California Community College Athletic Association

Team Stats

Rk	Team	m	s	k	k/s	e	ta	pct	a	a/s	pts	pts/s
12.182692307692308 1	San Diego Mesa	30	104	1321	12.70	547	3144	.246	1267	12.18	1766.0	17.0
11.245098039215685 2	MiraCosta	27	102	1197	11.74	527	3340	.201	1147	11.25	1636.0	16.0
11.144144144144144 3	Grossmont	31	111	1380	12.43	537	3214	.262	1237	11.14	1835.0	16.5
9.24742268041237 4	San Diego City	26	97	1047	10.79	469	3300	.175	897	9.25	1368.5	14.1
8.782608695652174 5	Southwestern	26	92	879	9.55	438	2930	.151	808	8.78	1216.0	13.2
8.19767441860465 6	Imperial Valley	24	86	922	10.72	298	2790	.224	705	8.20	1172.0	13.6
6.871794871794871 7	Palomar	23	78	636	8.15	362	2129	.129	536	6.87	898.0	11.5
5.578313253012048 8	Cuyamaca	24	83	514	6.19	264	2142	.117	463	5.58	678.0	8.2
5.463768115942029 9	San Diego Miramar	20	69	458	6.64	356	1475	.069	377	5.46	660.5	9.6

Rk	Team	m	s	digs	d/s	bs	ba	tot	b/s
9.24742268041237 1	San Diego City	26	97	2199	22.67	71	161	152	1.56
11.245098039215685 2	MiraCosta	27	102	1479	14.50	43	282	184	1.80
12.182692307692308 3	San Diego Mesa	30	104	1420	13.65	54	314	211	2.03
8.782608695652174 4	Southwestern	26	92	1374	14.93	48	222	159	1.73
11.144144144144144 5	Grossmont	31	111	1071	9.65	104	150	179	1.61
8.19767441860465 6	Imperial Valley	24	86	995	11.57	89	4	91	1.06
5.578313253012048 7	Cuyamaca	24	83	706	8.51	39	14	46	0.55
5.463768115942029 8	San Diego Miramar	20	69	648	9.39	38	29	53	0.76
6.871794871794871 9	Palomar	23	78	618	7.92	64	134	131	1.68

Rk	Team	m	s	sa	sa/s	r	re
11.245098039215685 1	MiraCosta	27	102	255	2.50	-	22
11.144144144144144 2	Grossmont	31	111	276	2.49	-	58
12.182692307692308 3	San Diego Mesa	30	104	234	2.25	-	15
5.463768115942029 4	San Diego Miramar	20	69	150	2.17	-	29
8.782608695652174 5	Southwestern	26	92	178	1.93	-	175
8.19767441860465 6	Imperial Valley	24	86	159	1.85	-	257
9.24742268041237 7	San Diego City	26	97	170	1.75	-	6
6.871794871794871 8	Palomar	23	78	131	1.68	-	6
5.578313253012048 9	Cuyamaca	24	83	118	1.42	-	13

Rk	Team	m	s	k	k/s	e	ta	pct	a	a/s	pts	pts/s
12.055555555555555 1	San Diego Mesa	16	54	673	12.46	268	1605	.252	651	12.06	913.0	16.9
11.186440677966102 2	MiraCosta	16	59	693	11.75	283	1918	.214	660	11.19	959.0	16.3
11.555555555555555 3	Grossmont	16	54	683	12.65	273	1597	.257	624	11.56	936.0	17.3
9.338983050847459 4	San Diego City	16	59	636	10.78	278	2008	.178	551	9.34	837.5	14.2
8.578947368421053 5	Southwestern	16	57	525	9.21	270	1800	.142	489	8.58	701.0	12.3
8.051724137931034 6	Imperial Valley	16	58	620	10.69	207	1916	.216	467	8.05	754.0	13.0
7.592592592592593 7	Palomar	16	54	477	8.83	239	1514	.157	410	7.59	675.0	12.5
4.535714285714286 8	Cuyamaca	16	56	289	5.16	141	1247	.119	254	4.54	365.5	6.5
5.545454545454546 9	San Diego Miramar	16	55	364	6.62	292	1214	.059	305	5.55	522.5	9.5

Rk	Team	m	s	digs	d/s	bs	ba	tot	b/s
9.338983050847459 1	San Diego City	16	59	1336	22.64	38	129	103	1.74
11.186440677966102 2	MiraCosta	16	59	843	14.29	18	154	95	1.61
12.055555555555555 3	San Diego Mesa	16	54	757	14.02	25	172	111	2.06
8.578947368421053 4	Southwestern	16	57	863	15.14	29	122	90	1.58
11.555555555555555 5	Grossmont	16	54	549	10.17	65	74	102	1.89
8.051724137931034 6	Imperial Valley	16	58	717	12.36	50	4	52	0.90
4.535714285714286 7	Cuyamaca	16	56	368	6.57	16	3	18	0.31
5.545454545454546 8	San Diego Miramar	16	55	556	10.11	31	7	35	0.63
7.592592592592593 9	Palomar	16	54	469	8.69	41	108	95	1.76

Rk	Team	m	s	sa	sa/s	r	re
11.186440677966102 1	MiraCosta	16	59	171	2.90	-	15
11.555555555555555 2	Grossmont	16	54	151	2.80	-	24
12.055555555555555 3	San Diego Mesa	16	54	129	2.39	-	0
5.545454545454546 4	San Diego Miramar	16	55	124	2.25	-	29
8.578947368421053 5	Southwestern	16	57	86	1.51	-	95
8.051724137931034 6	Imperial Valley	16	58	82	1.41	-	181
9.338983050847459 7	San Diego City	16	59	99	1.68	-	6
7.592592592592593 8	Palomar	16	54	103	1.91	-	0
4.535714285714286 9	Cuyamaca	16	56	59	1.05	-	13