California Community College Athletic Association

Team Stats

Rk	Team	gp	ab	h	rbi	bb	k	avg	obp	slg
0.4160371876815805 1	Pasadena City	40	1408	427	257	206	311	.303	.416	.385
0.37869198312236285 2	Mt. San Antonio	46	1616	468	253	197	272	.290	.379	.400
0.3707796193984039 3	Chaffey	40	1386	374	205	159	291	.270	.371	.360
0.36728395061728397 4	East Los Angeles	40	1363	351	160	170	271	.258	.367	.305
0.33601756954612005 5	Rio Hondo	35	1192	295	144	122	250	.247	.336	.318

Rk	Team	gp	2b	3b	hr	xbh
0.37869198312236285 1	Mt. San Antonio	46	83	24	16	123
0.4160371876815805 2	Pasadena City	40	65	7	12	84
0.3707796193984039 3	Chaffey	40	52	11	17	80
0.33601756954612005 4	Rio Hondo	35	40	4	12	56
0.36728395061728397 5	East Los Angeles	40	44	6	3	53

Rk	Team	gp	r	tb	sb	cs
0.4160371876815805 1	Pasadena City	40	314	542	35	8
0.37869198312236285 2	Mt. San Antonio	46	290	647	74	15
0.3707796193984039 3	Chaffey	40	240	499	72	24
0.36728395061728397 4	East Los Angeles	40	193	416	38	18
0.33601756954612005 5	Rio Hondo	35	165	379	21	16

Rk	Team	gp	hbp	sf	sh	hdp	go	fo	go/fo	pa
0.37869198312236285 1	Mt. San Antonio	46	53	30	16	36	416	455	.91	1912
0.4160371876815805 2	Pasadena City	40	83	24	32	34	401	267	1.50	1753
0.36728395061728397 3	East Los Angeles	40	74	13	30	38	438	294	1.49	1650
0.3707796193984039 4	Chaffey	40	71	13	16	31	365	345	1.06	1645
0.33601756954612005 5	Rio Hondo	35	42	10	24	35	319	290	1.10	1390

Rk	Team	app	gs	ip	h	r	er	era
0.33601756954612005 1	Rio Hondo	35	35	308.2	382	254	204	5.95
0.37869198312236285 2	Mt. San Antonio	46	46	415.0	449	289	223	4.84
0.36728395061728397 3	East Los Angeles	40	40	357.1	368	204	167	4.21
0.3707796193984039 4	Chaffey	40	40	359.2	364	207	160	4.00
0.4160371876815805 5	Pasadena City	40	40	351.1	314	165	130	3.33

Rk	Team	app	gs	k	k/9	hr	whip
0.4160371876815805 1	Pasadena City	40	40	284	7.28	6	-
0.37869198312236285 2	Mt. San Antonio	46	46	353	7.66	21	-
0.3707796193984039 3	Chaffey	40	40	314	7.86	12	-
0.36728395061728397 4	East Los Angeles	40	40	275	6.93	11	-
0.33601756954612005 5	Rio Hondo	35	35	234	6.82	16	-

Rk	Team	gp	tc	po	a	e	pb	f%
0.36728395061728397 1	East Los Angeles	40	1552	1071	436	45	12	.971
0.37869198312236285 2	Mt. San Antonio	46	1811	1243	496	72	41	.960
0.4160371876815805 3	Pasadena City	40	1525	1053	411	61	9	.960
0.3707796193984039 4	Chaffey	40	1572	1077	428	67	14	.957
0.33601756954612005 5	Rio Hondo	35	1364	902	383	79	15	.942

Rk	Team	gp	dp	sba	rcs	rcs%	ci
0.3707796193984039 1	Chaffey	40	32	20	18	.474	-
0.36728395061728397 2	East Los Angeles	40	26	36	19	.345	-
0.37869198312236285 3	Mt. San Antonio	46	34	37	18	.327	-
0.4160371876815805 4	Pasadena City	40	34	61	16	.208	-
0.33601756954612005 5	Rio Hondo	35	37	40	10	.200	1

Rk	Team	home games	attend	avg
0.33601756954612005 1	Rio Hondo	19	129,090	6,795
0.36728395061728397 2	East Los Angeles	19	10,045	529
0.37869198312236285 3	Mt. San Antonio	26	1,983	76
0.4160371876815805 4	Pasadena City	19	1,323	70
0.3707796193984039 5	Chaffey	18	70	4

Rk	Team	gp	ab	h	rbi	bb	k	avg	obp	slg
0.42018537590113286 1	Pasadena City	22	787	240	148	121	149	.305	.420	.404
0.3741721854304636 2	Mt. San Antonio	22	792	237	116	79	119	.299	.374	.414
0.36172566371681414 3	Chaffey	22	775	209	125	80	156	.270	.362	.354
0.371523915461624 4	East Los Angeles	22	761	204	91	87	139	.268	.372	.321
0.3234946871310508 5	Rio Hondo	22	742	174	85	73	158	.235	.323	.305

Rk	Team	gp	2b	3b	hr	xbh
0.3741721854304636 1	Mt. San Antonio	22	34	12	11	57
0.42018537590113286 2	Pasadena City	22	40	7	8	55
0.36172566371681414 3	Chaffey	22	28	8	7	43
0.3234946871310508 4	Rio Hondo	22	25	3	7	35
0.371523915461624 5	East Los Angeles	22	27	5	1	33

Rk	Team	gp	r	tb	sb	cs
0.42018537590113286 1	Pasadena City	22	180	318	20	2
0.3741721854304636 2	Mt. San Antonio	22	131	328	33	7
0.36172566371681414 3	Chaffey	22	141	274	33	14
0.371523915461624 4	East Los Angeles	22	107	244	24	11
0.3234946871310508 5	Rio Hondo	22	100	226	12	11

Rk	Team	gp	hbp	sf	sh	hdp	go	fo	go/fo	pa
0.3741721854304636 1	Mt. San Antonio	22	23	12	10	19	211	227	.93	916
0.42018537590113286 2	Pasadena City	22	47	16	18	18	240	160	1.50	989
0.371523915461624 3	East Los Angeles	22	43	8	13	20	230	177	1.30	912
0.36172566371681414 4	Chaffey	22	38	11	10	17	196	208	.94	914
0.3234946871310508 5	Rio Hondo	22	27	5	15	24	203	196	1.04	862

Rk	Team	app	gs	ip	h	r	er	era
0.3234946871310508 1	Rio Hondo	22	22	195.2	251	161	128	5.89
0.3741721854304636 2	Mt. San Antonio	22	22	201.0	191	110	76	3.40
0.371523915461624 3	East Los Angeles	22	22	195.1	195	112	99	4.56
0.36172566371681414 4	Chaffey	22	22	202.0	203	108	80	3.56
0.42018537590113286 5	Pasadena City	22	22	196.0	176	102	80	3.67

Rk	Team	app	gs	k	k/9	hr	whip
0.42018537590113286 1	Pasadena City	22	22	161	7.39	3	-
0.3741721854304636 2	Mt. San Antonio	22	22	162	7.25	8	-
0.36172566371681414 3	Chaffey	22	22	173	7.71	4	-
0.371523915461624 4	East Los Angeles	22	22	139	6.40	9	-
0.3234946871310508 5	Rio Hondo	22	22	127	5.84	12	-

Rk	Team	gp	tc	po	a	e	pb	f%
0.371523915461624 1	East Los Angeles	22	853	585	250	18	6	.979
0.3741721854304636 2	Mt. San Antonio	22	877	603	243	31	17	.965
0.42018537590113286 3	Pasadena City	22	847	588	223	36	5	.957
0.36172566371681414 4	Chaffey	22	893	606	252	35	4	.961
0.3234946871310508 5	Rio Hondo	22	905	587	266	52	11	.943

Rk	Team	gp	dp	sba	rcs	rcs%	ci
0.36172566371681414 1	Chaffey	22	20	8	8	.500	-
0.371523915461624 2	East Los Angeles	22	16	13	13	.500	-
0.3741721854304636 3	Mt. San Antonio	22	22	13	11	.458	-
0.42018537590113286 4	Pasadena City	22	17	34	8	.190	-
0.3234946871310508 5	Rio Hondo	22	27	24	6	.200	1

Rk	Team	home games	attend	avg
0.3234946871310508 1	Rio Hondo	11	58,990	5,363
0.371523915461624 2	East Los Angeles	11	10,045	913
0.3741721854304636 3	Mt. San Antonio	11	820	75
0.42018537590113286 4	Pasadena City	11	772	70
0.36172566371681414 5	Chaffey	11	70	6