California Community College Athletic Association

Team Stats

Rk	Team	gp	ab	h	rbi	bb	k	avg	obp	slg
25.0 1	Taft	36	1259	362	171	115	177	.288	.367	.380
32.0 2	Merced	36	1247	351	201	128	188	.281	.368	.400
40.0 3	Reedley	40	1406	395	212	195	235	.281	.381	.356
34.0 4	Sequoias	36	1265	353	167	134	153	.279	.364	.338
32.0 5	Fresno City	38	1334	371	196	148	233	.278	.377	.364
18.0 6	Coalinga	36	1214	297	157	129	249	.245	.335	.334
18.0 6	Porterville	36	1177	287	119	109	245	.244	.326	.319

Rk	Team	gp	2b	3b	hr	xbh
32.0 1	Merced	36	78	11	16	105
32.0 1	Fresno City	38	65	11	9	85
25.0 3	Taft	36	64	11	10	85
18.0 4	Coalinga	36	59	11	9	79
18.0 4	Porterville	36	60	11	2	73
40.0 6	Reedley	40	51	9	12	72
34.0 7	Sequoias	36	49	7	4	60

Rk	Team	gp	r	tb	sb	cs
40.0 1	Reedley	40	252	500	22	15
32.0 2	Merced	36	247	499	38	21
32.0 2	Fresno City	38	232	485	48	23
25.0 4	Taft	36	203	478	41	22
34.0 5	Sequoias	36	188	428	22	16
18.0 6	Coalinga	36	181	405	31	18
18.0 6	Porterville	36	136	375	16	13

Rk	Team	gp	hbp	sf	sh	hdp	go	fo	go/fo	pa
40.0 1	Reedley	40	45	21	40	36	432	346	1.25	1707
34.0 2	Sequoias	36	41	12	34	41	437	317	1.38	1486
32.0 3	Fresno City	38	75	18	32	38	385	350	1.10	1607
32.0 3	Merced	36	54	19	32	31	343	329	1.04	1480
25.0 5	Taft	36	53	18	25	36	434	294	1.48	1470
18.0 6	Coalinga	36	44	15	18	28	347	305	1.14	1420
18.0 6	Porterville	36	41	13	18	35	365	277	1.32	1358

Rk	Team	app	gs	ip	h	r	er	era
18.0 1	Coalinga	36	36	312.0	377	305	240	6.92
18.0 1	Porterville	36	36	314.0	422	264	194	5.56
34.0 3	Sequoias	36	36	325.1	383	231	188	5.20
32.0 4	Merced	36	36	319.2	281	198	155	4.36
25.0 5	Taft	36	36	322.1	369	209	153	4.27
40.0 6	Reedley	40	40	368.2	352	192	150	3.66
32.0 7	Fresno City	38	38	354.1	298	181	125	3.17

Rk	Team	app	gs	k	k/9	hr	whip
18.0 1	Coalinga	36	36	195	5.63	4	1.87
18.0 1	Porterville	36	36	154	4.41	11	1.72
34.0 3	Sequoias	36	36	186	5.15	13	1.56
25.0 4	Taft	36	36	199	5.56	11	1.52
32.0 5	Merced	36	36	244	6.87	10	1.40
32.0 5	Fresno City	38	38	301	7.65	2	1.33
40.0 7	Reedley	40	40	187	4.57	12	1.27

Rk	Team	gp	tc	po	a	e	pb	f%
34.0 1	Sequoias	36	1452	976	419	57	6	.961
40.0 2	Reedley	40	1679	1106	507	66	5	.961
32.0 3	Merced	36	1459	959	435	65	8	.955
25.0 4	Taft	36	1457	967	420	70	13	.952
32.0 5	Fresno City	38	1615	1063	473	79	15	.951
18.0 6	Porterville	36	1410	936	399	75	10	.947
18.0 6	Coalinga	36	1407	936	394	77	12	.945

Rk	Team	gp	dp	sba	rcs	rcs%	ci
32.0 1	Merced	36	39	25	20	.444	3
34.0 2	Sequoias	36	35	27	18	.400	-
18.0 3	Porterville	36	29	34	20	.370	1
40.0 4	Reedley	40	40	30	15	.333	-
25.0 5	Taft	36	23	30	12	.286	2
18.0 6	Coalinga	36	36	57	18	.240	-
32.0 7	Fresno City	38	37	60	17	.221	1

Rk	Team	home games	attend	avg
32.0 1	Fresno City	18	6,313	351
40.0 2	Reedley	22	2,618	119
18.0 3	Coalinga	19	1,700	90
25.0 4	Taft	16	1,295	81
18.0 5	Porterville	21	411	20
34.0 6	Sequoias	20	0	0
32.0 7	Merced	16	0	0

Rk	Team	gp	ab	h	rbi	bb	k	avg	obp	slg
15.0 1	Taft	24	828	220	90	70	121	.266	.340	.345
25.0 2	Merced	24	821	233	152	86	99	.284	.371	.418
26.0 3	Reedley	24	881	257	146	118	145	.292	.391	.360
23.0 4	Sequoias	24	847	239	120	95	97	.282	.373	.338
20.0 5	Fresno City	24	855	259	143	107	139	.303	.406	.399
11.0 6	Coalinga	24	827	205	106	92	166	.248	.340	.345
9.0 7	Porterville	24	798	195	86	69	182	.244	.322	.317

Rk	Team	gp	2b	3b	hr	xbh
25.0 1	Merced	24	57	10	11	78
20.0 2	Fresno City	24	42	8	8	58
15.0 3	Taft	24	36	6	6	48
11.0 4	Coalinga	24	43	8	7	58
9.0 5	Porterville	24	40	6	2	48
26.0 6	Reedley	24	32	5	6	43
23.0 7	Sequoias	24	29	6	2	37

Rk	Team	gp	r	tb	sb	cs
26.0 1	Reedley	24	167	317	12	10
25.0 2	Merced	24	180	343	23	13
20.0 3	Fresno City	24	171	341	31	17
15.0 4	Taft	24	104	286	18	17
23.0 5	Sequoias	24	132	286	16	12
11.0 6	Coalinga	24	127	285	15	11
9.0 7	Porterville	24	98	253	8	7

Rk	Team	gp	hbp	sf	sh	hdp	go	fo	go/fo	pa
26.0 1	Reedley	24	36	15	26	21	264	218	1.21	1076
23.0 2	Sequoias	24	33	8	23	29	274	230	1.19	1006
20.0 3	Fresno City	24	50	12	20	23	238	226	1.05	1044
25.0 4	Merced	24	35	13	25	18	258	224	1.15	980
15.0 5	Taft	24	28	8	15	25	299	191	1.57	949
11.0 6	Coalinga	24	29	10	11	16	236	204	1.16	969
9.0 7	Porterville	24	26	7	9	23	238	175	1.36	909

Rk	Team	app	gs	ip	h	r	er	era
11.0 1	Coalinga	24	24	208.0	246	184	149	6.45
9.0 2	Porterville	24	24	208.0	302	197	145	6.27
23.0 3	Sequoias	24	24	219.1	241	132	105	4.31
25.0 4	Merced	24	24	212.0	169	102	81	3.44
15.0 5	Taft	24	24	217.1	254	149	107	4.43
26.0 6	Reedley	24	24	227.2	210	115	87	3.44
20.0 7	Fresno City	24	24	226.0	187	100	67	2.67

Rk	Team	app	gs	k	k/9	hr	whip
11.0 1	Coalinga	24	24	128	5.54	3	1.78
9.0 2	Porterville	24	24	95	4.11	10	1.87
23.0 3	Sequoias	24	24	120	4.92	6	1.43
15.0 4	Taft	24	24	139	5.76	8	1.55
25.0 5	Merced	24	24	168	7.13	4	1.28
20.0 6	Fresno City	24	24	188	7.49	2	1.27
26.0 7	Reedley	24	24	113	4.47	9	1.22

Rk	Team	gp	tc	po	a	e	pb	f%
23.0 1	Sequoias	24	976	658	280	38	4	.961
26.0 2	Reedley	24	1040	683	314	43	1	.959
25.0 3	Merced	24	960	636	294	30	5	.969
15.0 4	Taft	24	977	652	275	50	10	.949
20.0 5	Fresno City	24	1024	678	298	48	7	.953
9.0 6	Porterville	24	928	618	258	52	7	.944
11.0 7	Coalinga	24	928	624	264	40	9	.957

Rk	Team	gp	dp	sba	rcs	rcs%	ci
25.0 1	Merced	24	24	10	15	.600	2
23.0 2	Sequoias	24	25	13	11	.458	-
9.0 3	Porterville	24	18	21	13	.382	-
26.0 4	Reedley	24	25	10	8	.444	-
15.0 5	Taft	24	14	21	6	.222	1
11.0 6	Coalinga	24	23	25	15	.375	-
20.0 7	Fresno City	24	26	23	9	.281	1

Rk	Team	home games	attend	avg
20.0 1	Fresno City	12	4,403	367
26.0 2	Reedley	12	1,404	117
11.0 3	Coalinga	12	1,100	92
15.0 4	Taft	12	895	75
9.0 5	Porterville	12	73	7
23.0 6	Sequoias	12	0	0
25.0 7	Merced	12	0	0