Skip to navigation Skip to content Skip to footer
California Community College Athletic Association

Team Stats

Rk Team gp ab h rbi bb k avg obp slg
114.0 1 Palomar 50 1898 685 462 184 288 .361 .435 .520
24.095238095238095 2 Grossmont 40 1391 420 288 211 255 .302 .408 .435
70.0 3 Southwestern 41 1389 404 222 160 279 .291 .388 .410
21.11111111111111 4 San Diego City 36 1262 353 203 139 217 .280 .380 .406
55.888888888888886 5 San Diego Mesa 39 1275 356 234 156 294 .279 .382 .452
36.0625 6 Imperial Valley 37 1199 294 125 87 313 .245 .321 .316
Rk Team gp 2b 3b hr xbh
114.0 1 Palomar 50 131 27 39 197
55.888888888888886 2 San Diego Mesa 39 83 16 35 134
24.095238095238095 3 Grossmont 40 81 16 24 121
70.0 4 Southwestern 41 76 16 19 111
21.11111111111111 5 San Diego City 36 67 9 25 101
36.0625 6 Imperial Valley 37 46 12 5 63
Rk Team gp r tb sb cs
114.0 1 Palomar 50 513 987 70 24
24.095238095238095 2 Grossmont 40 318 605 73 18
55.888888888888886 3 San Diego Mesa 39 254 576 72 13
21.11111111111111 4 San Diego City 36 252 513 47 18
70.0 5 Southwestern 41 249 569 27 11
36.0625 6 Imperial Valley 37 162 379 19 8
Rk Team gp hbp sf sh hdp go fo go/fo pa
114.0 1 Palomar 50 84 24 33 22 478 438 1.09 2223
24.095238095238095 2 Grossmont 40 55 26 12 26 322 384 .84 1695
70.0 3 Southwestern 41 72 19 18 36 333 368 .90 1658
55.888888888888886 4 San Diego Mesa 39 75 32 32 16 310 358 .87 1570
21.11111111111111 5 San Diego City 36 73 14 20 19 318 351 .91 1508
36.0625 6 Imperial Valley 37 50 8 7 30 327 224 1.46 1351
Rk Team app gs ip h r er era
36.0625 1 Imperial Valley 37 37 297.2 504 487 400 12.09
24.095238095238095 2 Grossmont 40 40 346.0 418 297 246 6.40
55.888888888888886 3 San Diego Mesa 39 39 330.1 413 306 234 6.38
21.11111111111111 4 San Diego City 36 36 315.2 370 238 188 5.36
70.0 5 Southwestern 41 41 357.0 342 204 178 4.49
114.0 6 Palomar 50 50 440.1 457 279 218 4.46
Rk Team app gs k k/9 hr whip
114.0 1 Palomar 50 50 415 8.48 30 -
70.0 2 Southwestern 41 41 252 6.35 19 -
55.888888888888886 3 San Diego Mesa 39 39 219 5.97 33 -
36.0625 4 Imperial Valley 37 37 206 6.23 37 -
24.095238095238095 5 Grossmont 40 40 307 7.99 20 -
21.11111111111111 6 San Diego City 36 36 261 7.44 20 -
Rk Team gp tc po a e pb f%
70.0 1 Southwestern 41 1524 1071 392 61 10 .960
21.11111111111111 2 San Diego City 36 1336 947 332 57 11 .957
24.095238095238095 3 Grossmont 40 1490 1038 386 66 18 .956
114.0 4 Palomar 50 1908 1317 506 85 23 .955
55.888888888888886 5 San Diego Mesa 39 1504 991 419 94 9 .938
36.0625 6 Imperial Valley 37 1310 893 329 88 21 .933
Rk Team gp dp sba rcs rcs% ci
55.888888888888886 1 San Diego Mesa 39 24 36 19 .345 0
114.0 2 Palomar 50 27 43 17 .283 2
21.11111111111111 3 San Diego City 36 23 49 19 .279 0
70.0 4 Southwestern 41 28 31 10 .244 0
24.095238095238095 5 Grossmont 40 21 47 11 .190 1
36.0625 6 Imperial Valley 37 19 96 17 .150 0
Rk Team home games attend avg
114.0 1 Palomar 25 2,850 114
70.0 2 Southwestern 23 1,600 70
55.888888888888886 3 San Diego Mesa 18 1,006 56
36.0625 4 Imperial Valley 16 577 36
24.095238095238095 5 Grossmont 21 506 24
21.11111111111111 6 San Diego City 18 380 21
Rk Team gp ab h rbi bb k avg obp slg
133.0 1 Palomar 25 945 340 244 101 127 .360 .443 .534
30.785714285714285 2 Grossmont 25 854 261 180 136 139 .306 .415 .451
66.0 3 Southwestern 25 855 244 135 96 163 .285 .381 .407
25.384615384615383 4 San Diego City 25 879 239 130 95 145 .272 .373 .408
56.5 5 San Diego Mesa 25 822 230 156 103 180 .280 .384 .462
36.54545454545455 6 Imperial Valley 25 782 186 64 54 211 .238 .305 .292
Rk Team gp 2b 3b hr xbh
133.0 1 Palomar 25 70 16 21 107
56.5 2 San Diego Mesa 25 57 9 25 91
30.785714285714285 3 Grossmont 25 55 9 17 81
66.0 4 Southwestern 25 42 10 14 66
25.384615384615383 5 San Diego City 25 46 7 20 73
36.54545454545455 6 Imperial Valley 25 24 6 2 32
Rk Team gp r tb sb cs
133.0 1 Palomar 25 276 505 40 12
30.785714285714285 2 Grossmont 25 198 385 34 12
56.5 3 San Diego Mesa 25 168 380 30 8
25.384615384615383 4 San Diego City 25 161 359 34 13
66.0 5 Southwestern 25 150 348 15 7
36.54545454545455 6 Imperial Valley 25 79 228 12 3
Rk Team gp hbp sf sh hdp go fo go/fo pa
133.0 1 Palomar 25 52 14 14 8 238 233 1.02 1126
30.785714285714285 2 Grossmont 25 34 15 8 17 182 269 .68 1047
66.0 3 Southwestern 25 42 9 8 23 217 221 .98 1010
56.5 4 San Diego Mesa 25 49 20 19 8 196 242 .81 1013
25.384615384615383 5 San Diego City 25 52 9 16 10 225 257 .88 1051
36.54545454545455 6 Imperial Valley 25 24 6 5 23 222 148 1.50 871
Rk Team app gs ip h r er era
36.54545454545455 1 Imperial Valley 25 25 198.2 335 316 264 11.96
30.785714285714285 2 Grossmont 25 25 214.0 258 174 143 6.01
56.5 3 San Diego Mesa 25 25 213.1 235 158 115 4.85
25.384615384615383 4 San Diego City 25 25 222.2 250 154 126 5.09
66.0 5 Southwestern 25 25 218.0 214 120 107 4.42
133.0 6 Palomar 25 25 220.2 208 110 89 3.63
Rk Team app gs k k/9 hr whip
133.0 1 Palomar 25 25 213 8.69 10 -
66.0 2 Southwestern 25 25 147 6.07 14 -
56.5 3 San Diego Mesa 25 25 117 4.94 16 -
36.54545454545455 4 Imperial Valley 25 25 117 5.30 27 -
30.785714285714285 5 Grossmont 25 25 187 7.86 15 -
25.384615384615383 6 San Diego City 25 25 184 7.44 17 -
Rk Team gp tc po a e pb f%
66.0 1 Southwestern 25 939 654 254 31 6 .967
25.384615384615383 2 San Diego City 25 934 668 232 34 6 .964
30.785714285714285 3 Grossmont 25 931 642 251 38 7 .959
133.0 4 Palomar 25 948 661 255 32 11 .966
56.5 5 San Diego Mesa 25 985 640 287 58 6 .941
36.54545454545455 6 Imperial Valley 25 876 596 223 57 4 .935
Rk Team gp dp sba rcs rcs% ci
56.5 1 San Diego Mesa 25 17 19 12 .387 0
133.0 2 Palomar 25 12 12 5 .294 0
25.384615384615383 3 San Diego City 25 16 31 15 .326 0
66.0 4 Southwestern 25 16 22 8 .267 0
30.785714285714285 5 Grossmont 25 18 18 5 .217 0
36.54545454545455 6 Imperial Valley 25 10 63 10 .137 0
Rk Team home games attend avg
133.0 1 Palomar 13 1,720 133
66.0 2 Southwestern 12 785 66
56.5 3 San Diego Mesa 12 678 57
36.54545454545455 4 Imperial Valley 11 402 37
30.785714285714285 5 Grossmont 14 431 31
25.384615384615383 6 San Diego City 13 330 25