Team Stats

Rk Team gp ab h rbi bb 2b 3b hr xbh k avg obp slg hbp sf sh hdp go fo go/fo pa
0.3146682897139379 1 Fresno City 45 1643 517 337 252 110 5 33 148 306 .315 .427 .448 82 17 13 22 209 266 .79 2007
0.29799247176913424 2 Merced 43 1594 475 258 153 69 15 22 106 340 .298 .375 .402 55 17 20 31 355 366 .97 1839
0.2856104651162791 3 Coalinga 40 1376 393 213 150 60 13 5 78 318 .286 .385 .359 82 16 24 32 343 300 1.14 1648
0.28122717311906503 4 Taft 40 1369 385 229 175 61 13 15 89 258 .281 .375 .378 43 20 18 21 349 346 1.01 1625
0.27439024390243905 5 Sequoias 42 1476 405 175 168 59 8 12 79 278 .274 .362 .350 47 20 23 44 352 381 .92 1734
0.2643598615916955 6 Reedley 42 1445 382 183 172 47 7 11 65 242 .264 .359 .329 49 16 23 43 422 358 1.18 1705
0.24776119402985075 7 Porterville 40 1340 332 171 120 62 12 23 97 319 .248 .329 .363 48 14 14 14 276 376 .73 1536
Rk Team gp r tb sb cs
394.0 1 Fresno City 45 394 736 73 25
299.0 2 Merced 43 299 640 66 10
262.0 3 Taft 40 262 517 95 23
248.0 4 Coalinga 40 248 494 95 27
216.0 5 Reedley 42 216 476 25 7
206.0 6 Sequoias 42 206 516 17 8
202.0 7 Porterville 40 202 487 43 13
Rk Team era w l app gs sv ip h r er bb k k/9 hr whip bf wp hbp
3.0294840294840295 1 Fresno City 3.03 40 5 45 45 7 407.0 355 159 137 139 460 10.17 16 1.21 1733 36 34
4.411131059245961 2 Reedley 4.41 20 22 42 42 6 371.1 368 217 182 180 336 8.14 15 1.48 1685 40 51
4.784505788067676 3 Sequoias 4.78 18 22 42 42 9 374.1 405 230 199 158 265 6.37 20 1.50 1695 48 55
5.019718309859155 4 Taft 5.02 20 19 40 40 8 355.0 413 239 198 146 262 6.64 30 1.57 1665 37 59
5.195260663507109 5 Coalinga 5.20 15 22 40 40 4 351.2 473 331 203 167 237 6.07 19 1.82 1771 46 66
5.627906976744186 6 Merced 5.63 17 26 43 43 8 387.0 465 312 242 172 248 5.77 29 1.65 1835 34 57
6.841747572815534 7 Porterville 6.84 11 29 40 40 6 343.1 441 324 261 220 265 6.95 14 1.93 1752 68 63
Rk Team gp tc po a e pb f% dp sba rcs rcs% ci
0.9737644905430141 1 Sequoias 42 1639 1122 474 43 17 .974 31 52 20 .278 0
0.9646987218502739 2 Fresno City 45 1643 1220 365 58 8 .965 27 55 18 .247 0
0.9630808402291534 3 Reedley 42 1571 1114 399 58 18 .963 35 52 20 .278 0
0.960455764075067 4 Taft 40 1492 1065 368 59 4 .960 25 59 11 .157 1
0.9573847051955633 5 Merced 43 1713 1161 479 73 33 .957 32 28 8 .222 0
0.9423076923076923 6 Porterville 40 1456 1030 342 84 32 .942 30 96 7 .068 0
0.9365695792880259 7 Coalinga 40 1545 1055 392 98 22 .937 22 51 22 .301 1
Rk Team home games attend avg
121.0 1 Taft 22 2,660 121
98.0 2 Reedley 21 2,040 98
72.0 3 Fresno City 25 1,786 72
3.0 4 Merced 20 50 3
0.0 5 Coalinga 21 0 0
0.0 5 Porterville 21 0 0
0.0 5 Sequoias 20 0 0
Rk Team gp ab h rbi bb 2b 3b hr xbh k avg obp slg hbp sf sh hdp go fo go/fo pa
0.3277591973244147 1 Fresno City 24 897 294 176 128 63 1 23 87 149 .328 .432 .477 44 10 8 11 117 154 .76 1087
0.3013392857142857 2 Merced 24 896 270 139 77 34 8 14 56 185 .301 .371 .404 29 12 9 13 180 211 .85 1023
0.2777101096224117 3 Coalinga 24 821 228 119 88 40 9 3 52 188 .278 .372 .359 41 9 14 22 212 183 1.16 973
0.27855477855477856 4 Taft 24 858 239 128 97 42 9 9 60 177 .279 .365 .380 23 6 9 12 202 202 1.00 993
0.28587830080367393 5 Sequoias 24 871 249 115 104 32 8 5 45 138 .286 .375 .358 26 11 12 22 186 237 .78 1024
0.28554641598119856 6 Reedley 24 851 243 130 93 33 6 7 46 127 .286 .371 .363 29 11 16 27 241 207 1.16 1000
0.2324455205811138 7 Porterville 24 826 192 89 57 35 6 12 53 194 .232 .296 .333 20 7 9 6 174 231 .75 919
Rk Team gp r tb sb cs
209.0 1 Fresno City 24 209 428 43 17
163.0 2 Merced 24 163 362 40 7
144.0 3 Taft 24 144 326 39 14
137.0 4 Coalinga 24 137 295 41 13
150.0 5 Reedley 24 150 309 15 5
136.0 6 Sequoias 24 136 312 15 6
100.0 7 Porterville 24 100 275 17 6
Rk Team era w l app gs sv ip h r er bb k k/9 hr whip bf wp hbp
2.4954545454545456 1 Fresno City 2.50 23 1 24 24 4 220.0 176 75 61 73 255 10.43 3 1.13 913 17 18
5.057275541795665 2 Reedley 5.06 12 12 24 24 4 215.1 216 142 121 106 183 7.65 8 1.50 990 34 32
4.093415007656968 3 Sequoias 4.09 12 10 24 24 5 217.2 219 117 99 75 143 5.91 11 1.35 941 26 27
5.052147239263803 4 Taft 5.05 11 12 24 24 3 217.1 255 142 122 86 168 6.96 17 1.57 1016 26 36
4.947867298578199 5 Coalinga 4.95 7 14 24 24 0 211.0 301 193 116 83 131 5.59 12 1.82 1051 22 29
5.217791411042945 6 Merced 5.22 12 12 24 24 6 217.1 263 167 126 87 131 5.42 13 1.61 1023 23 34
7.091772151898734 7 Porterville 7.09 4 20 24 24 2 210.2 282 203 166 133 147 6.28 9 1.97 1086 41 37
Rk Team gp tc po a e pb f% dp sba rcs rcs% ci
0.9763860369609856 1 Sequoias 24 974 652 299 23 7 .976 24 22 12 .353 0
0.9655937846836848 2 Fresno City 24 901 660 210 31 4 .966 18 23 11 .324 0
0.9579646017699115 3 Reedley 24 904 646 220 38 7 .958 21 29 8 .216 0
0.9632925472747497 4 Taft 24 899 652 214 33 4 .963 13 31 9 .225 0
0.9536082474226805 5 Merced 24 970 652 273 45 12 .954 17 15 6 .286 0
0.9321663019693655 6 Porterville 24 914 632 220 62 19 .932 20 68 7 .093 0
0.9427645788336934 7 Coalinga 24 926 633 240 53 4 .943 14 23 10 .303 1
Rk Team home games attend avg
147.0 1 Taft 12 1,755 147
100.0 2 Reedley 12 1,196 100
38.0 3 Fresno City 12 450 38
0.0 4 Merced 12 0 0
0.0 4 Coalinga 12 0 0
0.0 4 Porterville 12 0 0
0.0 4 Sequoias 12 0 0