Team Stats

Rk Team gp ab h rbi bb k avg obp slg
0.39144215530903326 1 Mt. San Antonio 46 1262 494 335 103 86 .391 .444 .595
0.3087686567164179 2 East Los Angeles 40 1072 331 196 105 130 .309 .384 .404
0.30845323741007197 3 Pasadena City 41 1112 343 190 119 165 .308 .384 .405
0.2876712328767123 4 Chaffey 38 949 273 136 70 108 .288 .346 .397
0.2631578947368421 5 Rio Hondo 39 950 250 107 76 137 .263 .327 .306
Rk Team gp 2b 3b hr xbh
157.0 1 Mt. San Antonio 46 98 18 41 157
77.0 2 Chaffey 38 54 19 4 77
73.0 3 East Los Angeles 40 52 13 8 73
66.0 4 Pasadena City 41 35 21 10 66
37.0 5 Rio Hondo 39 34 2 1 37
Rk Team gp r tb sb cs
366.0 1 Mt. San Antonio 46 366 751 119 8
237.0 2 Pasadena City 41 237 450 95 18
224.0 3 East Los Angeles 40 224 433 31 5
178.0 4 Chaffey 38 178 377 50 17
136.0 5 Rio Hondo 39 136 291 33 7
Rk Team gp hbp sf sh hdp go fo go/fo pa
1453.0 1 Mt. San Antonio 46 36 26 26 6 283 361 .78 1453
1293.0 2 Pasadena City 41 23 9 30 9 304 249 1.22 1293
1260.0 3 East Los Angeles 40 30 7 46 1 181 109 1.66 1260
1087.0 4 Chaffey 38 20 10 38 4 229 234 .98 1087
1086.0 5 Rio Hondo 39 16 4 40 8 239 202 1.18 1086
Rk Team app gs ip h r er era
5.713884992987378 1 Chaffey 38 38 237.2 334 251 194 5.71
5.19 2 Rio Hondo 39 39 233.1 374 259 173 5.19
4.861372812920592 3 East Los Angeles 40 40 247.2 344 217 172 4.86
3.0075376884422114 4 Pasadena City 41 41 265.1 267 150 114 3.01
1.8824214202561118 5 Mt. San Antonio 46 46 286.1 194 103 77 1.88
Rk Team app gs k k/7 hr whip
1.0861466821885915 1 Mt. San Antonio 46 46 310 7.58 13 1.09
1.09 2 Chaffey 38 38 81 2.39 15 -
- 3 East Los Angeles 40 40 91 2.57 15 -
- 3 Pasadena City 41 41 138 3.64 15 -
- 3 Rio Hondo 39 39 93 2.79 11 -
Rk Team gp tc po a e pb f%
0.9625 1 Mt. San Antonio 46 1120 851 227 42 7 .963
0.9590163934426229 2 Pasadena City 41 1098 796 257 45 7 .959
0.9407035175879397 3 East Los Angeles 40 995 636 300 59 5 .941
0.9127579737335835 4 Chaffey 38 1066 663 310 93 8 .913
0.9102222222222223 5 Rio Hondo 39 1125 683 341 101 9 .910
Rk Team gp dp sba rcs rcs% ci
0.3333333333333333 1 Mt. San Antonio 46 6 14 7 .333 0
0.14864864864864866 2 Rio Hondo 39 6 63 11 .149 0
0.125 3 Pasadena City 41 13 42 6 .125 2
0.1076923076923077 4 Chaffey 38 15 58 7 .108 -
0.016129032258064516 5 East Los Angeles 40 5 61 1 .016 -
Rk Team home games attend avg
90.0 1 Mt. San Antonio 22.0 1,974 90
63.0 2 Pasadena City 15.0 942 63
41.0 3 East Los Angeles 18.0 732 41
2.0 4 Chaffey 16.0 25 2
2.0 4 Rio Hondo 19.0 25 2
Rk Team gp ab h rbi bb k avg obp slg
0.44510385756676557 1 Mt. San Antonio 12 337 150 116 25 13 .445 .497 .674
0.3 2 East Los Angeles 12 330 99 47 27 39 .300 .364 .361
0.3421828908554572 3 Pasadena City 12 339 116 67 25 45 .342 .397 .442
0.2913907284768212 4 Chaffey 12 302 88 41 25 34 .291 .353 .401
0.24489795918367346 5 Rio Hondo 12 294 72 30 28 26 .245 .321 .299
Rk Team gp 2b 3b hr xbh
49.0 1 Mt. San Antonio 12 33 4 12 49
26.0 2 Chaffey 12 21 3 2 26
17.0 3 East Los Angeles 12 15 1 1 17
23.0 4 Pasadena City 12 15 5 3 23
14.0 5 Rio Hondo 12 13 - 1 14
Rk Team gp r tb sb cs
127.0 1 Mt. San Antonio 12 127 227 39 2
78.0 2 Pasadena City 12 78 150 31 5
48.0 3 East Los Angeles 12 48 119 9 -
55.0 4 Chaffey 12 55 121 14 4
32.0 5 Rio Hondo 12 32 88 10 1
Rk Team gp hbp sf sh hdp go fo go/fo pa
389.0 1 Mt. San Antonio 12 17 7 3 2 71 82 .87 389
383.0 2 Pasadena City 12 8 3 8 4 85 76 1.12 383
385.0 3 East Los Angeles 12 8 3 17 1 63 48 1.31 385
350.0 4 Chaffey 12 5 2 16 2 64 74 .86 350
348.0 5 Rio Hondo 12 5 - 21 2 88 76 1.16 348
Rk Team app gs ip h r er era
6.876106194690266 1 Chaffey 12 12 75.1 121 92 74 6.88
5.431034482758621 2 Rio Hondo 12 12 77.1 125 84 60 5.43
6.5394736842105265 3 East Los Angeles 12 12 76.0 140 90 71 6.54
3.652173913043478 4 Pasadena City 12 12 76.2 91 56 40 3.65
1.4411764705882353 5 Mt. San Antonio 12 12 68.0 48 20 14 1.44
Rk Team app gs k k/7 hr whip
1.1029411764705883 1 Mt. San Antonio 12 12 66 6.79 1 1.10
1.10 2 Chaffey 12 12 14 1.30 6 -
- 3 East Los Angeles 12 12 16 1.47 6 -
- 3 Pasadena City 12 12 34 3.10 5 -
- 3 Rio Hondo 12 12 22 1.99 1 -
Rk Team gp tc po a e pb f%
0.9485294117647058 1 Mt. San Antonio 12 272 196 62 14 4 .949
0.9487951807228916 2 Pasadena City 12 332 230 85 17 3 .949
0.9292929292929293 3 East Los Angeles 12 297 194 82 21 2 .929
0.8991097922848664 4 Chaffey 12 337 202 101 34 4 .899
0.91005291005291 5 Rio Hondo 12 378 224 120 34 2 .910
Rk Team gp dp sba rcs rcs% ci
0.5 1 Mt. San Antonio 12 2 3 3 .500 -
0.13793103448275862 2 Rio Hondo 12 4 25 4 .138 -
- 3 Pasadena City 12 2 18 - - 2
0.12903225806451613 4 Chaffey 12 2 27 4 .129 -
0.03225806451612903 5 East Los Angeles 12 1 30 1 .032 -
Rk Team home games attend avg
87.0 1 Mt. San Antonio 6.0 517 87
66.0 2 Pasadena City 6.0 392 66
52.0 3 East Los Angeles 6.0 312 52
5.0 4 Chaffey 6.0 25 5
5.0 4 Rio Hondo 6.0 25 5