California Community College Athletic Association

Team Stats

Rk	Team	gp	ab	h	rbi	bb	k	avg	obp	slg
0.30326704545454547 1	Pasadena City	40	1408	427	257	206	311	.303	.416	.385
0.2896039603960396 2	Mt. San Antonio	46	1616	468	253	197	272	.290	.379	.400
0.2698412698412698 3	Chaffey	40	1386	374	205	159	291	.270	.371	.360
0.2575201760821717 4	East Los Angeles	40	1363	351	160	170	271	.258	.367	.305
0.24748322147651006 5	Rio Hondo	35	1192	295	144	122	250	.247	.336	.318

Rk	Team	gp	2b	3b	hr	xbh
123.0 1	Mt. San Antonio	46	83	24	16	123
84.0 2	Pasadena City	40	65	7	12	84
80.0 3	Chaffey	40	52	11	17	80
56.0 4	Rio Hondo	35	40	4	12	56
53.0 5	East Los Angeles	40	44	6	3	53

Rk	Team	gp	r	tb	sb	cs
314.0 1	Pasadena City	40	314	542	35	8
290.0 2	Mt. San Antonio	46	290	647	74	15
240.0 3	Chaffey	40	240	499	72	24
193.0 4	East Los Angeles	40	193	416	38	18
165.0 5	Rio Hondo	35	165	379	21	16

Rk	Team	gp	hbp	sf	sh	hdp	go	fo	go/fo	pa
1912.0 1	Mt. San Antonio	46	53	30	16	36	416	455	.91	1912
1753.0 2	Pasadena City	40	83	24	32	34	401	267	1.50	1753
1650.0 3	East Los Angeles	40	74	13	30	38	438	294	1.49	1650
1645.0 4	Chaffey	40	71	13	16	31	365	345	1.06	1645
1390.0 5	Rio Hondo	35	42	10	24	35	319	290	1.10	1390

Rk	Team	app	gs	ip	h	r	er	era
5.94816414686825 1	Rio Hondo	35	35	308.2	382	254	204	5.95
4.836144578313253 2	Mt. San Antonio	46	46	415.0	449	289	223	4.84
4.206156716417911 3	East Los Angeles	40	40	357.1	368	204	167	4.21
4.0037071362372565 4	Chaffey	40	40	359.2	364	207	160	4.00
3.330170777988615 5	Pasadena City	40	40	351.1	314	165	130	3.33

Rk	Team	app	gs	k	k/9	hr	whip
$value 1	Chaffey	40	40	314	7.86	12	-
- 2	East Los Angeles	40	40	275	6.93	11	-
- 2	Mt. San Antonio	46	46	353	7.66	21	-
- 2	Pasadena City	40	40	284	7.28	6	-
- 2	Rio Hondo	35	35	234	6.82	16	-

Rk	Team	gp	tc	po	a	e	pb	f%
0.9710051546391752 1	East Los Angeles	40	1552	1071	436	45	12	.971
0.9602429596907786 2	Mt. San Antonio	46	1811	1243	496	72	41	.960
0.96 3	Pasadena City	40	1525	1053	411	61	9	.960
0.9573791348600509 4	Chaffey	40	1572	1077	428	67	14	.957
0.9420821114369502 5	Rio Hondo	35	1364	902	383	79	15	.942

Rk	Team	gp	dp	sba	rcs	rcs%	ci
0.47368421052631576 1	Chaffey	40	32	20	18	.474	-
0.34545454545454546 2	East Los Angeles	40	26	36	19	.345	-
0.32727272727272727 3	Mt. San Antonio	46	34	37	18	.327	-
0.2077922077922078 4	Pasadena City	40	34	61	16	.208	-
0.2 5	Rio Hondo	35	37	40	10	.200	1

Rk	Team	home games	attend	avg
6795.0 1	Rio Hondo	19	129,090	6,795
528.6842105263158 2	East Los Angeles	19	10,045	529
76.26923076923077 3	Mt. San Antonio	26	1,983	76
69.63157894736842 4	Pasadena City	19	1,323	70
3.888888888888889 5	Chaffey	18	70	4

Rk	Team	gp	ab	h	rbi	bb	k	avg	obp	slg
0.30495552731893266 1	Pasadena City	22	787	240	148	121	149	.305	.420	.404
0.29924242424242425 2	Mt. San Antonio	22	792	237	116	79	119	.299	.374	.414
0.2696774193548387 3	Chaffey	22	775	209	125	80	156	.270	.362	.354
0.2680683311432326 4	East Los Angeles	22	761	204	91	87	139	.268	.372	.321
0.23450134770889489 5	Rio Hondo	22	742	174	85	73	158	.235	.323	.305

Rk	Team	gp	2b	3b	hr	xbh
57.0 1	Mt. San Antonio	22	34	12	11	57
55.0 2	Pasadena City	22	40	7	8	55
43.0 3	Chaffey	22	28	8	7	43
35.0 4	Rio Hondo	22	25	3	7	35
33.0 5	East Los Angeles	22	27	5	1	33

Rk	Team	gp	r	tb	sb	cs
180.0 1	Pasadena City	22	180	318	20	2
131.0 2	Mt. San Antonio	22	131	328	33	7
141.0 3	Chaffey	22	141	274	33	14
107.0 4	East Los Angeles	22	107	244	24	11
100.0 5	Rio Hondo	22	100	226	12	11

Rk	Team	gp	hbp	sf	sh	hdp	go	fo	go/fo	pa
916.0 1	Mt. San Antonio	22	23	12	10	19	211	227	.93	916
989.0 2	Pasadena City	22	47	16	18	18	240	160	1.50	989
912.0 3	East Los Angeles	22	43	8	13	20	230	177	1.30	912
914.0 4	Chaffey	22	38	11	10	17	196	208	.94	914
862.0 5	Rio Hondo	22	27	5	15	24	203	196	1.04	862

Rk	Team	app	gs	ip	h	r	er	era
5.88756388415673 1	Rio Hondo	22	22	195.2	251	161	128	5.89
3.4029850746268657 2	Mt. San Antonio	22	22	201.0	191	110	76	3.40
4.561433447098976 3	East Los Angeles	22	22	195.1	195	112	99	4.56
3.5643564356435644 4	Chaffey	22	22	202.0	203	108	80	3.56
3.673469387755102 5	Pasadena City	22	22	196.0	176	102	80	3.67

Rk	Team	app	gs	k	k/9	hr	whip
$value 1	Chaffey	22	22	173	7.71	4	-
- 2	East Los Angeles	22	22	139	6.40	9	-
- 2	Mt. San Antonio	22	22	162	7.25	8	-
- 2	Pasadena City	22	22	161	7.39	3	-
- 2	Rio Hondo	22	22	127	5.84	12	-

Rk	Team	gp	tc	po	a	e	pb	f%
0.9788980070339977 1	East Los Angeles	22	853	585	250	18	6	.979
0.9646522234891676 2	Mt. San Antonio	22	877	603	243	31	17	.965
0.9574970484061394 3	Pasadena City	22	847	588	223	36	5	.957
0.9608062709966405 4	Chaffey	22	893	606	252	35	4	.961
0.9425414364640884 5	Rio Hondo	22	905	587	266	52	11	.943

Rk	Team	gp	dp	sba	rcs	rcs%	ci
0.5 1	Chaffey	22	20	8	8	.500	-
0.5 1	East Los Angeles	22	16	13	13	.500	-
0.4583333333333333 3	Mt. San Antonio	22	22	13	11	.458	-
0.19047619047619047 4	Pasadena City	22	17	34	8	.190	-
0.2 5	Rio Hondo	22	27	24	6	.200	1

Rk	Team	home games	attend	avg
5363.0 1	Rio Hondo	11	58,990	5,363
913.1818181818181 2	East Los Angeles	11	10,045	913
74.54545454545455 3	Mt. San Antonio	11	820	75
70.18181818181819 4	Pasadena City	11	772	70
6.363636363636363 5	Chaffey	11	70	6