Skip to navigation Skip to content Skip to footer
California Community College Athletic Association

Team Stats

Rk Team gp fg pct 3pt pct ft pct pts
2418.0 1 Merced 30 986-2266 43.5 180-633 28.4 263-415 63.4 80.6
2071.0 2 Sequoias 29 791-1993 39.7 222-785 28.3 267-446 59.9 71.4
1950.0 3 Fresno City 28 705-1727 40.8 216-637 33.9 324-444 73.0 69.6
1743.0 4 Reedley 28 624-1731 36.0 159-562 28.3 336-553 60.8 62.3
1480.0 5 West Hills-Lemoore 28 543-1552 35.0 107-455 23.5 249-445 56.0 52.9
1192.0 6 Taft 28 454-1581 28.7 87-358 24.3 201-422 47.6 42.6
1233.0 7 Porterville 29 474-1810 26.2 102-502 20.3 183-396 46.2 42.5
Rk Team gp off def reb mrgn
2418.0 1 Merced 30 19.3 23.5 42.8 13.1
2071.0 2 Sequoias 29 15.3 27.9 43.2 3.9
1233.0 3 Porterville 29 13.1 24.3 37.4 -5.0
1743.0 4 Reedley 28 12.4 29.1 41.5 -3.3
1480.0 5 West Hills-Lemoore 28 11.2 26.3 37.5 -0.5
1192.0 6 Taft 28 9.1 21.1 30.3 -18.3
1950.0 7 Fresno City 28 8.7 24.7 33.4 2.1
Rk Team gp to stl blk ast
1233.0 1 Porterville 29 28.4 12.0 3.0 9.4
1192.0 2 Taft 28 25.3 7.3 2.3 3.8
1743.0 3 Reedley 28 19.6 11.9 4.4 13.3
1480.0 4 West Hills-Lemoore 28 19.5 8.7 1.3 11.5
2071.0 5 Sequoias 29 19.0 13.2 3.3 16.2
1950.0 6 Fresno City 28 15.9 9.6 1.5 14.5
2418.0 7 Merced 30 13.3 15.1 3.3 18.4
Rk Team gp pf off eff net eff
2418.0 1 Merced 30 14.6 1.055 0.407
1950.0 2 Fresno City 28 15.4 0.906 0.063
2071.0 3 Sequoias 29 18.1 0.891 0.181
1743.0 4 Reedley 28 14.0 0.789 -0.054
1480.0 5 West Hills-Lemoore 28 16.8 0.738 -0.052
1192.0 6 Taft 28 15.1 0.531 -0.445
1233.0 7 Porterville 29 16.4 0.503 -0.337
Rk Team gp fg pct 3pt pct pts
1192.0 1 Taft 28 854-2031 42.0 183-607 30.1 79.7
1233.0 2 Porterville 29 743-1886 39.4 167-538 31.0 67.4
1743.0 3 Reedley 28 683-1888 36.2 163-597 27.3 64.1
1480.0 4 West Hills-Lemoore 28 575-1715 33.5 185-662 27.9 59.1
1950.0 5 Fresno City 28 559-1588 35.2 144-526 27.4 58.1
2071.0 6 Sequoias 29 580-1716 33.8 128-491 26.1 56.3
2418.0 7 Merced 30 573-1590 36.0 108-447 24.2 50.7
Rk Team gp off def reb mrgn
1192.0 1 Taft 28 17.5 31.0 48.6 -18.3
1233.0 2 Porterville 29 13.3 29.2 42.5 -5.0
1743.0 3 Reedley 28 16.2 28.6 44.8 -3.3
2071.0 4 Sequoias 29 12.6 26.7 39.2 3.9
1480.0 5 West Hills-Lemoore 28 12.4 25.6 38.0 -0.5
2418.0 6 Merced 30 8.1 21.6 29.7 13.1
1950.0 7 Fresno City 28 9.8 21.5 31.3 2.1
Rk Team gp to stl blk ast
2418.0 1 Merced 30 25.9 7.2 2.3 9.6
2071.0 2 Sequoias 29 23.0 8.6 3.0 11.6
1233.0 3 Porterville 29 19.4 16.0 4.2 14.5
1743.0 4 Reedley 28 18.5 9.9 2.8 14.0
1192.0 5 Taft 28 16.7 16.6 3.5 18.7
1480.0 6 West Hills-Lemoore 28 16.5 12.4 3.7 13.1
1950.0 7 Fresno City 28 14.6 7.8 1.6 11.6
Rk Team gp pf def eff net eff
1192.0 1 Taft 28 16.5 0.976 -0.445
1743.0 2 Reedley 28 16.1 0.843 -0.054
1480.0 3 West Hills-Lemoore 28 15.2 0.790 -0.052
2071.0 4 Sequoias 29 14.8 0.710 0.181
1233.0 5 Porterville 29 14.1 0.840 -0.337
1950.0 6 Fresno City 28 13.5 0.843 0.063
2418.0 7 Merced 30 13.3 0.648 0.407
Rk Team gp fg pct 3pt pct ft pct pts
1069.0 1 Merced 12 443-949 46.7 76-241 31.5 106-166 63.9 89.1
833.0 2 Sequoias 12 319-821 38.9 97-359 27.0 98-166 59.0 69.4
915.0 3 Fresno City 12 328-765 42.9 104-284 36.6 155-205 75.6 76.3
716.0 4 Reedley 12 251-724 34.7 68-248 27.4 146-219 66.7 59.7
687.0 5 West Hills-Lemoore 12 255-695 36.7 53-212 25.0 86-166 51.8 57.3
477.0 6 Taft 13 177-665 26.6 47-185 25.4 78-179 43.6 36.7
516.0 7 Porterville 13 200-786 25.4 43-219 19.6 73-155 47.1 39.7
Rk Team gp off def reb mrgn
1069.0 1 Merced 12 19.7 23.6 43.3 14.4
833.0 2 Sequoias 12 17.2 29.8 46.9 9.8
516.0 3 Porterville 13 10.8 22.7 33.5 -8.2
716.0 4 Reedley 12 11.2 30.0 41.2 -4.1
687.0 5 West Hills-Lemoore 12 11.7 25.4 37.1 1.4
477.0 6 Taft 13 7.5 21.6 29.2 -18.5
915.0 7 Fresno City 12 9.6 27.8 37.4 7.4
Rk Team gp to stl blk ast
516.0 1 Porterville 13 27.5 11.2 2.1 8.2
477.0 2 Taft 13 26.1 6.1 3.2 2.3
716.0 3 Reedley 12 16.7 12.0 5.8 12.8
687.0 4 West Hills-Lemoore 12 18.4 8.8 1.7 13.2
833.0 5 Sequoias 12 19.9 14.5 3.2 17.8
915.0 6 Fresno City 12 14.8 11.6 2.2 16.3
1069.0 7 Merced 12 11.2 17.8 3.8 23.5
Rk Team gp pf off eff net eff
1069.0 1 Merced 12 15.4 1.149 0.585
915.0 2 Fresno City 12 13.9 0.983 0.215
833.0 3 Sequoias 12 16.1 0.889 0.249
716.0 4 Reedley 12 10.9 0.796 0.045
687.0 5 West Hills-Lemoore 12 15.9 0.800 0.002
477.0 6 Taft 13 13.5 0.479 -0.529
516.0 7 Porterville 13 14.0 0.478 -0.448
Rk Team gp fg pct 3pt pct pts
477.0 1 Taft 13 433-1020 42.5 101-335 30.1 84.2
516.0 2 Porterville 13 361-842 42.9 88-251 35.1 70.8
716.0 3 Reedley 12 295-879 33.6 64-278 23.0 59.6
687.0 4 West Hills-Lemoore 12 251-754 33.3 94-315 29.8 61.2
915.0 5 Fresno City 12 224-661 33.9 55-217 25.3 52.2
833.0 6 Sequoias 12 213-658 32.4 44-181 24.3 49.3
1069.0 7 Merced 12 196-591 33.2 42-171 24.6 44.3
Rk Team gp off def reb mrgn
477.0 1 Taft 13 17.0 30.7 47.7 -18.5
516.0 2 Porterville 13 12.5 29.1 41.6 -8.2
716.0 3 Reedley 12 16.3 28.9 45.3 -4.1
833.0 4 Sequoias 12 10.4 26.8 37.2 9.8
687.0 5 West Hills-Lemoore 12 12.2 23.5 35.7 1.4
1069.0 6 Merced 12 8.0 20.8 28.8 14.4
915.0 7 Fresno City 12 10.2 19.8 30.0 7.4
Rk Team gp to stl blk ast
1069.0 1 Merced 12 29.8 6.8 1.7 7.6
833.0 2 Sequoias 12 24.3 8.6 3.7 10.0
516.0 3 Porterville 13 17.4 15.5 4.7 16.4
716.0 4 Reedley 12 17.8 10.0 2.7 13.1
477.0 5 Taft 13 13.8 19.0 3.1 20.9
687.0 6 West Hills-Lemoore 12 16.4 13.1 4.2 13.3
915.0 7 Fresno City 12 16.9 7.5 1.7 10.5
Rk Team gp pf def eff net eff
477.0 1 Taft 13 16.8 1.008 -0.529
716.0 2 Reedley 12 16.8 0.751 0.045
687.0 3 West Hills-Lemoore 12 14.3 0.798 0.002
833.0 4 Sequoias 12 14.1 0.640 0.249
516.0 5 Porterville 13 12.4 0.926 -0.448
915.0 6 Fresno City 12 12.6 0.769 0.215
1069.0 7 Merced 12 12.8 0.564 0.585