Skip to navigation Skip to content Skip to footer
California Community College Athletic Association

Team Stats

Rk Team gp ab h rbi bb k avg obp slg
0.2875297855440826 1 Taft 36 1259 362 171 115 177 .288 .367 .380
0.2814755412991179 2 Merced 36 1247 351 201 128 188 .281 .368 .400
0.2809388335704125 3 Reedley 40 1406 395 212 195 235 .281 .381 .356
0.2790513833992095 4 Sequoias 36 1265 353 167 134 153 .279 .364 .338
0.27811094452773616 5 Fresno City 38 1334 371 196 148 233 .278 .377 .364
0.24464579901153213 6 Coalinga 36 1214 297 157 129 249 .245 .335 .334
0.24384027187765506 7 Porterville 36 1177 287 119 109 245 .244 .326 .319
Rk Team gp 2b 3b hr xbh
105.0 1 Merced 36 78 11 16 105
85.0 2 Fresno City 38 65 11 9 85
85.0 2 Taft 36 64 11 10 85
79.0 4 Coalinga 36 59 11 9 79
73.0 5 Porterville 36 60 11 2 73
72.0 6 Reedley 40 51 9 12 72
60.0 7 Sequoias 36 49 7 4 60
Rk Team gp r tb sb cs
252.0 1 Reedley 40 252 500 22 15
247.0 2 Merced 36 247 499 38 21
232.0 3 Fresno City 38 232 485 48 23
203.0 4 Taft 36 203 478 41 22
188.0 5 Sequoias 36 188 428 22 16
181.0 6 Coalinga 36 181 405 31 18
136.0 7 Porterville 36 136 375 16 13
Rk Team gp hbp sf sh hdp go fo go/fo pa
1707.0 1 Reedley 40 45 21 40 36 432 346 1.25 1707
1607.0 2 Fresno City 38 75 18 32 38 385 350 1.10 1607
1486.0 3 Sequoias 36 41 12 34 41 437 317 1.38 1486
1480.0 4 Merced 36 54 19 32 31 343 329 1.04 1480
1470.0 5 Taft 36 53 18 25 36 434 294 1.48 1470
1420.0 6 Coalinga 36 44 15 18 28 347 305 1.14 1420
1358.0 7 Porterville 36 41 13 18 35 365 277 1.32 1358
Rk Team app gs ip h r er era
6.923076923076923 1 Coalinga 36 36 312.0 377 305 240 6.92
5.560509554140127 2 Porterville 36 36 314.0 422 264 194 5.56
5.200819672131148 3 Sequoias 36 36 325.1 383 231 188 5.20
4.363920750782064 4 Merced 36 36 319.2 281 198 155 4.36
4.2719751809720785 5 Taft 36 36 322.1 369 209 153 4.27
3.6618444846292943 6 Reedley 40 40 368.2 352 192 150 3.66
3.174976481655692 7 Fresno City 38 38 354.1 298 181 125 3.17
Rk Team app gs k k/9 hr whip
1.8685897435897436 1 Coalinga 36 36 195 5.63 4 1.87
1.7229299363057324 2 Porterville 36 36 154 4.41 11 1.72
1.5553278688524592 3 Sequoias 36 36 186 5.15 13 1.56
1.5232678386763185 4 Taft 36 36 199 5.56 11 1.52
1.3983315954118873 5 Merced 36 36 244 6.87 10 1.40
1.3292568203198496 6 Fresno City 38 38 301 7.65 2 1.33
1.2721518987341771 7 Reedley 40 40 187 4.57 12 1.27
Rk Team gp tc po a e pb f%
0.9607438016528925 1 Sequoias 36 1452 976 419 57 6 .961
0.9606908874329958 2 Reedley 40 1679 1106 507 66 5 .961
0.9554489376285127 3 Merced 36 1459 959 435 65 8 .955
0.9519560741249142 4 Taft 36 1457 967 420 70 13 .952
0.9510835913312693 5 Fresno City 38 1615 1063 473 79 15 .951
0.9468085106382979 6 Porterville 36 1410 936 399 75 10 .947
0.945273631840796 7 Coalinga 36 1407 936 394 77 12 .945
Rk Team gp dp sba rcs rcs% ci
0.4444444444444444 1 Merced 36 39 25 20 .444 3
0.4 2 Sequoias 36 35 27 18 .400 -
0.37037037037037035 3 Porterville 36 29 34 20 .370 1
0.3333333333333333 4 Reedley 40 40 30 15 .333 -
0.2857142857142857 5 Taft 36 23 30 12 .286 2
0.24 6 Coalinga 36 36 57 18 .240 -
0.22077922077922077 7 Fresno City 38 37 60 17 .221 1
Rk Team home games attend avg
351.0 1 Fresno City 18 6,313 351
119.0 2 Reedley 22 2,618 119
90.0 3 Coalinga 19 1,700 90
81.0 4 Taft 16 1,295 81
20.0 5 Porterville 21 411 20
0.0 6 Merced 16 0 0
0.0 6 Sequoias 20 0 0
Rk Team gp ab h rbi bb k avg obp slg
0.26570048309178745 1 Taft 24 828 220 90 70 121 .266 .340 .345
0.2838002436053593 2 Merced 24 821 233 152 86 99 .284 .371 .418
0.2917139614074915 3 Reedley 24 881 257 146 118 145 .292 .391 .360
0.282172373081464 4 Sequoias 24 847 239 120 95 97 .282 .373 .338
0.30292397660818715 5 Fresno City 24 855 259 143 107 139 .303 .406 .399
0.2478839177750907 6 Coalinga 24 827 205 106 92 166 .248 .340 .345
0.24436090225563908 7 Porterville 24 798 195 86 69 182 .244 .322 .317
Rk Team gp 2b 3b hr xbh
78.0 1 Merced 24 57 10 11 78
58.0 2 Fresno City 24 42 8 8 58
48.0 3 Taft 24 36 6 6 48
58.0 4 Coalinga 24 43 8 7 58
48.0 5 Porterville 24 40 6 2 48
43.0 6 Reedley 24 32 5 6 43
37.0 7 Sequoias 24 29 6 2 37
Rk Team gp r tb sb cs
167.0 1 Reedley 24 167 317 12 10
180.0 2 Merced 24 180 343 23 13
171.0 3 Fresno City 24 171 341 31 17
104.0 4 Taft 24 104 286 18 17
132.0 5 Sequoias 24 132 286 16 12
127.0 6 Coalinga 24 127 285 15 11
98.0 7 Porterville 24 98 253 8 7
Rk Team gp hbp sf sh hdp go fo go/fo pa
1076.0 1 Reedley 24 36 15 26 21 264 218 1.21 1076
1044.0 2 Fresno City 24 50 12 20 23 238 226 1.05 1044
1006.0 3 Sequoias 24 33 8 23 29 274 230 1.19 1006
980.0 4 Merced 24 35 13 25 18 258 224 1.15 980
949.0 5 Taft 24 28 8 15 25 299 191 1.57 949
969.0 6 Coalinga 24 29 10 11 16 236 204 1.16 969
909.0 7 Porterville 24 26 7 9 23 238 175 1.36 909
Rk Team app gs ip h r er era
6.447115384615385 1 Coalinga 24 24 208.0 246 184 149 6.45
6.274038461538462 2 Porterville 24 24 208.0 302 197 145 6.27
4.308510638297872 3 Sequoias 24 24 219.1 241 132 105 4.31
3.4386792452830193 4 Merced 24 24 212.0 169 102 81 3.44
4.430981595092025 5 Taft 24 24 217.1 254 149 107 4.43
3.4392386530014645 6 Reedley 24 24 227.2 210 115 87 3.44
2.668141592920354 7 Fresno City 24 24 226.0 187 100 67 2.67
Rk Team app gs k k/9 hr whip
1.7788461538461537 1 Coalinga 24 24 128 5.54 3 1.78
1.8701923076923077 2 Porterville 24 24 95 4.11 10 1.87
1.43161094224924 3 Sequoias 24 24 120 4.92 6 1.43
1.5460122699386503 4 Taft 24 24 139 5.76 8 1.55
1.2830188679245282 5 Merced 24 24 168 7.13 4 1.28
1.2743362831858407 6 Fresno City 24 24 188 7.49 2 1.27
1.2166910688140558 7 Reedley 24 24 113 4.47 9 1.22
Rk Team gp tc po a e pb f%
0.9610655737704918 1 Sequoias 24 976 658 280 38 4 .961
0.9586538461538462 2 Reedley 24 1040 683 314 43 1 .959
0.96875 3 Merced 24 960 636 294 30 5 .969
0.9488229273285568 4 Taft 24 977 652 275 50 10 .949
0.953125 5 Fresno City 24 1024 678 298 48 7 .953
0.9439655172413793 6 Porterville 24 928 618 258 52 7 .944
0.9568965517241379 7 Coalinga 24 928 624 264 40 9 .957
Rk Team gp dp sba rcs rcs% ci
0.6 1 Merced 24 24 10 15 .600 2
0.4583333333333333 2 Sequoias 24 25 13 11 .458 -
0.38235294117647056 3 Porterville 24 18 21 13 .382 -
0.4444444444444444 4 Reedley 24 25 10 8 .444 -
0.2222222222222222 5 Taft 24 14 21 6 .222 1
0.375 6 Coalinga 24 23 25 15 .375 -
0.28125 7 Fresno City 24 26 23 9 .281 1
Rk Team home games attend avg
367.0 1 Fresno City 12 4,403 367
117.0 2 Reedley 12 1,404 117
92.0 3 Coalinga 12 1,100 92
75.0 4 Taft 12 895 75
7.0 5 Porterville 12 73 7
0.0 6 Merced 12 0 0
0.0 6 Sequoias 12 0 0