California Community College Athletic Association

Team Stats

Rk	Team	gp	ab	h	rbi	bb	k	avg	obp	slg
4.550279329608939 1	Pasadena City	41	1403	417	242	159	240	.297	.394	.391
4.439024390243903 2	Chaffey	41	1456	432	238	180	237	.297	.391	.393
4.352156057494867 3	Rio Hondo	36	1301	366	185	120	204	.281	.371	.348
4.7114093959731544 4	Mt. San Antonio	39	1319	356	179	142	202	.270	.371	.348
4.374301675977653 5	East Los Angeles	40	1374	354	164	178	324	.258	.367	.326

Rk	Team	gp	2b	3b	hr	xbh
4.439024390243903 1	Chaffey	41	87	10	11	108
4.550279329608939 2	Pasadena City	41	72	15	10	97
4.7114093959731544 3	Mt. San Antonio	39	59	13	6	78
4.374301675977653 4	East Los Angeles	40	59	4	9	72
4.352156057494867 5	Rio Hondo	36	56	8	5	69

Rk	Team	gp	r	tb	sb	cs
4.550279329608939 1	Pasadena City	41	299	549	26	11
4.439024390243903 2	Chaffey	41	264	572	60	35
4.7114093959731544 3	Mt. San Antonio	39	219	459	71	26
4.352156057494867 4	Rio Hondo	36	211	453	22	17
4.374301675977653 5	East Los Angeles	40	191	448	57	20

Rk	Team	gp	hbp	sf	sh	hdp	go	fo	go/fo	pa
4.439024390243903 1	Chaffey	41	53	13	21	32	400	355	1.13	1723
4.550279329608939 2	Pasadena City	41	80	21	45	31	419	330	1.27	1708
4.374301675977653 3	East Los Angeles	40	65	9	43	25	397	302	1.31	1669
4.7114093959731544 4	Mt. San Antonio	39	80	17	23	48	437	313	1.40	1581
4.352156057494867 5	Rio Hondo	36	76	16	30	27	397	303	1.31	1543

Rk	Team	app	gs	ip	h	r	er	era
4.7114093959731544 1	Mt. San Antonio	39	39	347.2	409	239	182	4.71
4.550279329608939 2	Pasadena City	41	41	358.0	405	227	181	4.55
4.439024390243903 3	Chaffey	41	41	369.0	380	220	182	4.44
4.374301675977653 4	East Los Angeles	40	40	358.0	386	239	174	4.37
4.352156057494867 5	Rio Hondo	36	36	324.2	375	207	157	4.35

Rk	Team	app	gs	k	k/9	hr	whip
4.352156057494867 1	Rio Hondo	36	36	269	7.46	13	-
4.374301675977653 2	East Los Angeles	40	40	256	6.44	18	-
4.439024390243903 3	Chaffey	41	41	253	6.17	12	-
4.550279329608939 4	Pasadena City	41	41	234	5.88	19	-
4.7114093959731544 5	Mt. San Antonio	39	39	290	7.51	7	-

Rk	Team	gp	tc	po	a	e	pb	f%
4.439024390243903 1	Chaffey	41	1621	1107	458	56	24	.965
4.550279329608939 2	Pasadena City	41	1562	1074	427	61	14	.961
4.352156057494867 3	Rio Hondo	36	1461	974	426	61	14	.958
4.374301675977653 4	East Los Angeles	40	1634	1074	485	75	19	.954
4.7114093959731544 5	Mt. San Antonio	39	1510	1043	389	78	21	.948

Rk	Team	gp	dp	sba	rcs	rcs%	ci
4.352156057494867 1	Rio Hondo	36	27	26	16	.381	1
4.374301675977653 2	East Los Angeles	40	36	30	16	.348	-
4.7114093959731544 3	Mt. San Antonio	39	20	33	13	.283	-
4.439024390243903 4	Chaffey	41	28	30	11	.268	-
4.550279329608939 5	Pasadena City	41	21	45	14	.237	-

Rk	Team	home games	attend	avg
4.352156057494867 1	Rio Hondo	20	200,000	10,000
4.550279329608939 2	Pasadena City	22	1,534	70
4.439024390243903 3	Chaffey	22	1,525	69
4.7114093959731544 4	Mt. San Antonio	22	550	25
4.374301675977653 5	East Los Angeles	19	85	4

Rk	Team	gp	ab	h	rbi	bb	k	avg	obp	slg
4.5536626916524705 1	Pasadena City	22	780	245	155	86	125	.314	.403	.435
5.3538461538461535 2	Chaffey	22	786	232	130	81	118	.295	.379	.399
4.64565587734242 3	Rio Hondo	22	796	220	108	74	130	.276	.365	.335
4.979695431472081 4	Mt. San Antonio	22	750	200	105	77	113	.267	.364	.364
4.476439790575917 5	East Los Angeles	22	737	197	83	86	167	.267	.365	.341

Rk	Team	gp	2b	3b	hr	xbh
5.3538461538461535 1	Chaffey	22	45	8	7	60
4.5536626916524705 2	Pasadena City	22	45	14	7	66
4.979695431472081 3	Mt. San Antonio	22	34	12	5	51
4.476439790575917 4	East Los Angeles	22	40	1	4	45
4.64565587734242 5	Rio Hondo	22	29	6	2	37

Rk	Team	gp	r	tb	sb	cs
4.5536626916524705 1	Pasadena City	22	180	339	10	4
5.3538461538461535 2	Chaffey	22	144	314	22	13
4.979695431472081 3	Mt. San Antonio	22	118	273	28	16
4.64565587734242 4	Rio Hondo	22	121	267	9	7
4.476439790575917 5	East Los Angeles	22	95	251	26	7

Rk	Team	gp	hbp	sf	sh	hdp	go	fo	go/fo	pa
5.3538461538461535 1	Chaffey	22	27	4	11	19	213	201	1.06	909
4.5536626916524705 2	Pasadena City	22	39	14	21	16	235	183	1.28	940
4.476439790575917 3	East Los Angeles	22	30	5	21	19	216	159	1.36	879
4.979695431472081 4	Mt. San Antonio	22	41	5	10	26	251	179	1.40	883
4.64565587734242 5	Rio Hondo	22	43	10	16	15	232	193	1.20	939

Rk	Team	app	gs	ip	h	r	er	era
4.979695431472081 1	Mt. San Antonio	22	22	197.0	256	148	109	4.98
4.5536626916524705 2	Pasadena City	22	22	195.2	216	124	99	4.55
5.3538461538461535 3	Chaffey	22	22	195.0	211	137	116	5.35
4.476439790575917 4	East Los Angeles	22	22	191.0	206	136	95	4.48
4.64565587734242 5	Rio Hondo	22	22	195.2	238	135	101	4.65

Rk	Team	app	gs	k	k/9	hr	whip
4.64565587734242 1	Rio Hondo	22	22	150	6.90	8	-
4.476439790575917 2	East Los Angeles	22	22	131	6.17	8	-
5.3538461538461535 3	Chaffey	22	22	131	6.05	9	-
4.5536626916524705 4	Pasadena City	22	22	110	5.06	10	-
4.979695431472081 5	Mt. San Antonio	22	22	156	7.13	3	-

Rk	Team	gp	tc	po	a	e	pb	f%
5.3538461538461535 1	Chaffey	22	858	585	252	21	12	.976
4.5536626916524705 2	Pasadena City	22	861	587	241	33	3	.962
4.64565587734242 3	Rio Hondo	22	896	587	268	41	8	.954
4.476439790575917 4	East Los Angeles	22	890	573	272	45	12	.949
4.979695431472081 5	Mt. San Antonio	22	862	591	216	55	16	.936

Rk	Team	gp	dp	sba	rcs	rcs%	ci
4.64565587734242 1	Rio Hondo	22	17	16	13	.448	1
4.476439790575917 2	East Los Angeles	22	18	16	10	.385	-
4.979695431472081 3	Mt. San Antonio	22	13	18	11	.379	-
5.3538461538461535 4	Chaffey	22	15	15	5	.250	-
4.5536626916524705 5	Pasadena City	22	13	26	7	.212	-

Rk	Team	home games	attend	avg
4.64565587734242 1	Rio Hondo	11	110,000	10,000
4.5536626916524705 2	Pasadena City	11	738	68
5.3538461538461535 3	Chaffey	11	800	73
4.979695431472081 4	Mt. San Antonio	11	398	36
4.476439790575917 5	East Los Angeles	11	85	8