California Community College Athletic Association

Team Stats

Rk	Team	m	s	k	k/s	e	ta	pct	a	a/s	pts	pts/s
18.178571428571427 1	Fresno City	26	84	1134	13.50	358	2817	.275	1035	12.32	1527.0	18.2
15.2 2	Sequoias	22	75	799	10.65	329	2366	.199	658	8.77	1140.0	15.2
13.511494252873563 3	Porterville	25	87	826	9.49	399	2875	.149	735	8.45	1175.5	13.5
12.978494623655914 4	Taft	27	93	895	9.62	351	2835	.192	712	7.66	1207.0	13.0
12.933823529411764 5	Reedley	21	68	625	9.19	407	2285	.095	570	8.38	879.5	12.9
11.76388888888889 6	Merced	21	72	642	8.92	440	1922	.105	579	8.04	847.0	11.8
9.058823529411764 7	Coalinga	21	68	481	7.07	394	1666	.052	401	5.90	616.0	9.1
8.626666666666667 8	Cerro Coso	22	75	439	5.85	350	1901	.047	432	5.76	647.0	8.6
5.8 9	Columbia	23	75	312	4.16	87	432	.521	186	2.48	435.0	5.8

Rk	Team	m	s	digs	d/s	bs	ba	tot	b/s
1537.0 1	Taft	27	93	1537	16.53	79	142	150	1.61
1507.0 2	Porterville	25	87	1507	17.32	87	89	132	1.51
1492.0 3	Fresno City	26	84	1492	17.76	77	228	191	2.27
1133.0 4	Sequoias	22	75	1133	15.11	157	72	193	2.57
922.0 5	Cerro Coso	22	75	922	12.29	75	8	79	1.05
877.0 6	Coalinga	21	68	877	12.90	48	14	55	0.81
773.0 7	Columbia	23	75	773	10.31	81	0	81	1.08
719.0 8	Reedley	21	68	719	10.57	64	103	116	1.70
638.0 9	Merced	21	72	638	8.86	18	40	38	0.53

Rk	Team	m	s	sa	sa/s	r	re
2.5057471264367814 1	Porterville	25	87	218	2.51	2153	291
2.4047619047619047 2	Fresno City	26	84	202	2.40	1088	82
2.3194444444444446 3	Merced	21	72	167	2.32	0	0
2.0441176470588234 4	Reedley	21	68	139	2.04	1387	166
1.9733333333333334 5	Sequoias	22	75	148	1.97	1180	92
1.7419354838709677 6	Taft	27	93	162	1.74	1457	145
1.72 7	Cerro Coso	22	75	129	1.72	1448	296
1.1764705882352942 8	Coalinga	21	68	80	1.18	0	117
0.56 9	Columbia	23	75	42	0.56	362	31

Rk	Team	m	s	k	k/s	e	ta	pct	a	a/s	pts	pts/s
18.875 1	Fresno City	16	48	652	13.58	167	1451	.334	599	12.48	906.0	18.9
14.709090909090909 2	Sequoias	16	55	560	10.18	232	1727	.190	451	8.20	809.0	14.7
11.910714285714286 3	Porterville	16	56	481	8.59	208	1612	.169	449	8.02	667.0	11.9
14.077586206896552 4	Taft	17	58	595	10.26	185	1797	.228	472	8.14	816.5	14.1
13.173469387755102 5	Reedley	16	49	454	9.27	291	1653	.099	410	8.37	645.5	13.2
11.620689655172415 6	Merced	17	58	515	8.88	345	1561	.109	467	8.05	674.0	11.6
9.981132075471699 7	Coalinga	16	53	409	7.72	310	1337	.074	344	6.49	529.0	10.0
10.071428571428571 8	Cerro Coso	16	56	381	6.80	287	1568	.060	375	6.70	564.0	10.1
5.6415094339622645 9	Columbia	16	53	225	4.25	62	314	.519	152	2.87	299.0	5.6

Rk	Team	m	s	digs	d/s	bs	ba	tot	b/s
1045.0 1	Taft	17	58	1045	18.02	51	109	106	1.82
886.0 2	Porterville	16	56	886	15.82	53	54	80	1.43
828.0 3	Fresno City	16	48	828	17.25	47	142	118	2.46
858.0 4	Sequoias	16	55	858	15.60	116	68	150	2.73
760.0 5	Cerro Coso	16	56	760	13.57	71	8	75	1.34
700.0 6	Coalinga	16	53	700	13.21	47	10	52	0.98
592.0 7	Columbia	16	53	592	11.17	59	0	59	1.11
457.0 8	Reedley	16	49	457	9.33	47	77	86	1.74
511.0 9	Merced	17	58	511	8.81	15	32	31	0.53

Rk	Team	m	s	sa	sa/s	r	re
1.8928571428571428 1	Porterville	16	56	106	1.89	1345	152
2.8333333333333335 2	Fresno City	16	48	136	2.83	460	28
2.206896551724138 3	Merced	17	58	128	2.21	0	0
2.163265306122449 4	Reedley	16	49	106	2.16	1020	116
1.8 5	Sequoias	16	55	99	1.80	843	53
2.0 6	Taft	17	58	116	2.00	898	88
1.9285714285714286 7	Cerro Coso	16	56	108	1.93	1121	192
1.2830188679245282 8	Coalinga	16	53	68	1.28	0	100
0.2830188679245283 9	Columbia	16	53	15	0.28	211	11