	16	16	5	2	23

Rk	Team	gp	r	tb	sb	cs
8.0 1	LA Valley	16	165	288	14	4
8.0 1	Antelope Valley	16	167	293	6	-
7.0 3	Canyons	16	168	244	62	5
12.0 4	Citrus	16	147	267	12	2
1.0 5	LA Mission	16	142	212	10	2
3.0 6	Barstow	16	102	200	21	1
1 7	Glendale	16	87	177	10	2
2.0 8	Victor Valley	16	70	137	20	4

Rk	Team	gp	hbp	sf	sh	hdp	go	fo	go/fo	pa
8.0 1	LA Valley	16	16	8	2	2	86	133	.65	516
8.0 1	Antelope Valley	16	11	8	12	3	86	141	.61	539
7.0 3	Canyons	16	15	7	10	2	90	117	.77	502
12.0 4	Citrus	16	5	12	4	3	100	132	.76	531
1.0 5	LA Mission	16	20	1	1	-	91	93	.98	493
3.0 6	Barstow	16	10	3	5	1	119	97	1.23	484
484 7	Glendale	16	9	-	1	1	101	123	.82	469
2.0 8	Victor Valley	16	4	2	4	2	105	81	1.30	409

Rk	Team	app	gs	ip	h	r	er	era
2.0 1	Victor Valley	16	16	83.2	154	178	126	10.54
10.54 2	Glendale	16	16	89.0	199	163	126	9.91
3.0 3	Barstow	16	16	90.0	181	162	122	9.49
8.0 4	LA Valley	16	16	90.2	127	100	78	6.02
1.0 5	LA Mission	16	16	89.0	104	61	53	4.17
12.0 6	Citrus	16	16	95.2	95	65	48	3.51
8.0 7	Antelope Valley	16	16	98.0	91	60	51	3.64
7.0 8	Canyons	16	16	92.0	76	21	19	1.45

Rk	Team	app	gs	k	k/7	hr	whip
8.0 1	LA Valley	16	16	36	2.78	8	-
8.0 1	Antelope Valley	16	16	83	5.93	13	-
7.0 3	Canyons	16	16	81	6.16	-	-
12.0 4	Citrus	16	16	49	3.59	7	-
1.0 5	LA Mission	16	16	32	2.52	4	-
3.0 6	Barstow	16	16	31	2.41	7	-
- 7	Glendale	16	16	30	2.36	17	-
2.0 8	Victor Valley	16	16	42	3.51	9	-

Rk	Team	gp	tc	po	a	e	pb	f%
8.0 1	Antelope Valley	16	413	293	105	15	8	.964
7.0 2	Canyons	16	374	276	88	10	2	.973
8.0 3	LA Valley	16	439	272	142	25	11	.943
12.0 4	Citrus	16	424	287	113	24	4	.943
1.0 5	LA Mission	16	389	267	104	18	7	.954
.954 6	Glendale	16	426	267	123	36	8	.915
2.0 7	Victor Valley	16	376	251	83	42	19	.888
3.0 8	Barstow	16	446	270	122	54	21	.879

Rk	Team	gp	dp	sba	rcs	rcs%	ci
7.0 1	Canyons	16	2	2	6	.750	-
3.0 2	Barstow	16	4	19	3	.136	-
12.0 3	Citrus	16	3	11	2	.154	1
8.0 4	LA Valley	16	-	13	1	.071	-
1.0 5	LA Mission	16	-	19	2	.095	1
1 6	Glendale	16	3	11	2	.154	-
2.0 7	Victor Valley	16	1	27	2	.069	1
8.0 8	Antelope Valley	16	1	19	1	.050	-

Rk	Team	home games	attend	avg
8.0 1	LA Valley	8.0	643	81
3.0 2	Barstow	8.0	800	100
7.0 3	Canyons	8.0	378	48
12.0 4	Citrus	8.0	207	26
8.0 5	Antelope Valley	8.0	0	0
1.0 6	LA Mission	8.0	0	0
0 7	Glendale	8.0	0	0
2.0 8	Victor Valley	8.0	0	0