Skip to navigation Skip to content Skip to footer
California Community College Athletic Association

Team Stats

Rk Team gp ab h rbi bb k avg obp slg
0.29961089494163423 1 Sequoias 22 771 231 135 101 110 .300 .394 .387
0.2944606413994169 2 Fresno City 20 686 202 133 111 166 .294 .408 .434
0.2855191256830601 3 Reedley 21 732 209 111 108 135 .286 .383 .395
0.2796005706134094 4 Merced 20 701 196 127 92 142 .280 .381 .391
0.26774595267745954 5 Coalinga 23 803 215 98 67 187 .268 .343 .330
0.24057217165149544 6 Taft 22 769 185 91 89 185 .241 .337 .343
0.2109256449165402 7 Porterville 23 659 139 52 82 168 .211 .326 .253
Rk Team gp 2b 3b hr xbh
58.0 1 Fresno City 20 36 6 16 58
58.0 1 Reedley 21 44 6 8 58
55.0 3 Merced 20 42 3 10 55
55.0 3 Sequoias 22 46 6 3 55
44.0 5 Taft 22 24 5 15 44
40.0 6 Coalinga 23 33 4 3 40
23.0 7 Porterville 23 20 1 2 23
Rk Team gp r tb sb cs
156.0 1 Merced 20 156 274 39 5
154.0 2 Sequoias 22 154 298 16 5
153.0 3 Fresno City 20 153 298 26 14
126.0 4 Reedley 21 126 289 19 7
118.0 5 Coalinga 23 118 265 11 7
105.0 6 Taft 22 105 264 28 11
66.0 7 Porterville 23 66 167 17 14
Rk Team gp hbp sf sh hdp go fo go/fo pa
919.0 1 Sequoias 22 25 10 12 18 219 207 1.06 919
914.0 2 Coalinga 23 30 9 5 4 112 97 1.15 914
895.0 3 Taft 22 25 3 9 7 192 177 1.08 895
884.0 4 Reedley 21 17 16 11 17 190 207 .92 884
851.0 5 Fresno City 20 27 10 17 7 125 167 .75 851
837.0 6 Merced 20 26 6 12 10 148 162 .91 837
781.0 7 Porterville 23 31 1 8 18 173 122 1.42 781
Rk Team app gs ip h r er era
9.338345864661655 1 Porterville 23 23 177.1 297 233 184 9.34
7.367720465890183 2 Coalinga 23 23 200.1 267 207 164 7.37
5.8816466552315605 3 Taft 22 22 194.1 266 167 127 5.88
3.99438202247191 4 Merced 20 20 178.0 164 95 79 3.99
3.4720812182741114 5 Sequoias 22 22 197.0 179 90 76 3.47
2.4 6 Reedley 21 21 195.0 164 69 52 2.40
1.7532467532467533 7 Fresno City 20 20 179.2 142 68 35 1.75
Rk Team app gs k k/9 hr whip
2.3289473684210527 1 Porterville 23 23 95 4.82 8 2.33
1.9267886855241263 2 Coalinga 23 23 125 5.62 13 1.93
1.8833619210977701 3 Taft 22 22 130 6.02 10 1.88
1.3820224719101124 4 Merced 20 20 180 9.10 2 1.38
1.280148423005566 5 Fresno City 20 20 205 10.27 0 1.28
1.2205128205128206 6 Reedley 21 21 153 7.06 7 1.22
1.16751269035533 7 Sequoias 22 22 163 7.45 11 1.17
Rk Team gp tc po a e pb f%
0.9721485411140584 1 Merced 20 754 532 201 21 19 .972
0.9620853080568721 2 Sequoias 22 844 591 221 32 1 .962
0.9612121212121212 3 Reedley 21 825 585 208 32 8 .961
0.9540078843626807 4 Porterville 23 761 532 194 35 12 .954
0.9538866930171278 5 Fresno City 20 759 539 185 35 1 .954
0.9395734597156398 6 Taft 22 844 583 210 51 5 .940
0.9357326478149101 7 Coalinga 23 778 600 128 50 17 .936
Rk Team gp dp sba rcs rcs% ci
0.4 1 Merced 20 12 9 6 .400 0
0.38095238095238093 2 Reedley 21 23 13 8 .381 -
0.37142857142857144 3 Fresno City 20 10 22 13 .371 0
0.3333333333333333 4 Sequoias 22 18 10 5 .333 -
0.20512820512820512 5 Coalinga 23 8 31 8 .205 0
0.19148936170212766 6 Porterville 23 16 38 9 .191 0
0.08571428571428572 7 Taft 22 19 32 3 .086 0
Rk Team home games attend avg
116.0 1 Reedley 11 1,268 116
68.0 2 Taft 9 605 68
48.0 3 Fresno City 11 520 48
10.0 4 Merced 11 102 10
5.0 5 Porterville 14 60 5
0.0 6 Coalinga 12 0 0
0.0 6 Sequoias 15 0 0
Rk Team gp ab h rbi bb k avg obp slg
0.2861635220125786 1 Sequoias 9 318 91 52 40 45 .286 .383 .374
0.33992094861660077 2 Fresno City 7 253 86 65 51 52 .340 .465 .506
0.3209169054441261 3 Reedley 10 349 112 69 50 59 .321 .412 .447
0.2946058091286307 4 Merced 7 241 71 40 32 40 .295 .390 .407
0.2663316582914573 5 Coalinga 11 398 106 38 37 84 .266 .337 .329
0.2425 6 Taft 11 400 97 43 39 94 .242 .336 .338
0.22784810126582278 7 Porterville 7 237 54 24 32 47 .228 .353 .266
Rk Team gp 2b 3b hr xbh
24.0 1 Fresno City 7 13 4 7 24
33.0 2 Reedley 10 27 1 5 33
19.0 3 Merced 7 14 2 3 19
21.0 4 Sequoias 9 16 3 2 21
18.0 5 Taft 11 7 2 9 18
19.0 6 Coalinga 11 14 4 1 19
9.0 7 Porterville 7 9 0 0 9
Rk Team gp r tb sb cs
49.0 1 Merced 7 49 98 7 1
55.0 2 Sequoias 9 55 119 4 4
73.0 3 Fresno City 7 73 128 13 5
74.0 4 Reedley 10 74 156 10 3
51.0 5 Coalinga 11 51 131 2 3
52.0 6 Taft 11 52 135 14 6
30.0 7 Porterville 7 30 63 4 2
Rk Team gp hbp sf sh hdp go fo go/fo pa
378.0 1 Sequoias 9 11 2 7 7 101 81 1.25 378
447.0 2 Coalinga 11 7 3 2 1 46 43 1.07 447
463.0 3 Taft 11 18 1 5 2 97 86 1.13 463
423.0 4 Reedley 10 10 8 6 9 84 100 .84 423
329.0 5 Fresno City 7 14 7 4 - 27 65 .42 329
286.0 6 Merced 7 7 2 4 4 38 47 .81 286
288.0 7 Porterville 7 14 0 5 5 48 39 1.23 288
Rk Team app gs ip h r er era
9.59016393442623 1 Porterville 7 7 61.0 96 77 65 9.59
7.585284280936455 2 Coalinga 11 11 99.2 150 109 84 7.59
5.292358803986712 3 Taft 11 11 100.1 130 79 59 5.29
4.721311475409836 4 Merced 7 7 61.0 62 37 32 4.72
3.375 5 Sequoias 9 9 80.0 69 32 30 3.38
2.0224719101123596 6 Reedley 10 10 89.0 64 28 20 2.02
1.1428571428571428 7 Fresno City 7 7 63.0 47 22 8 1.14
Rk Team app gs k k/9 hr whip
2.360655737704918 1 Porterville 7 7 40 5.90 5 2.36
2.157190635451505 2 Coalinga 11 11 60 5.42 6 2.16
1.8737541528239203 3 Taft 11 11 63 5.65 4 1.87
1.4426229508196722 4 Merced 7 7 63 9.30 0 1.44
1.2380952380952381 5 Fresno City 7 7 65 9.29 0 1.24
1.146067415730337 6 Reedley 10 10 68 6.88 4 1.15
1.05 7 Sequoias 9 9 62 6.98 8 1.05
Rk Team gp tc po a e pb f%
0.9830508474576272 1 Merced 7 236 183 49 4 6 .983
0.9911504424778761 2 Sequoias 9 339 240 96 3 - .991
0.9507772020725389 3 Reedley 10 386 267 100 19 3 .951
0.9585062240663901 4 Porterville 7 241 183 48 10 4 .959
0.9405204460966543 5 Fresno City 7 269 189 64 16 1 .941
0.9445727482678984 6 Taft 11 433 301 108 24 2 .945
0.9250645994832042 7 Coalinga 11 387 299 59 29 8 .925
Rk Team gp dp sba rcs rcs% ci
1.0 1 Merced 7 5 0 2 1.000 0
0.25 2 Reedley 10 9 9 3 .250 -
0.5555555555555556 3 Fresno City 7 2 4 5 .556 0
0.375 4 Sequoias 9 6 5 3 .375 -
0.17647058823529413 5 Coalinga 11 4 14 3 .176 0
0.3333333333333333 6 Porterville 7 7 8 4 .333 0
0.1875 7 Taft 11 9 13 3 .188 0
Rk Team home games attend avg
112.0 1 Reedley 5 559 112
70.0 2 Taft 5 350 70
0.0 3 Fresno City 4 0 0
0.0 3 Merced 3 0 0
0.0 3 Porterville 4 0 0
0 6 Coalinga 6 - -
0.0 7 Sequoias 4 0 0