Skip to navigation Skip to content Skip to footer
California Community College Athletic Association

Team Stats

Rk Team gp ab h rbi bb k avg obp slg
0.32454361054766734 1 Barstow 40 1479 480 295 179 228 .325 .414 .437
0.3222908478382931 2 Glendale 47 1781 574 392 221 348 .322 .414 .506
0.3022284122562674 3 Canyons 39 1436 434 258 193 251 .302 .395 .430
0.2778625954198473 4 Antelope Valley 39 1310 364 186 141 279 .278 .360 .373
0.27360594795539034 5 Citrus 40 1345 368 206 185 261 .274 .371 .353
0.2666168782673637 6 Victor Valley 39 1339 357 155 146 249 .267 .360 .338
Rk Team gp 2b 3b hr xbh
188.0 1 Glendale 47 112 12 64 188
128.0 2 Canyons 39 90 20 18 128
106.0 3 Barstow 40 68 15 23 106
81.0 4 Antelope Valley 39 48 22 11 81
81.0 4 Citrus 40 66 4 11 81
76.0 6 Victor Valley 39 65 2 9 76
Rk Team gp r tb sb cs
434.0 1 Glendale 47 434 902 103 26
328.0 2 Barstow 40 328 647 37 17
291.0 3 Canyons 39 291 618 30 6
236.0 4 Citrus 40 236 475 61 19
213.0 5 Antelope Valley 39 213 489 54 13
206.0 6 Victor Valley 39 206 453 77 32
Rk Team gp hbp sf sh hdp go fo go/fo pa
2125.0 1 Glendale 47 79 29 15 24 330 450 .73 2125
1745.0 2 Barstow 40 58 14 15 27 375 339 1.11 1745
1711.0 3 Canyons 39 41 20 21 25 330 321 1.03 1711
1625.0 4 Citrus 40 39 28 28 23 336 370 .91 1625
1558.0 5 Victor Valley 39 54 9 10 36 286 258 1.11 1558
1519.0 6 Antelope Valley 39 33 11 24 30 324 329 .98 1519
Rk Team app gs ip h r er era
7.946113989637305 1 Antelope Valley 39 39 321.2 467 339 284 7.95
6.4508670520231215 2 Barstow 40 40 346.0 462 302 248 6.45
6.273753527751646 3 Citrus 40 40 354.1 442 291 247 6.27
5.885630498533724 4 Canyons 39 39 341.0 386 256 223 5.89
5.625 5 Victor Valley 39 39 312.0 384 255 195 5.63
4.671428571428572 6 Glendale 47 47 420.0 409 266 218 4.67
Rk Team app gs k k/9 hr whip
2.026943005181347 1 Antelope Valley 39 39 218 6.10 21 2.03
2.03 2 Barstow 40 40 191 4.97 24 -
- 3 Canyons 39 39 265 6.99 28 -
- 3 Citrus 40 40 335 8.51 21 -
- 3 Glendale 47 47 394 8.44 18 -
- 3 Victor Valley 39 39 198 5.71 20 -
Rk Team gp tc po a e pb f%
0.9705882352941176 1 Barstow 40 1462 1005 414 43 8 .971
0.9666295884315906 2 Glendale 47 1798 1238 500 60 35 .967
0.9555722891566265 3 Canyons 39 1328 937 332 59 19 .956
0.9534098582039163 4 Citrus 40 1481 1024 388 69 13 .953
0.9467905405405406 5 Victor Valley 39 1184 795 326 63 18 .947
0.9414255469301341 6 Antelope Valley 39 1417 964 370 83 7 .941
Rk Team gp dp sba rcs rcs% ci
0.32432432432432434 1 Antelope Valley 39 26 50 24 .324 1
0.2857142857142857 2 Victor Valley 39 17 50 20 .286 -
0.28 3 Barstow 40 35 54 21 .280 -
0.21428571428571427 4 Canyons 39 17 44 12 .214 -
0.20481927710843373 5 Citrus 40 27 66 17 .205 1
0.16853932584269662 6 Glendale 47 46 74 15 .169 1
Rk Team home games attend avg
110.5909090909091 1 Glendale 22 2,433 111
88.88888888888889 2 Barstow 18 1,600 89
78.0 3 Antelope Valley 20 1,552 78
56.0 4 Canyons 19 1,053 56
36.59090909090909 5 Citrus 22 805 37
35.44444444444444 6 Victor Valley 18 638 35
Rk Team gp ab h rbi bb k avg obp slg
0.3553615960099751 1 Barstow 20 802 285 158 77 124 .355 .426 .460
0.35561160151324084 2 Glendale 20 793 282 212 106 124 .356 .451 .573
0.3225388601036269 3 Canyons 20 772 249 155 113 123 .323 .416 .442
0.301699716713881 4 Antelope Valley 20 706 213 111 58 150 .302 .363 .401
0.30029585798816566 5 Citrus 20 676 203 119 97 103 .300 .399 .404
0.2814285714285714 6 Victor Valley 20 700 197 82 81 132 .281 .374 .364
Rk Team gp 2b 3b hr xbh
94.0 1 Glendale 20 50 10 34 94
65.0 2 Canyons 20 45 13 7 65
59.0 3 Barstow 20 42 9 8 59
45.0 4 Antelope Valley 20 28 9 8 45
51.0 5 Citrus 20 40 3 8 51
41.0 6 Victor Valley 20 32 1 8 41
Rk Team gp r tb sb cs
232.0 1 Glendale 20 232 454 33 11
175.0 2 Barstow 20 175 369 20 6
172.0 3 Canyons 20 172 341 15 6
132.0 4 Citrus 20 132 273 31 9
122.0 5 Antelope Valley 20 122 283 28 9
108.0 6 Victor Valley 20 108 255 43 14
Rk Team gp hbp sf sh hdp go fo go/fo pa
959.0 1 Glendale 20 41 12 7 7 148 201 .74 959
924.0 2 Barstow 20 28 8 9 13 185 179 1.03 924
930.0 3 Canyons 20 20 13 12 10 158 153 1.03 930
831.0 4 Citrus 20 24 16 18 11 173 191 .91 831
812.0 5 Victor Valley 20 24 2 5 21 151 126 1.20 812
803.0 6 Antelope Valley 20 15 8 16 19 172 172 1.00 803
Rk Team app gs ip h r er era
7.953488372093023 1 Antelope Valley 20 20 172.0 266 194 152 7.95
6.3791208791208796 2 Barstow 20 20 182.0 253 163 129 6.38
5.247169811320754 3 Citrus 20 20 176.2 214 122 103 5.25
5.742537313432836 4 Canyons 20 20 178.2 199 135 114 5.74
6.9978401727861765 5 Victor Valley 20 20 154.1 219 149 120 7.00
3.35 6 Glendale 20 20 180.0 170 90 67 3.35
Rk Team app gs k k/9 hr whip
2.13953488372093 1 Antelope Valley 20 20 103 5.39 11 2.14
2.14 2 Barstow 20 20 82 4.05 15 -
- 3 Canyons 20 20 117 5.89 15 -
- 3 Citrus 20 20 165 8.41 11 -
- 3 Glendale 20 20 160 8.00 6 -
- 3 Victor Valley 20 20 92 5.37 10 -
Rk Team gp tc po a e pb f%
0.967828418230563 1 Barstow 20 746 513 209 24 4 .968
0.9645669291338582 2 Glendale 20 762 521 214 27 13 .965
0.945226917057903 3 Canyons 20 639 450 154 35 9 .945
0.9572413793103448 4 Citrus 20 725 503 191 31 4 .957
0.9550748752079867 5 Victor Valley 20 601 409 165 27 9 .955
0.9388535031847134 6 Antelope Valley 20 785 515 222 48 6 .939
Rk Team gp dp sba rcs rcs% ci
0.34782608695652173 1 Antelope Valley 20 17 30 16 .348 1
0.2571428571428571 2 Victor Valley 20 9 26 9 .257 -
0.28205128205128205 3 Barstow 20 19 28 11 .282 -
0.16129032258064516 4 Canyons 20 7 26 5 .161 -
0.2 5 Citrus 20 13 32 8 .200 -
0.06666666666666667 6 Glendale 20 16 28 2 .067 -
Rk Team home games attend avg
153.1 1 Glendale 10 1,531 153
95.0 2 Barstow 10 950 95
75.0 3 Antelope Valley 10 742 75
52.0 4 Canyons 10 519 52
35.2 5 Citrus 10 352 35
53.3 6 Victor Valley 10 533 53