Skip to navigation Skip to content Skip to footer
California Community College Athletic Association

Team Stats

Rk Team gp ab h rbi bb k avg obp slg
0.4115267947421638 1 LA Valley 36 989 407 345 140 76 .412 .491 .666
0.3628808864265928 2 Citrus 40 1083 393 245 99 84 .363 .422 .494
0.3533604887983707 3 Barstow 35 982 347 222 90 111 .353 .417 .503
0.34355828220858897 4 Canyons 44 1141 392 276 151 113 .344 .436 .516
0.3327449249779347 5 Antelope Valley 44 1133 377 309 167 143 .333 .426 .534
0.32208293153326906 6 LA Mission 40 1037 334 224 140 148 .322 .420 .460
0.3136842105263158 7 Glendale 38 950 298 182 116 135 .314 .397 .436
0.2613981762917933 8 Victor Valley 28 658 172 86 52 117 .261 .325 .337
Rk Team gp 2b 3b hr xbh
146.0 1 LA Valley 36 86 14 46 146
132.0 2 Canyons 44 92 15 25 132
130.0 3 Antelope Valley 44 69 24 37 130
102.0 4 Barstow 35 71 17 14 102
99.0 5 Citrus 40 71 13 15 99
93.0 6 LA Mission 40 62 12 19 93
73.0 7 Glendale 38 44 15 14 73
36.0 8 Victor Valley 28 24 10 2 36
Rk Team gp r tb sb cs
371.0 1 LA Valley 36 371 659 33 5
357.0 2 Antelope Valley 44 357 605 13 3
331.0 3 Canyons 44 331 589 125 17
273.0 4 Citrus 40 273 535 33 10
273.0 4 LA Mission 40 273 477 23 7
252.0 6 Barstow 35 252 494 33 1
196.0 7 Glendale 38 196 414 26 8
102.0 8 Victor Valley 28 102 222 34 6
Rk Team gp hbp sf sh hdp go fo go/fo pa
1386.0 1 Canyons 44 48 16 30 5 223 336 .66 1386
1375.0 2 Antelope Valley 44 30 16 29 7 185 290 .64 1375
1245.0 3 Citrus 40 22 15 26 14 277 279 .99 1245
1235.0 4 LA Mission 40 39 6 13 2 221 251 .88 1235
1186.0 5 LA Valley 36 34 21 2 6 212 270 .79 1186
1109.0 6 Barstow 35 20 4 13 3 225 228 .99 1109
1094.0 7 Glendale 38 18 3 7 6 201 220 .91 1094
729.0 8 Victor Valley 28 11 2 6 5 170 124 1.37 729
Rk Team app gs ip h r er era
10.338461538461539 1 Victor Valley 28 28 151.2 306 330 224 10.34
9.504901960784315 2 Glendale 38 38 204.0 457 378 277 9.50
8.52020202020202 3 Barstow 35 35 198.0 400 364 241 8.52
5.8370607028754 4 LA Valley 36 36 208.2 282 223 174 5.84
4.5974576271186445 5 LA Mission 40 40 236.0 300 200 155 4.60
3.8571428571428568 6 Citrus 40 40 245.0 257 177 135 3.86
3.508860759493671 7 Antelope Valley 44 44 263.1 278 165 132 3.51
3.200743494423792 8 Canyons 44 44 269.0 299 170 123 3.20
Rk Team app gs k k/7 hr whip
$value 1 Antelope Valley 44 44 173 4.60 24 -
- 2 Barstow 35 35 67 2.37 13 -
- 2 Canyons 44 44 173 4.50 14 -
- 2 Citrus 40 40 103 2.94 15 -
- 2 Glendale 38 38 55 1.89 39 -
- 2 LA Mission 40 40 84 2.49 12 -
- 2 LA Valley 36 36 83 2.78 19 -
- 2 Victor Valley 28 28 59 2.72 9 -
Rk Team gp tc po a e pb f%
0.9517743403093721 1 Antelope Valley 44 1099 761 285 53 20 .952
0.9516263552960801 2 Canyons 44 1199 820 321 58 11 .952
0.943952802359882 3 LA Valley 36 1017 626 334 57 24 .944
0.9390354868061874 4 Citrus 40 1099 716 316 67 6 .939
0.9216867469879518 5 LA Mission 40 996 669 249 78 26 .922
0.9155370177267987 6 Glendale 38 959 597 281 81 15 .916
0.8793388429752066 7 Victor Valley 28 605 386 146 73 28 .879
0.8732240437158469 8 Barstow 35 915 544 255 116 40 .873
Rk Team gp dp sba rcs rcs% ci
0.3137254901960784 1 Canyons 44 11 35 16 .314 1
0.2631578947368421 2 Barstow 35 9 28 10 .263 -
0.14634146341463414 3 Citrus 40 9 35 6 .146 1
0.13793103448275862 4 LA Valley 36 1 25 4 .138 1
0.11475409836065574 5 LA Mission 40 4 54 7 .115 1
0.05555555555555555 6 Glendale 38 10 68 4 .056 -
0.05084745762711865 7 Victor Valley 28 3 56 3 .051 1
0.044444444444444446 8 Antelope Valley 44 7 43 2 .044 0
Rk Team home games attend avg
82.0 1 LA Valley 20.0 1,629 82
66.0 2 Barstow 16.0 1,050 66
57.0 3 Canyons 22.0 1,246 57
31.0 4 Citrus 20.0 614 31
14.0 5 Antelope Valley 19.0 250 14
0.0 6 Glendale 16.0 0 0
0.0 6 LA Mission 13.0 0 0
0.0 6 Victor Valley 15.0 0 0
Rk Team gp ab h rbi bb k avg obp slg
0.4073226544622426 1 LA Valley 16 437 178 149 53 30 .407 .481 .659
0.40563991323210413 2 Citrus 16 461 187 128 49 24 .406 .457 .579
0.327710843373494 3 Barstow 16 415 136 94 51 50 .328 .411 .482
0.4138817480719794 4 Canyons 16 389 161 147 81 17 .414 .522 .627
0.40224719101123596 5 Antelope Valley 16 445 179 147 63 34 .402 .480 .658
0.375609756097561 6 LA Mission 16 410 154 113 61 45 .376 .478 .517
0.3056234718826406 7 Glendale 16 409 125 78 50 46 .306 .393 .433
0.2830188679245283 8 Victor Valley 16 371 105 59 28 59 .283 .338 .369
Rk Team gp 2b 3b hr xbh
66.0 1 LA Valley 16 41 6 19 66
59.0 2 Canyons 16 44 6 9 59
67.0 3 Antelope Valley 16 38 11 18 67
46.0 4 Barstow 16 33 8 5 46
51.0 5 Citrus 16 32 9 10 51
41.0 6 LA Mission 16 30 5 6 41
35.0 7 Glendale 16 25 3 7 35
23.0 8 Victor Valley 16 16 5 2 23
Rk Team gp r tb sb cs
165.0 1 LA Valley 16 165 288 14 4
167.0 2 Antelope Valley 16 167 293 6 -
168.0 3 Canyons 16 168 244 62 5
147.0 4 Citrus 16 147 267 12 2
142.0 5 LA Mission 16 142 212 10 2
102.0 6 Barstow 16 102 200 21 1
87.0 7 Glendale 16 87 177 10 2
70.0 8 Victor Valley 16 70 137 20 4
Rk Team gp hbp sf sh hdp go fo go/fo pa
502.0 1 Canyons 16 15 7 10 2 90 117 .77 502
539.0 2 Antelope Valley 16 11 8 12 3 86 141 .61 539
531.0 3 Citrus 16 5 12 4 3 100 132 .76 531
493.0 4 LA Mission 16 20 1 1 - 91 93 .98 493
516.0 5 LA Valley 16 16 8 2 2 86 133 .65 516
484.0 6 Barstow 16 10 3 5 1 119 97 1.23 484
469.0 7 Glendale 16 9 - 1 1 101 123 .82 469
409.0 8 Victor Valley 16 4 2 4 2 105 81 1.30 409
Rk Team app gs ip h r er era
10.541832669322709 1 Victor Valley 16 16 83.2 154 178 126 10.54
9.910112359550562 2 Glendale 16 16 89.0 199 163 126 9.91
9.488888888888889 3 Barstow 16 16 90.0 181 162 122 9.49
6.022058823529411 4 LA Valley 16 16 90.2 127 100 78 6.02
4.168539325842697 5 LA Mission 16 16 89.0 104 61 53 4.17
3.5121951219512195 6 Citrus 16 16 95.2 95 65 48 3.51
3.6428571428571432 7 Antelope Valley 16 16 98.0 91 60 51 3.64
1.4456521739130435 8 Canyons 16 16 92.0 76 21 19 1.45
Rk Team app gs k k/7 hr whip
$value 1 Antelope Valley 16 16 83 5.93 13 -
- 2 Barstow 16 16 31 2.41 7 -
- 2 Canyons 16 16 81 6.16 - -
- 2 Citrus 16 16 49 3.59 7 -
- 2 Glendale 16 16 30 2.36 17 -
- 2 LA Mission 16 16 32 2.52 4 -
- 2 LA Valley 16 16 36 2.78 8 -
- 2 Victor Valley 16 16 42 3.51 9 -
Rk Team gp tc po a e pb f%
0.9636803874092009 1 Antelope Valley 16 413 293 105 15 8 .964
0.9732620320855615 2 Canyons 16 374 276 88 10 2 .973
0.9430523917995444 3 LA Valley 16 439 272 142 25 11 .943
0.9433962264150944 4 Citrus 16 424 287 113 24 4 .943
0.9537275064267352 5 LA Mission 16 389 267 104 18 7 .954
0.9154929577464789 6 Glendale 16 426 267 123 36 8 .915
0.8882978723404256 7 Victor Valley 16 376 251 83 42 19 .888
0.8789237668161435 8 Barstow 16 446 270 122 54 21 .879
Rk Team gp dp sba rcs rcs% ci
0.75 1 Canyons 16 2 2 6 .750 -
0.13636363636363635 2 Barstow 16 4 19 3 .136 -
0.15384615384615385 3 Citrus 16 3 11 2 .154 1
0.07142857142857142 4 LA Valley 16 - 13 1 .071 -
0.09523809523809523 5 LA Mission 16 - 19 2 .095 1
0.15384615384615385 6 Glendale 16 3 11 2 .154 -
0.06896551724137931 7 Victor Valley 16 1 27 2 .069 1
0.05 8 Antelope Valley 16 1 19 1 .050 -
Rk Team home games attend avg
81.0 1 LA Valley 8.0 643 81
100.0 2 Barstow 8.0 800 100
48.0 3 Canyons 8.0 378 48
26.0 4 Citrus 8.0 207 26
0.0 5 Antelope Valley 8.0 0 0
0.0 5 Glendale 8.0 0 0
0.0 5 LA Mission 8.0 0 0
0.0 5 Victor Valley 8.0 0 0