Skip to navigation Skip to content Skip to footer
California Community College Athletic Association

Team Stats

Rk Team gp ab h rbi bb k avg obp slg
227.0 1 Fresno City 45 1584 490 292 218 295 .309 .414 .435
20.0 2 Cerro Coso 40 1393 420 243 117 297 .302 .370 .439
22.0 3 Taft 43 1547 449 266 200 378 .290 .390 .441
0.0 4 Sequoias 42 1430 394 197 191 234 .276 .376 .357
133.0 5 Reedley 43 1509 415 257 194 245 .275 .377 .350
0.0 6 Merced 40 1392 379 238 176 295 .272 .378 .387
3.0 7 Porterville 40 1277 272 112 132 308 .213 .305 .269
8.0 8 Coalinga 36 1181 241 77 118 361 .204 .290 .245
Rk Team gp 2b 3b hr xbh
227.0 1 Fresno City 45 101 13 24 138
22.0 2 Taft 43 77 11 45 133
20.0 3 Cerro Coso 40 87 13 26 126
0.0 4 Merced 40 65 13 23 101
0.0 4 Sequoias 42 76 7 9 92
133.0 6 Reedley 43 55 14 10 79
3.0 7 Porterville 40 42 10 3 55
8.0 8 Coalinga 36 39 3 1 43
Rk Team gp r tb sb cs
227.0 1 Fresno City 45 332 689 55 16
22.0 2 Taft 43 313 683 66 26
133.0 3 Reedley 43 301 528 19 11
0.0 4 Merced 40 286 539 44 15
20.0 5 Cerro Coso 40 269 611 28 9
0.0 6 Sequoias 42 238 511 25 12
3.0 7 Porterville 40 132 343 42 18
8.0 8 Coalinga 36 86 289 21 13
Rk Team gp hbp sf sh hdp go fo go/fo pa
227.0 1 Fresno City 45 81 24 27 42 367 431 .85 1934
22.0 2 Taft 43 57 8 18 17 325 358 .91 1830
133.0 3 Reedley 43 67 24 32 37 414 418 .99 1826
0.0 4 Sequoias 42 51 20 35 42 421 380 1.11 1727
0.0 4 Merced 40 72 17 36 24 340 369 .92 1693
20.0 6 Cerro Coso 40 46 20 17 29 317 344 .92 1593
3.0 7 Porterville 40 39 3 29 24 384 303 1.27 1480
8.0 8 Coalinga 36 26 2 2 20 308 240 1.28 1329
Rk Team app gs ip h r er era
8.0 1 Coalinga 36 36 306.1 484 445 380 11.16
3.0 2 Porterville 40 40 338.2 463 362 311 8.26
20.0 3 Cerro Coso 40 40 338.2 422 276 220 5.85
22.0 4 Taft 43 43 375.2 399 263 204 4.89
0.0 5 Merced 40 40 354.2 323 234 190 4.82
0.0 5 Sequoias 42 42 374.2 358 182 140 3.36
133.0 7 Reedley 43 43 389.2 350 184 142 3.28
227.0 8 Fresno City 45 45 403.1 355 199 130 2.90
Rk Team app gs k k/9 hr whip
8.0 1 Coalinga 36 36 214 6.29 14 2.30
3.0 2 Porterville 40 40 206 5.47 17 2.02
20.0 3 Cerro Coso 40 40 285 7.57 12 1.80
22.0 4 Taft 43 43 303 7.26 21 1.58
0.0 5 Merced 40 40 293 7.44 17 1.46
227.0 6 Fresno City 45 45 420 9.37 12 1.40
0.0 7 Sequoias 42 42 332 7.98 17 1.24
133.0 8 Reedley 43 43 283 6.54 14 1.23
Rk Team gp tc po a e pb f%
0.0 1 Sequoias 42 1620 1124 438 58 2 .964
0.0 1 Merced 40 1549 1064 426 59 12 .962
22.0 3 Taft 43 1625 1127 432 66 16 .959
3.0 4 Porterville 40 1443 1016 368 59 62 .959
227.0 5 Fresno City 45 1695 1210 406 79 28 .953
20.0 6 Cerro Coso 40 1495 1015 409 71 10 .953
133.0 7 Reedley 43 1753 1169 498 86 4 .951
8.0 8 Coalinga 36 1308 922 275 111 10 .915
Rk Team gp dp sba rcs rcs% ci
0.0 1 Merced 40 28 26 30 .536 -
0.0 1 Sequoias 42 30 17 12 .414 -
133.0 3 Reedley 43 36 31 18 .367 -
20.0 4 Cerro Coso 40 30 28 13 .317 -
22.0 5 Taft 43 33 60 15 .200 1
3.0 6 Porterville 40 20 72 16 .182 -
227.0 7 Fresno City 45 31 36 6 .143 1
8.0 8 Coalinga 36 20 63 10 .137 -
Rk Team home games attend avg
227.0 1 Fresno City 24 5,434 227
133.0 2 Reedley 23 3,049 133
22.0 3 Taft 19 415 22
20.0 4 Cerro Coso 20 400 20
8.0 5 Coalinga 18 135 8
3.0 6 Porterville 22 50 3
0.0 7 Merced 17 0 0
0.0 7 Sequoias 23 0 0
Rk Team gp ab h rbi bb k avg obp slg
270.0 1 Fresno City 21 747 243 158 103 116 .325 .425 .461
21.0 2 Cerro Coso 21 740 198 117 61 161 .268 .344 .380
18.0 3 Taft 21 748 221 126 89 164 .295 .386 .439
0.0 4 Sequoias 21 739 217 129 112 115 .294 .404 .388
158.0 5 Reedley 21 718 200 133 103 118 .279 .386 .361
0.0 6 Merced 21 722 205 131 95 143 .284 .398 .392
5.0 7 Porterville 21 695 163 70 68 172 .235 .319 .291
0.0 8 Coalinga 21 687 140 45 57 208 .204 .278 .246
Rk Team gp 2b 3b hr xbh
270.0 1 Fresno City 21 50 9 11 70
18.0 2 Taft 21 28 5 23 56
21.0 3 Cerro Coso 21 40 5 11 56
0.0 4 Merced 21 33 6 11 50
0.0 4 Sequoias 21 49 3 5 57
158.0 6 Reedley 21 27 7 6 40
5.0 7 Porterville 21 22 4 3 29
0.0 8 Coalinga 21 22 2 1 25
Rk Team gp r tb sb cs
270.0 1 Fresno City 21 175 344 29 6
18.0 2 Taft 21 148 328 23 15
158.0 3 Reedley 21 151 259 12 5
0.0 4 Merced 21 151 283 16 9
21.0 5 Cerro Coso 21 131 281 7 4
0.0 6 Sequoias 21 150 287 13 4
5.0 7 Porterville 21 81 202 23 7
0.0 8 Coalinga 21 51 169 12 6
Rk Team gp hbp sf sh hdp go fo go/fo pa
270.0 1 Fresno City 21 39 16 11 24 163 225 .72 916
18.0 2 Taft 21 25 5 9 7 155 196 .79 876
158.0 3 Reedley 21 32 15 14 21 196 206 .95 882
0.0 4 Sequoias 21 33 11 20 19 212 195 1.09 915
0.0 4 Merced 21 48 10 18 14 165 210 .79 893
21.0 6 Cerro Coso 21 29 8 12 15 160 211 .76 850
5.0 7 Porterville 21 20 3 17 14 191 167 1.14 803
0.0 8 Coalinga 21 14 - 1 15 179 146 1.23 759
Rk Team app gs ip h r er era
0.0 1 Coalinga 21 21 176.2 276 264 224 11.41
5.0 2 Porterville 21 21 180.2 250 197 176 8.77
21.0 3 Cerro Coso 21 21 184.1 231 143 116 5.66
18.0 4 Taft 21 21 184.1 189 121 97 4.74
0.0 5 Merced 21 21 185.2 148 85 65 3.15
0.0 5 Sequoias 21 21 188.2 163 78 64 3.05
158.0 7 Reedley 21 21 189.2 155 69 51 2.42
270.0 8 Fresno City 21 21 190.0 170 76 54 2.56
Rk Team app gs k k/9 hr whip
0.0 1 Coalinga 21 21 109 5.55 7 2.29
5.0 2 Porterville 21 21 95 4.73 13 2.01
21.0 3 Cerro Coso 21 21 147 7.18 6 1.75
18.0 4 Taft 21 21 148 7.23 9 1.51
0.0 5 Merced 21 21 151 7.32 7 1.22
270.0 6 Fresno City 21 21 217 10.28 8 1.39
0.0 7 Sequoias 21 21 181 8.63 10 1.10
158.0 8 Reedley 21 21 149 7.07 11 1.07
Rk Team gp tc po a e pb f%
0.0 1 Sequoias 21 820 566 231 23 1 .972
0.0 1 Merced 21 788 557 206 25 4 .968
18.0 3 Taft 21 780 553 199 28 7 .964
5.0 4 Porterville 21 766 542 194 30 31 .961
270.0 5 Fresno City 21 786 570 185 31 6 .961
21.0 6 Cerro Coso 21 813 552 222 39 3 .952
158.0 7 Reedley 21 836 569 227 40 2 .952
0.0 8 Coalinga 21 754 533 153 68 4 .910
Rk Team gp dp sba rcs rcs% ci
0.0 1 Merced 21 17 9 11 .550 -
0.0 1 Sequoias 21 16 2 5 .714 -
158.0 3 Reedley 21 18 11 8 .421 -
21.0 4 Cerro Coso 21 19 12 5 .294 -
18.0 5 Taft 21 17 19 8 .296 -
5.0 6 Porterville 21 11 29 12 .293 -
270.0 7 Fresno City 21 17 13 3 .188 -
0.0 8 Coalinga 21 14 40 1 .024 -
Rk Team home games attend avg
270.0 1 Fresno City 11 2,965 270
158.0 2 Reedley 11 1,733 158
18.0 3 Taft 11 190 18
21.0 4 Cerro Coso 10 210 21
0.0 5 Coalinga 10 0 0
5.0 6 Porterville 10 50 5
0.0 7 Merced 11 0 0
0.0 7 Sequoias 10 0 0