Team Stats

Rk Team gp ab h rbi bb 2b 3b hr xbh k avg obp slg hbp sf sh hdp go fo go/fo pa
0.37905844155844154 1 Taft 42 1232 467 314 102 87 12 47 146 105 .379 .428 .584 21 23 17 11 209 280 .75 1395
0.33300099700897307 2 Fresno City 38 1003 334 239 138 66 7 20 93 160 .333 .418 .473 17 13 32 11 196 251 .78 1203
0.32396839332748023 3 Sequoias 43 1139 369 236 148 66 8 7 81 133 .324 .407 .414 19 12 21 6 249 256 .97 1339
0.3154228855721393 4 Coalinga 38 1005 317 213 113 70 13 28 111 168 .315 .394 .495 26 13 14 10 94 114 .82 1171
0.2854368932038835 5 Merced 37 1030 294 164 109 56 6 16 78 168 .285 .365 .398 22 3 15 10 181 268 .68 1179
0.2717271727172717 6 Reedley 37 909 247 143 120 55 2 14 71 143 .272 .365 .383 20 10 25 9 206 255 .81 1084
0.26910994764397905 7 Porterville 37 955 257 136 116 32 6 5 43 153 .269 .363 .331 28 5 25 11 243 248 .98 1129
Rk Team gp r tb sb cs
334.0 1 Taft 42 334 719 97 9
282.0 2 Sequoias 43 282 472 115 14
262.0 3 Fresno City 38 262 474 70 10
233.0 4 Coalinga 38 233 497 57 17
175.0 5 Merced 37 175 410 22 3
161.0 6 Reedley 37 161 348 70 14
150.0 7 Porterville 37 150 316 37 5
Rk Team era w l app gs sv ip h r er bb k k/7 hr whip bf wp hbp
3.4213483146067416 1 Fresno City 3.42 26 11 38 38 2 237.1 260 132 116 72 148 4.37 19 1.40 1082 12 33
3.5130111524163565 2 Sequoias 3.51 30 11 43 43 5 269.0 326 158 135 83 190 4.94 19 1.52 1167 4 13
5.828793774319067 3 Taft 5.83 23 16 42 42 3 257.0 303 256 214 181 210 5.72 35 1.88 1206 37 40
6.025568181818182 4 Merced 6.03 11 21 37 37 0 234.2 344 246 202 100 124 3.70 10 1.89 1214 12 11
6.483013293943871 5 Reedley 6.48 6 19 37 37 1 225.2 336 280 209 162 131 4.06 19 2.21 1232 39 24
7.5439882697947205 6 Porterville 7.54 7 28 37 37 0 227.1 373 292 245 87 119 3.66 25 2.02 1182 33 23
7.577319587628866 7 Coalinga 7.58 10 16 38 38 0 226.1 377 310 245 106 124 3.84 33 2.13 1222 5 30
Rk Team gp tc po a e pb f% dp sba rcs rcs% ci
0.9670442842430484 1 Fresno City 38 971 678 261 32 7 .967 6 21 8 .276 0
0.9611111111111111 2 Sequoias 43 1080 765 273 42 7 .961 9 45 7 .135 0
0.9498997995991983 3 Taft 42 998 697 251 50 11 .950 4 55 9 .141 0
0.9268774703557312 4 Reedley 37 1012 677 261 74 22 .927 10 72 4 .053 0
0.9263157894736842 5 Coalinga 38 950 648 232 70 11 .926 3 89 3 .033 0
0.9251700680272109 6 Porterville 37 1029 658 294 77 18 .925 15 91 5 .052 0
0.9042553191489362 7 Merced 37 1034 678 257 99 11 .904 3 66 2 .029 1
Rk Team home games attend avg
54.0 1 Sequoias 20.0 1,075 54
27.0 2 Reedley 18.0 475 27
13.0 3 Coalinga 19.0 246 13
0.0 4 Fresno City 16.0 0 0
0.0 4 Merced 17.0 0 0
0.0 4 Porterville 15.0 0 0
0.0 4 Taft 19.0 0 0
Rk Team gp ab h rbi bb 2b 3b hr xbh k avg obp slg hbp sf sh hdp go fo go/fo pa
0.3771106941838649 1 Taft 18 533 201 131 35 37 3 16 56 38 .377 .420 .548 11 9 10 9 93 131 .71 598
0.38556701030927837 2 Fresno City 18 485 187 149 70 38 4 12 54 57 .386 .466 .555 11 9 21 6 91 124 .73 596
0.3484251968503937 3 Sequoias 18 508 177 117 64 30 4 2 36 58 .348 .424 .435 9 8 12 1 123 120 1.02 601
0.27927927927927926 4 Coalinga 18 444 124 63 46 26 1 12 39 74 .279 .356 .423 10 5 8 6 57 74 .77 513
0.3048016701461378 5 Merced 16 479 146 87 49 30 5 11 46 75 .305 .387 .457 16 1 8 5 77 118 .65 553
0.2843601895734597 6 Reedley 16 422 120 72 54 25 0 10 35 58 .284 .373 .415 9 6 10 4 86 110 .78 501
0.27391304347826084 7 Porterville 18 460 126 67 57 14 4 1 19 91 .274 .374 .328 18 2 14 6 99 119 .83 551
Rk Team gp r tb sb cs
135.0 1 Taft 18 135 292 35 3
140.0 2 Sequoias 18 140 221 63 7
162.0 3 Fresno City 18 162 269 31 3
74.0 4 Coalinga 18 74 188 13 8
93.0 5 Merced 16 93 219 11 2
80.0 6 Reedley 16 80 175 35 7
74.0 7 Porterville 18 74 151 12 3
Rk Team era w l app gs sv ip h r er bb k k/7 hr whip bf wp hbp
2.1702127659574466 1 Fresno City 2.17 16 2 18 18 1 109.2 104 44 34 30 73 4.66 3 1.22 480 4 17
2.135593220338983 2 Sequoias 2.14 14 3 18 18 4 118.0 135 47 36 35 78 4.63 7 1.44 531 0 8
6.710059171597633 3 Taft 6.71 8 8 18 18 2 112.2 134 134 108 92 93 5.78 14 2.01 595 19 21
5.90625 4 Merced 5.91 6 7 16 16 0 106.2 155 114 90 50 56 3.68 4 1.92 561 7 6
6.58 5 Reedley 6.58 2 8 16 16 0 100.0 151 121 94 73 61 4.27 6 2.24 546 13 8
8.610619469026549 6 Porterville 8.61 4 12 18 18 0 113.0 204 160 139 50 45 2.79 13 2.25 608 16 11
7.702194357366771 7 Coalinga 7.70 2 9 18 18 0 106.1 187 138 117 45 44 2.90 13 2.18 574 1 14
Rk Team gp tc po a e pb f% dp sba rcs rcs% ci
0.9665924276169265 1 Fresno City 18 449 327 107 15 1 .967 6 12 5 .294 0
0.9614604462474645 2 Sequoias 18 493 354 120 19 6 .961 7 19 6 .240 0
0.9300847457627118 3 Taft 18 472 329 110 33 4 .930 1 31 3 .088 0
0.9201773835920177 4 Reedley 16 451 300 115 36 8 .920 6 32 1 .030 0
0.9198218262806236 5 Coalinga 18 449 310 103 36 2 .920 3 37 1 .026 0
0.9213051823416507 6 Porterville 18 521 332 148 41 9 .921 11 41 1 .024 0
0.8989473684210526 7 Merced 16 475 317 110 48 6 .899 3 28 1 .034 1
Rk Team home games attend avg
50.0 1 Sequoias 9.0 450 50
13.0 2 Reedley 6.0 75 13
13.0 2 Coalinga 8.0 100 13
0.0 4 Fresno City 10.0 0 0
0.0 4 Merced 8.0 0 0
0.0 4 Porterville 10.0 0 0
0.0 4 Taft 10.0 0 0