California Community College Athletic Association

Team Stats

Rk	Team	gp	ab	h	rbi	bb	k	avg	obp	slg
542.0 1	Pasadena City	40	1408	427	257	206	311	.303	.416	.385
647.0 2	Mt. San Antonio	46	1616	468	253	197	272	.290	.379	.400
499.0 3	Chaffey	40	1386	374	205	159	291	.270	.371	.360
416.0 4	East Los Angeles	40	1363	351	160	170	271	.258	.367	.305
379.00000000000006 5	Rio Hondo	35	1192	295	144	122	250	.247	.336	.318

Rk	Team	gp	2b	3b	hr	xbh
647.0 1	Mt. San Antonio	46	83	24	16	123
542.0 2	Pasadena City	40	65	7	12	84
499.0 3	Chaffey	40	52	11	17	80
379.00000000000006 4	Rio Hondo	35	40	4	12	56
416.0 5	East Los Angeles	40	44	6	3	53

Rk	Team	gp	r	tb	sb	cs
647.0 1	Mt. San Antonio	46	290	647	74	15
542.0 2	Pasadena City	40	314	542	35	8
499.0 3	Chaffey	40	240	499	72	24
416.0 4	East Los Angeles	40	193	416	38	18
379.00000000000006 5	Rio Hondo	35	165	379	21	16

Rk	Team	gp	hbp	sf	sh	hdp	go	fo	go/fo	pa
647.0 1	Mt. San Antonio	46	53	30	16	36	416	455	.91	1912
542.0 2	Pasadena City	40	83	24	32	34	401	267	1.50	1753
416.0 3	East Los Angeles	40	74	13	30	38	438	294	1.49	1650
499.0 4	Chaffey	40	71	13	16	31	365	345	1.06	1645
379.00000000000006 5	Rio Hondo	35	42	10	24	35	319	290	1.10	1390

Rk	Team	app	gs	ip	h	r	er	era
379.00000000000006 1	Rio Hondo	35	35	308.2	382	254	204	5.95
647.0 2	Mt. San Antonio	46	46	415.0	449	289	223	4.84
416.0 3	East Los Angeles	40	40	357.1	368	204	167	4.21
499.0 4	Chaffey	40	40	359.2	364	207	160	4.00
542.0 5	Pasadena City	40	40	351.1	314	165	130	3.33

Rk	Team	app	gs	k	k/9	hr	whip
647.0 1	Mt. San Antonio	46	46	353	7.66	21	-
542.0 2	Pasadena City	40	40	284	7.28	6	-
499.0 3	Chaffey	40	40	314	7.86	12	-
416.0 4	East Los Angeles	40	40	275	6.93	11	-
379.00000000000006 5	Rio Hondo	35	35	234	6.82	16	-

Rk	Team	gp	tc	po	a	e	pb	f%
416.0 1	East Los Angeles	40	1552	1071	436	45	12	.971
647.0 2	Mt. San Antonio	46	1811	1243	496	72	41	.960
542.0 3	Pasadena City	40	1525	1053	411	61	9	.960
499.0 4	Chaffey	40	1572	1077	428	67	14	.957
379.00000000000006 5	Rio Hondo	35	1364	902	383	79	15	.942

Rk	Team	gp	dp	sba	rcs	rcs%	ci
499.0 1	Chaffey	40	32	20	18	.474	-
416.0 2	East Los Angeles	40	26	36	19	.345	-
647.0 3	Mt. San Antonio	46	34	37	18	.327	-
542.0 4	Pasadena City	40	34	61	16	.208	-
379.00000000000006 5	Rio Hondo	35	37	40	10	.200	1

Rk	Team	home games	attend	avg
379.00000000000006 1	Rio Hondo	19	129,090	6,795
416.0 2	East Los Angeles	19	10,045	529
647.0 3	Mt. San Antonio	26	1,983	76
542.0 4	Pasadena City	19	1,323	70
499.0 5	Chaffey	18	70	4

Rk	Team	gp	ab	h	rbi	bb	k	avg	obp	slg
318.0 1	Pasadena City	22	787	240	148	121	149	.305	.420	.404
328.0 2	Mt. San Antonio	22	792	237	116	79	119	.299	.374	.414
274.0 3	Chaffey	22	775	209	125	80	156	.270	.362	.354
244.0 4	East Los Angeles	22	761	204	91	87	139	.268	.372	.321
225.99999999999997 5	Rio Hondo	22	742	174	85	73	158	.235	.323	.305

Rk	Team	gp	2b	3b	hr	xbh
328.0 1	Mt. San Antonio	22	34	12	11	57
318.0 2	Pasadena City	22	40	7	8	55
274.0 3	Chaffey	22	28	8	7	43
225.99999999999997 4	Rio Hondo	22	25	3	7	35
244.0 5	East Los Angeles	22	27	5	1	33

Rk	Team	gp	r	tb	sb	cs
328.0 1	Mt. San Antonio	22	131	328	33	7
318.0 2	Pasadena City	22	180	318	20	2
274.0 3	Chaffey	22	141	274	33	14
244.0 4	East Los Angeles	22	107	244	24	11
225.99999999999997 5	Rio Hondo	22	100	226	12	11

Rk	Team	gp	hbp	sf	sh	hdp	go	fo	go/fo	pa
328.0 1	Mt. San Antonio	22	23	12	10	19	211	227	.93	916
318.0 2	Pasadena City	22	47	16	18	18	240	160	1.50	989
244.0 3	East Los Angeles	22	43	8	13	20	230	177	1.30	912
274.0 4	Chaffey	22	38	11	10	17	196	208	.94	914
225.99999999999997 5	Rio Hondo	22	27	5	15	24	203	196	1.04	862

Rk	Team	app	gs	ip	h	r	er	era
225.99999999999997 1	Rio Hondo	22	22	195.2	251	161	128	5.89
328.0 2	Mt. San Antonio	22	22	201.0	191	110	76	3.40
244.0 3	East Los Angeles	22	22	195.1	195	112	99	4.56
274.0 4	Chaffey	22	22	202.0	203	108	80	3.56
318.0 5	Pasadena City	22	22	196.0	176	102	80	3.67

Rk	Team	app	gs	k	k/9	hr	whip
328.0 1	Mt. San Antonio	22	22	162	7.25	8	-
318.0 2	Pasadena City	22	22	161	7.39	3	-
274.0 3	Chaffey	22	22	173	7.71	4	-
244.0 4	East Los Angeles	22	22	139	6.40	9	-
225.99999999999997 5	Rio Hondo	22	22	127	5.84	12	-

Rk	Team	gp	tc	po	a	e	pb	f%
244.0 1	East Los Angeles	22	853	585	250	18	6	.979
328.0 2	Mt. San Antonio	22	877	603	243	31	17	.965
318.0 3	Pasadena City	22	847	588	223	36	5	.957
274.0 4	Chaffey	22	893	606	252	35	4	.961
225.99999999999997 5	Rio Hondo	22	905	587	266	52	11	.943

Rk	Team	gp	dp	sba	rcs	rcs%	ci
274.0 1	Chaffey	22	20	8	8	.500	-
244.0 2	East Los Angeles	22	16	13	13	.500	-
328.0 3	Mt. San Antonio	22	22	13	11	.458	-
318.0 4	Pasadena City	22	17	34	8	.190	-
225.99999999999997 5	Rio Hondo	22	27	24	6	.200	1

Rk	Team	home games	attend	avg
225.99999999999997 1	Rio Hondo	11	58,990	5,363
244.0 2	East Los Angeles	11	10,045	913
328.0 3	Mt. San Antonio	11	820	75
318.0 4	Pasadena City	11	772	70
274.0 5	Chaffey	11	70	6